Доклады Академии наукДоклады Академии наук0869-5652The Russian Academy of Sciences1794510.31857/S0869-56524892195-198Research ArticleApplicability of international indicators of land degradation neutrality estimation for Russian boreal forestsPtichnikovA. V.dkarelin7@gmail.comKarelinD. V.dkarelin7@gmail.comKotlyakovV. M.<p>Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences</p>dkarelin7@gmail.comPautovY. A.dkarelin7@gmail.comBorovlevA. Y.dkarelin7@gmail.comKuznetsovaD. A.dkarelin7@gmail.comZamolodchikovD. G.dkarelin7@gmail.comGrabovskyV. I.dkarelin7@gmail.comInstitute of Geography of the Russian Academy of SciencesCenter of Forest Ecology and ProductivitySilver Taiga Sustainable Development Fund2011201948921951980212201902122019Copyright © 2019, Russian academy of sciences2019<p class="a"><span lang="EN-US" style="letter-spacing: -.05pt;">In this paper, we analyze applicability of Land degradation neutrality (LDN) concept of the UN Convention to Combat Desertification for Russian boreal forests. In this regard, it is necessary to adapt the three global LDN indicators (land cover, land productivity, and carbon stocks) to the assessment of land degradation processes of boreal forests in Russia and around the world. The proposed study concludes that landscapes with different types of forest restoration dynamics can be viewed as the object in forest land dynamic studies. The proposed research also suggests the set of LDN indicators adapted for boreal forests conditions. In order to assess LDN proxies we calculated the retrospective and projected net carbon balance in the middle taiga zone of Noshulskoye forest domain (Komi Republic, Russia) using the CBM CFS model. Here we explored 3 scenarios of forest net carbon balance under the three different felling regimes. It was shown that the net carbon balance cannot be applied as an independent LDN indicator, since it does not take into account changes in species diversity and primary productivity. We also suggest that industrial felling should imitate natural types of restoration dynamics in order to achieve LDN targets. It can be reached through minimization of forest felling at sites with fireless types of succession, which accumulate maximum stocks of dead phytomass matter and serve as forest refuges supporting biodiversity.</span></p>Land degradation neutral balanceforests landscape dynamicscarbon balance“Priluzie” model forestнейтральный баланс деградации земельландшафтная динамика лесовуглеродный балансмодельный лес “Прилузье”[Конвенция ООН по борьбе с опустыниванием. Рамочная стратегия КБ ООН на 2018-2030 гг. URL: https://www.unccd.int/sites/default/files/relevant-links/2018-08/cop21add1_SF_RU.pdf][Куст Г.С., Андреева О.В., Лобковский В.А. Нейтральный баланс деградации земель - новейший подход для принятия решений в области землепользования и земельной политики // Проблемы постсоветского пространства. 2018. № 5 (4). С. 369-389. https://doi.org/10.24975/2313-8920-2018-5-4-369-389][Рекомендации по проведению рубок главного пользования с сохранением экологических свойств леса в участках малонарушенных (девственных) лесов на территории Республики Коми. Сыктывкар, 2006. 43 с.][Kull S., Kurz W.A., Rampley G., et al. Operational-Scale Carbon Budget Model of the Canadian Forest Sector (CBM-CFS3) Version 1.0: User’s Guide (Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Northern Forestry Centre, Edmonton, 2006).][Замолодчиков Д.Г., Грабовский В.И., Честных О.В. РОБУЛ-М: новое средство прогноза углеродного бюджета лесов // Леса России: политика, промышленность, наука, образование. Матер. II межд. научно-техн. конф. Т. 2. СПб.: СПбГЛТУ, 2017. С. 125-128.]