Comparison of the effectiveness of ultrasound diagnosis in assessment of uterine scar defets after cesarean section
- Authors: Sidorova T.A.1, Martynov S.A.1, Adamyan L.V.1, Letunovskaya A.B.1, Boykova Y.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia
- Issue: No 4 (2022)
- Pages: 132-140
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/0300-9092/article/view/274531
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18565/aig.2022.4.132-140
- ID: 274531
Cite item
Abstract
Full Text
About the authors
Tatyana A. Sidorova
Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: t_sidorova@oparina4.ru
PhD student at Gynecological Department
Sergey A. Martynov
Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of RussiaDr. Med. Sci., Leading Researcher at Gynecological Department
Leyla V. Adamyan
Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: adamyanleila@gmail.com
Dr. Med. Sci., Professor, Academician of RAS, Head of the Department of Operative Gynecology
Anna B. Letunovskaya
Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russiaobstetrician-gynecologist, doctor of ultrasound diagnostics
Yulia V. Boykova
Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of RussiaPhD, doctor of ultrasound diagnostics
References
- Donnez O. Cesarean scar defects: management of an iatrogenic pathology whose prevalence has dramatically increased. Fertil. Steril. 2020; 113(4): 704-16. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.01.037.
- Betran A.P., Ye J., Moller A.B., Zhang J., Gtilmezoglu A.M., Torloni M.R. The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990-2014. PLoS One. 2016; 11(2): e0148343. https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148343.
- Здравоохранение в России. 2021. Статистический сборник. М.: Росстат; 2021. 171 с.
- Краснопольский В.И., Буянова С.Н., Щукина Н.А., Логутова Л.С. Несостоятельность шва (рубца) на матке после кесарева сечения: проблемы и решения (редакционная статья). Российский вестник акушера-гинеколога. 2015; 15(3): 4-8. . https://dx.doi.org/10.17116/rosakush20151534-8.
- Мартынов С.А., Адамян Л.В. Рубец на матке после кесарева сечения: терминологические аспекты. Гинекология. 2020; 22(5): 70-5. [Martynov S.A., Adamyan L.V. Cesarean scar defect: terminological aspects. Gynecology. 2020; 22(5): 70-5. (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.26442/20795696.2020.5.200415.
- Jordans I.P.M., de Leeuw R.A., Stegwee S.I., Amso N.N., Barri-Soldevila P.N., van den Bosch T. et al. Sonographic examination of uterine niche in non-pregnant women: a modified Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2019; 53(1): 107-15. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.19049.
- Baranov A., Gunnarsson G., Salvesen K.A., Isberg P.E., Vikhareva O. Assessment of Cesarean hysterotomy scar in non-pregnant women: reliability of transvaginal sonography with and without contrast enhancement. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2016; 47(4): 499-505. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.14833.
- Monteagudo A., Carreno C., Timor-Tritsch I.E. Saline infusion sonohysterography in nonpregnant women with previous cesarean delivery: the "niche" in the scar. J. Ultrasound Med. 2001; 20(10): 1105-15. https://dx.doi.org/10.7863/jum.2001.20.10.1105.
- Regnard C., Nosbusch M., Fellemans C., Benali N., van Rysselberghe M., Barlow P., Rozenberg S. Cesarean section scar evaluation by saline contrast sonohysterography. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2004; 23(3): 289-92. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.999.
- Osser O.V., Jokubkiene L., Valentin L. High prevalence of defects in Cesarean section scars at transvaginal ultrasound examination. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2009; 34(1): 90-7. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.6395.
- Menada Valenzano M., Lijoi D., Mistrangelo E., Costantini S., Ragni N. Vaginal ultrasonographic and hysterosonographic evaluation ofthe low transverse incision after caesarean section: correlation with gynaecological symptoms. Gynecol. Obstet. Invest. 2006; 61(4): 216-22. https://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000091497.
- Rasheedy R., Sammour H., Elkholy A., Fadel E. Agreement between transvaginal ultrasound and saline contrast sonohysterography in evaluation of cesarean scar defect. J. Gynecol. Obstet. Hum. Reprod. 2019; 48(10): 827-31. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2019.05.013.
- Antila-Langsjo R., Maenpaa J.U., Huhtala H., Tomas E., Staff S. Comparison of transvaginal ultrasound and saline contrast sonohysterography in evaluation of cesarean scar defect: a prospective cohort study. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2018; 97(9): 1130-6. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13367.
- Ludwin A., Martins W.P., Ludwin I. Evaluation of uterine niche by threedimensional sonohysterography and volumetric quantification: techniques and scoring classification system. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2019; 53(1): 139-43. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.19181.