Известия Русского географического обществаИзвестия Русского географического общества0869-6071The Russian Academy of Sciences1119410.31857/S0869-607115113-16Review ArticleApproaches to the allocation of periphery and рeripheralization in the spatial development of modern RussiaAnokhinA. A.a.anohin@spbu.ruKuzinV. Yu.vadim-13.06@yandex.ruSaint Petersburg State UniversityNorth-Eastern Federal University named after M. K. Ammosov2602201915113162402201924022019Copyright © 2019,2019<p>The article is devoted to the issues of periphery and peripheralization of the spatial development of Russia, a significant part of the territory of which has experienced the negative direction of social and economic development during the transition to a market economy and continues to undergo it at the present time.</p>
<p>The article discusses the theoretical approaches of Russian and foreign authors to the definition of the concepts of periphery, peripheralization of space. Based on the use of methods of comparative analysis and systematization, the authors identified six main approaches of researchers to the definition of the concept of periphery: positional, functional, problem, generative-translational, social, subjective, and also revealed the content and peculiarity of each approach.</p>
<p>The authors highlighted such basic properties of the periphery as diverse remoteness, economic degradation and social marginalization, poly-scale character, migration outflow, ubiquity and relativity, weak involvement in global economic relations. A system of indicators characterizing the periphery in accordance with the selected approaches is proposed.</p>
<p>On the basis of the conducted research, it was concluded that the spatial development of individual centers of Russia is taking place with the spatial degradation of its most part, which significantly actualizes the question of the future of the Russian periphery and its impact on the spatial development of the country as a whole. Due to the weakness of its own potential, the Russian periphery cannot act as an independent attractor of socio-economic development and requires strengthening state regulation measures based on the competitive advantages of each territory.</p>spatial development inequalityperipheryрeripheralizationdepressed territoriescompetitive abilitygrowth polemigration.неравномерность пространственного развитияпериферияпериферизациядепрессивные территорииконкурентоспособностьполюс ростамиграция[Anokhin A. A. Geopoliticheskiye riski i konkurentosposobnost Rossii // Sovremennyye problemy teorii i praktiki obshchestvennoy geografii: Sb. nauch. trudov. SPb.: Izd-vo SpbGU, 2009. S. 28-38.][Anokhin A. A., Zhitin D. V., Krasnov A. I., Lachininskiy S. S. Sotsialno-ekonomicheskaya geografiya: traditsii i sovremennost // Vestn. SPbGU. Ser. 7. Geologiya. Geografiya. 2015. N 1. S. 75-85.][Anokhin A. A., Kuzin V. Yu. Aktualnyye voprosy sotsialno-geograficheskikh issledovaniy // Izv. RGO. 2018. T. 150, vyp. 2. S. 72-86.][Artobolevskiy S. S., Baklanov P. Ya., Treyvish A. I. Prostranstvo i razvitiye Rossii: polimasshtabnyy analiz // Vestn. RAN. 2009. T. 79, vyp. 2. S. 101-123.][Gerasimenko T. I. Etnokulturnyye transgranichnyye regiony - osnova dlya integratsii sopredelnykh gosudarstv (primer Orenburgsko-Kazakhstanskogo porubezhia) // Kotlyakov V. M., Streletskiy V. N., Glezer O. B., Safronov S. G. (otv. red.). Vopr. geogr. 2016. Sb. 141: Problemy regionalnogo razvitiya Rossii. M.: Izdatelskiy dom «Kodeks». S. 453-470.][Gritsay O. V., Ioffe G. V., Treyvish A. I. Tsentr i periferiya v regionalnom razvitii. M.: Institut geografii AN SSSR, 1991.][Druzhinin A. G. Polizavisimost v tsentro-periferiynoy stratifikatsii territorialnoy organizatsii obshchestva: osnovy kontseptsii. Sotsialno-ekonomicheskaya geografiya // Vestn. Assotsiatsii rossiyskikh geografov-obshchestvovedov. 2014. N 3. S. 29-40.][Zamyatina N. Yu., Pilyasov A. N. Rossiya, kotoruyu my obreli: issleduya prostranstvo na mikrourovne. M.: Novyy khronograf, 2013.][Zubarevich N. V. Regiony Rossii: neravenstvo, krizis, modernizatsiya. M.: Nezavisimyy institut sotsialnoy politiki, 2010.][Kaganskiy V. L. Vnutrennyaya periferiya - novaya rastushchaya zona kulturnogo landshafta Rossii // Izv. RAN. Ser. geograf. 2012. N 6. S. 23-34.][Kaybicheva E. I. Takaya mnogolikaya periferiya, ili k voprosu o tipologii periferiynykh regionov // Vestn. Samarskogo gos. ekonom. un-ta. 2017. N 7 (153). S. 23- 29.][Kryukov V. A. Rastushchaya periferiya // Vostok Rossii: problemy osvoyeniya - preodoleniya prostranstva. Novosibirsk: Izd-vo IEOPP SO RAN, 2017. S. 234- 236.][Kuzin V. Yu. Prostranstvennyye osobennosti sotsialnogo neravenstva v Voronezhskoy oblasti // Vestn. SPbGU. Ser. 7. Geologiya. Geografiya. 2012. N 4. S. 146- 154.][Kuzin V. Yu. Ekonomicheskaya i sotsialnaya polyarizatsiya regionov Rossii: nekotoryye trendy. Sotsialno-ekonomicheskaya geografiya // Vestn. Assotsiatsii rossiyskikh geografov-obshchestvovedov. 2018. N 7. S. 263-270.][Martynov V. L. Rossiyskaya sotsialno-ekonomicheskaya geografiya: sovremennoye sostoyaniye, osnovnyye problemy i perspektivy razvitiya // Baltiyskiy region. 2015. N 2 (24). S. 109-126.][Maslikhina V. Yu. Prostranstvennaya neodnorodnost ekonomicheskogo razvitiya regionalnykh sistem v Rossii // Vestn. Povolzhskogo gos. tekhnologich. un-ta. Ser. Ekonomika i upravleniye. 2013. N 1. S. 5-16.][Nefedova T. G. Rossiyskaya periferiya kak sotsialno-ekonomicheskiy fenomen // Regionalnyye issledovaniya. 2008. N 5 (20). S. 14-30.][Nosonov A. M. Teorii prostranstvennogo razvitiya v sotsialno-ekonomicheskoy geografii // Pskovskiy regionologicheskiy zhurnal. 2011. N 11. S. 3-16.][Nymmik S. Ya. O yadrakh rayonoobrazovaniya // Vestn. MGU. Ser. 5. Geografiya. 1970. N 1. S. 47-52.][Preobrazhenskiy Yu. V. Podkhody k vyyavleniyu tsentra i periferii // Izv. Saratovskogo un-ta. Novaya ser. Ser. Nauki o Zemle. 2016. N 16. 4. S. 216-221.][Preobrazhenskiy Yu. V., Tsoberg O. A. Podkhody k izucheniyu degradatsii territorialnykh obshchestvennykh sistem // Vestn. TvGU. Ser. Geografiya i geoekologiya. 2016. N 2. S. 129-138.][Preodoleniye prostranstvennogo neravenstva. Kak snova sobrat sovetskiy «pazl» v usloviyakh rynochnoy ekonomiki. Gruppa Vsemirnogo banka, 2018.][Prostranstvo sovremennoy Rossii: vozmozhnosti i baryery razvitiya (razmyshleniya geografov-obshchestvovedov) / Otv. red. A. G. Druzhinin. V. A. Kolosov. V. E. Shuvalov. M.: Vuzovskaya kniga, 2012. 336 s.][Rodoman B. B. Ekspressnyy transport, rasseleniye i okhrana prirody // Metody izucheniya rasseleniya. M.: In-t geografii AN SSSR, 1987. S. 44-54.][Rodoman B. B. Rossiyskaya vnutrennyaya periferiya: vzglyad v raznykh priblizheniyakh. na raznykh urovnyakh // Rossiyskaya glubinka - modeli i metody izucheniya. Eslan; M.: In-t geografii RAN, 2012. S. 41-48.][Szhatiye sotsialno-ekonomicheskogo prostranstva: novoye v teorii regionalnogo razvitiya i praktike ego gosudarstvennogo regulirovaniya. Eslan; M., 2010.][Strategiya prostranstvennogo razvitiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii na period do 2025 goda. M., 2018.][Bathelt H., Henn S. The geographies of knowledge transfers over distance: Toward a typology // Environment and Planning A 46. 2014. Vol. 6. 1403-1424.][Beetz S. Die Natur der Peripherien / Ed. K.-S. Rehberg. Die Natur der Gesellschaft. Verhandlungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie in Kassel 2006, Teil 1, Frankfurt a. M.: Campus. 2008. P. 77-562.][Beetz S. Peripherisierung als räumliche Organisation sozialer Ungleichheit / Eds by E. Barlösius, C. Neu // Peripherisierung - eine neue Form sozialer Ungleichheit? Berlin: Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften. 2008. P. 7-16.][Bernt M., Liebmann H. (eds). Peripherisierung, Stigmatisierung, Abhängigkeit? Deutsche Mittelstädte und ihr Umgang mit Peripherisierungsprozessen. Wiesbaden: Springer, 2013.][Bürk T. Voices from the margin: The stigmatization process as an effect of socio-spatial peripheralization in small-town Germany / Eds by A. Fischer-Tahir and M. Naumann // Peripheralization. The Making of Spatial Dependencies and Social Injustice. Wiesbaden: Springer VS, 2013. 86-168.][Convergence without Equity: A Closer Look at Spatial Disparities in Russia. World Bank, 2017.][Egedy T., Redmond D., Ehrlich K. Urban Regeneration and Housing as Potential Tools for Enhancing the Creative Economy. Place-making and Policies for Competitive Cities, 2013. 127-147.][Friedmann J. Regional Development Policy: A Case Study of Venezuela, MIT Press, 1966.][Komlosy A. An den Rand gedrängt: Wirtschafts- und Sozialgeschichte des oberen Waldviertels. Österreichische Texte zur Gesellschaftskritik. Bd. 34. Wien: Verlag für Gesellschaftskritik, 1988.][Kühn M., Weck S. Peripherisierung - ein Erklärungsansatz zur Entsteheung von Peripherien / Eds by M. Bernt and H. Liebmann // Peripherisierung, Stigmatisierung, Abhängigkeit? Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, 2013. P. 24-46.][Mehretu A., Pigozzi B. W., Sommers L. M. Concepts in social and spatial marginality. Geografiska Annaler 82B, 2000. P. 89-101.][Suorsa K. Regionality, innovation policy and peripheral regions in Finland, Sweden and Norway. 2007. Fennia 185 (1). 15-29.][Understanding Geographies of Polarization and Peripheralization. Perspectives from Central and Eastern Europe and Beyond, 2015 / Eds by Thilo Lang, Sebastian Henn, Wladimir Sgibnev, Kornelia Ehrlich. DOI: 10.1057/9781137415080.][Viturka M., Pařil V., Tonev P., Šašinka P., Kunc J. The metropolisation processes: a case of Central Europe and the Czech Republic. Prague Economic Papers. 2017. 26(5). 505-522.][World Development Report. Reshaping Economic Geography, Washington, DC: World Bank, 2009.]