Complications in surgical treatment of colorectal endometriosis

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

In colorectal endometriosis, surgery may involve techniques such as shaving, disc excision or segmental resection with anastomosis (either using hardware or manual methods). A two-stage intestinal resection with stoma removal followed by restoration of intestinal integrity is performed in case of multifocal infiltrative forms. However, it is the order and extent of surgical treatment that is debatable for some patient groups.

The article discusses various approaches to the surgical treatment of colorectal endometriosis. Colorectal endometriosis is the most severe type of deep endometriosis, among all other types. Complications, such as intestinal obstruction, bleeding, and perforation may occur in 4–13% of cases. Surgical intervention is the only effective treatment method. There can be the following types of surgery: segmental bowel resection (35.8%), shaving (31.9%), disc excision (23.1%). Combined treatment is used in 2.9% of cases. According to the Clavien–Dindo classification, perioperative complications range from 10 to 14% (anastomotic failure with the development of pelvic abscesses – 6.6%, rectovaginal fistulas – 3.8%, intestinal paresis in the postoperative period – 12.7%, severe dysuric disorders – 1.5%, hydronephrosis – 4.5%). The frequency of complications depends on several factors, including the surgical access, the size of the infiltrate, the depth of the lesion, and intraoperative approaches.

Conclusion: Colorectal surgery for endometriosis is a high-tech surgical procedure that requires a personalized approach at all stages of treatment. This includes preoperative imaging to create a detailed map of the affected area, which can help to develop an individual treatment plan.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Vladimir D. Chuprynin

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Centre for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Author for correspondence.
Email: v_chuprynin@oparina4.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0003-7856-2863

PhD, Head of the Surgery Department

Russian Federation, Moscow

Tatyana Yu. Smolnova

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Centre for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: smoltat@list.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3543-651X
Scopus Author ID: 6504317244

Dr. Med. Sci., Senior Researcher at the Surgery Department

Russian Federation, Moscow

Mikhail V. Melnikov

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Centre for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: m_melnikov@oparina4.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0007-2792-7200

PhD, Head of Clinical Work at the Surgery Department

Russian Federation, Moscow

Vyacheslav V. Chursin

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Centre for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: v_chursin@oparina4.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0002-9952-6629

surgeon at the Department of General Surgery

Russian Federation, Moscow

Natalya A. Buralkina

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Centre for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: natalyaburalkina@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5109-6725

Dr. Med. Sci., Senior Researcher at the Surgery Department

Russian Federation, Moscow

Mariam A. Vardanyan

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Centre for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: mv132013@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0002-4619-1431

PhD Student at the Surgery Department

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Dunselman G.A.J., Vermeulen N., Becker C., Calhaz-Jorge C., D'Hooghe T., De Bie B. et al. ESHRE guideline: management of women with endometriosis. Hum. Reprod. 2014; 29(3): 400-12. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/det457
  2. Schenken R.S. Endometriosis: Pathogenesis, clinical features, and diagnosis. Available at: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/endometriosis-in-adults-pathogenesis-epidemiology-and-clinical-impact
  3. Roman H., Bridoux V., Merlot B., Resch B., Chat R., Coget J. et al. Risk of bowel fistula following surgical management of deep endometriosis of the rectosigmoid: a series of 1102 cases. Hum. Reprod. 2020; 35(7): 1601-11. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaa131
  4. Donnez O., Roman H. Choosing the right surgical technique for deep endometriosis: shaving, disc excision, or bowel resection? Fertil. Steril. 2017; 108(6): 931-42. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.09.006
  5. Пилюгина Э.И., Хилькевич Е.Г., Мельников М.В., Чупрынин В.Д. Клинико-диагностические и хирургические особенности колоректального эндометриоза. Акушерство и гинекология. 2021; 5: 135-40. [Pilyugina E.I., Khilkevich E.G., Mel'nikov M.V., Chuprynin V.D. Clinical, diagnostic, and surgical characteristics of colorectal endometriosis. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2021; (5): 135-40 (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2021.5.135-140
  6. Чупрынин В.Д., Швагирева С.В., Хилькевич Е.Г., Чурсин В.В., Мельников М.В., Матроницкий Р.Б. Особенности современной колоректальной хирургии: взгляд хирурга и гинеколога. Акушерство и гинекология. 2024; 11: 60-75. [Chuprynin V.D., Shvagireva S.V., Khilkevich E.G., Chursin V.V., Melnikov M.V., Matronitsky R.B. Features of modern colorectal surgery: the view of a surgeon and gynecologist. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2024; (11): 66-75 (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2024.268
  7. Movilla P., van Reesema L., Andrews B., Gaughan T., Loring M., Bhakta A. et al. Impact of race and ethnicity on perioperative outcomes during hysterectomy for endometriosis. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2022; 29(11): 1268-77. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2022.09.005
  8. Khazali S., Bachi A., Mondelli B., Fleischer K., Adamczyk M., Delanerolle G. et al. Intra-operative and post-operative complications of endometriosis excision using the SOSURE approach - A single- surgeon retrospective series of 1116 procedures over 8 years. Facts Views Vis. Obgyn. 2024; 16(3): 325-36. https://dx.doi.org/10.52054/FVVO.16.3.030
  9. Dindo D., Demartines N., Clavien P.A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann. Surg. 2004; 240(2): 205-13. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934
  10. Abo C., Moatassim S., Marty N., Saint Ghislain M., Huet E., Bridoux V. et al. Postoperative complications after bowel endometriosis surgery by shaving, disc excision, or segmental resection: a three-arm comparative analysis of 364 consecutive cases. Fertil. Steril. 2018; 109(1): 172-8.e1. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.10.001
  11. Bendifallah S., Puchar A., Vesale E., Moawad G., Daraï E., Roman H. Surgical outcomes after colorectal surgery for endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2021; 28(3): 453-66. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2020.08.015
  12. Bouaziz J., Soriano D. Complications of colorectal resection for endometriosis. Minerva Ginecol. 2017; 69(5): 477-87. https://dx.doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4784.17.04052-7
  13. Jayot A., Nyangoh Timoh K., Bendifallah S., Ballester M., Darai E. Comparison of laparoscopic discoid resection and segmental resection for colorectal endometriosis using a propensity score matching analysis. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2018; 25(3): 440-6. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2017.09.019
  14. Afors K., Centini G., Fernandes R., Murtada R., Zupi E., Akladios C. et al. Segmental and discoid resection are preferential to bowel shaving for medium-term symptomatic relief in patients with bowel endometriosis. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2016; 23(7): 1123-9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2016.08.813
  15. Kondo W., Ribeiro R., Zomer M.T., Hayashi R. Laparoscopic double discoid resection with a circular stapler for bowel endometriosis. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2015; 22(6): 929-31. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2015.04.021
  16. Meyer R., Nasseri Y.Y., Barnajian M., Siedhoff M.T., Wright K.N., Hamilton K.M. et al. Risk factors for major complications following colorectal resections for endometriosis in the USA. Int. J. Colorectal Dis. 2024; 39(1): 1. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-023-04577-5
  17. Crestani A., Le Gac M., de Labrouhe É., Touboul C., Bendifallah S., Ferrier C. et al. Outcomes of discoid excision and segmental resection for colorectal endometriosis: robotic versus conventional laparoscopy. J. Robot. Surg. 2024; 18(1): 87. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-024-01854-5
  18. Roman H., Merlot B., Forestier D., Noailles M., Magne E., Carteret T. et. al. Nonvisualized palpable bowel endometriotic satellites. Hum. Reprod. 2021; 36(3): 656-65. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaa340
  19. Bouaziz J., Soriano D. Complications of colorectal resection for endometriosis. Minerva Ginecol. 2017; 69(5): 477-87. https://dx.doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4784.17.04052-7
  20. Daraï E., Cohen J., Ballester M. Colorectal endometriosis and fertility. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2017; 209: 86-94. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.05.024
  21. de Koning R., Cantineau A.E.P., van der Tuuk K., De Bie B., Groen H., van den Akker-van Marle M.E. et al. The (cost-) effectiveness of surgical excision of colorectal endometriosis compared to ART treatment trAjectory (TOSCA study) – a study protocol. Reprod. Fertil. 2024; 5(2): e230048. https://dx.doi.org/10.1530/RAF-23-0048
  22. Dubernard G., Maissiat E., Legendre G., Dennis T., Capmas P., Warembourg S. et al. Evaluating the safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment for rectal endometriosis: results from a French prospective multicentre study including 60 patients. Hum. Reprod. 2024; 39(8): 1673-83. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deae127
  23. Philip C.A., Warembourg S., Dairien M., Lefevre C., Gelet A., Chavrier F. et al. Transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for management of rectosigmoid deep infiltrating endometriosis: results of Phase-I clinical trial. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2020; 56(3): 431-42. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.21937
  24. Crestani A., Merlot B., Goualard P.H., Grigoriadis G., Chanavaz Lacheray I., Dennis T. et al. Bowel endometriosis: Surgical customization is demanding. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2024; 94: 102495. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2024.102495

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2025 Bionika Media