Buccal mucosal urethroplasty, first experience in the Samara region

Cover Page

Abstract


The incidence of urethral strictures in the structure of genitourinary diseases is about 6%. Treatment effectiveness, according to the literature, accounts for only 30%. The article describes the authors’ early experience of urethroplasty with free flaps of oral mucosa. Similar operations were performed for the first time in the Samara region. The stages of the surgery are described, images of surgical stages and pre- and post-operative urethrography results are presented. From the oral cavity a full-thickness mucosal flap 4×1.5 cm in size was taken. Wounds in the oral cavity were sutured, whereby uniform epithelialization without forming rough scars occurred. Through perineal access bulbar urethra with cicatricial changes was approached and mobilized. Buccal flaps were separated from underlying fatty tissue and sequentially fixed to the cavernous bodies with the separate sutures. Dorsal wall of the mobilized urethra was incised along the stricture. Bladder was drained through silicone catheter 14 Ch, above which the edges of incised urethra were sutured with the edges of transplanted mucosa. Surgical wound was sutured in layers tightly. In the late postoperative period, patients underwent urethrocopy and uroflowmetry. Good functional results were achieved.


R S Nizamova

Author for correspondence.
samara-urology@mail.ru
Samara State Medical University Samara, Russia

I M Bayrikov

samara-urology@mail.ru
Samara State Medical University Samara, Russia

E S Gubanov

samara-urology@mail.ru
Samara State Medical University Samara, Russia

P Yu Stolyarenko

samara-urology@mail.ru
Samara State Medical University Samara, Russia

E A Boryaev

samara-urology@mail.ru
Samara State Medical University Samara, Russia

A D Soltanov

samara-urology@mail.ru
Samara State Medical University Samara, Russia

T M Evstigneeva

samara-urology@mail.ru
Samara State Medical University Samara, Russia

  • Аль-Шукри С.Х., Корнеев И.А., Ильин Д.М., Шультеис Д. Заместительная уретропластика с применением слизистой оболочки: опыт К.М. Сапежко и И.А. Тырмоса. Нефрология. 2012; 16 (2): 98-102.
  • Кызласов П.С., Забелин М.В., Сокольщик М.М. Комбинированная заместительная уретропластика лоскутом влагалищной оболочки яичка и слизистой оболочки щеки. Анн. пластической, реконструктивной и эстетической хир. 2016; (4): 41-44.
  • Коган М.И., Красулин В.В., Митусов В.В. и др. Оперативное лечение стриктур и облитераций уретры. Урология. 2015; (2): 17-23.
  • Котов С.В. Стриктуры уретры у мужчин - современное состояние проблемы. Мед. вестн. Башкортостана. 2015; 10 (3): 266-270.
  • Суховерхов А.О., Ершов А.В., Красноборов Е.П. Эффективность лечения стриктур уретры. Восточно-Сибирская межрег. науч.-практ. конф. урологов и нефрологов. Красноярск: ККБ. 2014; 124 с.
  • Курбатов Д.Г. Буккальная уретропластика: иллюстрированный атлас операций. М.: Медпрактика-М. 2009; 91 с.
  • Сапежко К.М. К лечению дефектов уретры путём пересадки слизистой оболочки. Хирургическая летопись. 1894; 4 (5): 775-784.
  • Пушкарь Д.Ю., Живов А.В., Багаудинов М.Р., Исмаилов М.Р. Качество жизни мужчин после различных операций по поводу стриктуры уретры. Андрол. и генитальная хир. 2013; 14 (2): 26-30. doi: 10.17650/2070-9781-2013-2-26-30.
  • Barbagli G., Montorsi F., Guazzoni G. et al. Ventral oral mucosal onlay graft urethroplasty in nontraumatic bulbar urethral strictures: surgical technique and multivariable analysis of results in 214 patients. Eur. Urol. 2013; 64: 440-447. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.046.
  • Chapple C., Andrich D., Atala A. et al. SIU/ICUD Consultation on Urethral Strictures: The management of anterior urethral stricture disease using substitution urethroplasty. Urology. 2014; 83 (3): 31-47. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.09.012.
  • Warner J.N., Wisenbaugh E.S., Martins F.E. Bulbar urethral stricture: How to optimise the use of buccal mucosal grafts. Arab. J. Urol. 2016; 14 (2): 78-83. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2016.01.002.
  • Pavone C., Fontana D., Giacalone N. et al. Urethroplasty with dorsal buccal mucosa graft. Is it still the method of choice in long term urethral stenosis? Arch. Ital. Urol. Androl. 2017; 89 (1): 42-44. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2017.1.42.

Views

Abstract - 9

PDF (Russian) - 5


© 2017 Nizamova R.S., Bayrikov I.M., Gubanov E.S., Stolyarenko P.Y., Boryaev E.A., Soltanov A.D., Evstigneeva T.M.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed
under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.