Clinical ambiguousness of measurement of tumor markers in the differential diagnosis of the uterus appendages tumors and inflam-matory pelvic mass in girls


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

In the diagnosis of ovarian tumors, with the most frequent gystotypes specific to childhood and adolescence, is widely used of tumor markers tests: alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and Ca-125. Features of the development of malignancies in children restrict of tumor markers tests in clinical practice. At the same time there are no tumor marker with 100 % specificity for the tumor. The article describes the clinical cases of 13-year-old female patient with appendicular infiltrate and secondary right adnekstumor and 14-year-old girl with hematogenous disseminated tuberculosis and salpingooophorities. The levels of Ca-125 and was an increased in both cases: in the first - to 39.41 IU/ml, in the second - up to 928.1 IU/ml. Thus, it was confirmed that the increase of serum concentration of CA-125 were in direct proportion to the pathological “irritation” of peritoneal serosa. In fact, the Ca-125 had the feature of acute phase proteins, so, its tumor specificity was low. Therefore the use of tumor marker test for Ca-125 is not always makes more easy task of differential diagnosis of the nature of the tumor mass pelvic in girls.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Nadezda Anatolyevna Kokhreidze

Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University

Email: kokhreidze@mail.ru
MD, PhD, Associate Professor. Department of Children Gynecology and Female Reproductology, Faculty of Postgraduate Education

Svetlana Alekseevna Leontyeva

Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University

Email: Sonik1977@yandex.ru
Postgraduate Student, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology

References

  1. Алексеева М. Л., Гусарова Е. В., Муллабаева С. М., Понкратова Т. С. Онкомаркеры, их характеристика и некоторые аспекты их клинико-диагностического исследования. Проблемы репродукции. 2005; 3: 65-79
  2. Алиев М. Д., Поляков В. Г., Менткевич Г. Л., Маякова С. А., ред. Детская онкология: национальное руководство. М.: Издательская группа РОНЦ. Практическая медицина. 2012.
  3. Поддубная И. В., ред. Онкология: справочник практического врача. М.: МЕДпресс-информ. 2009.
  4. Чиссов В. И., Давыдов М. И., ред. Онкология: национальное руководство. М.: ГЕОТАР-Медиа. 2013.
  5. Чиссов В. И., Дарьялова С. Л., ред. Онкология: учебник. М.: ГЕОТАР-Медиа. 2009.
  6. Чиссов В. И., Трахтенберга А. Х., ред. Ошибки в клинической онкологии: руководство для врачей. 3-е изд. М.: ГЕОТАР-Медиа; 2009. (Серия «Библиотека врача-специалиста»).

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2015 Kokhreidze N.A., Leontyeva S.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 69634 от 15.03.2021 г.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies