Classification of overactive bladder depending on severity of symptoms

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Aim of the study: To devise the method of evaluating severity of symptoms in patients with overactive bladder (OAB). Patients and methods: The severity of symptoms was assessed in 533 patients with OAB (the mean age 56,4 ± 0,6 years). All the patients filled the voiding diaries during 3 days, some of them assessed quality of life with KHQ questionnaire and had full urodynamic investigation. Results: The statistical analysis allowed to identify three levels of severity of OAB symptoms, determined in accordance with a score (S). S = 2 × number of voiding (pro 3 days) + number of urgency incidences (pro 3 days) + 1* (* — in case of urge incontinence). The score less than 62 defined as 1st (light) severity, between 63 and 80 —2nd (moderate) severity, more than 80 — 3rd (severe).Severity of OAB significantly correlated with urodynamic changes and quality of life deterioration. Conclusion: The devised method reproduced severity of OAB symptoms is simple and seems to be suitable for widespread use

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Igor Valentinovich Kuzmin

St.-Petersburg State I. P. Pavlov Medical University

Email: kuzminigor@mail.ru
doctor of medical science, professor, department of urology

Salman Hasunovich Al-Shukri

St.-Petersburg State I. P. Pavlov Medical University

Email: al-shukri@mail.ru
doctor of medical science, professor, head of the department of urology

References

  1. Аль-Шукри С. Х., Кузьмин И. В. Императивные позывы к мочеиспусканию — ведущий симптом гиперактивности мочевого пузыря / В сб.: Материалы IV Международной научно-практической конференции «Малоинвазивные методы диагностики и лечения в современной урологии». С-Петербург. 2007. C. 31–32.
  2. Аляев Ю. Г., Балан В. Е., Гаджиева З. К. Распространенность императивных нарушений мочеиспускания среди женщин старше 40 лет / В сб.: Материалы Пленума Всероссийского о-ва урологов. Тюмень. 2005. C. 356–357.
  3. Кузьмин И. В. Оценка качества жизни у больных с гиперактивностью мочевого пузыря // Нефрол. 2006. Т. 10, № 4. С. 93–97.
  4. Данилов В. В., Вольных И. Ю., Данилова Т. И. и др. Обоснование сроков назначения М-холинолитиков при консервативном лечении гиперактивного мочевого пузыря // Урол. 2006. № 5. С. 71–74.
  5. Abrams P., Kelleher C. J., Kerr L. A., Rogers R. G. Overactive bladder significantly affects quality of life // Am J Manag Care. 2000. N 6. P. 580–590.
  6. Abrams P., Cardozo L., Fall M. et al. The standardization of terminology in lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardization Sub-Committee of the International Continence Society // Urology. 2003. Vol. 61, N 1. P. 37–49.
  7. Abrams P. Urgency: the key to defining the overactive bladder // BJU Int. 2005. Vol. 96 (Suppl. 1). P. 1–3.
  8. Blaivas J. G., Panagopoulos G., Weiss J. P. et al. The urgency perception score: validation and test-retest // J Urol. 2007. Vol. 177, N 1. P. 199–202.
  9. Cardozo L., Coyne K. S., Versi E. Validation of the urgency perception scale // BJU Int. 2005. Vol. 95, N 4. P. 591–596.
  10. Chapple C. R., Artibani W., Cardozo L. D. et al. The role of urinary urgency and its measurement in the overactive bladder symptom syndrome: current concepts and future prospects // BJU Int. 2005. Vol. 96, N 3. P. 441–442.
  11. Flisser A. J., Blaivas J. G. Role of cystometry in evaluating patients with overactive bladder // Urology. 2002. Vol.60, N 5. P. 33–42.
  12. Ghei M., Malone-Lee J. Using the circumstances of symptom experience to assess the severity of urgency in the overactive bladder // J Urol. 2005. Vol.174, N 3. P. 972–976.
  13. Herzog A. R., Diokno A. C., Fultz N. H. Urinary incontinence: medical and psychosocial aspects / In: Annual review of gerontology and geriatrics New York: Springer Publishing Company. 1989. Vol. 9. P. 77–119.
  14. Homma Y., Yoshida M., Seki N. et al. Symptom assessment tool for overactive bladder syndrome — overactive bladder symptom score // Urology. 2006. Vol. 68, N 2. P. 318–323.
  15. Irwin D. E., Milsom I., Hunskaar S. et al. Population-based survey of urinary incontinence, overactive bladder, and other lower urinary tract symptoms in five countries: results of the EPIC study // Eur Urol. 2006. Vol. 50, N 6. P. 1306–1314.
  16. Kelleher C. J., Cardozo L. D., Khullar V., Salvatore S. A new questionnaire to assess the quality of life of urinary incontinent women // Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997. Vol. 104, N 9. P. 1374–1379.
  17. Kobelt G. Economic considerations and outcome measurement in urge incontinence // Urology. 1997. Vol. 50, N 6A. P. 100–107.
  18. Nixon A., Colman S., Sabounjian L. et al. A validated patient reported measure of urinary urgency severity in overactive bladder for use in clinical trials // J Urol. 2005. Vol.174, N 2. P. 604–647.
  19. Papanicolaou S., Hunskaar S., Lose G., Sykes D. Assessment of bothersomeness and impact on quality of life of urinary incontinence in women in France, Germany, Spain and the UK // BJU Int. 2005. Vol. 96, N 6. P. 831–838.
  20. Schafer W., Abrams P., Liao L. et al. Good urodynamic practice: uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies // Neurourol Urodyn. 2002. Vol. 21. P. 261–274.
  21. Stewart W. F., Van Rooyen J. B., Cundiff G. W. et al. Prevalence and burden of overactive bladder in the United States // World J Urol. 2003. Vol. 20, N 6. P. 327–336.
  22. Tyagi S., Thomas C. A., Hayashi Y., Chancellor M. B. The overactive bladder: Epidemiology and morbidity // Urol Clin North Am. 2006. Vol. 33, N 4. P. 433–438.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2012 Kuzmin I.V., Al-Shukri S.H.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ №ФС77-65570 от 04 мая 2016 г.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies