Comparative characteristic of clinical and laboratory indicators of congenital herpes virus infection in children and the course of mother’s pregnancy


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The work summarizes the results of the investigations made by the researchers of Scientific Research Institute of Children’s Infections in Saint Petersburg. There are presented comparative characteristics of congenital Herpes virus infection accompanied by a course of the mother’s pregnancy. Etiologic interpretation of congenital Herpes virus infection was based on the identification of specific antibodies of M and G class immunoglobulins against CMV, HSV and EBV by fluorescence immunoassay, virus DNA by PCR in different biological environment (blood, sputum, urine). The results of the tests were filled into the created individual electronic block-cards and processed further by the methods of parametric and nonparametric statistics in the licensed version of “Windows Vista Professional” operational environment “Statistica 7.0” program (correlated, regressive, cluster, discriminant tests) with the confidence level p < 0,05. There are described two our clinical observations of those children who have survived after generalized Herpes virus infection. There are framed the risks of congenital infection revealing depending on the pregnancy course in the form of the algorithm. There are also given the practical recommendations on the interpretation of the laboratory data found. The clinical presentation of congenital Herpes infections (HSV, CMV and EBV) is extremely polymorphic and doesn’t allow definite suspecting of the disease etiology. In the case of congenital infection suspicion the method of choice is the indication of causative genome in the biological samples available. The determination of specific IgM in the first-year children is less informative in these cases. The system of laboratory follow up of the pregnancy to assess the risk of congenital infection needs further improvement (it needs monitoring, current recommendations on interpretation).

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Galina Mikhailovna Ushakova

Federal Research Institute of Pediatric Infections

Email: galaush@mail.ru
MD, PhD, Researcher

Valeriy Viktorovich Vasiliev

North-West State Medical University named after I. I. Mechnikov

Email: vcubed@yandex.ru
MD, PhD, Dr Med Sci, Professor

Zinaida Alexeevna Osipova

Federal Research Institute of Pediatric Infections

Email: niidi@niidi.ru
MD, PhD, Senior researcher

Sof’ya Hidmetovna Kuyoumchan

North-West State Medical University named after I. I. Mechnikov

Email: niidi@niidi.ru
Postgraduate Student

Alsu Yunirovna Tuktarova

Federal Research Institute of Pediatric Infections

Email: niidi@niidi.ru
Junior researcher

References

  1. Васильев В. В. Врожденные инфекции в практике семейного врача. Российский семейный врач. 2013; Т. 17 (1): 16-27.
  2. Лобзин Ю. В., Васильев В. В. Ключевые аспекты проблемы врожденных инфекций. Журнал инфектологии. 2014; Т 6 (3): 5-14.
  3. Протоколы диагностики, лечения и профилактики внутриутробных инфекций у новорожденных детей Российской ассоциации перинатологов: методические рекомендации. М.: ГОУ ВУНМЦ МЗ РФ; 2002: 104.
  4. Санталова Г. В., Гасилина Е. С. Инфекции простого герпеса у детей (диагностика, подходы к терапии): Учебн. пособие для системы послевузовского образования врачей. Самара: ГОУ ВПО «Сам ГМУ»; 2010.
  5. Скрипченко Н. В., Васильев В. В., Романова Е. С., Ушакова Г. М., Жанарстанова Г. А. Диагностика и прогнозирование некоторых врожденных инфекций в системе «беременная-плод-ребенок первого года жизни. Российский вестник перинатологии и педиатрии. 2013; Т 58 (3): 92-97.
  6. Цинзерлинг В. А. Внутриутробные инфекции: современный взгляд на проблему. Журнал инфектологии. 2014; Т. 6 (4): 5-10.
  7. Coll O, Benoist G, Ville Y, Weisman L. E. et al. Guidelines on CMV congenital infection: WAPM Perinatal Infections Working Group. J. Perinat. Med. 2009; 37 (5): 433-45.
  8. Robert-Gangneux F., Dardy M. L. Epidemiology of and diagnostic strategies for toxoplasmosis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2012; 25 (2): 264-296.
  9. Sampedro M. A., Martinez L. A., Teatino P. M., Rodriguez-Granger J. Diagnosis of congenital infection. Enferm. Infecc. Microbiol. Clin. 2011; 29 (5): 15-20.
  10. Walker S. P., Palma-Dias R., Wood E. M., Shekleton P., Giles L. Cytomegalovirus in pregnancy: to screen or not to screen. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013; 13 (96): 129-34.
  11. Yinon Y., Farine D., Yudin M. H. Screening, diagnosis, and management of cytomegalovirus infection in pregnancy. Obstet. Gynecol. Surv. 2010; 65 (11): 736-43.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2015 Ushakova G.M., Vasiliev V.V., Osipova Z.A., Kuyoumchan S.H., Tuktarova A.Y.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 69634 от 15.03.2021 г.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies