Risk communications in the sphere of the ambient air quality and population health: the potential for integrating digital technologies

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Introduction. Effective risk communication is a significant factor in reducing preventable morbidity and mortality associated with anthropogenic environmental pollution in modern cities. The World Health Organization considers active use of digital technologies (risk communications via the Internet or mobile applications) a key trend in the development of up-to-date communication systems.Purpose. To establish possibilities and ways to integrate digital technologies into risk communications associated with ambient air pollution based on the characteristics on information demands typical for residents of Russian megacities.Materials and methods. The empirical base for the research was provided by the results of an online quantitative survey conducted among adults in Novosibirsk and Perm, two industrially developed cities in Russia with the population exceeding 1 million people (n = 378, 2020).Results. We established that people had rather low proactive interest in any information about environmental conditions (ambient air pollution and its impacts on health) since less than a half of the respondents searched for it on their own. Still, 76% of them wanted to be informed about these issues and this means that in general there is a high interest in the topic. Data on health associated with ambient air pollution and possible actions aimed at risk mitigation are the most interesting for public in general. People prefer texts and videos when it comes down to a way to communicate information. Interactive maps have some potential but they are still not very popular among people. There is also a demand for a specialized mobile application, which gives an opportunity to get information about ambient air quality and health risks. Social networks, messengers, and news tickers on websites have the greatest potential for informing people about ambient air pollution and health risks.Research limitations. The survey was conducted only among residents of large cities in Russia. Therefore, the results do not cover opinions of people who live in medium-sized or small towns or in rural areas.Conclusion. Emphasis in these risk communications should be made on a) an actual ambient air quality; b) its potential effects on health; c) ways to minimize risks. Overall, it seems necessary to develop a whole system of risk communications on environmental pollution and health in Russia. This should involve active use of digital technologies.Compliance with ethical standards. The study was conducted in conformity with the International Sociological Association’s (ISA) Code of Ethics; was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Federal Scientific Center for Medical and Preventive Technologies for Population Health Risk Management (protocol No. 6 dated March 12, 2020). All participants gave informed voluntary written consent to participate in the study.Contribution of the authors: Lebedeva-Nesevria N.A. — study concept and design, writing and editing the text; Barg A.O. — sociological data analysis, drawing up the references. All authors have approved the final version of the article and bear full responsibility for the integrity of all its parts.Funding. The study had no sponsorship.Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.Received: May 14, 2025 / Accepted: June 24, 2025 / Published: October 31, 2025

About the authors

Natalia N. Lebedeva-Nesevria

Federal Scientific Center for Medical and Preventive Health Risk Management Technologies

Email: natnes@list.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3036-3542

Anastasiya O. Barg

Federal Scientific Center for Medical and Preventive Health Risk Management Technologies

Email: an-bg@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2901-3932

References

  1. Глобальные рекомендации ВОЗ по качеству воздуха: касающиеся твердых частиц (ТЧ2,5 и ТЧ10), озона, двуокиси азота, двуокиси серы и окиси углерода. Резюме; 2021. Доступно: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/345334/9789240035409-rus.pdf
  2. Chen Y., Chen S., Zhang L., Kang W., Lin G., Yang Q. Association between ambient air pollutants and short-term mortality risks during 2015-2019 in Guangzhou, China. Front. Public Health. 2024; 12: 1359567. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1359567
  3. Gariazzo C., Renzi M., Marinaccio A., Michelozzi P., Massari S., Silibello C., et al. Association between short-term exposure to air pollutants and cause-specific daily mortality in Italy. A nationwide analysis. Environ. Res. 2023; 216(Pt. 3): 114676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.114676
  4. Guo Y., Li S., Tawatsupa B., Punnasiri K., Jaakkola J.J., Williams G. The association between air pollution and mortality in Thailand. Sci. Rep. 2014; 4: 5509. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep05509
  5. Semczuk-Kaczmarek K., Rys-Czaporowska A., Sierdzinski J., Kaczmarek L.D., Szymanski F.M., Platek A.E. Association between air pollution and COVID-19 mortality and morbidity. Intern. Emerg. Med. 2022; 17(2): 467–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-021-02834-5
  6. Салтыкова М.М., Балакаева А.В., Федичкина Т.П., Бобровницкий И.П. Основные причины смертности, обусловленной загрязнением воздуха. Гигиена и санитария. 2020; 99(4): 337–43. https://elibrary.ru/gdgnzm
  7. Государственный доклад «О состоянии санитарно-эпидемиологического благополучия населения в Российской Федерации в 2023 году». М.; 2024.
  8. Зайцева Н.В., Май И.В. Качество атмосферного воздуха и показатели риска здоровью как объективные критерии результативности воздухоохранной деятельности на территориях городов – участников федерального проекта «Чистый воздух». Анализ риска здоровью. 2023; (1): 4–12. https://doi.org/10.21668/health.risk/2023.1.01 https://elibrary.ru/omvwle
  9. Май И.В., Загороднов С.Ю. Мелкодисперсные пыли в атмосферном воздухе городов федерального проекта «Чистый воздух» как фактор риска здоровью и объект управления. Здоровье населения и среда обитания — ЗНиСО. 2024; 32(12): 39–47. https://doi.org/10.35627/2219-5238/2024-32-12-39-47 https://elibrary.ru/mjluew
  10. Май И.В., Зайцева Н.В. Показатели риска и вреда здоровью населения в системе новых механизмов мониторинга и управления качеством воздуха. Здоровье населения и среда обитания — ЗНиСО. 2022; 30(10): 7–15. https://doi.org/10.35627/2219-5238/2022-30-10-7-15 https://elibrary.ru/seitzk
  11. Pfleger E., Adrian C., Lutz R., Drexler H. Science communication on the public health risks of air pollution: a computational scoping review from 1958 to 2022. Arch. Public Health. 2023; 81(1): 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-023-01031-4
  12. Hano M.C., Baghdikian C.L., Prince S., Lazzarino E., Hubbell B., Sams E., et al. Illuminating stakeholder perspectives at the intersection of air quality health risk communication and cardiac rehabilitation. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2019; 16(19): 3603. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16193603
  13. Cromar K., Lazrak N. Risk communication of ambient air pollution in the WHO European Region: review of air quality indexes and lessons learned. Copenhagen; 2023.
  14. WHO Strategic Communications Framework for effective communications. Available at: https://who.int/mediacentre/communication-framework.pdf
  15. Berg S.H., O’Hara J.K., Shortt M.T., Thune H., Brønnick K.K., Lungu D.A., et al. Health authorities’ health risk communication with the public during pandemics: a rapid scoping review. BMC Public Health. 2021; 21(1): 1401. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11468-3
  16. Toolkit Communicating on air quality and health Inspiring practices, challenges and tips. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/futurium/en/system/files/ged/181008_final_toolkit_on_communicating_on_air_quality_and_health_heal.pdf
  17. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Air Quality Design Values. Available at: https://epa.gov/air-trends/air-quality-design-values
  18. Экологическая ситуация города Москвы. Доступно: https://mosecom.mos.ru/
  19. Экологический портал Санкт-Петербурга. Доступно: https://public.mon.ecopass.adc.spb.ru/air/concentrate
  20. ФГИС «Экомониторинг». Доступно: https://ecomonitoring.mnr.gov.ru/public/lists/main
  21. Экологическая повестка: за десять месяцев до выборов в Госдуму. Аналитический обзор; 2020. Доступно: https://wciom.ru/analytical-reviews/analiticheskii-obzor/ehkologicheskaja-povestka-za-desjat-mesjacev-do-vyborov-v-gosdumu
  22. Россияне о состоянии окружающей среды. По результатам социологических исследований; 2013. Доступно: https://wciom.ru/fileadmin/file/reports_conferences/2013/2013-06-17-ekologiya.pdf
  23. % россиян хотят получать больше информации на тему экологии; 2024. Доступно: https://nafi.ru/en/analytics/65-rossiyan-khotyat-poluchat-bolshe-informatsii-na-temu-ekologii/
  24. Как изменился российский интернет за 30 лет, рассказали его отцы-основатели в рамках 30-летия Рунета; 2024. Доступно: https://raec.ru/live/branch/14416/
  25. Аудитория интернета в 2022 г. Доступно: https://vk.cc/cQBJYr
  26. Экология: общая ситуация и острые проблемы; 2021. Доступно: https://fom.ru/Obraz-zhizni/14659
  27. Tompkins L.K., Pennington A.F., Sircar K.D., Mirabelli M.C. Communication channels for receiving air quality alerts among adults in the United States. Prev. Med. Rep. 2021; 25: 101677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101677
  28. Smallbone K. Individuals’ interpretation of air quality information: customer insight and awareness study. Available at: http://uk-air.defra.gov.uk/assets/documents/reports/cat14/1210261047_Individuals_interpretation_of_air_quality_information_customer_insight_&_awareness_study.pdf

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2025



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ:  ПИ № ФС77-50668 от 13.07.2012 г.