<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="other" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Obstetrics and Gynecology</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Obstetrics and Gynecology</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Акушерство и гинекология</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">0300-9092</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2412-5679</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Bionika Media</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">246388</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Статьи</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject></subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">OPYT PRIMENENIYa «MYaGKIKh» SKhEM STIMULYaTsII SUPEROVULYaTsII U PATsIENTOK GRUPPY RISKA RAZVITIYa SINDROMA GIPERSTIMULYaTsIIYaIChNIKOV</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>ОПЫТ ПРИМЕНЕНИЯ «МЯГКИХ» СХЕМ СТИМУЛЯЦИИ СУПЕРОВУЛЯЦИИ У ПАЦИЕНТОК ГРУППЫ РИСКА РАЗВИТИЯ СИНДРОМА ГИПЕРСТИМУЛЯЦИИЯИЧНИКОВ</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Kalinina</surname><given-names>E A</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Калинина</surname><given-names>Е А</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>ФГУ Научный центр акушерства, гинекологии и перинатологии им. академика В.И. Кулакова Минздравсоцразвития РФ</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Ebzeeva</surname><given-names>M V</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Эбзеева</surname><given-names>М В</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>ФГУ Научный центр акушерства, гинекологии и перинатологии им. академика В.И. Кулакова Минздравсоцразвития РФ</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Kuz'michev</surname><given-names>L N</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Кузьмичев</surname><given-names>Л Н</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>ФГУ Научный центр акушерства, гинекологии и перинатологии им. академика В.И. Кулакова Минздравсоцразвития РФ</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Kalinina</surname><given-names>Ye A</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Ebzeyeva</surname><given-names>M V</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Kuzmichev</surname><given-names>L N</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en"></institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">ФГУ Научный центр акушерства, гинекологии и перинатологии им. академика В.И. Кулакова Минздравсоцразвития РФ</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff id="aff2"><institution></institution></aff><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2010-12-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>12</month><year>2010</year></pub-date><issue>6</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">NO6 (2010)</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">№6 (2010)</issue-title><fpage>60</fpage><lpage>64</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2023-02-17"><day>17</day><month>02</month><year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2010, Bionika Media</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2010, ООО «Бионика Медиа»</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2010</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Bionika Media</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">ООО «Бионика Медиа»</copyright-holder></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.eco-vector.com/0300-9092/article/view/246388">https://journals.eco-vector.com/0300-9092/article/view/246388</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The paper presents the results of a study to enhance the efficiency and safety of in vitro fertilization (IVF) programs in patients at high risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), by applying the modified protocols. In 50 study group patients, the ovaries were stimulated by the mild regimen using low-dose (75-150 IU) recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) from day 5 of their menstrual cycle; in a control group comprising 25 patients, the IVF program was implemented by a short protocol from day 2-3 of their menstrual cycle, by administering the standard doses of rFSH (150-225 IU). The daily and course doses of the inductor, the number of growing and dominant follicles, obtained oocytes and embryos, their quality, and the incidence rates of OHSS were estimated.
The number of growing follicles was 9.2±1.8 and 12.2±2.4 in the study and control groups, respectively; the daily dose of the inductor was 125.5±45.7 and 175±25.8 IU; its course dose was 950±157.4 and 1405±178.2 IU; the obtained oocytes averaged 7.5±1.2 and 12.1±1.3; the fertilization rate was 65.1 and 78.5%; pregnancy occurred in 22.8 and 28.3% of cases, respectively; embryo transfer had to be cancelled due to a risk for OHSS in 8 and 12% of the patients, respectively.
It is expedient to use mild superovulation regimens in OHSS-risk group patients.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Представлены результаты исследования, посвященного повышению эффективности и безопасности программ ЭКО у пациенток с высоким риском развития синдрома гиперстимуляции яичников (СГЯ) путем использования модифицированных протоколов. 50 пациенткам основной группы стимуляцию яичников проводили по мягкой схеме с применением низких доз (75-150 МЕ) рекомбинантного фол- ликулостимулирующего гормона (ФСГ) начиная с 5-го дня менструального цикла; в группе сравнения, включавшей 25 пациенток, программа ЭКО была проведена по короткому протоколу со 2-3-го дня менструального цикла с применением стандартных доз рекомбинантного ФСГ (150-225 МЕ). Оценивали ежедневную и курсовую дозы индуктора, количество растущих и доминантных фолликулов, число полученных ооцитов и эмбрионов, их качество, частоту развития СГЯ. Число растущих фолликулов составило 9,2±1,8 и 12,2±2,4 в основной и контрольной группах соответственно; ежедневная доза индуктора - 125,5±45,7 и 175±25,8 МЕ; курсовая доза - 950±157,4 и 1405 ±178,2 МЕ; среднее число полученных ооцитов - 7,5±1,2 и 12,1±1,3; частота оплодотворения - 65,1 и 78,5%; беременность наступила в 22,8 и 28,3% случаев соответственно; отмена переноса в связи с риском СГЯ потребовалась у 8 и 12% пациенток соответственно. Применение «мягких» протоколов стимуляции суперовуляции представляется целесообразным у пациенток группы риска развития СГЯ.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>infertility</kwd><kwd>mild stimulation regimens</kwd><kwd>ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome</kwd><kwd>ovarian reserve</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>бесплодие</kwd><kwd>«мягкие» схемы стимуляции</kwd><kwd>синдром гиперстимуляции яичников</kwd><kwd>овари- альный резерв</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Барыкина А.Б. ЭКО в естественных циклах и модифицированные протоколы // Пробл. репрод. - 2005. - № 5. - С. 44-49.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Назаренко Т.А. Стимуляция функции яичников. - М., 2008. - С. 139-142</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Aboulghar M.A., Mansour R.T. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: classifications and critical analysis of preventive measures // Hum. Reprod. Update. - 2003. - Vol. 9. - P. 275- 289.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Baart E.B., Martini E., Eijkemans M.J. et al. Milder ovarian stimulation for in-vitro fertilization reduces aneuploidy in the human preimplantation embryo: a randomized controlled trial // Hum. Reprod. - 2007. - Vol. 22. - P. 980-988.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Beckers N.G., Macklon N.S., Eijkemans M.J. et al. Women with regular menstrual cycles and a poor response to ovarian hyperstimulation exhibit follicular phase characteristics suggestive of ovarian aging // Fertil. And Steril. - 2002. - Vol.78. - Р. 291-297.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Beckers N.G., Platteau P., Eijkemans M.J. et al. The early luteal phase administration of oestrogen and progesterone does not induce premature luteolysis in normo-ovulatory women // Eur. J. Endocrinol. - 2006.	- Vol. 155. - Р. 355-363.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Broekmans F.J., Knauff E.A., Te Velde E.R. et al. Female reproductive ageing: current knowledge and future trends // Trends Endocrinol. Metabol. - 2007.	- Vol. 18. - Р. 58-65.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Delvigne A., Rosenberg S. Epidemiology and prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS): a review // Hum. Reprod. Update. - 2002. - Vol. 8. - Р. 559-577.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Devroey P., Bourgain C., Macklon N.S. Reproductive biology and IVF: ovarian stimulation and endometrial receptivity // Trends Endocrinol. Metab. - 2004. - Vol. 15. - Р. 84-90.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Fauser B.C., Devroey P. Reproductive biology and IVF: ovarian stimulation and luteal phase consequences // Trends Endocrinol. Metab. -2003. - Vol.14. - Р. 236-242.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Fauser B.C., Devroey P., Macklon N.S. Multiple birth resulting from ovarian stimulation for subfertility treatment // Lancet. - 2005. - Vol. 365. - Р. 1807-1816.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Gerris M. Single embryo transfer and IVF/ICSI outcome: a balanced appraisal // Hum. Reprod. Update. - 2005. - Vol. 11. - Р. 105-121.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Hohmann F.P., Macklon N.S., Fauser B.C. A randomized comparison of two ovarian stimulation protocols with gonadotropin-releaseng hormone (GnRH) antagonist cotreatment for in-vitro fertilization commensing recombinant follicle- stimulating hormone on cycle day 2 or 5 with standard long GnRH agonist protocol // J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. - 2003. - Vol. 88. - Р. 166-173.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Heijnen E.M., Eijkemans M.J., De Klerk C. et al. A mild treatment strategy for in-vitro fertilisation: a randomised non-inferiority trial // Lancet. - 2007. - Vol. 369. - Р. 743-749.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>KlinkertE.R., BroekmansF.J.M., Looman C.W.N. et al. A poor response in the first in vitro fertilization cycle is not necessarily related to a poor prognosis in subsequent cycles // Fertil. and Steril. - 2004. - Vol. 80. - Р. 1247-1253.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Macklon N.S., Stouffer R.L., Giudice L.C. et al. The science behind 25 years of ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization // Endocrol. Rev. - 2006. - Vol. 27. - Р. 170-207.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Nargund G., Frydman R. Towards a more physiological approach to IVF // Reprod. Biomed. Online. - 2007. - Vol. 14. - Р. 550-552.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Olivennes F., Frydman R., Garel M. Women's views on friendly IVF: a qualitative preliminary study // J. Psychosom. Obstet. Gynaecol. - 2009. - Vol. 30. - Р. 101-104.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Pelinck M.J., Vogel N.E.A., HoekA. et al. Cumulative pregnancy rates after three cycles of minimal stimulation IVF and results according to subfertility diagnostic: a multicentre cohort study // Hum. Reprod. - 2006. - Vol. 21. - Р. 2375-2383.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Pennings G., Ombelet W. Coming soon to your clinic: patient-friendly ART, New Debate // Hum. Reprod. - 2007. - Vol. 22. - Р. 2075-2079.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Tarlatzis B.C., Zepiridis L., Grimbizis G. et al. Clinical management of low ovarian response to stimulation for IVF: a systematic review // Hum. Reprod. Update. - 2003. - Vol. 9. - Р. 61-76.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Ubaldi F., Rienzi L., Baroni E. et al. Hopes and facts about mild ovarian stimulation // Reprod. Biomed. Online. - 2007. - Vol.14. - Р. 675- 681.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Valbuena D., Martin J. ,de Pablo J.L. et al. Increasing levels of estradiol are deleterious to embryonic implantation because they directly affect the embryo // Fertil. Sandteril. - 2001. - Vol. 76. - Р.962-968.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Verberg M.F.G., Eijkemans M.J.C., Macklon N.S. et al. The clinical significance of the retrieval of a low number of oocytes following mild ovarian stimulation for IVF: a meta-analysis // Hum. Reprod. Update. - 2009. - Vol. 15. - Р. 5-12.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
