<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="other" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Geotectonics</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Geotectonics</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Геотектоника</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">0016-853X</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">3034-4972</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">The Russian Academy of Sciences</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">660373</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.31857/S0016853X23050090</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="edn">OSVGIM</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Статьи</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject></subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Ediacaran and Cambrian Volcanogenic and Sedimentary Complexes of Southern Ulutau (Central Kazakhstan): Structure, Substantiation of Age and Setting of Formation</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Эдиакарские и кембрийские вулканогенные и осадочные комплексы Южного Улутау (Центральный Казахстан): строение, обоснование возраста и обстановки формирования</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Tretyakov</surname><given-names>A. A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Третьяков</surname><given-names>А. А.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>and8486@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Degtyarev</surname><given-names>K. E.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Дегтярев</surname><given-names>К. Е.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>and8486@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Kanygina</surname><given-names>N. A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Каныгина</surname><given-names>Н. А.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>and8486@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Zhuravlev</surname><given-names>A. N.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Журавлев</surname><given-names>А. Н.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>and8486@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Skuzovatov</surname><given-names>S. Yu.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Скузоватов</surname><given-names>С. Ю.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>and8486@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Geological Institute RAS</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Геологический институт РАН</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff2"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Vinogradov Institute of Geochemistry of the Siberian Branch RAS</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Институт геохимии им. А.П. Виноградова Сибирского отделения РАН</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2023-09-01" publication-format="electronic"><day>01</day><month>09</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><issue>5</issue><fpage>37</fpage><lpage>69</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2025-02-22"><day>22</day><month>02</month><year>2025</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2023, А.А. Третьяков, К.Е. Дегтярев, Н.А. Каныгина, А.Н. Журавлев, С.Ю. Скузоватов</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2023, А.А. Третьяков, К.Е. Дегтярев, Н.А. Каныгина, А.Н. Журавлев, С.Ю. Скузоватов</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2023</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">А.А. Третьяков, К.Е. Дегтярев, Н.А. Каныгина, А.Н. Журавлев, С.Ю. Скузоватов</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">А.А. Третьяков, К.Е. Дегтярев, Н.А. Каныгина, А.Н. Журавлев, С.Ю. Скузоватов</copyright-holder></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.eco-vector.com/0016-853X/article/view/660373">https://journals.eco-vector.com/0016-853X/article/view/660373</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p id="idm45181320474976">The article presents the results of studying and substantiating the age of the Ediacaran volcanogenic-sedimentary and Cambrian sedimentary strata isolated for the first time within the southern part of the Ulutau terrane (Southern Ulutau) in the west of Central Kazakhstan. Age Estimates (SHRIMP II) obtained 594 ± 3, 594 ± 5, 600 ± 2 Ma for effusive and tufogenic rocks, as well as their isotope-geochemical characteristics, are the first evidence of the manifestation of Ediacaran suprasubduction magmatism in the paleozoics of Kazakhstan and the Northern Tien Shan. The data obtained indicate the participation of the Ulutau terrane at the end of the Precambrian in the structure of the volcanic-plutonic belt, fragments of which are also Neoproterozoic blocks within Southwestern Kazakhstan (the Zeltava and Chui‒Kendyktas terranes) of the Southern Tien Shan and the Karakum‒Tajik terrane. The formation of the Ediacaran suprasubduction belt may be a continuation of the evolution of the Neoproterozoic active continental margin that arose in the Tonian period on the northwestern margin of the supercontinent Rodinia.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p id="idm45181320473264">В статье приведены результаты изучения и обоснования возраста эдиакарских слабометаморфизованных вулканогенно-осадочных и кембрийских осадочных толщ, выделенных впервые в пределах южной части Улутауского террейна (Южном Улутау) на западе Центрального Казахстана. Оценки возраста (SHRIMP II) 594 ± 3, 595 ± 5, 600 ± 2 млн лет для эффузивных и туфогенных пород, а также их изотопно-геохимические характеристики являются первым свидетельством проявления эдиакарского надсубдукционного магматизма в палеозоидах Казахстана и Северного Тянь-Шаня. Полученные данные указывают на участие Улутауского террейна в конце докембрия в строении вулкано-плутонического пояса, фрагментами которого также являются неопротерозойские блоки в пределах Юго-Западного Казахстана (Жельтавский и Чуйско-Кендыктасский террейны), Южного Тянь-Шаня и Каракумо-Таджикского террейна. Формирование эдиакарского надсубдукционного пояса может являться продолжением эволюции неопротерозойской активной континентальной окраины, возникшей в тонийское время на северо-западной окраине суперконтинента Родиния.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Ediacaran</kwd><kwd>Cambrian</kwd><kwd>rhyolites</kwd><kwd>andesites</kwd><kwd>U–Pb dating</kwd><kwd>subduction</kwd><kwd>Rodinia</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>эдиакарий</kwd><kwd>кембрий</kwd><kwd>риолиты</kwd><kwd>андезиты</kwd><kwd>U–Pb-датирование</kwd><kwd>субдукция</kwd><kwd>Родиния</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Зайцев Ю.А., Хераскова Т.Н. Венд Центрального Казахстана. ‒ Под ред. Ю.А. Зайцева ‒ М.: МГУ, 1979. 251 с.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Крылов И.Н., Сергеев В.Н., Хераскова Т.Н. Находка кремнистых микрофоссилий в кембрийских отложениях Байконурского синклинория // Изв. АН СССР. Сер. геол. 1986. № 1. С. 51–56.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Милеев В.С., Розанов С.Б. Геология и тектоника докембрия Центрального Казахстана. ‒ Под ред. Ю.А. Зайцева ‒ М.: МГУ, 1976. 366 с.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Миркамалов Р.Х., Чирикин В.В., Хан Р.С., Харин В.Г., Сергеев С.А. Hезультаты U‒Pb (SHRIMP) датирования гранитоидных и метаморфических комплексов Тянь-Шаньского складчатого пояса (Узбекистан) // Вестн. СПбГУ. 2012. № 7. С. 3–25.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Носова А.А., Возняк А.А., Богданова С.В., Савко К.А., Лебедева Н.М., Травин А.В., Юдин Д.С., Пейдж Л., Ларионов А.Н., Постников А.В. Раннекембрийский сиенитовый и монцонитовый магматизм на юго-востоке Восточно-Европейской платформы: петрогенезис и тектоническая обстановка формирования // Петрология. 2019. Т. 27. № 4. С. 357‒400.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Третьяков А.А., Дегтярев К.Е., Каныгина Н.А., Федоров Б.В. Мезопротерозойский бимодальный магматизм Улутауского террейна Центрального Казахстана // ДАН. Науки о Земле. 2023. Т. 508. № 1. С. 5‒13.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Третьяков А.А., Дегтярев К.Е., Каныгина Н.А., Ковач В.П., Федоров Б.В. Позднедокембрийские риолит-гранитные вулкано-плутонические ассоциации Южного Улутау (Центральный Казахстан) // Геотектоника. 2022. № 4. С. 3–34.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Третьяков А.А., Данукалов Н.К., Дегтярев К.Е. Позднедокембрийские вулканогенные и вулканогенно осадочные толщи Улутауского массива (Центральный Казахстан): особенности состава и обоснование возраста. ‒ В сб.: Фундаментальные проблемы тектоники и геодинамики. ‒ Мат-лы LII Тектонического совещания. ‒ М.: ГЕОС, 2020. С. 338‒343.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Филатова Л.И. Стратиграфия и историко-геологический (формационный) анализ метаморфических толщ докембрия Центрального Казахстана. ‒ М.: Недра, 1983.160 с.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Ярмолюк В.В., Дегтярев К.Е. Докембрийские террейны Центрально-Азиатского орогенного пояса: сравнительная характеристика, типизация и особенности тектонической эволюции // Геотектоника. 2019. № 1. С. 3‒43.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Alexeiev D.V., Biske G.S., Kröner A., Tretyakov A.A., Kovach V.P., Rojas-Agramonte Y., Ediacaran, Early Ordovician and early Silurian arcs in the South Tianshan orogen of Kyrgyzstan // J. Asian Earth Sci. 2020. Vol. 190. P. 104194.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Alexeiev D.V., Khudoley A.K., DuFrane S.A., Glorie S., Vishnevskaya I.A., Semiletkin S.A., Letnikova E.F. Early Neoproterozoic fore-arc basin strata of the Malyi Karatau Range (South Kazakhstan): depositional ages, provenance and implications for reconstructions of Precambrian continents // Gondwana Research. 2023. Vol. 119. P. 313–340.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Biske Yu.S., Ershova V.B., Konopelko D.L., Stockl D., Mamadjanov Yu.M., Wang X.S. Detrital-zircon geochronology and provenance of Ediacaran–Silurian rocks of the central to northern Tajikistan traverse: Geodynamic implications for the evolution of the Tian Shan // Gondwana Research. 2021. Vol. 99. P. 247–268.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Cohen K.M., Finney S.C., Gibbard P.L., Fan J.X. The ICS International Chronostratigraphic Chart // Episodes. 2013 (updated 02.2022). Vol. 36. № 3. P. 199–204.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Condie K.C. Chemical Composition and Evolution of the Upper Continental Crust: Contrasting Results from Surface Samples and Shales // Chem. Geol. 1993. Vol. 104. P. 1‒37.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Cullers R.L. The chemical signature of source rocks in size fractions of Holocene stream sediment derived from metamorphic rocks in the Wet Mountains region, Colorado, U.S.A. // Chem. Geol. 1994. Vol. 113. P. 327–343.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Degtyarev K., Yakubchuk A., Tretyakov A., Kotov A., Kovach V. Precambrian geology of the Kazakh Uplands and Tien Shan: An overview // Gondwana Research. 2017. Vol. 47. P. 44–75.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Depaolo D.J. Neodymium isotopes in the Colorado Front Range and crust-mantle evolution in the Proterozoic// Nature. 1981. Vol. 291. P. 193–196.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Drummond M.S., Defant M.J., Kepezhinskas P.K. Petrogenesis of slab derived trondhjemite–tonalite–dacite/adakite magmas // Trans. R. Soc. Edinb: Earth Sci. 1996. Vol. 87. P. 205–215.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Elhlou S., Belousova E., Griffin W.L., Pearson N.J., Riley S.Y. Trace element and isotopic composition of GJ-red zircon standard by laser ablation. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 2006. Vol. 70. A158. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GCA.2006.06.1383</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Frost B.R., Barnes C.G., Collins W.J., Arculus R.J., Ellis D.J., Frost C.D. A geochemical classification for granitic rocks // J. Petrol. 2001. Vol. 42. P. 2033–2048.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Herron M.M. Geochemical classification of terrigenous sands and shales from core or log data // J. Sediment. Petrol. 1988. Vol. 58. P. 820–829.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Horstwood M.S.A., Kosler J., Gehrels G., Jackson S.E., McLean N.M., Paton Ch., Pearson N.J., Sircombe K., Sylvester P., Vermeesch P., Bowring J.F., Condon D.J., Schoene B. Community-derived standards for LA-ICP-MS U‒(Th)‒Pb geochronology – uncertainty propagation, age interpretation and data reporting // Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research. 2016. Vol. 40. № 3. P. 311‒332.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Ge R., Zhu W., Wilde S.A., He J., Cui X., Wang X., Bihai Z. Neoproterozoic to Paleozoic long-lived accretionary orogeny in the northern Tarim Craton // Tectonics. 2014. Vol. 33. P. 302–329.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Gehrels G.E., Detrital zircon U‒Pb geochronology: Current methods and new opportunities. ‒ In: Tectonics of Sedimentary Basins: Recent Advances. ‒ Ed. by C. Busby, A. Azor, (Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, UK. 2012). P. 47–62.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>Jackson S.E., Pearson N.J., Griffin W.L., Belousova E.A. The application of laser ablation-inductively cou-pled plasma-mass spectrometry to in situ U‒Pb zircon geochronology // Chem. Geol. 2004. V. 211. P. 47–69.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>Jiang G., Shi X., Zhang S., Wang Y., Xiao S. Stratigraphy and Paleogeography of the Ediacaran Doushantuo Formation (ca. 635–551 Ma) in South China // Gondwana Research. 2011. Vol. 19. P. 831–849.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation>Kanygina N.A., Tretyakov A.A., Degtyarev K.E., Kovach V.P., Skuzovatov S.Y., Pang K.N., Wang K.L., Lee H.Y. Late Mesoproterozoic–early Neoproterozoic quartzite–schist sequences of the Aktau-Mointy terrane (Central Kazakhstan): Provenance, crustal evolution, and implications for paleotectonic reconstruction // Precambrian Research. 2021. Vol. 354. 106040.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation>Käßner A., Ratschbacher L., Pfänder J.A., Hacker B.R., Zack G., Sonntag B.-L., Khan J., Stanek K.P., Gadoev M., Oimahmadov I., Proterozoic-Mesozoic history of the Central Asian orogenic belt in the Tajik and southwestern Kyrgyz Tien Shan: U‒Pb, 40Ar/39Ar, and fission-track geochronology and geochemistry of granitoids // GSA Bull. 2017. Vol. 129. P. 281–303.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><mixed-citation>Kelemen P.B., Hanghøj K., Greene A.R. One view on the geochemistry of subduction-related magmatic arcs, with an emphasis of primitive andesite and lower crust // Treat. Geochem. 2014. P. 749–806</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><mixed-citation>Konopelko D., Klemd R., Mamadjanov Y., Hegner E., Knorsch M., Fidaev D., Kern M., Sergeev S. Permian age of orogenic thickening and crustal melting in the Garm Block, South Tien Shan // J. Asian Earth Sci. 2015. Vol. 113. P. 711–727.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><mixed-citation>Konopelko D., Seltmann R., Mamadjanov Y., Romer R.L., Rojas-Agramonte Y., Jeffries T., Fidaev D., Niyozov A.A. Geotraverse across two paleo-subduction zones in Tien Shan, Tajikistan // Gondwana Research. 2017. Vol. 47. P. 110–130.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><label>33.</label><mixed-citation>Konopelko D., Biske Y.S., Kullerud K., Ganiev I., Seltmann R., Brownscombe W., Mirkamalov R., Wang B., Safonova I., Kotler P., Shatov V., Sun M., Wong J. Early Carboniferous metamorphism of the Neoproterozoic South Tien Shan‒Karakum basement: New geochronological results from Baisun and Kyzylkum, Uzbekistan // J. Asian Earth Sci. 2019. Vol. 177. P. 275–286.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><label>34.</label><mixed-citation>Kovach V., Degtyarev K., Tretyakov A., Kotov A., Tolmacheva E.,Wang K.-L., Chung S.-L., Lee H.-Y., Jahn B.-M. Sources and provenance of the Neoproterozoic placer deposits of the northern Kazakhstan: Implication for continental growth of the western Central Asian Orogenic Belt // Gondwana Research. 2017. Vol. 47. P. 28–43.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><label>35.</label><mixed-citation>Larionov A.N., Andreichev V.A., Gee D.G. The Vendian alkaline igneous suite of northern Timan: ion microprobe U‒Pb zircon ages of gabbros and syenite the Vendian alkaline igneous suite of northern Timan: Ion microprobe U‒Pb zircon ages of gabbros and syenite // Geol. Soc. London. Mem. 2004. Vol. 30. P. 69–74.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><label>36.</label><mixed-citation>Le Bas M.J., Le Maitre R.W., Streckeisen A., Zanettin B. A chemical classification of volcanic rocks based on the total alkali-silica diagram // J. Petrol. 1986. Vol. 27. P. 745–750.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B37"><label>37.</label><mixed-citation>Long X-P., Yuan C., Sun M., Kroner A., Zhao G-C., Wilde S., Hu A-Q. Reworking of the Tarim Craton by underplating of mantle plume-derived magmas: evidence from Neoproterozoic granitoids in the Kuluketage area, NW China // Precambrian Research. 2011. Vol. 187. P. 1–14.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B38"><label>38.</label><mixed-citation>McLennan S.M., Hemming S.R., McDaniel D.K., Hanson G.N. “Geochemical approaches to sedimentation, provenance, and tectonics,” in: Processes Controlling the Composition of Clastic Sediments. Ed.by M.J. Johnson, A. Basu, (GSA Spec. Pap. 1993. Vol. 284). P. 21–40.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B39"><label>39.</label><mixed-citation>Nesbitt H.W., Young G.M. Early Proterozoic climates and plate motions inferred from major element chemistry of lutites // Nature. 1982. Vol. 299. P. 715‒717.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B40"><label>40.</label><mixed-citation>Pearce J.A., Norry M.J. Petrogenetic implications of Ti, Zr, Y, and Nb variations in volcanic rocks // Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 1979. Vol. 69. P. 33–47.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B41"><label>41.</label><mixed-citation>Pearce J.A., Harris N.W., Tindle A.G. Trace element discrimination diagrams for the tectonic interpretation of granitic rocks // J. Petrol. 1984. Vol. 25. P. 956–983.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B42"><label>42.</label><mixed-citation>Pearce J.A. Geochemical fingerprinting of oceanic basalts with applications to ophiolite classification and the search for Archean oceanic crust // Lithos, 2008. Vol. 100. P. 14–48.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B43"><label>43.</label><mixed-citation>Pilitsyna A.V., Tretyakov A.A., Degtyarev K.E., Salnikova E.B., Kotov A.B., Kovach V.P., Wang K.-L., Batanova V.G. Early Palaeozoic metamorphism of Precambrian crust in the Zheltau terrane (Southern Kazakhstan, Central Asian Orogenic belt): P–T paths, protoliths, zircon dating and tectonic implications // Lithos. 2019. Vol. 324–325. P. 115–140.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B44"><label>44.</label><mixed-citation>Precambrian Geology of China. ‒ Ed. by M. Zhai, (Springer, NY, USA. 2015). P. 390.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B45"><label>45.</label><mixed-citation>Ren R., Guan S.W., Zhang S.C., Wu L., Zhang H.Y. How did the peripheral subduction drive the Rodinia breakup: Constraints from the Neoproterozoic tectonic process in the northern Tarim Craton // Precambrian Research. 2020. Vol. 339. P. 1–17.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B46"><label>46.</label><mixed-citation>Skoblenko (Pilitsyna) A.V., Degtyarev K.E., Kanygina N.A., Tretyakov A.A., Skuzovatov S.Yu., Pang K.-N., Lee H.-Y. Precambrian and Early Palaeozoic metamorphic complexes in the SW part of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt: Ages, compositions, regional correlations and tectonic affinities // Gondwana Research. 2022. Vol. 105. P. 117‒142.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B47"><label>47.</label><mixed-citation>Sláma J., Košler J., Condon D.J., Crowley J.L., Gerdes A., Hanchar J.M., Horstwood M.S.A., Morris G.A., Nasdala L., Norberg N., Schaltegger U., Schoene B., Tubrett M.N., Whitehouse M.J. Plešovice zircon – a new natural reference material for U‒Pb and Hf isotopic microanalysis // Chem. Geol. 2008. Vol. 249. P. 1–35.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B48"><label>48.</label><mixed-citation>Sheshukov V.S., Kuzmichev A.B., Dubenskiy A.S., Okina O.I., Degtyarev K.E., Kanygina N.A., Kuznetsov N.B., Romanjuk T.V., Lyapunov S.M. “U‒Pb zircon dating by LA-SF-ICPMS at Geological Institute GIN RAS (Moscow),” in: Analysis of Geological and Environmental Materials of 10th Int. Conf., Sydney, Australia, (Sydney, Australia. 2018. Abstr. Book), P. 63.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B49"><label>49.</label><mixed-citation>Shervais J.W. Ti‒V plots and the petrogenesis of modern and ophiolitic lavas // Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 1982. Vol. 59. P. 101–118.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B50"><label>50.</label><mixed-citation>Sun S.S., McDonough W.F. “Chemical and isotopic systematic of oceanic basalts: Implications for mantle composition and processes,” in: Magmatism in the Ocean Basins. Ed.by A.D. Saunders, M.J. Norry, (Geol. Soc. London. Spec. Publ. 1989. Vol. 42), P. 313–345.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B51"><label>51.</label><mixed-citation>Taylor S.R., McLennan S.M. The Continental Crust: Its Composition and Evolution. ‒ (Blackwell, Oxford, UK. 1985). P. 312.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B52"><label>52.</label><mixed-citation>Tretyakov A.A., Pilitsyna A.V., Degtyarev K.E., Kanygina N.A., Salnikova E.B., Kovach V.P., Lee H.-Y., Wang K.-L., Batanova V.G., Kovalchuk E.V. Neoproterozoic granitoid magmatism and granulite metamorphism in the Chu-Kendyktas terrane (Southern Kazakhstan, Central Asian orogenic belt): Zircon dating, Nd isotopy and tectono-magmatic evolution // Precambrian Research. 2019. Vol. 332. P. 105397.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B53"><label>53.</label><mixed-citation>Whalen J.B., Currie K.L., Chappell B.W. A-type granites ‒ geochemical characteristics, discrimination and petrogenesis // Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 1987. Vol. 95. P. 407–419.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B54"><label>54.</label><mixed-citation>Wiedenbeck M.P.A., Corfu F., Griffin W.L., Meier M., Oberli F., von Quadt A., Roddick J.C., Spiegel W. Three natural zircon standards for U‒Th‒Pb, Lu‒Hf, trace element and REE analyses // Geostandards and Geoanalytical Res. 1995. Vol. 19. P. 1–23.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B55"><label>55.</label><mixed-citation>Wiedenbeck M., Hanchar J.M., Peck W.H., Sylvester P., Valley J., Whitehouse M., Kronz A., Morishita Y., Nasdala L., Fiebig J., Franchi I., Girard J.-P., Greenwood R.C., Hinton R., Kita N., Mason P.R.D., Norman M., Ogasawara M., Piccoli P.M., Rhede D., Satoh H., Schulz-Dobrick B., Skår Ø., Spicuzza M.J., Terada K., Tindle A., Togashi S., Vennemann T., Xie Q., Zheng Y.-F. Further characterization of the 91500 zircon crystal // Geostandards and Geoanalytical Res. 2004. Vol. 28. P. 9–39.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B56"><label>56.</label><mixed-citation>Worthington J.R., Kapp P., Minaev V., Chapman J.B., Mazdab F.K., Ducea M.N., Oimahmadov I., Gadoev M. Birth, life, and demise of the Andean – syncollisional Gissar arc: Late Paleozoic tectono-magmatic-metamorphic evolution of the southwestern Tian Shan, Tajikistan // Tectonics. 2017. Vol. 36. P. 1861–1912.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B57"><label>57.</label><mixed-citation>Wu L., Guan S.W., Ren R., Wang X.B., Yang H.J., Jing J.Q., Zhu G.Y. The characteristics of Precambrian sedimentary basin and the distribution of deep source rock: A case study of Tarim basin in Neoproterozoic and source rocks in early Cambrian, Western China // Petrol. Explor. Dev. 2016. Vol. 43. P. 905‒915.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B58"><label>58.</label><mixed-citation>Wu H.-X., Dilek Y., Zhang F.-Q., Chen H.-L., Chen H., Wang C.-Y., Lin X.-B., Cheng X.-G. Ediacaran magmatism and rifting along the northern margin of the Tarim craton: Implications for the late Neoproterozoic Rodinia configuration and breakup // GSA Bull. 2022. Vol. 135. № 1–2. P. 367–388.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B59"><label>59.</label><mixed-citation>Xu B., Jian P., Zheng H., Zou H., Zhang L., Liu D. U‒Pb zircon geochronology and geochemistry of Neoproterozoic volcanic rocks in the Tarim Block of northwest China: Implications for the breakup of Rodinia supercontinent and Neoproterozoic glaciations // Precambrian Research. 2005. Vol. 136. P. 107–123.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B60"><label>60.</label><mixed-citation>Zhang C.-L., Li X.-H., Li Z.-X., Lu S.-N., Ye H.-M., Li H.-M. Neoproterozoic ultramficmafic-carbonatite complex, granitoids in Quruqtagh of northeastern Tarim Block, Western China: Geochronology, geochemistry and tectonic implications // Precambrian Research. 2007. Vol. 152. P. 149–169.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B61"><label>61.</label><mixed-citation>Zhang C.L., Zou H.B., Li H.K., Wang H.Y. Multiple phases of Neoproterozoic ultramafic-mafic complex in Kuruqtagh, northern margin of Tarim: Interaction between plate subduction and mantle plume? // Precambrian Research. 2012. Vol. 222–223. P. 488–502.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B62"><label>62.</label><mixed-citation>Zhang C.L., Ye X.T., Zou H.B., Chen X.Y. Neoproterozoic sedimentary basin evolution in southwestern Tarim, NW China: New evidence from field observations, detrital zircon U‒Pb ages and Hf isotope compositions // Precambrian Research. 2016. Vol. 280. P. 31–45.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B63"><label>63.</label><mixed-citation>Zhao G.C., Wang Y.J., Huang B.C., Dong Y.P., Li S.Z., Zhang G.W., Yu S. Geological reconstructions of the East Asian blocks: From the breakup of Rodinia to the assembly of Pangea // Earth Sci. Rev. 2018. Vol. 186. P. 262–286.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B64"><label>64.</label><mixed-citation>Overlap-Similarity, http:// www.geo.arizona.edu/alc (Accessed April, 2023).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B65"><label>65.</label><mixed-citation>Normalized Prob, http:// www.geo.arizona.edu/alc (Accessed Aril, 2023).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B66"><label>66.</label><mixed-citation>Cumulative Prob plot, http:// www.geo.arizona.edu/alc (Accessed April, 2023).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B67"><label>67.</label><mixed-citation>Age Pick, http:// www.geo.arizona.edu/alc (Accessed April, 2023).</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
