Email this article 
Current estimate of functional vision in patients with bifocal pseudophakia after correction of residual defocus by different methods
- Authors: Takhtaev Y.V1, Bogachuk E.G1
-
Affiliations:
- North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov
- Issue: Vol 9, No 1 (2016)
- Pages: 19-23
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/ov/article/view/2939
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/OV9119-23
- ID: 2939
Cite item
Open Access
Access granted
Abstract
In this article we evaluated the influence of different surgical methods for correction of residual ametropia on contrast sensitivity at different light conditions and high-order aberrations in patients with bifocal pseudophakia. The study included 45 eyes (30 people) after cataract surgery, which studied dependence between contrast sensitivity and aberrations level before and after surgical correction of residual ametropia by of three methods - LASIK, Sulcoflex IOL implantation or IOL exchange. Contrast sensitivity was measured by Optec 6500 and aberration using Pentacam «OCULUS». We processed the results using the Mann-Whitney U-test. This study shows correlation between each method and residual aberrations level and their influence on contrast sensitivity level.
Full Text
About the authors
Yuri V Takhtaev
North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov
Email: Yurii.Takhtaev@szgmu.ru
MD Head of Ophthalmology department
Elena G Bogachuk
North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov
Email: begrun@mail.ru
postgraduate resident of Ophthalmology department
References
- Бикбов М.М. Метод интраокулярной коррекции аметропии и создания бифокального зрения в артифакичном глазу линзами RAINER SULCOFLEX : учебно-методическое пособие. - Уфа, 2011. - 28 с. [Bikbov MM. Metod intraokulyarnoy korrektsii ametropii i sozdaniya bifokal'nogo zreniya v artifakichnom glazu linzami RAINER SULCOFLEX : uchebno-metodicheskoe posobie. Ufa, 2011; 28 p. (In Russ).]
- Сергиенко Н.М. Офтальмологическая оптика. - Киев, 1982. - 182 с. [Sergienko NM. Oftal'mologicheskaya optika. Kiev; 1982. 182 p. (In Russ).]
- Хрипун К.В., Астахов С.Ю. Коррекция астигматизма при высоких степенях гиперметропии - какой способ выбрать? // Офтальмологические ведомости. - 2015. - Т. 7. - № 2. - С. 9-12. [Khripun KV, Astakhov SY. Korrektsiya astigmatizma pri vysokikh stepenyakh gipermetropii - kakoy sposob vybrat'? Ophthalmology Journal. 2015;7(2):9-12. (In Russ).]
- Хрипун К.В., Рахманова В.В., Рамазанова А.М. Ошибки при имплантации добавочных торических ИОЛ (Sulcoflex Toric, Rayner) // Офтальмологические ведомости. - 2015. - Т. 8. - № 1. - С. 12-17. [Khripun KV, Rakhmanova VV, Ramazanova AM. Oshibki pri implantatsii dobavochnykh toricheskikh IOL (Sulcoflex Toric, Rayner). Ophthalmology Journal. 2015;8(1):12-17. (In Russ).]
- Alio JL, Abdelghany AA, Fernа´ndez-Buenaga R. Management of residual refractive error after cataract surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2014;25(4):291-297.
- Clare G, Bloom P. Bilateral ciliary sulcus implantation of secondary piggyback multifocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33(2):320-322. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.08.061.
- Das М, Kumar A, Singh AP, et al. Is IOL Exchange A Safe and Cost Effective Procedure in Post Cataract Surgery Refractive Surprises. AIOC. 2010;4:139-141
- Guell JL, Gris O, de Muller A, Corcostegui B. LASIK for the correction of residual refractive errors from previous surgical procedures. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1999;30(5):341-349.
- Haboi-Wilner Z, Sacha D, Cahane M, et al. Refractive resuis with secondary piggyback implantation to correct pseudophakic errors. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31(11):2101-2103. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.05.023.
- Jendritza BB, Knorz MC, Morton S. Wavefront-guided excimer laser vision correction after multifocal IOL implantation. J Refract Surg. 2008;24(3):274-279.
- Kahraman G, Amort M. Nev. supplementary intraocular lens for refractive enhancement in pseudophakic patients J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36(7):1090-1094.
- Khan M, Muhtaseb I. Piggybacking With the Sulcoflex. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;(6):14-15.
- Kim P, Briganti EM, Sutton GL, et al. Laser in situ keratomileusis for refractive error after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31(5)979-986.
- Macsai MS, Fontes BM. Refractive enhancement following presbyopia-correcting intraocular lens implantation. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2008;19(1):18-21. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e3282f14d9f.
- Moreno-Barriuso E, Lloves JM, Marcos S, et al. Ocular aberrations before and after myopic corneal refractive surgery: LASIK-induced changes measured withlaser ray tracing. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42(6):1396-1403.
- Norouzi H, Rahmati-Kamel M. Laser in situ keratomileusis for correction of induced astigmatism from cataract surgery. J Refract Surg. 2003;19(4):416-424.
- Pershin K, Pashinova N. Fine tuning eximer laser correction after intraocular lens implantation and corneal transplantation. J Refract Surg. 2000;16(2):257-260.
- Sа´les CS, Manche EE. Managing residual refractive error after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(6):1289-129. Villa C, Gutie´rrez R, Jime´nez JR, Gonzа´lez-Me´ijome JM. Night vision disturbances after successful LASIK surgery. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91(8):1031-1037. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2006.110874.
- Yoshino M, Minami K, Hirasawa M, Oki S, Bissen-Miyajima H. Clinical Results of Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lens Implantation after Laser In Situ Keratomileusis. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 2015;119(9):613-618.
Supplementary files
