<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Ethno review</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Ethno review</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Этнографическое обозрение</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">0869-5415</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">3034-6274</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">The Russian Academy of Sciences</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">672549</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.31857/S0869541524020052</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="edn">CLCVRP</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Special theme of the issue: domestic ethnography and international scholarship in the 20th century: contacts, influences, and confrontations</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Специальная тема номера: Отечественная этнография и мировая наука в XX в.: контакты, влияния и противостояния</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">How Moscow did not become a world center of marxist anthropology: historian L.V. Danilova, theoretical discussions of the 1960s, and international contacts of soviet scholars</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Как Москва не стала мировым центром марксистской антропологии: историк Л.В. Данилова, теоретические дискуссии 1960-х годов и международные контакты советских ученых</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Alymov</surname><given-names>Sergei S.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Алымов</surname><given-names>Сергей Сергеевич</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio><p>к. и. н., старший научный сотрудник </p></bio><email>alymovs@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology, Russian Academy of Sciences</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Институт этнологии и антропологии РАН</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2024-08-26" publication-format="electronic"><day>26</day><month>08</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><issue>2</issue><fpage>89</fpage><lpage>110</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2025-02-27"><day>27</day><month>02</month><year>2025</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2024, Russian Academy of Sciences</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2024, Российская академия наук</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2024</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Russian Academy of Sciences</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Российская академия наук</copyright-holder></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.eco-vector.com/0869-5415/article/view/672549">https://journals.eco-vector.com/0869-5415/article/view/672549</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article analyzes theoretical and methodological discussions in Russian ethnography and historiography of the 1960s. The focus is on the fate of the historian L.V. Danilova and the collection, edited by her, “Problems of the History of Pre-Capitalist Societies” (1968), one of the brightest achievements of the non-dogmatic Marxism of the thaw era. On the basis of new archival materials, it reconstructs the project of the multi-volume publication “Laws of History and Specific Forms of the World Historical Process”, traces the roots of the “new direction” in ethnography, and offers a new reading of the activity of the history methodology sector of the Institute of History. International team of the would-be authors of this project could have made it a notable phenomenon in world Marxist thought. The author concludes that this did not happen because of the opposition of the conservative academic establishment.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Статья посвящена анализу теоретико-методологических дискуссий в отечественной этнографии и историографии 1960-х годов. В центре внимания – судьба историка Л.В. Даниловой и сборника под ее редакцией “Проблемы истории докапиталистических обществ” (1968), одного из ярких достижений недогматического марксизма эпохи оттепели. На новых архивных материалах реконструируется проект многотомного издания “Законы истории и конкретные формы всемирно-исторического процесса”, прослеживаются корни “нового направления” в этнографии, дается новое прочтение деятельности сектора методологии истории Института истории, а также освещаются международные связи, которые могли сделать данный проект заметным явлением мировой марксистской мысли. Автор приходит к выводу, что этого в полной мере не произошло из-за противодействия консервативного академического истеблишмента.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>history of anthropology</kwd><kwd>Soviet ethnography</kwd><kwd>philosophy of history</kwd><kwd>Marxism</kwd><kwd>pre-capitalist societies</kwd><kwd>Soviet historiography</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>история антропологии</kwd><kwd>советская этнография</kwd><kwd>философия истории</kwd><kwd>марксизм</kwd><kwd>докапиталистические общества</kwd><kwd>советская историография</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><award-group><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution xml:lang="ru">Российский научный фонд</institution></institution-wrap><institution-wrap><institution xml:lang="en">Russian Science Foundation</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>22-18-00241</award-id></award-group><funding-statement xml:lang="ru">Е.В. Говор; Е.В. Данилова; А.В. Журавель; Вал.М. Гефтер; Вл.М. Гефтер</funding-statement></funding-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Atnashev, T. 2023. Mikhail Gefter, Pavel Volobuev i drugie mastera pozdnesovetskogo diskursa. Dopolniaia Alekseia Yurchaka [Mikhail Gefter, Pavel Volobuev and Other Masters of Late-Soviet Discourse: Supplementing Alexei Yurchak]. Neprikosnovennyi zapas 2 (148): 43–63.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Атнашев Т. Михаил Гефтер, Павел Волобуев и другие мастера позднесоветского дискурса. Дополняя Алексея Юрчака // Неприкосновенный запас. 2023. № 2 (148). С. 43–63.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bakhta, V.M. 1960. K voprosu o strukture pervobytnogo proizvodstva [On the Question of the Structure of Primitive Production]. Voprosy istorii 7: 59–73.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Бахта В.М. К вопросу о структуре первобытного производства // Вопросы истории. 1960. № 7. С. 59–73.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bakhta, V.M. 1961. Otdel 1, Pervobytnoe obshchestvo i ego kul’tura [Pt 1, Primitive Society and Its Culture]. Vestnik istorii mirovoi kul’tury 1: 98–111.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Бахта В.М. Отдел 1. Первобытное общество и его культура // Вестник истории мировой культуры. 1961. № 1. С. 98–111.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bromley, Y.V. 1979. Problems of Primitive Society in Soviet Ethnology. In Towards a Marxist Anthropology: Problems and Perspectives, edited by S. Diamond, 201–214. Hague: Mouton Publishers.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Будрайтскис И. Диссиденты среди диссидентов. М.: Свободное марксистское издательство, 2017.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Budraitskis, I. 2017. Dissidenty sredi dissidentov [Dissidents among Dissidents]. Moscow: Svobodnoe marksistskoe izdatel’stvo.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Данилов А.И. К вопросу о методологии исторической науки // Коммунист. 1969. № 5. С. 68–81.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Claessen, H.J.M., and P. Skalnik, eds. 1978. The Early State. Hague: Mouton Publishers.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Данилова Л.В. Дискуссия по важной проблеме // Вопросы философии. 1965. № 12. С. 149–156.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Danilov, A.I. 1969. K voprosu o metodologii istoricheskoi nauki [On the Question of Methodology of History]. Kommunist 5: 68–81.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Данилова Л.В. Дискуссионные проблемы теории докапиталистических обществ // Проблемы истории докапиталистических обществ / Отв. ред. Л.В. Данилова. М.: Наука, 1968. С. 27–66.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Danilova, L.V. 1965. Diskussiia po vazhnoi probleme [Discussion on an Important Problem]. Voprosy filosofii 12: 149–156.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Данилова Л.В. Партийная организация Института истории АН СССР в идейном противостоянии с партийными инстанциями. 1966–1968 гг. // Вопросы истории. 2007. № 12. С. 44–80.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Danilova, L.V. 1968. Diskussionnye problemy teorii dokapitalisticheskikh obshchestv [Debatable Issues of the Theory of Precapitalist Societies]. In Problemy istorii dokapitalisticheskikh obshchestv [Problems of the History of Precapitalist Societies], edited by L.V. Danilova, 27–66. Moscow: Nauka.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Дмитриев А. Крот истории в спячке: о закате марксистской теории истории в послесталинском СССР // Неприкосновенный запас. 2023. № 2 (148). С. 28–42.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Danilova, L.V. 2007. Partiinaia organizatsiia Instituta istorii AN SSSR v ideinom protivostoianii s partiinymi instantsiiami. 1966–1968 [Party Organization of the Institute of History AS USSR in Opposition to the Party: 1966–1968]. Voprosy istorii 12: 44–80.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Драбкин Я.А. Памяти Михаила Яковлевича Гефтера // Новая и новейшая история. 1995. № 5. С. 113–129.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dmitriev, A. 2023. Krot istorii v spiachke: o zakate marksistskoi teorii istorii v poslestalinskom SSSR [The Mole of History in Hibernation: On the Decline of the Marxist Theory of History in the Post-Stalin USSR]. Neprikosnovennyi zapas 2 (148): 28–42.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Гефтер М., Драбкин Я., Мальков В. Мир за двадцать лет // Новый мир. 1965. № 6. С. 206–230.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Drabkin, Y.A. 1995. Pamiati Mikhaila Yakovlevicha Geftera [In Memory of M.Y. Gefter]. Novaia i noveishaia istoriia 5: 113–129.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Жуков Е.М. О периодизации всемирной истории // Вопросы истории. 1960. № 8. С. 22–33.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dunn, S.P. 1971. Review of Problemy istorii dokapitalisticheskikh obshchestv [Problems of the History of Pre-Capitalist Societies], edited by L.V. Danilova. American Anthropologist 4 (73): 828–829.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Журавель А.В. По линии наибольшего сопротивления (памяти Л.В. Даниловой) // Российская история. 2014. № 2. С. 90–103.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gefter, M., Y. Drabkin, and V. Malkov. 1965. Mir za dvadtsat’ let [The World of the Latest Twenty Years]. Novyi mir 6: 206–230.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Зимин А.А. Храм науки (Размышления о прожитом) // Судьбы творческого наследия отечественных историков второй половины ХХ века / Сост. А.Л. Хорошкевич. М.: Аквариус, 2015. С. 35–384.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gellner, E., et al. 1975. The Soviet and the Savage. Current Anthropology 4 (16): 595–617.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Калмыков Н.П. Евгений Михайлович Жуков (1907–1980) // Портреты историков. Время и судьбы. Т. 4, Новая и новейшая история / Отв. ред. Г.Н. Севостьянов. М.: Наука, 2004. С. 195–209.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kalmykov, N.P. 2004. Evgenii Mikhailovich Zhukov (1907–1980) [Evgenii Mikhailovich Zhukov (1907–1980)]. In Portrety istorikov. Vremia i sud’by [Portraits of Historians: Time and Fates]. Vol. 4, Novaia i noveishaia istoriia [Modern History], edited by G.N. Sevostianov, 195–209. Moscow: Nauka.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Неретина С.С. Точки на зрении. СПб.: Изд-во РХГА, 2005.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Markwick, R.D. 2001. Rewriting History in Soviet Russia: The Politics of Revisionist Historiography, 1956–1974. New York: Palgrave.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Никифоров В.Н. Восток и всемирная история. М.: Наука, 1975.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Neretina, S.S. 2005. Tochki na zrenii [Points on View]. St. Petersburg: Izdatel’stvo RKhGA.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Павлов Д.Б., Тихонов В.В., Чернобаев А.А. Институт российской истории РАН 1936–2021. Очерк истории // Институт российской истории РАН 1936–2021 гг. Очерк истории. Биобиблиографический словарь / Отв. ред. Ю.А. Петров, А.А. Чернобаев. М.: ИРИ РАН, 2021. С. 8–78.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nikiforov, V.N. 1975. Vostok i vsemirnaia istoriia [The East and World History]. Moscow: Nauka.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Семенов Ю.И. Норайр Бадамович Тер-Акопян (15.01.1926–25.01.2007) // Этнографическое обозрение. 2007. № 4. С. 178–182.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pavlov, D.B., V.V. Tikhonov, and A.A. Chernobaev. 2021. Institut rossiiskoi istorii RAN 1936–2021. Ocherk istorii [The Institute of Russian History RAS 1936–2021: An Outline of History]. In Institut rossiiskoi istorii RAN 1936–2021 gg. Ocherk istorii. Biobibliograficheskii slovar’ [The Institute of Russian History RAS 1936–2021: An Outline of History: Biobibliography], edited by Y.A. Petrov and A.A. Chernobaev, 8–78. Moscow: IRI RAN.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bromley Y.V. Problems of Primitive Society in Soviet Ethnology // Towards a Marxist Anthropology: Problems and Perspectives / Ed. S. Diamond. Hague: Mouton Publishers, 1979. P. 201–214.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ryzhkovskyi, V. 2019. Soviet Occidentalism: Medieval Studies and the Restructuring of Imperial Knowledge in Twentieth-Century Russia. PhD diss., Georgetown University.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Claessen H.J.M., Skalnik P. (eds.) The Early State. Hague: Mouton Publishers, 1978.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Semenov, Y.I. 2007. Norair Badamovich Ter-Akopian (15.01.1926–25.01.2007) [Norair Badamovich Ter-Akopian (15.01.1926–25.01.2007)]. Etnograficheskoe obozrenie 4: 178–182.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dunn S.P. Review of: Problemy istorii dokapitalisticheskikh obshchestv [Problems of the History of Pre-Capitalist Societies] / Ed. L.V. Danilova. M., 1968 // American Anthropologist. 1971. No. 4 (73). P. 828–829.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Skalnik, P. 2003. Gellner’s Encounter with Soviet Etnografiia. Social Evolution &amp; History 2 (2): 177–193.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gellner E. et al. The Soviet and the Savage // Current Anthropology. 1975. No. 4 (16). P. 595–617.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zhukov, E.M. 1960. O periodizatsii vsemirnoi istorii [On Periodization of World History]. Voprosy istorii 8: 22–33.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Markwick R.D. Rewriting History in Soviet Russia: The Politics of Revisionist Historiography, 1956–1974. N.Y.: Palgrave, 2001.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zhuravel, A.V. 2014. Po linii naibol’shego soprotivleniia (pamiati L.V. Danilovoi) [Against the Current (in Memory of L.V. Danilova). Rossiiskaia istoriia 2: 90–103.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ryzhkovskyi V. Soviet Occidentalism: Medieval Studies and the Restructuring of Imperial Knowledge in Twentieth-Century Russia. PhD diss. Georgetown University, Washington, D.C., 2019.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zimin, A.A. 2015. Khram nauki (Razmyshleniia o prozhitom) [Temple of Science: Reflections on the Past]. In Sud’by tvorcheskogo naslediia otechestvennykh istorikov vtoroi poloviny XX veka [The Heritage of Russian Historians of the Second Half of the 20 Century], edited by A.L. Khoroshkevich, 35–384. Moscow: Akvarius.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Skalnik P. Gellner’s Encounter with Soviet Etnografiia // Social Evolution &amp; History. 2003. No. 2 (2). P. 177–193.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list></back></article>
