Modeling the Efficiency of Nudging in Public Administration

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат ақылы немесе тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

The study focuses on developing a predictive model to evaluate efficiency of soft behavioral regulation methods (nudging) in public administration. Despite widespread adoption of nudging techniques in government management globally, the research specifically aimed at identifying and assessing criteria for their efficiency remains limited. The paper analyzes existing approaches to evaluating the efficiency of nudging and proposes a new predictive model based on supervised machine learning techniques. The research involves collecting and processing data related to nudging practices in governmental organizations, determining key factors that influence the efficiency of these methods, and building a predictive model using classification algorithms. The resulting model incorporates 15 essential features and achieves the prediction accuracy of 82%. Findings of this study can be applied in both academic research and practical evaluations of nudging implementations in public administration.

Авторлар туралы

A. Popova

Israel Institute of Innovation

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: appopova0804@gmail.com
Tel Aviv, 22 Rival Str.

A. Sanina

International Laboratory of Digital Transformation in Public Administration, National Research University Higher School of Economics

Email: asanina@hse.ru
Saint Petersburg, 17A, Promyshlennaya St.

A. Ataeva

International Laboratory of Digital Transformation in Public Administration, National Research University Higher School of Economics

Email: aataeva@hse.ru
Saint Petersburg, 17A, Promyshlennaya St.

E. Rylskikh

International Laboratory of Digital Transformation in Public Administration, National Research University Higher School of Economics

Email: e.v.rylskikh@gmail.com
Saint Petersburg, 17A, Promyshlennaya St.

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Anisimova A.A. (2021) Methods of improving digital tax services in modern tax administration practice. Nalogi i nalogooblozheniye. no. 1. pp. 71–80. https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-065X.2021.1.35283. (In Russ.)
  2. Bratchenko S.A. (2021) [Quality and effectiveness in state governance practice (Examples of state programme management)]. Ekonomika: vchera, segodnya, zavtra. vol. 11. no. 10-1 pp. 247–260. https://doi.org/10.34670/AR.2021.15.53.029. (In Russ.)
  3. Davydova M.L. (2020) Smart Regulation as the Basis for Improving Modern Law-Making. Journal of Russian Law. no. 11. pp. 14–29. https://doi.org/10.12737/jrl.2020.130 (In Russ.)
  4. Kitayeva E.A., Suyetina T.A., Kitayev M.R. (2019) The system of nudging influences (Nudge) as a factor in increasing the effectiveness of forming the population’s commitment to a healthy lifestyle. Manager zdravooсhranenia. no 2. (In Russ.)
  5. Taler R., Sansteyn K. (2017) Nudge. Arkhitektura vybora. Kak uluchshit’ nashi resheniya o zdorov’e, blagosostoyanii i schast’e [Nudge. The architecture of choice. How to improve our decisions about health, well-being, and happiness]. M.: Mann, Ivanov i Ferber. 240 p. (In Russ.)
  6. Tchernyshenko M.S. (2021) Theoretical Aspects of Nudging. Novelty. Experiment. Traditions (N.Ex.T). vol. 7. no. 1. pp. 51–57. (In Russ.)
  7. Chubarova T. V. (2019) Modern paternalism as a product of the mainstream: social problems, individual solutions. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’, no. 6, pp. 27–39. https://doi.org/10.31857/S086904990007562-0. (In Russ.)
  8. Shanin A. A., Davydov A. YU. (2022) Prospects for the Use of Behavioral Insights in the COVID-19 Prevention Legal Regulation. Advances in Law Studies. no 1. pp. 16–20. https://doi.org/10.29039/2409-5087-2022-10-1-16-20. (In Russ.)
  9. Ambrosino A. et al. (2017) Nudge, a critical perspective. Encyclopedia of Law and Economics. Springer. pp. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61836-X
  10. Bovens L. (2012) Real nudge. European journal of risk regulation. vol. 3. no. 1. pp. 43–46.
  11. Forte T., Santinha G., Patrão M. (2024) Exploring the Viability and Acceptance of Nudge in Public Policies for Health Promotion. Healthcare Policy. vol. 4. no. 12. pp. 476. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12040476
  12. Gerrits L. (2021) Soul of a new machine: Self-learning algorithms in public administration. Information Polity. vol. 26. no. 3. pp. 237–250.
  13. Jung D., Jeong W. (2011) Nudge: a tool for better policy impacts and its limitations under various policy contexts. Public Administration Review. vol. 71. no. 4. pp. 653–56.
  14. Moseley A., Stoker G. (2013) Nudging citizens? Prospects and pitfalls confronting a new heuristic. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. vol. 79. pp. 4–10.
  15. Münscher R., Vetter M., Scheuerle T. (2016) A review and taxonomy of choice architecture techniques. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. vol. 29. no. 5. pp. 511–524.
  16. Ranchordás S. (2020) Nudging citizens through technology in smart cities. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology. vol. 34. no. 3. vol. 254–276.
  17. Schmidt A. T. (2019) Getting real on rationality–Behavioral science, nudging, and public policy. Ethics. vol. 129. no. 4. pp. 511–543.
  18. Sunstein C. R. (2014b) Nudging: a very short guide. Journal of Consumer Policy. vol. 37. pp. 583–588.
  19. Sunstein C. R. (2014a) Why nudge?: The politics of libertarian paternalism. Yale University Press.
  20. Tummers L. (2019) Public policy and behavior change. Public Administration Review. vol. 79. no. 6. pp. 925–930.

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML

© Russian Academy of Sciences, 2025