Development of systemic approaches to management of the regional prevalence (literature review)

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Managing the territorial prevalence in the population, especially the economically active part of it, requires an integrated approach based on the principles of primary health care (PHC) and interdepartmental cooperation. Key influencing factors include legislation, ethical standards, diagnostic methods, health monitoring, education, and coordination between government agencies, employers, and medical institutions.
The main elements on which the possibility of managing employee morbidity depends on the point of view of the impact on the health of employees (the working population of working age) are analyzed according to publicly available texts in the Russian Science Citation Index, on the PubMed portal.
The legislative framework, including International Labour Organization Conventions No. 155 and No. 161 in the field of occupational safety and health) and national standards, sets minimum standards for occupational safety, but workers’ health issues go beyond occupational diseases and require integration with PHC systems. Ethical aspects such as confidentiality and protection of workers’ rights complicate the collection of data necessary for effective management of prevalence. Modern diagnostic and monitoring methods, including biomonitoring and digital technologies, make it possible to identify risks at an early stage, but their implementation requires a balance between efficiency and respect for workers’ rights. Education that increases health literacy and risk awareness plays an important role.
Conclusion. To improve the management system, it is necessary to establish interaction between health and occupational safety information systems, ensure data protection and develop targeted prevention programs. Only coordinated efforts by all stakeholders will make it possible to create a sustainable system that promotes the preservation of the health of the able-bodied population and the socio-economic development of the regions.

About the authors

Vadim E. Andrusov

Research Institute for Healthcare Organization and Medical Management of Moscow Healthcare Department

Email: vadim_andrusov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0779-1469
researcher, Research Institute for Healthcare Organization and Medical Management of Moscow Healthcare Department, Moscow, 115088, Russian Federation

References

  1. Matlin S.A., Depoux A., Schütte S., Flahault A., Saso L. Migrants’ and refugees’ health: towards an agenda of solutions. Public Health Rev. 2018; 39(1): 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40985-018-0104-9
  2. Старшинин А.В., Андрусов В.Э. Аспекты применения современных решений в территориальном планировании организаций социальной сферы. Труд и социальные отношения. 2024; 35(4): 142–51. https://doi.org/10.20410/2073-7815-2024-35-4-142-151 https://elibrary.ru/marfcn
  3. Arynova Z., Sartova R.B., Sartova S. Regional aspects of the implementation of social policy on the example of the Рavlodar region. J. Econ. Res. Bus. Adm. 2023; 145(3): 122–36. https://doi.org/10.26577/be.2023.v145.i3.011
  4. de Leeuw E. Engagement of Sectors Other than Health in Integrated Health Governance, Policy, and Action. Annu. Rev. Public Health. 2017; 38: 329–49. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044309
  5. Gostin L.O., Monahan J.T., Kaldor J., DeBartolo M., Friedman E.A., Gottschalk K., et al. The legal determinants of health: harnessing the power of law for global health and sustainable development. Lancet. 2019; 393(10183): 1857–910. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30233-8
  6. OECD Addressing societal challenges using transdisciplinary research. Paris: OECD Science; 2020.
  7. Crawshaw P., Gray J., Haighton C., Lloyd S. Health inequalities and health-related economic inactivity: Why good work needs good health. Public Health Pract. (Oxf.). 2024; 8: 100555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100555
  8. Montano M., Oursler K.K., Marconi V.C. Healthy aging: Linking causal mechanisms with holistic outcomes. Aging Cell. 2023; 23(1): e14065. https://doi.org/10.1111/acel.14065
  9. Park J., Kim Y. From workers to the working-age population: a new paradigm for the occupational health service. Saf. Health Work. 2019; 10(3): 251–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2019.07.002
  10. Yang L., Weston C., Cude C., Kincl L. Evaluating Oregon’s occupational public health surveillance system based on the CDC updated guidelines. Am. J. Ind. Med. 2020; 63(8): 713–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.23139
  11. Rosner D., Markowitz G. A short history of occupational safety and health in the United States. Am. J. Public Health. 2020; 110(5): 622–8. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2020.305581
  12. García García A.M. Occupational health from the health administration services: the “occupational perspective” opportunities for the exercise of Public Health. Arch. Prev. Riesgos Labor. 2020; 23(3): 309–14. https://doi.org/10.12961/aprl.2020.23.03.01 (in Spanish)
  13. Linnan L.A., Leff M.S., Martini M.C., Walton A.L., Baron S., Hannon P.A., et al. Workplace health promotion and safety in state and territorial health departments in the United States: a national mixed-methods study of activity, capacity, and growth opportunities. BMC Public Health. 2019; 19(1): 291. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6575-x
  14. Mendis S., Graham I., Hammerich A., Mikkelsen B., Kavousi M., Pathirana R., et al. Promoting global cardiovascular health to advance the sustainable development agenda. JACC Adv. 2024; 3(12): 101388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101388
  15. Amirabdolahian S., Pare G., Tams S. Digital wellness programs in the workplace: meta-review. J. Med. Internet Res. 2025; 27: e70982. https://doi.org/10.2196/70982
  16. Belgasm H., Alzubi A., Iyiola K., Khadem A. Interpersonal conflict and employee behavior in the public sector: investigating the role of workplace ostracism and supervisors’ active empathic listening. Behav. Sci. (Basel). 2025; 15(2): 194. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15020194
  17. Jeganathan B. AI-powered ergonomics: enhancing workplace safety through posture detection. IJRSI. 2025; (Mar 5): 410–29. https://doi.org/10.51244/IJRSI.2025.12020037
  18. Wahlström V., Öhrn M., Harder M., Eskilsson T., Fjellman-Wiklund A., Pettersson-Strömbäck A. Physical work environment in an activity-based flex office: a longitudinal case study. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health. 2024; 97(6): 661–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-024-02073-z
  19. Wütschert M.S., Romano-Pereira D., Suter L., Schulze H., Elfering A. A systematic review of working conditions and occupational health in home office. Work. 2022; 72(3): 839–52. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-205239
  20. Guest D.E. Human resource management and employee well-being: towards a new analytic framework. Hum. Resour. Manag. J. 2017; 27(1): 22–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12139
  21. Grimm L.A., Bauer G.F., Jenny G.J. Is the health-awareness of leaders related to the working conditions, engagement, and exhaustion in their teams? A multi-level mediation study. BMC Public Health. 2021; 21(1): 1935. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11985-1
  22. Carey F.R., Hu E.Y., Stamas N., Seelig A., Liu L., Schneiderman A., et al. Comparison of health measures between survey self-reports and electronic health records among Millennium Cohort Study participants receiving Veterans Health Administration care. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2025; 25(1): 81. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-025-02529-x
  23. Худяков Ю.Г., Николайкин Н.И., Андрусов В.Э. Управление опасностями производственной среды. М.: Проспект; 2017. https://elibrary.ru/ysgwef
  24. Андрусов В.Э., Худяков Ю.Г. Законодательные и медицинские аспекты снижения опасностей факторов производственной среды авиапредприятий. Научный вестник Московского государственного технического университета гражданской авиации. 2017; 20(3): 90–9. https://elibrary.ru/ytxtvd
  25. Vamos S., Okan O., Sentell T., Rootman I. Making a case for «Education for Health Literacy»: An international perspective. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2020; 17(4): 1436. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041436
  26. Андрусов В.Э., Николайкин Н.И., Худяков Ю.Г. Заболеваемости с временной утратой трудоспособности как инструмент оценки безопасности рабочих мест. XXI век: итоги прошлого и проблемы настоящего плюс. 2018; 7(1): 50–6. https://elibrary.ru/ytxpfr
  27. Власенко А.В., Филин А.С., Андрусов В.Э. К вопросу о возможности оценки состояния здоровья и анализа заболеваемости медицинских работников. В кн.: Современная медицина: новые подходы и актуальные исследования. Сборник статей по материалам XII–XIII международной научно-практической конференции. Том 6–7 (11). М.: Интернаука; 2018: 34–7.
  28. Grote G., Guest D. The case for reinvigorating quality of working life research. SAGE Publications Ltd. Hum. Relat. 2017; 70(2): 149–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726716654746
  29. Molnár C., Csehné P.I. Review of human resource management practices supporting the development of employee wellbeing. Új Munkaügyi Szemle. 2023; 4(3): 14–29. https://doi.org/10.58269/umsz.2023.3.2
  30. Boon C., Eckardt R., Lepak D.P., Boselie P. Integrating strategic human capital and strategic human resource management. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Stud. 2018; 29(1): 34–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1380063
  31. Guest D.E. Strengthening links between HRM theories, HR practices and outcomes: A proposal to advance research on HRM and outcomes. Hum. Resour. Manag. J. 2025; 35(1): 319–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12569
  32. Han J., Sun J.M., Wang H.L. Do high performance work systems generate negative effects? How and when? Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 2020; 30(2): 100699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100699
  33. Ho H., Kuvaas B. Human resource management systems, employee well-being, and firm performance from the mutual gains and critical perspectives: The well-being paradox. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2020; 59(3): 235–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21990
  34. Peccei R., Van De Voorde K. Human resource management–well-being–performance research revisited: Past, present, and future. Hum. Resour. Manag. J. 2019; 29(4): 539–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12254

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2025


СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ:  ПИ № ФС77-50668 от 13.07.2012 г.