Diagnosis and treatment of pelvic congestion syndrome in women with interventional radiology methods

Cover Page

Abstract


Aim. Evaluation of the results of venography and efficacy of gonadal veins embolization in female patients with pelvic congestive syndrome and concomittant genital pathology.

Methods. The study included 61 patients with pelvic varicosities diagnosed on the basis of ultrasound and Doppler studies of the veins with obligatory use of Valsalva test. The average age of the patients was 34.11±0.98 years. Patients were divided into groups according to the presence or absence of concomitant genital pathology: group A - 16 patients with pelvic varicose veins without concomitant genital pathology; group B - 20 patients with pelvic varicose veins and endometriosis; group C - 25 patients with pelvic varicose veins and other genital pathology. All patients underwent selective pelvic vein embolization by the combined method with the use of coils and sclerosants. The variants of anatomical structure of venous system in patients from three groups were clarified according to the results of venography. Efficacy of the method was assessed by the change in pelvic pain intensity according to Visual Analogue Scale before and after embolization.

Results. Bilateral pelvic varicose veins in all groups was the most prevalent variant diagnosed in venography. In groups A and C 87.5 and 84% of patients, respectively, noted improvement. In group B 35% of patients reported improvement, while 65% maintained pain after embolization. However, even while maintaining pain, decrease of its intensity was reported by 35% of patients, but in 6 (30%) of cases it required surgical organ-resecting treatment.

Conclusion. Venograghy in pelvic congestive syndrome in women is characterized by stagnation of venous blood in the venous system of pelvis with the reflux and valvular incompetence; endovascular method confirmed its high efficiency for relieving pelvic pain syndrome; we had no complications during the study.


S V Verezgova

Author for correspondence.
filipersik@mail.ru
North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov Saint-Petersburg, Russia

E B Troik

filipersik@mail.ru
North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov Saint-Petersburg, Russia

  • Richet M.A. Traite pratique d’anatomie medico-chirurgicale. . Paris: Balliere et fils. 1857.
  • Ignacio E.A., Dua R., Sarin S. et al. Pelvic congestion syndrome: diagnosis and treatment. Semin. Intervent. Radiol. 2008; 25 (4): 361-368. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1102998.
  • O’Brien M., Gillespie D. Diagnosis and treatment of the pelvic congestion syndrome. J. Vasc. Surg.: Venous and Lymphatic Dis. 2015; 3 (1): 96-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2014.05.007.
  • Phillips D., Deipolyi A.R., Hesketh R.L. et al. Pelvic congestion syndrome: etiology of pain, diagnosis, and clinical management. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 2014; 25: 725-733. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2014.01.030.
  • Rozanblit A.M., Ricci Z.J., Tuvia J., Amis E.S. Incompetent and dilated ovarian veins: a common finding in asymptomatic porous woman. Am. J. Radiol. 2001; 176: 119-122. doi: 10.2214/ajr.176.1.1760119.
  • Волков А.Е. Эхосемиотика варикозного расширения вен малого таза. Эхография. 2000; 1 (1): 55-58.
  • Савицкий Г.А., Иванова Р.Д., Щеглов И.Ю. и др. Хирургическое лечение синдрома тазовых болей в гинекологической клинике. СПб.: ЭЛБИ. 2000; 144 с.
  • Kim H.S., Malhotra A.D., Rowe P.C. et al. Embolotherapy for pelvic congestion syndrome: Long-term results. J. Vasc. Intervent. Radiol. 2006; 17: 289-297. doi: 10.1097/01.RVI.0000194870.11980.F8.
  • Rane N. Pelvic congestion syndrome. Curr. Probl. Diagn. Radiol. 2013; 42 (4): 135-140. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2012.11.002.
  • Верезгова С.В., Троик Е.Б. Использование эндоваскулярных методов для диагностики и лечения варикозной болезни малого таза. Дальневосточный мед. ж. 2016; (2): 21-23.
  • Venbrux A.C., Lambert D.L. Embolization of the ovarian veins as a treatment for patients with chronic pelvic pain caused by pelvic venous incompetence (pelvic congestion syndrome). Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol. 1999; 11 (4): 395-399. doi: 10.1097/00001703-199908000-00006.

Views

Abstract - 13

PDF (Russian) - 18


© 2017 Verezgova S.V., Troik E.B.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed
under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.