<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Ethno review</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Ethno review</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Этнографическое обозрение</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">0869-5415</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">3034-6274</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">The Russian Academy of Sciences</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">672266</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.31857/S0869541523020070</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="edn">RAPGDT</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Статьи</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en"><italic>Non diis curae</italic>: the rhetoric and practices of natural punishment for sacrilege</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title><italic>Non diis curae</italic>: риторика и практики естественного наказания за святотатство</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Drozdov</surname><given-names>S. T</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Дроздов</surname><given-names>С. Т</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>sdrozdov@eu.spb.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">European University at St. Petersburg</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Европейский университет в Санкт-Петербурге</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2023-04-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>04</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><issue>2</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">NO2 (2023)</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">№2 (2023)</issue-title><fpage>134</fpage><lpage>152</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2025-02-27"><day>27</day><month>02</month><year>2025</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2023, Russian Academy of Sciences</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2023, Российская академия наук</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2023</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Russian Academy of Sciences</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Российская академия наук</copyright-holder></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.eco-vector.com/0869-5415/article/view/672266">https://journals.eco-vector.com/0869-5415/article/view/672266</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article analyzes situations in which punishment for sacrilege is carried out by natural actors without the intervention of the supernatural ones. Such actors include the state represented by lawmakers and law enforcers, religious specialists, as well as religious activists and ordinary believers. The configurations of agency of the three types of actors described in the article, which have their own specifics and tools for natural (as opposed to supernatural) retaliation for sacrilege, cause violent or non-violent resolution of conflicts in which representatives of either type see blasphemy and sacrilege. The article also analyzes the boundaries of actor agency related, on the one hand, to perceptions of the right to the sanctuary and, consequently, to anger over its desecration, and, on the other hand, to the real possibility to carry out this punishment. In the case of the latter, the notion of conditional agency of the “accused” by “prosecutors” is also discussed, and the ways and reasons for its reduction are considered.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Статья посвящена анализу ситуаций, в которых наказание за святотатство осуществляется естественными акторами, не дожидающимися вмешательства сверхъестественных. К таким акторам относятся: государство в лице законодателей и правоприменителей; религиозные специалисты; религиозные активисты. Описываемые в статье конфигурации агентности трех выделенных акторов, обладающих собственной спецификой и инструментами осуществления естественного (в противовес сверхъестественному) возмездия за святотатство, создают предпосылки для насильственного или же ненасильственного разрешения конфликтов, в которых усматривают богохульство, кощунство и святотатство. В статье также анализируются границы агентности акторов, связанные, с одной стороны, с представлениями о праве на святыню и, соответственно, на гнев из-за ее осквернения, а с другой, - с наличием реальной возможности это наказание осуществить. В последнем случае обсуждается также представление “обвинителей” об условной агентности “обвиняемых”, а также рассматриваются способы и причины ее снижения.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>anthropology of religion</kwd><kwd>agency</kwd><kwd>sacrilege</kwd><kwd>blasphemy</kwd><kwd>punishment</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>антропология религии</kwd><kwd>агентность</kwd><kwd>святотатство</kwd><kwd>богохульство</kwd><kwd>кощунство</kwd><kwd>наказание</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Иванов С.А. Блаженные похабы: культурная история юродства. М.: Языки славянских культур, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Лещинский А.Н. Особенности богородичного движения в России (из опыта социально-философского анализа). М.: РОИР, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Лихачев Д.С., Панченко А.М., Понырко Н.В. Смех в Древней Руси. Л.: Наука, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Масагутова М.Р. "Как оно ни есть, а все равно беседа была": онлайн-трансляции как новая религиозная практика общины чуриковцев // Этнография. 2021. № 4 (14). С. 138-157. https://doi.org/10.31250/2618-8600-2021-4(14)-138-157</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Панченко А.А. О пользе святотатства, или Pussy Riot глазами антрополога // Отечественные записки. 2013. № 1. С. 217-227.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Штырков С.А. Наказание святотатцев: фольклорный мотив и нарративная схема // Труды факультета этнологии. Вып. 1 / Отв. ред. А.К. Байбурин. СПб.: Изд-во ЕУСПб, 2001. С. 198-210.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Юргенсмейер М. "Ужас Мой пошлю пред тобою". Религиозное насилие в глобальном масштабе. М.: НЛО, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Asad T. On Suicide Bombing. N.Y.: Columbia University Press, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Butler J. The Sensibility of Critique: Response to Asad and Mahmood // Is Critique Secular?: Blasphemy, Injury, and Free Speech / Eds. T. Asad, W. Brown, J. Butler, S. Mahmood. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2009. P. 95-130. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780823252381-005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Clay E. The Orthodox Church of the Sovereign Mother of God/The New Cathar Church // Revisionism and Diversification in New Religious Movements / Ed. E. Barker. L.: Routledge, 2013. P. 93-94.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Cliteur P., Herrenberg T. The Fall and Rise of Blasphemy Law. Leiden: Leiden University Press, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Emirbayer M., Mische A. What Is Agency? // American Journal of Sociology. 1998. Vol. 103 (4). P. 962-1023. https://doi.org/10.1086/231294</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Favret-Saada J. An Anthropology of Religious Polemics: The Case of Blasphemy Affairs // HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory. 2016. Vol. 6 (1). P. 29-45. https://doi.org/10.14318/hau6.1.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Goode E., Ben-Yehuda N. Moral Panics: The Social Construction of Deviance. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Hanegraaff W.J. New Age Religion and Western Culture: Esotericism in the Mirror of Secular Though. Leiden: Brill, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Hewson M. Agency // Encyclopedia of Case Study Research / Eds. A.J. Mills, G. Durepos, E. Wiebe. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc., 2010. P. 13-17.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Jones J. Let Me Take You Down: Inside the Mind of Mark David Chapman, the Man Who Killed John Lennon. N.Y.: Villard Books, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Jones P. Blasphemy, Offensiveness and Law // British Journal of Political Science. 1980. Vol. 10 (2). P. 129-148. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400002064</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Levy L.W. Blasphemy: Verbal Offense against the Sacred, from Moses to Salman Rushdie. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Nash D. Blasphemy in the Christian World: A History. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Oustinova-Stjepanovic G. End of Organized Atheism: The Genealogy of the Law on Freedom of Conscience and Its Conceptual Effects in Russia // History and Anthropology. 2020. Vol. 31 (5). P. 600-617. https://doi.org/10.1080/02757206.2019.1684271</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Philo S. British Invasion: The Crosscurrents of Musical Influence. Lanham: Rowman &amp; Littlefield, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Temperman J., Koltay A. Blasphemy and Freedom of Expression: Comparative, Theoretical and Historical Reflections after the Charlie Hebdo Massacre. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Turner S. Beatles ‘66: The Revolutionary Year. N.Y.: Ecco, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Walter N. Blasphemy Ancient and Modern. London: Rationalist Press Association, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>Wiener J.Come Together: John Lennon in His Time. Champaign: University of Illinois Press, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
