<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="other" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Obstetrics and Gynecology</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Obstetrics and Gynecology</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Акушерство и гинекология</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">0300-9092</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2412-5679</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Bionika Media</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">329740</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Статьи</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Unknown</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Rhesus sensitization. Hemolytic disease of the fetus. Clinical recommendations (protocol)</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>РЕЗУС-СЕНСИБИЛИЗАЦИЯ. ГЕМОЛИТИЧЕСКАЯ БОЛЕЗНЬ ПЛОДА. Клинические рекомендации (протокол)</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>-</surname><given-names>-</given-names></name></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2017-12-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>12</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><issue>6</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">NO6 (2017)</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">№6 (2017)</issue-title><fpage>187</fpage><lpage>196</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2023-04-14"><day>14</day><month>04</month><year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2017, Bionika Media</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2017, ООО «Бионика Медиа»</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2017</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Bionika Media</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">ООО «Бионика Медиа»</copyright-holder></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.eco-vector.com/0300-9092/article/view/329740">https://journals.eco-vector.com/0300-9092/article/view/329740</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p/></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p/></trans-abstract></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Савельева Г.М., Курцер М.А., Панина О.Б., Сичинава Л.Г., Коноплянников А.Г. Гемолитическая болезнь плода у беременных с резус-сенсибилизацией. Диагностика, лечение, профилактика. Методическое письмо Минздравсоцразвития России №15-4//10/2-12699 от 16 декабря 2011 г. М.; 2012. 18с.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Коноплянников А.Г., Павлова Н.Г. Изосерологическая несовместимость крови матери и плода. Г емолитическая болезнь плода и новорожденных. В кн.: Савельева Г.М., Сухих Г.Т., Серов В.Н., Радзинский В.Е., ред. Акушерство. Национальное руководство. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа; 2015: 324-34.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Кулаков В.И. Новые технологии и научные приоритеты в акушерстве и гинекологии. Акушерство и гинекология. 2002; 5: 3-5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Михайлов А.В., Константинова Н.Н., Пигина Т.В. Внутриматочные переливания плоду как способ лечения отечной формы гемолитической болезни. Акушерство и гинекология. 1990; 7: 41-5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Ультразвуковая диагностика иммунного и неиммунного отека плода. В кн.: Митьков В.В., Медведев М.В., ред. Клиническое руководство по ультразвуковой диагностике. М.: Видар; 1996; т.2: 164-80.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Внутриматочные вмешательства под ультразвуковым контролем во время беременности. В кн.: Митьков В.В., Медведев М.В., ред. Клиническое руководство по ультразвуковой диагностике. М.: Видар; 1996; т.2: 280-302.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Савельева Г.М., Коноплянников А.Г., Курцер М.А. Резус-изоиммунизация. Старые проблемы. Новые решения. Вопросы гинекологии, акушерства и перинатологии. 2005; 4(3): 89-93.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Сидельникова В.М. Антенатальная диагностика, лечение гемолитической болезни плода при резус-изоиммунизации и меры ее профилактики. Акушерство и гинекология. 2005; 5: 56-60.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Суханова Л.П. Динамика перинатальной смертности в акушерских стационарах России в 1991-2002 гг. Акушерство и гинекология. 2005; 4: 46-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Фролова О.Г., Токова 3.3. Основные показатели деятельности акушерско-гинекологической службы и репродуктивного здоровья. Акушерство и гинекология. 2005; 1: З-6.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Delaney M., Matthews D.S. Hemolytic disease of fetus and newborn: managing the mother, fetus and newborn. Hematology Am. Soc. Hematol. Educ. Programme. 2015; 2015(1):146-51.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Harkness U.F., Spinnato J.A. Prevention and management of RhD isoimmunization. Clin. Perinatol. 2004; 31(4): 721-42.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Crowther C., Middleton P., McBain R. Anti-D administration in pregnancy for preventing Rhesus alloimmunization. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2013; (2): CD000020.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Chilcott J., Tappenden P., Lloyd Jones M. et al. The economics of routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis for pregnant women who are rhesus negative. BJOG. 2004; 111(9): 903-7.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Ravinet J., Carbonne B. Economic analysis of the prevention of anti-D immunization. J. Gynecol. Obstet. Biol. Reprod. (Paris). 2006; 35(Suppl. 1): 1S104-11.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Qureshi H., Massey E., Kirwan D., Davies T., Robson S., White J. et al. BCSH guideline for the use of anti-D immunoglobulin for the prevention of haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. Transfus. Med. 2014; 24(1): 8-20.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Bennardello F., Coluzzi S., Curciarello G., Todros T., Villa S. Recommendations for the prevention and treatment of haemolytic disease of the foetus and newborn. Blood Transfus. 2015; 13(1): 109-34.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Bennardello F., Curciarello G. Survey of the prevention and incidence of haemolytic disease of the newborn in Italy. Blood Transfus. 2013; 11(4): 518-27.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Fung K., Eason E., Crane J., Armson A., De La Ronde S., Farine D. et al. Prevention of Rh alloimmunization. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can. 2003; 25(9): 765-73.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Fyfe I., Ritchy M., Taruc C., Crompton D., Galliford B., Perrin R. Appropriate provision of anti-D prophylaxis to RhD negative pregnant women: a scoping review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014; 14: 411.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Griffey R., Chen B., Krehbiel N. Performance in appropriate Rh testing and treatment with Rh immunoglobulin in emergency department. Ann. Emerg. Med. 2012; 59(4): 285-93.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Moise K.J., Argoti P.S. Management and prevention of red cell alloimmunization in pregnancy. A systematic review. Obstet. Gynecol. 2012; 120(5): 1132-9.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Karanth L., Jaafar S.H., Kanagasabai S., Nair N.S., Barua A. Anti-D administration after spontaneous miscarriage for preventing Rhesus alloimmunization. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2013; (3): CD009617.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Pressman E.K. Ultrasound for evaluation of fetal anemia. Ultrasound Clin. 2013; 8(1):79-87.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Garabedian C., Vaast P., Behal H., Coulon C., Duahamel A., Thomas D. et al. Management of severe fetal anemia by Doppler measurement of middle cerebral artery: are there other benefits than reducing invasive procedures? Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2015; 192: 27-30.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>Babović I., Pleśinac S., Radojićić Z., Antonović O., Sparić R., Plećaś D., Radunović N. Middle cerebral artery Doppler in prediction degree of fetal anemia and the best timing for the second intrauterine intravascular transfusion in red cell alloimmune disease. Clin. Exp. Obstet. Gynecol. 2015; 42(6): 792-6.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>López-Carpintero N., Rodríguez-González R., González-González A., Díez-Sanchez J. Role of middle cerebral artery Doppler in the management of Rhesus alloimmunization cases. Ginecol. Obstet. Mex. 2010; 78(8): 410-7.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation>Scheier M., Hernandez-Andrade E., Carmo A., Dezerega V., Nicolaides K.H. Prediction of fetal anemia in rhesus disease by measurement of fetal middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2004; 23(5): 432-6.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation>Kent J., Farrell A.-M., Soothill P. Routine administration of Anti-D: the ethical case for offering pregnant women fetal RHD genotyping and a review of policy and practice. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014; 14: 87.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><mixed-citation>Clausen F.B., Christiansen M., Steffensen R., Jorgensen S., Nielsen C., Jakobsen M.A. et al. Report of the first nationally implemented clinical routine screening for fetal RHD in D-pregnant women to ascertain the requirement for antenatal RhD prophylaxis. Transfusion. 2012; 52(4): 752-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><mixed-citation>Finning K., Martin P., Summers J., Massey E., Poole G., Daniels G. Effect of high throughput RH D typing of fetal DNA in maternal plasma on use of anti-Rh D immunoglobulin in Rh D negative pregnant women. BMJ. 2008; 336(7648):816-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><mixed-citation>Lindenburg I.T., Smits-Wintjens V.E., van Klink J.M., Verduin E., van Kamp I.L., Walther F.J. et al. Long-term neurodevelopmental outcome after intrauterine transfusion for hemolytic disease of the fetus/newborn: the LOTUS study. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2012; 206(2): 141-9.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><label>33.</label><mixed-citation>Deka D., Dadhwal V., Sharma A.K., Shende U., Agarwal S., Agarwal R., Vanamail P. Perinatal survival and procedure-related complications after intrauterine transfusion for red cell alloimmunization. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2016; 293(5): 967-73.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><label>34.</label><mixed-citation>Lindenburg I.T., van Kamp I.L., Oepkes D. Intrauterine blood transfusion: current indications and associated risks. Fetal Diagn. Ther. 2014; 36(4): 263-71.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
