Вестник Российской академии наукВестник Российской академии наук0869-5873The Russian Academy of Sciences1524610.31857/S0869-5873897745-754Research ArticleWorld trade wars: new impact estimation toolsMakarovV. L.<p>Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Scientific Director of the CEMI of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Head of the Laboratory of the PRUE. G.V. Plekhanov</p>makarov@cemi.rssi.ruWuJie<p>Chairman of the Board of Guangzhou Milestone Software Co., Ltd., Researcher at the Center for Economic and Social Integration and Forecasting of the Academy of Social Sciences of the PRC, Guest Professor, Academy of Social Sciences of the Guangdong Province</p>jw@gzmss.comWuZili<p>Vice Chairman of Guangzhou Milestone Software Co., Ltd</p>wzl@gzmss.comKhabrievB. R.<p>Transaction Support Manager, RT-Business Development LLC, graduate student at CEMI RAS</p>khabrievbulat@me.comBakhtizinA. R.<p>Corresponding Member of RAS, Director of CEMI RAS</p>albert.bakhtizin@gmail.comCentral Economic and Mathematical Institute of the Russian Academy of SciencesPlekhanov Russian University of EconomicsGuangzhou Milestone Software Co., Ltd.Economic and Social Integration and Prediction Center of Chinese Academy of Social SciencesGuangdong Academy of Social SciencesLLC “RT-Development of Business”0807201989774575405072019Copyright © 2019, Russian academy of sciences2019<p style="text-align: justify;">This article provides an overview of the most well-known tools for quantifying the effects of trade wars. The most famous and highly cited works are analyzed. In these works, mathematical models that view the economic systems of several states and participants of international relations at the same time are considered, analysis of which revealed a certain bias of results in favor of individual countries, as well as the lack of consideration of the specific features of the economic systems of most of the subjects considered. In the next work, which is a continuation of this article, we will provide information regarding the model complex being developed for assessing the effects of intercountry trade wars, allowing us to carry out calculations of measures aimed at other countries that are against Russia and China and present the results obtained.</p>trade warsinternational relationseconomic and mathematical modelscomputational experimentsторговые войнымеждународные отношенияэкономико-математические моделивычислительные эксперименты[World Trade Statistical Review 2018. World Trade Organization, 2018. https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/wts2018_e/wts2018_e.pdf (дата обращения 26.03.2019).][Johnson H. G. Optimum Tariffs and Retaliation // The Review of Economic Studies. 1953. V. 21. № 2. P. 142-153.][Dong Y., Whalley J. Gains and Losses from Potential Bilateral US - China Trade Retaliation // Economic Modelling. 2012. V. 29(6). P. 2226-2236.][Gompert D. C., Astrid S. C., Cristina L. G. War with China: Thinking Through the Unthinkable. Santa Monica, Calif.: RAND Corporation, RR-1140-A, 2016. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1140.html (дата обращения 08.02.2019).][Corong E., Hertel T., McDougall R. et al. The Standard GTAP Model, Version 7 // Journal of Global Economic Analysis. 2017. № 2(1). P. 1-119.][Aguiar A., Narayanan B., McDougall R. An Overview of the GTAP 9 Data Base // Journal of Global Economic Analysis. 2016. № 1(1). P. 181-208.][Bollen J., Rojas-Romagosa H. Trade Wars: Economic impacts of US tariff increases and retaliations. An International Perspective. CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis, June 2018.][McDonald S., Thierfelder K. Globe v2: A SAM based global CGE model using GTAP data. 2015. www.cgemod.org.uk (дата обращения 08.02.2019).][Robinson S., Thierfelder K. NAFTA collapse, trade war and North American disengagement // Journal of Policy Modeling. 2018. V. 40(3). P. 614-635.][Bouët A., Laborde D. US trade wars with emerging countries in the 21st century: Make America and its partners lose again. IFPRI Discussion Paper 1669. Washington, D.C., 2017. http://ebrary.ifpri.org/cdm/ref/collection/p15738coll2/id/131368 (дата обращения 08.04.2019).][Chunding L., Chuantian H., Chuangwei L. Economic Impacts of the Possible China - US Trade War // Emerging Markets Finance and Trade. 2018. V. 54. № 7. P. 1557-1577.][Trade Wars: There are no winners // KPMG Economics & Tax Centre, August 2018. https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/au/pdf/2018/trade-wars-no-winners.pdf (дата обращения 08.02.2019).][Hopkins M. About the Moody’s Analytics Global Macroeconomic Model // Moody’s Analytics, March 2018. https://www.moodysanalytics.com/-/media/whitepaper/2018/global-macroeconomic-model-description-short-version (дата обращения 08.02.2019).][Herve K., Pain N., Richardson P. et al. The OECD’s New Global Model. OECD Economics Department Working Papers. 2010. № 768. OECD Publishing, Paris.][Vitek F. The Global Macrofinancial Model // IMF Working Paper. № 18/81. https://ssrn.com/abstract= 3182506 (дата обращения 26.03.2019).][Altshuler C., Holland D., Hong P., Li H.-Y. The World Economic Forecasting Model at the United Nations // Development Policy and Analysis Division. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. United Nations, August 2016. https://www.un.org/development/desa/dpad/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/publication/2016_Apr_WorldEconomicForecastingModel.pdf (дата обращения 08.02.2019).][Boissay F., Villetell J. The French Block of the ESCB Multi-Country Model. ECB Working Paper. 2005. № 456.][Angelini E., Boissay F., Ciccarelli M. The Dutch block of the ESCB multi-country model. ECB Working Paper Series. 2006. V. 646./June.][Vetlov I., Warmedinger T. The German Block of the ESCB Multi-Country model. ECB Working Papers Series. 2006. V. 654/July.][Angelini E., D,Agostino A., McAdam P. The Italian Block of the ESCB Multi-Country Model. ECB Working Paper. 2006. № 660.][Sideris D., Zonzilos N. The Greek Model of the European System of Central Banks Multi-Country Model. Bank of Greece, Working Paper. 2005. № 20.]