On the efficacy of parenteral chondroitin sulfate in patients with osteoarthritis in the presence of grade 1 functional joint failure

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

It is necessary to reconsider the use of drugs affecting the pathobiochemical pathways in the development of cartilaginous tissue structural changes in functional joint failure (FJF) in the presence of osteoarthritis (OA). Objective. To evaluate the efficacy of the parenteral formulation of the pharmaceutically active substance chondroitin sulfate (CS; Chondroguard®, CS-Bioactive© Bioiberica S.A.U., Spain, manufactured by the ZAO «FarmFirma “Sotex», Russia) in patients with Stage II knee OA (KOA) and grade 1 FJF. Subjects and methods. A 50-day open-label, prospective, controlled, randomized trial was conducted according to inclusion/exclusion criteria. The trial enrolled 82 patients with Stage II KOA, grade 1 FJF, who were divided into two groups: 1) 42 patients received CS (Chondroguard®, 100 mg/ml) intramuscularly every other day; the first three 1-ml injections; and if well tolerated, the fourth and next 2-ml injections (a 50-day treatment cycle included 25 injections); 2) 40 patients took celecoxib at a dose of 200 mg/day, which can be reduced to 100 mg/day and discontinued. On days 0 and 50, the investigators assessed pain intensity using a visual analogue scale (VAS), Lequesne’s functional indices, WOMAC, and joint ultrasound data and the safety of therapy using the WHO and Naranjo scales. The data were statistically processed applying the Statistica 10.0 software (StatSoft, Inc., USA). Results. Chondroguard® therapy was well tolerated by patients and was accompanied by a significant improvement in pain intensity scores according to VAS (U test=7.79; p<0.0001), a decrease in the severity of OA according to Lequesne’s indices (U test=7.79; p=< 0.0001), and WOMAC (U test=7.12; p=<0.0001). There was a decline in the number of combined signs of synovitis and tendonitis in Group 1 (Chondroguard®) as compared with that in Group 2 (celecoxib). A marked improvement in the Lequesne subscales («Pain and discomfort», «Walking distance», «Daily activity») and WOMAC was also recorded in patients receiving Chondroguard®. Conclusion. The use of Chondroguard® is effective and safe in patients with Stage II KOA and grade 1 FJF, who require outpatient care.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

I. Sarvilina

OOO «Novomeditsina» (New Medicine) Medical Center

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: isarvilina@mail.ru

MD

俄罗斯联邦, Rostov-on-Don

参考

  1. Насонова В.А., Фоломеева О.М. Медико-социальное значение XIII класса болезней для населения России. Научно-практическая ревматология. 2001; 1: 7-11
  2. Lawrence R.C., Felson D.T., Helmick C.G. et al. National Arthritis Data Workgroup. Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the United States. Part I.I. Arthritis Rheum. 2008; 58 (1): 26-35. DOI: 10.1002/ art.23176
  3. Murphy L., Schwartz T.A., Helmick C.G. et al. Lifetime risk of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008; 59 (9): 1207-13. DOI: 10.1002/ art.24021
  4. Российские клинические рекомендации. Ревматология. Под ред. Е.Л. Насонова. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2020; 448 с.
  5. Балабанова Р.М., Эрдес Ш.Ф. Динамика распространенности ревматических заболеваний, входящих в XIII класс МКБ-10, в популяции взрослого населения России за 2000-2010 гг. Научно-практическая ревматология. 2012; 50 (3): 10-2 doi: 10.14412/1995-4484-2012-702
  6. Litwic A., Edwards M.H., Dennison E.M. et al. Epidemiology and burden of osteoarthritis. Br Med Bull. 2013; 105 (1): 185-99. doi: 10.1093/bmb/lds038
  7. Leyland K.M., Gates L.S., Sanchez Santos M.T. et al. The PCCOA Steering Committee. Knee osteoarthritis and time to all cause mortality in six community based cohorts: an international meta analysis of individual participant level data. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2021; 33: 529-45. doi: 10.1007/s40520-020-01762-2
  8. Pal C.P., Singh P., Chaturvedi S. et al. Epidemiology of knee osteoarthritis in India and related factors. Indian J. Orthop. 2016; 50 (5): 518-22. doi: 10.4103/00195413.189608
  9. Эрдес Ш.Ф., Фоломеева О.М. Инвалидность взрослого населения России, обусловленная ревматическими заболеваниями. РМЖ. 2007; 15 (26): 1946-50
  10. Cross M., Smith E., Hoy D. et al. The global burden of hip and knee osteoarthritis: Estimates from the global burden of disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014; 73 (7): 1323-30. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204763
  11. Samuels J., Krasnokutsky S., Abramson S.B. Osteoarthritis: a tale of three tissues. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2008; 66: 244-50.
  12. Samuel A., Kanimozhi D. Outcome measures used in patient with knee osteoarthritis: With special importance on functional outcome measures. Int J. Health Sci. 2019; 13 (1): 52-60.
  13. Клиническая фармакология. Национальное руководство. Под ред. Белоусова Ю.Б., Лепахина В.К., Кукеса В.Г., Петрова В.И. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2009
  14. Алексеева Л.И. Препараты замедленного действия в лечении ОА. РМЖ. 2012; 7: 389-93
  15. Reginster J.-Y., Veronese N. Highly purified chondroitin sulfate: a literature review on clinical efficacy and pharmacoeconomic aspects in osteoarthritis treatment. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2021; 33 (1): 37-47. doi: 10.1007/s40520-020-01643-8
  16. Волошин В.П., Еремин А.В., Санкаранараянан С.А. и др. Исследование эффективности действия препарата Хондрогард (хондроитина сульфат) у пациентов с остеоартрозом. Трудный пациент. 2015; 13 (3): 2932
  17. Лила А.М., Громова О.А., Торшин И.Ю. и др. Молекулярные эффекты Хондрогарда при остеоартрите и грыжах межпозвоночного диска. Неврология, нейропсихиатрия, психосоматика. 2017; 9 (3): 88-97 doi: 10.14412/2074-27112017-3-88-97
  18. Гонартроз. Клинические рекомендации [Gonartroz. Klinicheskie rekomendatsii (in Russ.)]. URL: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/recomend/667_1
  19. Коксартроз. Клинические рекомендации [Koksartroz. Klinicheskie rekomendatsii (in Russ.)]. URL: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/recomend/666_1
  20. Singh J.A., Noorbaloochi S., MacDonald R. et al. Chondroitin for osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; 1: CD005614. doi: 10.1002/14651 858.cd005 614.pub2
  21. Торшин И.Ю., Лила А.М., Наумов А.В. и др. Метаанализ клинических исследований эффективности лечения остеоартрита препаратом Хондрогард. ФАРМАКОЭКОНОМИКА. Современная Фармакоэкономика и Фармакоэпидемиология. 2020; 13 (4): 399-410 doi: 10.17749/2070-4909/farmakoekonomika.2020.066
  22. Лила А.М., Ткачева О.Н., Наумов А.В. и др. Место и роль парентеральной формы хондроитина сульфата в терапии остеоартрита: мультидисци-плинарный Консенсус. РМЖ. 2021; 6: 68-74
  23. Kellgren J.H., Lawrence J.S. Radiographic assessment of osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1957; 16 (4): 494-502. doi: 10.1136/ard.16.4.494
  24. Смирнов А.В. Атлас рентгенологической диагностики первичного остеоартроза. М.: ИМА-ПРЕСС, 2010
  25. Zhang W., Doherty M., Peat G. et al. EULAR evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010; 69 (3): 483-9. doi: 10.1136/ard.2009.113100

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Time course of changes in the indicators of the Lequesne subscale «Pain and discomfort». Note. Here and in Figs 2, 3: the data are presented as the mean value (M); *p<0.05, **p>0.05 is the significance of differences in the mean values of the indicators according to the Mann–Whitney U-test upon inclusion in the investigation and at 50 days after start of treatment in Groups 1 and 2; the significance of differences between Groups 1 and 2 at 50 days after start of treatment; the significance of differences in the mean values of the indicators according to the Mann–Whitney U test is indicated in the following order: first in order is the significance of differences in the mean values of indicators according to the Mann–Whitney U test upon inclusion in the investigation and at 50 days after start of treatment between Groups 1 and 2 upon inclusion in the investigation upon inclusion in the investigation; second in order is the significance of differences in the mean values of indicators according to the Mann–Whitney U test between Groups 1 and 2 at 50 days after start of treatment.

下载 (123KB)
3. Fig. 2. Time course of changes in the indicators of the Lequesne subscale «Walking distance»

下载 (58KB)
4. Fig. 3. Time course of changes in the indicators of the Lequesne subscale «Daily activity»

下载 (115KB)

版权所有 © Russkiy Vrach Publishing House, 2022
##common.cookie##