Current classification systems and methodological approaches in the diagnosis of uterine malformations
- Autores: Safronov O.V.1, Briukhina E.V.1, Ishchenko L.S.1, Safronova L.E.1, Mshak-Manukyan G.N.1
-
Afiliações:
- South Ural State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
- Edição: Nº 3 (2019)
- Páginas: 18-24
- Seção: Articles
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/0300-9092/article/view/248418
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18565/aig.2%20019.3.18-24
- ID: 248418
Citar
Texto integral
Acesso está concedido
Acesso é pago ou somente para assinantes
Resumo
Palavras-chave
Texto integral
Sobre autores
Oleg Safronov
South Ural State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: docsafronov@rambler.ru
PhD, associate professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Institute for Advanced Professional Education
Elena Briukhina
South Ural State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: elena-bruhina@rambler.ru
MD, professor, head of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Institute for Advanced Professional Education
Lyudmila Ishchenko
South Ural State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: LyudaLyn@mail.ru
PhD, associate professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Institute for Advanced Professional Education
Larisa Safronova
South Ural State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: lmel@rambler.ru
PhD, assistant of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Institute for Advanced Professional Education
Gohar Mshak-Manukyan
South Ural State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: goar_m-m@mail.ru
assistant of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Institute for Advanced Professional Education
Bibliografia
- Venetis C.A., Papadopoulos S.P., Campo R., Gordts S., Tarlatzis B.C., Grimbizis G.F. Clinical implications of congenital uterine anomalies: a metaanalysis of comparative studies. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2014; 29(6): 665-83. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.09.006.
- Gundabattula S.R., Joseph E., Marakani L.R., Dasari S., Nirmalan P.K. Reproductive outcomes after resection of intrauterine septum. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2014. 34(3): 235-7. https://dx.doi.org/10.3109/ 01443615.2013.836477.
- Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Electronic address: ASRM@asrm.org; Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Uterine septum: a guideline. Fertil. Steril. 2016; 106(3): 530-40. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.05.014.
- Ludwin A., Pitynski K., Ludwin I., Banas T., Knafel A. Two- and threedimensional ultrasonography and sonohysterography versus hysteroscopy with laparoscopy in the differential diagnosis of septate, bicornuate, and arcuate uteri. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2013; 20(1): 90-9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. jmig.2012.09.011.
- Fernandes S.M., Magäes A.M., Marques A.L., Leite H.V. Reproductive outcomes after hysteroscopic septoplasty: a retrospective study. Rev. Bras. Ginecol. Obstet. 2015; 37(3): 110-14. https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/SO-720320150005258.
- Sugiura-Ogasawara M., Ozaki Y., Suzumori N. Mullerian anomalies and recurrent miscarriage. Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2013; 25(4): 293-8. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0b013e3283632849.
- Heinonen P.K. Distribution of female genital tract anomalies in two classifications. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2016; 206(11): 141-6. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.09.009.
- Di Spiezio Sardo A., Campo R., Gordts S., Spinelli M., Cosimato C., Tanos V. et al. The comprehensiveness of the ESHRE/ESGE classification of female genital tract congenitalanomalies: a systematic review of cases not classified by the AFS system. Hum. Reprod. 2015; 30(5): 1046-58. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dev 061.
- Acien P., Acien M.I. The history of female genital tract malformation classifications and proposal of an updated system. Hum. Reprod. Update. 2011; 17(5): 693-705. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmr021.
- Oppelt P.G., Lermann J., Strick R., Dittrich R., Strissei P., Rettig I. et al. Malformations in a cohort of 284 women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome (MRKH). Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2012; 10: 57. https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-10-57.
- Amin M.B., Edge S., Greene F., Byrd D.R., Brookland R.K., Washington M.K. et al. The 8th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual. New York: Springer; 2017. 1032c.
- Grimbizis G.F., Gordts S., Di Spiezio Sardo A., Brucker S., DeAngelis C., Gergolet M. et al. The ESHRE-ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies. Gynecol. Surg. 2013; 10(3): 199-212. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10397-013-0800-x.
- Кругляк Д.А., Буралкина Н.А., Ипатова М.В., Батырова З.К., Уварова Е.В. Аплазия влагалища и матки (синдром Майера-Рокитанского-Кюстнера-Хазера): этиология, патогенетические аспекты и теория формирования порока (обзор литературы). Гинекология. 2018; 20(2): 64-6.
- Мартыш Н.С. Применение эхографии в диагностике аномалий развития внутренних половых органов у девочек. Акушерство и гинекология. 2011; 7-1: 89-93.
- Макиян З.Н., Адамян Л.В., Быченко В.Г., Мирошникова Н.А., Козлова А.В. Функциональная магнитно-резонансная томография для определения кровотока при симметричных аномалиях матки. Акушерство и гинекология. 2016; 10: 73-79.
- Адамян Л.В., Гашенко В.О., Данилов А.Ю., Коган Е.А. Результаты восстановления репродуктивной функции у больных с внутриматочной перегородкой после хирургического лечения и новые пути решения проблемы (обзор литературы). Проблемы репродукции. 2011; 17(1): 35-40.
- Graupera B., Pascual M.A., Hereter L., Browne J.L., Übeda B., Rodriguez I. et al. Accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound compared with magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of Mullerian duct anomalies using ESHRE-ESGE consensus on the classification of congenital anomalies of the female genital tract. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2015; 46(5): 616-22. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.14825.
- El-Sherbiny W., El-Mazny A., Abou-Salem N., Mostafa W.S. The diagnostic accuracy of two- vs three-dimensional sonohysterography for evaluation of the uterine cavity in the reproductive age. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2015; 22(1): 127-31. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2014.08.779.
- Liu M., Wang S.S., Lin X.W., He S.H. Clinical value of three-dimensional transvaginal sonography in diagnosis of septate uterus and prediction of adverse pregnancy outcome. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2013; 48(7): 499-503.
- Grimbizis G.F., Di Spiezio Sardo A., Saravelos S.H., Gordts S., Exacoustos C., Van Schoubroeck D. et al. The Thessaloniki ESHRE/ESGE consensus on diagnosis of female genital anomalies. Hum. Reprod. 2016; 31(1): 2-7. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dev264.
- Ludwin A., Ludwin I. Comparison of the ESHRE-ESGE and ASRM classifications of Mullerian duct anomalies in everyday practice. Hum. Reprod. 2015; 30(3): 569-80. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deu344.
- Ludwin A., Martins W.P., Nastri C.O., Ludwin I., Coelho Neto M.A., Leitäo V.M. et al. Congenital Uterine Malformation by Experts (CUME): better criteria for distinguishing between normal/arcuate and septate uterus? Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2018; 51(1): 101-9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.18923.
- Ludwin A., Ludwin I., Kudla M., Kottner J. Reliability of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology/European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy and American Society for Reproductive Medicine classification systems for congenital uterine anomalies detected using three-dimensional ultrasonography. Fertil. Steril. 2015; 104(3): 688-97. e8. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. fertnstert.2015.06.019.