<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="review-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Obstetrics and Gynecology</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Obstetrics and Gynecology</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Акушерство и гинекология</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">0300-9092</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2412-5679</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Bionika Media</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">632074</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18565/aig.2023.235</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Reviews</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Обзоры</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Review Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Uterine niches following cesarean section: the problem of diagnosis and treatment</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Ниша в области рубца на матке после кесарева сечения: проблемы диагностики и лечения</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5061-1227</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Loginova</surname><given-names>Ekaterina A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Логинова</surname><given-names>Екатерина Александровна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>PhD, Researcher at the Laboratory of Gynecology, Department of Pelvic Oncology</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>к.м.н., н.с. лаборатории гинекологии отделения онкохирургии органов таза</p></bio><email>e.loginova@mknc.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Valiev</surname><given-names>Ramiz K.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Валиев</surname><given-names>Рамиз Камраддинович</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>PhD, Head of the Department of Pelvic Floor Oncology</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>к.м.н., заведующий отделом онкохирургии тазового дна</p></bio><email>r.valiev@mknc.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Ivanova</surname><given-names>Larisa B.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Иванова</surname><given-names>Лариса Борисовна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>PhD, Head of the Laboratory of Gynecology, Pelvic Oncology Department</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>к.м.н., заведующий лабораторией гинекологии отделения онкохирургии органов таза</p></bio><email>l.ivanova@mknc.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Davydova</surname><given-names>Irina Y.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Давыдова</surname><given-names>Ирина Юрьевна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Dr. Med. Sci., Leading Researcher, Department of Pelvic Floor Oncology</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>д.м.н., в.н.с. отдела онкохирургии тазового дна</p></bio><email>i.davydova@mknc.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Dymova</surname><given-names>Alisa V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Дымова</surname><given-names>Алиса Владимировна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>obstetrician-gynecologist at the Department of Oncosurgery of the Pelvic Organs</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>врач акушер-гинеколог отделения онкохирургии органов таза</p></bio><email>a.dymova@mknc.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">A.S. Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Centre, Moscow Department of Health</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">ГБУЗ «Московский клинический научно-практический центр имени А.С. Логинова Департамента здравоохранения города Москвы»</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2024-04-17" publication-format="electronic"><day>17</day><month>04</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><issue>4</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en"/><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>24</fpage><lpage>32</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2024-05-16"><day>16</day><month>05</month><year>2024</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2024-05-16"><day>16</day><month>05</month><year>2024</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2024, Bionika Media</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2024, ООО «Бионика Медиа»</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2024</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Bionika Media</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">ООО «Бионика Медиа»</copyright-holder></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.eco-vector.com/0300-9092/article/view/632074">https://journals.eco-vector.com/0300-9092/article/view/632074</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Currently, there is an increase in the frequency of cesarean sections, and the number of young fertile women with a scar on the uterus rises as well. The presence of any scar on the uterus is always a risk for reproductive complications. If there is a severe myometrial defect, it can lead to thinning of the myometrium of less than 3 mm and formation of a defect on the part of the uterine cavity (niche). This article discusses the issues of terminology, the causes of formation and the clinical consequences of the defects in the scar area. Uterine rupture along the scar during pregnancy and childbirth is a life-threatening complication that can occur in the absence of timely diagnosis and treatment of this pathology in women planning a pregnancy. Modern algorithms for diagnosis and choice of treatment tactics depending on the clinical and instrumental results of the examination are presented in the article. Ultrasound examination, sonography, MRI, hysteroscopy are the main methods for diagnosing pathology in the area of the uterine scar after cesarean section. Depending on the clinical symptoms, the patient’s reproductive plans and the location of the defect, both dynamic observation and surgical correction of the uterine scar are possible. Hysteroscopic niche resection and metroplasty are the main methods of surgical treatment of patients with uterine scar defects.</p> <p><bold>Conclusion:</bold> The comprehensive examination of women with a uterine scar after cesarean section, the combination of at least two examination methods (ultrasound and MRI) can significantly increase the accuracy and quality of diagnosing the condition of the postoperative uterine scar. The choice of treatment for defects in the area of the uterine scar after cesarean section depends on the severity of clinical symptoms, the woman’s reproductive plans, the characteristics and localization of the myometrial defect in the area of the scar. Reconstructive surgery on the uterus (metroplasty) makes it possible not only to improve the quality of a woman’s life and restore fertility, but most importantly it can reduce the risks of life – threatening complications during pregnancy.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>В настоящее время возрастает частота кесаревых сечений и вместе с этим – количество молодых активных фертильных женщин с рубцом на матке. Наличие любого рубца на матке – это всегда риски репродуктивных осложнений, особенно если формируется выраженный дефект миометрия с его истончением менее 3 мм и дефектом со стороны полости матки (ниша). Разрыв матки по рубцу во время беременности и родов – жизнеугрожающее осложнение, которое может возникнуть при отсутствии своевременной диагностики и лечения данной патологии у женщин, планирующих беременность. В настоящей статье рассмотрены вопросы терминологии, причины формирования и клинические последствия наличия дефектов в области рубца; представлены современные алгоритмы диагностики и выбора тактики лечения в зависимости от клинических и инструментальных результатов обследования. Ультразвуковое исследование (УЗИ), сонография, магнитно-резонансная томография (МРТ), гистероскопия – основные методы диагностики патологии в области рубца на матке после кесарева сечения. В зависимости от клинических симптомов, репродуктивных планов пациентки и расположения дефекта возможны как динамическое наблюдение, так и хирургическая коррекция рубца на матке. Гистероскопическая резекция ниши и метропластика – это основные методы хирургического лечения пациенток с дефектом рубца на матке.</p> <p><bold>Заключение: </bold>Комплексное обследование женщин с рубцом на матке после кесарева сечения, сочетание как минимум двух методов обследования (УЗИ и МРТ), позволяет значительно увеличить точность и качество диагностики состояния послеоперационного рубца на матке. Реконструктивная операция на матке (метропластика) позволяет не только улучшить качество жизни женщины и восстановить фертильность, но и, самое главное, – снизить риски жизнеугрожающих осложнений во время беременности.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>myometrial defect</kwd><kwd>niche</kwd><kwd>cesarean section</kwd><kwd>metroplasty</kwd><kwd>laparoscopy</kwd><kwd>robot-assisted surgery</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>дефект миометрия</kwd><kwd>ниша</kwd><kwd>кесарево сечение</kwd><kwd>метропластика</kwd><kwd>лапароскопия</kwd><kwd>робот-ассистированная хирургия</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Павлова Т.Ю., Филиппова Р.Д., Крамарский В.А., Аргунов В.А. Комплексная оценка характера репаративных процессов в области разреза матки после кесарева сечения. Якутский медицинский журнал. 2008; (4): 37-40. [Pavlova T.Yu., Filippova R.D., Kramarskiy V.A., Argunov V.A. Complex assessment of pattern of reparative processes at the place of uterine incision after caesarean section. Yakut Medical Journal. 2008; (4): 37-40. (in Russian)].</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Щукина Н.А., Буянова С.Н., Чечнева М.А., Земскова Н.Ю., Пучкова Н.В., Барто Р.А., Баринова И.В., Благина Е.И. Причины формирования несостоятельного рубца на матке после кесарева сечения, роль дисплазии соединительной ткани Российский вестник акушера-гинеколога. 2018; 18(5): 4-11. [Shchukina N.A., Buianova S.N., Chechneva M.A., Zemskova N.Iu., Puchkova N.V., Barto R.A., Barinova I.V., Blagina E.I. Causes of a postcesarean incompetent uterine scar: a role of connective tissue dysplasia. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2018; 18(5): 4-11. (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.17116/rosakush2018180514.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Мартынов С.А., Адамян Л.В. Рубец на матке после кесарева сечения: терминологические аспекты. Гинекология. 2020; 22(5): 70-5. [Martynov S.A., Adamyan L.V. Cesarean scar defect: terminological aspects. Gynecology. 2020; 22(5): 70-5. (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.26442/ 20795696.2020.5.200415.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Poidevin L.O. The value of hysterography in the prediction of cesarean section wound defects. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1961; 81: 67-71. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9378(16)36308-6.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Chen H.Y., Chen S.J., Hsieh F.J. Observation of cesarean section scar by transvaginal ultrasonography. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 1990; 16(5): 443-7. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0301-5629(90)90166-a.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Morris H. Surgical pathology of the lower uterine segment caesarean section scar: is the scar a source of clinical symptoms? Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 1995; 14(1): 16-20. doi: 10.1097/00004347-199501000-00004.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Monteagudo A., Carreno C., Timor-Tritsch I.E. Saline infusion sonohysterography in nonpregnant women with previous cesarean delivery: the "niche" in the scar. J. Ultrasound Med. 2001; 20(10): 1105-15. https://dx.doi.org/10.7863/jum.2001.20.10.1105.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Ofili-Yebovi D., Ben-Nagi J., Sawyer E., Yazbek J., Lee C., Gonzalez J., Jurkovic D. Deficient lower-segment Cesarean section scars: prevalence and risk factors. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2008; 31(1): 72-7. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.5200.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Roberge S., Boutin A., Chaillet N., Moore L., Jastrow N., Demers S., Bujold E. Systematic review of cesarean scar assessment in the nonpregnant state: imaging techniques and uterine scar defect. Am. J. Perinatol. 2012; 29(6): 465-71. https://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1304829.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Краснопольская К.В., Попов А.А., Чечнева М.А., Федоров А.А., Ершова И.Ю. Прегравидарная метропластика по поводу несостоятельного рубца на матке после кесарева сечения: влияние на естественную фертильность и результаты ЭКО. Проблемы репродукции. 2015; 3: 56-62. [Krasnopol'skaia K.V., Popov A.A., Chechneva M.A., Fedorov A.A., Ershova I.Yu. Preconceptional methroplastic operation in patients with uterine scar incompetence after Caesarian section: the influence on natural fertility and IVF outcomes. Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2015; 21(3): 56-62. (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.17116/repro201521356-62.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Макиян З.Н., Адамян Л.В., Карабач В.В., Чупрынин В.Д. Новый метод хирургического лечения несостоятельности рубца на матке после кесарева сечения с помощью внутриматочного манипулятора с желобом. Акушерство и гинекология. 2020; 2: 104-10. [Makiyan Z.N., Adamyan L.V., Karabach V.V., Chuprynin V.D. A new method for surgical treatment of uterine scar insuffisiency after a previous cesarean section using an intrauterine manipulator with a groove. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2020; (2): 104-10 (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2020.2.104-110.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Аракелян А.С., Мартынов С.А., Хорошун Н.Д. и др. Диагностика и хирургическая коррекция несостоятельности рубца на матке после кесарева сечения с использованием лапароскопии и гистероскопии. В кн.: Сухих Г.Т., Адамян Л.В., ред. Материалы XXIX конгресса «Новые технологии в диагностике и лечении гинекологических заболеваний». Москва, 7–10 июня 2016 г. М.; 2016: 179-80. [Arakelyan A.S., Martynov S.A., Khoroshun N.D. et al. Diagnostics and surgical correction of uterine scarfailure after CS using laparoscopy and hysteroscopy. In: Sukhikh G.T., Adamyan L.V., ed. Materials of the XXIX Congress “New technologies in the diagnosis and treatment of gynecological diseases”. Moscow, June 7–10, 2016. Moscow; 2016: 179-80 (in Russian)].</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Vikhareva Osser O., Valentin L. Clinical importance of appearance of cesarean hysterotomy scar at transvaginal ultrasonography in nonpregnant women. Obstet. Gynecol. 2011; 117(3): 525-32. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e318209abf0.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Jordans I.P.M., de Leeuw R.A., Stegwee S.I., Amso N.N., Barri-Soldevila P.N., van den Bosch T. et al. Sonographic examination of uterine niche in non-pregnant women: a modified Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2019; 53(1): 107-15. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.19049.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Попов А.А., Федоров А.А., Вроцкая В.С., Мананникова Т.Н., Тюрина С.С., Коваль А.А., Чечнева М.А., Логутова Л.С. Эндоскопические методы диагностики и хирургической коррекции несостоятельного рубца на матке после кесарева сечения. Акушерство и гинекология Санкт-Петербурга. 2016; (1): 54-7. [Popov A.A., Fedorov A.A., Vrotskaya V.S., Manannikova T.N., Tyurina S.S., Koval A.A., Chechneva M.A., Logutova L.S. Endoscopic diagnosis and surgical correction of the insolvent uterine scar after cesarean section. Obstetrics and Gynecology of St. Petersburg. 2016; (1): 54-7 (in Russian)].</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Jastrow N., Chaillet N., Roberge S., Morency A.M., Lacasse Y., Bujold E. Sonographic lower uterine segment thickness and risk of uterine scar defect: a systematic review. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can. 2010; 32(4): 321-7. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34475-9.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Bij de Vaate A.J., van der Voet L.F., Naji O., Witmer M., Veersema S., Brölmann H.A. et al. Prevalence, potential risk factors for development and symptoms related tothe presence of uterine niches following Cesarean section: systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2014; 43(4): 372-82. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.13199.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Marjolein Bij de Vaate A.J., Linskens I.H., van der Voet L.F., Twisk J.W., Brölmann H.A., Huirne J.A. Reproducibility of three-dimensional ultrasound for the measurement of a niche in a caesarean scar and assessment of its shape. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2015; 188: 39-44. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.02.018.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Vitale S.G., Ludwin A., Vilos G.A., Török P., Tesarik J., Vitagliano A. et al. From hysteroscopy to laparoendoscopic surgery: what is the best surgical approach for symptomatic isthmocele? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2020; 301(1): 33-52. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s00404-020-05438-0.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Tang X., Wang J., Du Y., Xie M., Zhang H., Xu H., Hua K. Caesarean scar defect: Risk factors and comparison of evaluation efficacy between transvaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2019; 242: 1-6. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.ejogrb.2019.09.001.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Пономарева Ю.Н., Логинова Е.А., Семенцова Н.А. Робот-ассистированная коррекция несостоятельного рубца на матке после кесарева сечения. Акушерство и гинекология. 2021; 10: 143-52. [Ponomareva Yu.N., Loginova E.A., Sementsova N.A. Robot-assisted correction of incompetent uterine scar after cesarean section. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2021; (10): 143-52 (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/ aig.2021.10.143-152.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Ножницева О.Н., Семенов И.А., Беженарь В.Ф. Рубец на матке после операции кесарева сечения и оптимальный алгоритм диагностики его состояния. Лучевая диагностика и терапия. 2019; 2: 85-90. [Nozhnitseva O.N., Semenov I.A., Bezhenar V.F. The scar on the uterus after cesarean section and the optimal algorithm for diagnostics. Diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy. 2019; (2): 85-90. (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.22328/ 2079-5343-2019-10-2-85-90.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Naji O., Wynants L., Smith A., Abdallah Y., Saso S., Stalder C. et al. Does the presence of a Caesarean section scar affect implantation site and early pregnancy outcome in women attending an early pregnancy assessment unit? Hum. Reprod. 2013; 28(6): 1489-96. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/det110.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Bij de Vaate A.J., Brölmann H.A., van der Voet L.F., van der Slikke J.W., Veersema S., Huirne J.A. Ultrasound evaluation of the Cesarean scar: relation between a niche and postmenstrual spotting. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2011; 37(1): 93-9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.8864.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Erickson S.S., Van Voorhis B.J. Intermenstrual bleeding secondary to cesarean scar diverticuli: report of three cases. Obstet. Gynecol. 1999; 93(5 Pt 2): 802-5. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00314-7.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>Vissers J., Sluckin T.C., van Driel-Delprat C.C.R., Schats R., Groot C.J.M., Lambalk C.B. et al. Reduced pregnancy and live birth rates after in vitro fertilization in women with previous Caesarean section: a retrospective cohort study. Hum. Reprod. 2020; 35(3): 595-604. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dez295.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>Stewart K.S., Evans T.W. Recurrent bleeding from the lower segment scar--a late complication of Caesarean section. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1975; 82(8): 682-6. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1975.tb00706.x.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation>Vissers J., Hehenkamp W., Lambalk C.B., Huirne J.A. Post-Caesarean section niche-related impaired fertility: hypothetical mechanisms. Hum. Reprod. 2020; 35(7): 1484-94. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/ deaa094.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation>Fitzpatrick K.E., Kurinczuk J.J., Alfirevic Z., Spark P., Brocklehurst P., Knight M. Uterine rupture by intended mode of delivery in the UK: a national case-control study. PLoS Med. 2012; 9(3): e1001184. https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pmed.1001184.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><mixed-citation>Savukyne E., Bykovaite-Stankeviciene R., Machtejeviene E., Nadisauskiene R., Maciuleviciene R. Symptomatic uterine rupture: a fifteen year review. Medicina (Kaunas). 2020; 56(11): 574. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ medicina56110574.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><mixed-citation>Kayani S.I., Alfirevic Z. Uterine rupture after induction of labour in women with previous caesarean section. BJOG. 2005; 112(4): 451-5. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00336.x.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><mixed-citation>Kaplanoglu M., Bulbul M., Kaplanoglu D., Bakacak S.M. Effect of multiple repeat cesarean sections on maternal morbidity: data from southeast Turkey. Med. Sci. Monit. 2015; 21: 1447-53. https://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.893333.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><label>33.</label><mixed-citation>van der Voet L.F., Vervoort A.J., Veersema S., BijdeVaate A.J., Brölmann H.A., Huirne J.A. Minimally invasive therapy for gynaecological symptoms related to a niche in the caesarean scar: a systematic review. BJOG. 2014; 121(2): 145-56. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12537.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><label>34.</label><mixed-citation>Feng Y.L., Li M.X., Liang X.Q., Li X.M. Hysteroscopic treatment of postcesarean scar defect. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2012; 19(4): 498-502. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2012.03.010.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><label>35.</label><mixed-citation>Gubbini G., Casadio P., Marra E. Resectoscopic correction of the "isthmocele" in women with postmenstrual abnormal uterine bleeding and secondary infertility. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2008; 15(2): 172-5. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.jmig.2007.10.004.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><label>36.</label><mixed-citation>Raimondo G., Grifone G., Raimondo D., Seracchioli R., Scambia G., Masciullo V. Hysteroscopic treatment of symptomatic cesarean-induced isthmocele: a prospective study. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2015; 22(2): 297-301. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2014.09.011.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B37"><label>37.</label><mixed-citation>Vervoort A., Voet L.F., Hehenkamp W., Thurkow A.L., Kesteren P., Quartero H. et al. Hysteroscopic resection of a uterine caesarean scar defect (niche) in women with postmenstrual spotting: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2018; 125(3): 326-34. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14733.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B38"><label>38.</label><mixed-citation>Zhu Q., He X., Jiang L., Liang G., Zhu Ch., Pan H. et al. Effectiveness of hysteroscopic resection of a uterine caesarean niche can be predicted: a prospective cohort study. Sci. Rep. 2020; 10(1): 17424. https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-74622-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B39"><label>39.</label><mixed-citation>Bakavičiūtė G., Špiliauskaitė S., Meškauskienė A., Ramašauskaitė D. Laparoscopic repair of the uterine scar defect - successful treatment of secondary infertility: a case report and literature review. Acta Med. Litu. 2016; 23(4): 227-31. https://dx.doi.org/10.6001/actamedica.v23i4.3424.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B40"><label>40.</label><mixed-citation>Dosedla E., Calda P. Outcomes of laparoscopic treatment in women with cesarean scar syndrome. Med. Sci. Monit. 2017; 23: 4061-6. https://dx.doi.org/10.12659/msm.902720.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B41"><label>41.</label><mixed-citation>Zhang Y. A comparative study of transvaginal repair and laparoscopic repair in the management of patients with previous cesarean scar defect. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2016; 23(4): 535-41. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.jmig.2016.01.007.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B42"><label>42.</label><mixed-citation>Xie H., Wu Y., Yu F., He M., Cao M., Yao S. A comparison of vaginal surgery and operative hysteroscopy for the treatment of cesarean-induced isthmocele: a retrospective review. Gynecol. Obstet. Invest. 2014; 77(2): 78-83. https://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000356961.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B43"><label>43.</label><mixed-citation>Jacobson M.T., Osias J., Velasco A., Charles R., Nezhat C. Laparoscopic repair of a uteroperitoneal fistula. JSLS. 2003; 7(4): 367-9.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B44"><label>44.</label><mixed-citation>Ciebiera M., Jakiel G., Słabuszewska-Jóźwiak A. Laparoscopic correction of the uterine muscle loss in the scar after a Caesarean section delivery. Wideochir. Inne. Tech. Maloinwazyjne. 2013; 8(4): 342-5. https://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ wiitm.2013.39514.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B45"><label>45.</label><mixed-citation>Федоров А.А., Попов А.А., Чечнева М.А., Логутова Л.С., Щукина Н.А., Вроцкая В.С., Коваль А.А., Тюрина С.С., Ефремова Е.С., Беспалова А.Г. Ниша в рубце на матке после кесарева сечения. Диагностика, хирургическая тактика и исходы. Российский вестник акушера-гинеколога. 2021; 21(2): 50-5. [Fedorov A.A., Popov A.A., Chechneva M.A., Logutova L.S., Schukina N.A., Vrotskaya V.S., Koval’ A.A., Tyurina S.S., Efremova E.S., Bespalova A.G. Niche in the uterine scar after cesarean section. Diagnostics, surgical tactics and outcomes. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2021; 21(2): 50-5. (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.17116/ rosakush20212102150.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B46"><label>46.</label><mixed-citation>Vervoort A., Vissers J., Hehenkamp W., Brölmann H., Huirne J. The effect of laparoscopic resection of large niches in the uterine caesarean scar on symptoms, ultrasound findings and quality of life: a prospective cohort study. BJOG. 2018; 125(3): 317-25. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ 1471-0528.14822.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B47"><label>47.</label><mixed-citation>Курцер М.А., Егикян Н.М., Савельева Н.А., Ватагина М.А., Писарская Е.С., Платицын И.В., Кутакова Ю.Ю., Логунова А.О. Оптимизация предгравидарной тактики ведения пациенток с дефектом рубца на матке после кесарева сечения. Акушерство и гинекология. 2021; 12: 68-75. [Kurtser M.A., Egikyan N.M., Savelyeva N.A., Vatagina M.A., Pisarskaya E.S., Platitsyn I.V., Kutakova Yu.Yu., Logunova A.O. Optimizing pre-pregnancy management of patients with post-cesarean section uterine scar. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2021; (12): 68-75 (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/ aig.2021.12.68-75.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B48"><label>48.</label><mixed-citation>Ye M., Zhang Q., Li Z., Gu C., Meng Y. Robotic CSP resection and hysterotomy repair. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2021; 28(5): 945-6. https://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.11.017.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B49"><label>49.</label><mixed-citation>Логинова Е.А., Пономарева Ю.Н., Давыдова И.Ю., Иванова Л.Б., Валиев Р.К. Робот-ассистированная метропластика. Акушерство и гинекология. 2022; 3: 129-37. [Loginova E.A., Ponomareva Yu.N., Davydova I.Yu., Ivanova L.B., Valiev R.K. Robot-assisted metroplasty. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2022; (3): 129-37 (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/ aig.2022.3.129-137.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B50"><label>50.</label><mixed-citation>Wang H.F., Chen H.H., Ting W.H., Lu H.F., Lin H.H., Hsiao S.M. Robotic or laparoscopic treatment of cesarean scar defects or cesarean scar pregnancies with a uterine sound guidance. Taiwan J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2021; 60(5): 821-6. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2021.07.007.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B51"><label>51.</label><mixed-citation>Zhang X., Yang M., Wang Q., Chen J., Ding J., Hua K. Prospective evaluation of five methods used to treat cesarean scar defects. Int. J. Gynaecol Obstet. 2016; 134(3): 336-9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.ijgo.2016.04.011.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B52"><label>52.</label><mixed-citation>Chen Y.Y., Tsai C.C., Lan K.C., Ou Y.C. Preliminary report on the use of a levonorgestrel intrauterine system for the treatment of intermenstrual bleeding due to previous cesarean delivery scar defect. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 2019; 45(10): 2015-20. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ jog.14060.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
