Clinical and anatomical features of patients with apical prolapse

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

Objective: To study clinical and anatomical features of patients with apical prolapse (AP).

Materials and methods: 230 medical records of patients with pelvic organ prolapse who underwent examination and treatment from 2019 to 2024 at the University Clinic "I am healthy!" were analyzed. The main patient group consisted of 130 women with apical prolapse, the comparison group included 100 patients with anterior/posterior vaginal wall prolapse without apical prolapse. Evaluation was performed according to the POP-Q classification, using standard questionnaires (POPDI-6, UDI-6) and clinical examination.

Results: Patients with apical prolapse more often reported incomplete bladder emptying and the need to reduce prolapse to ease voiding. In the comparison group, stress urinary incontinence and lower abdominal pressure were more common. In almost half of the patients with apical prolapse, the leading point was Ba (44.6%). In patients without apical prolapse, prolapse of the posterior vaginal wall (point Bp) occurred most often (62%). No significant differences in symptoms were found between the groups, which complicates the early diagnosis of apical prolapse.

Conclusion: When examining the patients with pelvic organ prolapse and collecting their history, it is necessary to take into account the "pitfalls" that complicate objective diagnosis of apical prolapse. It is necessary to improve the technique of physical examination of gynecological patients for early detection of first-level support defects, which will allow timely prescription of adequate treatment with the best long-term results.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

Е. Dubinskaya

Patrice Lumumba Peoples' Friendship University of Russia, Ministry of Education and Science

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: eka-dubinskaya@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8311-0381

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Dr. Med. Sci., Professor at the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology

俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

A. Gasparov

Patrice Lumumba Peoples' Friendship University of Russia, Ministry of Education and Science

Email: 13513520@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6301-1880

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Dr. Med. Sci., Professor, Professor at the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology

俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

Е. Matskevich

Patrice Lumumba Peoples' Friendship University of Russia, Ministry of Education and Science

Email: liza151196chik@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0000-3315-7408

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Teaching Assistant at the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Faculty of Postgraduate Education

俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

参考

  1. Brown H.W., Hegde A., Huebner M., Neels H., Barnes H.C., Marquini G.V. et al. International urogynecology consultation chapter 1 committee 2: Epidemiology of pelvic organ prolapse: prevalence, incidence, natural history, and service needs. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2022; 33(2): 173-87. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-05018-z
  2. Zumrutbas A.E. Understanding pelvic organ prolapse: a comprehensive review of etiology, epidemiology, comorbidities, and evaluation. Soc. Int. Urol. J. 2025; 6: 6. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/siuj6010006
  3. Hadizadeh-Talasaz Z., Khadivzadeh T., Mohajeri T., Sadeghi M. Worldwide prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Iran. J. Public. Health. 2024; 53(3): 524-38. https://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ ijph.v53i3.15134
  4. Смольнова Т.Ю., Красный А.М., Чупрынин В.Д., Садекова А.А., Чурсин В.В., Тамбиева Ф.Р. Способ хирургической коррекции пролапса гениталий у пациентки со сниженным уровнем экспрессии гена CACNA1C в круглых связках матки. Акушерство и гинекология. 2020; 12: 234-41. [Smolnova T.Yu., Krasny A.M., Chuprynin V.D., Sadekova A.A., Chursin V.V., Tambieva F.R. Smolnova T.Yu., Krasnyi A.M., Chuprynin V.D., Sadekova A.A., Chursin V.V., Tаmbieva F.R. Surgical procedure to correct genital prolapse in a patient with reduced CACNA1C gene expression in the round ligament of the uterus. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2020; (12): 234-41 (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2020.12.234-241
  5. Komesu Y.M., Dinwiddie D.L., Richter H.E., Lukacz E.S., Sung V.W., Siddiqui N.Y. et al. Defining the relationship between vaginal and urinary microbiomes. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2020; 222(2): 154.e1-e10. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.ajog.2019.08.011
  6. Kowalski J.T., Barber M.D., Klerkx W.M., Grzybowska M.E., Toozs-Hobson P., Rogers R.G. et al. International urogynecological consultation chapter 4.1: definition of outcomes for pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2023; 34(11): 2689-99. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s00192-023-05660-9
  7. Patnam R., Edenfield A., Swift S. Defining normal apical vaginal support: a relook at the POSST study. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2020; 30(1): 47-51. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3681-8
  8. Trutnovsky G., Robledo K.P., Shek K.L., Dietz H.P. Definition of apical descent in women with and without previous hysterectomy: a retrospective analysis. PLOS One. 2019; 14(3): e0213617. https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0213617
  9. Dietz H.P., Mann K.P. What is clinically relevant prolapse? An attempt at defining cutoffs for the clinical assessment of pelvic organ descent. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2014; 25(4): 451-5. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s00192-013-2307-4
  10. Oh S., Shin E.K., Lee S.Y., Kim M.J., Lee Y., Jeon M.J. Anatomic criterion for clinically relevant apical prolapse in urogynecology populations. Urogynecology. 2023; 29(11): 860-4. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001383
  11. Dubinskaya E.D., Gasparov A.S., Babichev A.I., Kolesnikova S.N. Improving of long-term follow-up after cystocele repair. J. Gynecol. Obstet. Hum. Reprod. 2022; 51(2): 102278. https://dx.doi.org/0.1016/j.jogoh.2021.102278
  12. Szymanowski P., Szepieniec W. K., Szweda H., Ligeza J., Sadakierska-Chudy A. Apical defect - the essence of cystocele pathogenesis? Ginekol Pol. 2024; 95 (7): 511-7. https://dx.doi.org/10.5603/GP.a2023.0022
  13. Haylen B.T., Maher C.F., Barber M.D., Camargo S., Dandolu V., Digesu A. et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) / International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Int. Urogynecol. J. 2016; 27(2): 165-94. https:// dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2932-1
  14. Barber M.D., Walters M.D., Bump R.C. Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2005; 193(1): 103-13. https:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2004.12.025
  15. Gray T., Strickland S., Pooranawattanakul S., Li W., Campbell P., Jones G. et al. What are the concerns and goals of women attending a urogynaecology clinic? Content analysis of free-text data from an electronic pelvic floor assessment questionnaire (ePAQ-PF). Int. Urogynecol. J. 2019; 30(1): 33-41. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3697-0
  16. Cichowski S., Grzybowska M. E., Halder G. E., Jansen S., Gold D., Espuña M. et al. International Urogynecology Consultation: Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROs) use in the evaluation of patients with pelvic organ prolapse. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2022; 33(10): 2603-31. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s00192-022-05315-1
  17. Безменко А.А., Захаров И.С., Беженарь В.Ф., Староверова А.С., Баграмян Э.А., Иванова О.А., Капитанова М.В. Анатомо-функциональные особенности тазового дна женщин в различные возрастные периоды. Акушерство и гинекология. 2025; 6: 131-8. [Bezmenko A.A., Zakharov I.S., Bezhenar V.F., Staroverova A.S., Bagramyan E.A., Ivanova O.A., Kapitanova M.V. Anatomical and functional characteristics of the pelvic floor in women of various age groups. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2025; (6): 131-8 (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2025.101
  18. Tegerstedt G., Miedel A., Maehle-Schmidt M., Nyren O., Hammarström M. A short-form questionnaire identified genital organ prolapse. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2005; 58(1): 41-6. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.06.008
  19. Collins S.A., O'Shea M., Dykes N., Ramm O., Edenfield A., Shek K.L. et al. International Urogynecological Consultation: clinical definition of pelvic organ prolapse. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2021; 32(8): 2011-19. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-04875-y
  20. Hong C.X., Nandikanti L., Shrosbree B., Delancey J.O., Chen L. Variations in structural support site failure patterns by prolapse size on stress 3D MRI. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2023; 34(8): 1923-31. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s00192-023-05482-9
  21. Маринкин И.О., Ракитин Ф.А., Волчек А.В., Солуянов М.Ю., Кулешов В.М., Макаров К.Ю., Соколова Т.М., Нимаев В.В., Айдагулова С.В. Проявления недифференцированной дисплазии соединительной ткани и прогнозирование рецидивов при хирургической коррекции переднего пролапса тазовых органов у женщин. Акушерство и гинекология. 2024; 12: 70-9. [Marinkin I.O., Rakitin F.A., Volchek A.V., Soluyanov M.Yu., Kuleshov V.M., Makarov K.Yu., Sokolova T.M., Nimaev V.V., Aidagulova S.V. Manifestations of undifferentiated connective tissue dysplasia and prediction of recurrence after surgical correction of anterior pelvic organ prolapse in women. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2024; (12): 70-9 (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2024.208

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Study design

下载 (673KB)
3. Fig. 2. Severity of pelvic organ prolapse symptoms at different stages of apical prolapse (POP-Q), POPDI-6 scores

下载 (225KB)

版权所有 © Bionika Media, 2025