<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Ethno review</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Ethno review</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Этнографическое обозрение</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">0869-5415</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">3034-6274</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">The Russian Academy of Sciences</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">672156</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.31857/S0869541523060040</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="edn">MNYEVA</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Статьи</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Homes as memory boxes: a cognitive approach to understanding attachment to possessions</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Дома как вместилища памяти: когнитивный анализ привязанности к имуществу (пер. с англ. С.В. Соколовского)</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Güngör</surname><given-names>S. A</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Гюнгёр</surname><given-names>С. А</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>sibel.gungor@puhu.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Research and Consultancy</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Центр исследований и консультаций</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2023-12-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>12</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><issue>6</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">NO6 (2023)</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">№6 (2023)</issue-title><fpage>44</fpage><lpage>60</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2025-02-27"><day>27</day><month>02</month><year>2025</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2023, Russian Academy of Sciences</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2023, Российская академия наук</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2023</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Russian Academy of Sciences</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Российская академия наук</copyright-holder></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.eco-vector.com/0869-5415/article/view/672156">https://journals.eco-vector.com/0869-5415/article/view/672156</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article presents a review and analysis of collecting as collecting things of a certain type, discussed in a wide range of this practice, from compulsive accumulation to collecting works of art and museum collections. Furthermore, there are people who store and collect things related to their experiences and intentions. I designate this type of gathering as idiocentric gathering and explore the motives of their keepers. Claiming that collecting is one of the psychic manifestations, this study uses a theoretical approach that encompasses discussions (including in-depth interviews and focus groups) about the relationship of human being and thing, memory and self. A cognitive perspective and ethnosemantic analysis are used to evaluate the collected data. I argue that idiocentric collecting is a way of connecting the past and the future, providing the custodians with a sense of continuity and connectedness in time and space.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Статья посвящена обзору и анализу широкого спектра практик коллекционирования - от навязчивого накопления вещей определенного вида до собирания произведений искусства отдельными людьми и музеями. Кроме того, есть люди хранящие вещи, связанные с их опытом и намерениями; этот вид собирания автор обозначает как идиоцентристское и исследует мотивы таких хранителей. Утверждая, что коллекционирование является одним из психических проявлений человека, данное исследование использует теоретический подход, охватывающий дискуссии (включая глубинные интервью и фокус-группы) об отношениях человека и вещи, памяти и самости. Для оценки полученных данных используются когнитивная перспектива и этносемантический анализ. Автор приходит к выводу, что идиоцентристское коллекционирование представляет собой способ соединения прошлого и будущего, дающий хранителям ощущение непрерывности и связности во времени и пространстве.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>collecting</kwd><kwd>objects</kwd><kwd>memorabilia</kwd><kwd>collection</kwd><kwd>memory</kwd><kwd>self</kwd><kwd>time</kwd><kwd>reification</kwd><kwd>classification</kwd><kwd>self-representation</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>коллекция</kwd><kwd>вещи</kwd><kwd>меморабилиа</kwd><kwd>память</kwd><kwd>реификация</kwd><kwd>классификация</kwd><kwd>представления о себе</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Andersson, M., and J. Krebs. 1978. On the Evolution of Hoarding Behaviour. Animal Behaviour 26: 700-711.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Appadurai, A., ed. 1986. The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Baddeley, A.D. 1999. Essentials of Human Memory. New York: Psychology Press Ltd.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Barthes, R. 1986. Elements of Semiology. New York: Hill &amp; Wang.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Baudrillard, J. 1994. The System of Collecting. In The Cultures of Collecting, edited by J. Elsner and R. Cardinal, 7-24. London: Reaktion Books.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Baudrillard, J. 2010. Nesneler Sistemi [The System of Things]. İstanbul: Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yayınevi.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Belk, R. 2006. Collectors and Collecting. In Handbook of Material Culture, edited by C. Tilley et al., 534-545. London: Sage.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Bloch, M.E. 2012. Anthropology and Cognitive Challenge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Cardinal, R., and J. Elsner, eds. 1994. The Cultures of Collecting. London: Reaktion Books Ltd.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Chang, T. 1996. Models of Collecting. Oxford Art Journal 19 (2): 95-97.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Clifford, J. 1988. The Predicament of Culture Twentieth-Century Ethnography, Literature, and Art. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Durkheim, E. 2004. The Cosmological System of Totemism and the Idea of Class. In Anthropological Theory: An Introductory History, edited by R.J. McGee and R.L. Warms, 92-102. New York: McGraw Hill.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Ewing, K.E. 1990. The Illusion of Wholeness: Culture, Self, and the Experience of Inconsistency. Ethos 18 (3): 251-278.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Frost, R.O., and G. Steketee. 2010. Stuff Compulsive Hoarding and the Meaning of Things. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Frost, R.O., and V. Hristova. 2011. Assessment of Hoarding. Journal of Clinical Psychology 67 (5): 1-11.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Gibson, M. 2008. Objects of the Dead: Mourning and Memory in Everyday Life. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Halbwachs, M. 1992. On Collective Memory. London: University of Chicago Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Heidegger, M. 1996. Being and Time. Albany: SUNY Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Hoskins, J. 1998. Biographical Objects: How Things Tell the Stories of People's Lives. New York: Routledge.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Humprey, N. 1979. The Biological Basis of Collecting. Human Nature 2: 44-47.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Kandel, E.R. 2006. In Search of Memory the Emergence of a New Science of Mind. New York: W.W. Norton &amp; Co.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, B. 1989. Objects of Memory: Material Culture as Life Review. In Folk Groups and Folklore Genres: A Reader, edited by E. Oring, 329-338. Logan: Utah State University Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Kopytoff, I. 1986. The Cultural Biography of Things: Commoditization as Process. In The Social Life of Things Commodities in Cultural Perspective, edited by A. Appadurai, 64-91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Lacewing, M. n.d. Plato's Theory of Forms. https://www.alevelphilosophy.co.uk/handouts_religion/PlatoTheoryForms.pdf (retrieved: 21.03.2012).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Layton, R. 2006. Structuralism and Semiotics. In Handbook of Material Culture, edited by C. Tilley et al., 29-42. London: Sage.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>Lee, D. 1950. Codifications of Reality: Lineal and Nonlineal. Psychosomatic Medicine 12: 89-97.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>Marx, K. 1992. Capital. Vol. 1, A Critique of Political Economy. London: Penguin.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation>Marx, K., and F. Engels. 2004. Feuerbach: Opposition of the Materialist and Idealist Outlook. In Anthropological Theory: An Introductory History, edited by R.J. McGee and R.L. Warms, 67-81. New York: McGraw Hill.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation>Melchionne, K. 1996. Collecting: An Unruly Passion: Psychological Perspectives (Review). Philosophy and Literature 20 (2): 524-526.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><mixed-citation>Muensterberger, W. 1994. Collecting: An Unruly Passion: Psychological Perspectives. Princeton: Princeton University Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><mixed-citation>Paine, C. 2013. Religious Objects in Museums: Private Lives and Public Duties. London: Bloomsbury.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><mixed-citation>Parkin, D. 1999. Mementoes as Transitional Objects in Human Displacement. Journal of Material Culture 4 (3): 303-320.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><label>33.</label><mixed-citation>Pearce, S.M. 1995. On Collecting: An Investigation into Collecting. Abingdon: Routledge.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><label>34.</label><mixed-citation>Quinn, N. 2006. The Self. Anthropological Theory 6 (3): 362-384.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><label>35.</label><mixed-citation>Redding, P. 1997. Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E.N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hegel</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><label>36.</label><mixed-citation>Spiro, M. 1993. Is the Western Conception of the Self "Peculiar" within the Context of the World Cultures? Ethos 21 (2): 107-153.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B37"><label>37.</label><mixed-citation>Stewart, S. 1993. On Longing: Narratives of the Miniature, the Gigantic, the Souvenir, the Collection. London: Duke University Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B38"><label>38.</label><mixed-citation>Sutton, J. 2017. Memory. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E.N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/memory</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B39"><label>39.</label><mixed-citation>Thomas, J. 2006. Phenomenology and Material Culture. In Handbook of Material Culture, edited by C. Tilley et al., 43-59. London: Sage.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B40"><label>40.</label><mixed-citation>Tilley, C. 2006. Theoretical Perspectives. In Handbook of Material Culture, edited by C. Tilley et al., 7-11. London: Sage.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B41"><label>41.</label><mixed-citation>Wheeler, M. 2011. Martin Heidegger. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E.N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/heidegger</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
