Specifics of femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty: a review

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Optimal rotational alignment of the femoral component is critical in total knee arthroplasty. The measured resection technique, gap-balancing technique, and hybrid approach are available intraoperative methods for determining femoral rotation; however, each has distinct advantages and limitations. This review aimed to examine the potential of preoperative planning, assess the impact of femoral component malrotation and its acceptable limits on surgical outcomes, and determine the feasibility of using standard intraoperative methods for establishing femoral component rotation as a reference approach in total knee arthroplasty. The systematic review was planned and conducted in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The review reports study characteristics, the number of patients dissatisfied with surgical outcomes, and the specific features of preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative methods used to determine femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty. Initially, 354 articles meeting the main search criteria were identified. Overall, outcomes from 2132 total knee arthroplasties reported in the retrieved publications were analyzed. A total of 149 patients were dissatisfied with surgical outcomes because of anterior knee pain. As modern imaging technologies continue to advance rapidly, the use of more contemporary preoperative assessment methods is becoming increasingly relevant to improve clinical outcomes. Although visual and manual techniques may appear effective, they may be associated with a risk of femoral component malrotation exceeding 3°, which to some extent limits their use in clinical practice. The use of costly imaging modalities, such as computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, is not a standard procedure for postoperative screening assessment of implant position.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Roman A. Zubavlenko

Scientific Research Institute of Traumatology, Orthopedics and Neurosurgery, Razumovsky Saratov State Medical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: sarniiton@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8225-1150
SPIN-code: 2459-8660
Russian Federation, Saratov

Vladimir V. Ostrovskij

Scientific Research Institute of Traumatology, Orthopedics and Neurosurgery, Razumovsky Saratov State Medical University

Email: sarniito@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8602-2715
SPIN-code: 7078-8019

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Saratov

References

  1. Kuzin VV, Kuzin AV, Germanov AV, Shpak MA. Impact of personalized alignment technique on implant components position in total knee arthroplasty. Genij Ortopedii. 2025;31(1):12–18. doi: 10.18019/1028-4427-2025-31-1-12-18 EDN: IVFKMZ
  2. Kornilov NN, Kulyaba TA. Arthroplasty of the Knee Joint. St. Petersburg: RNIITO; 2012. (In Russ.)
  3. Lavand’homme P, Thienpont E. Pain after total knee arthroplasty: a narrative review focusing on the stratification of patients at risk for persistent pain. Bone Joint Journal. 2015;97-B(Suppl A):45–48. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B10.36524
  4. Kim YH, Park JW, Kim JS, Park SD. The relationship between the survival of total knee arthroplasty and postoperative coronal, sagittal and rotational alignment of knee prosthesis. Int Orthop. 2014;38(2):379–385. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-2097-9
  5. Becker R, Bäker K, Hommel H, et al. No correlation between rotation of femoral components in the transverse plane and clinical outcome after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019;27(5):1456–1462. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-4981-8
  6. Favroul C, Batailler C, Canetti R, et al. Image-based robotic unicompartmental knee arthroplasty allowed to match the rotation of the tibial implant with the native kinematic knee alignment. Int Orthop. 2023;47(2):519–526. doi: 10.1007/s00264-022-05637-1
  7. Khominets VV, Metlenko PA, Kudyashev AL, et al. Implementation of the preoperative plan for knee joint endoprosthetics: standard technique and computer navigation. In: XII All-Russian Congress of Traumatology and Orthopedics: Collection of Abstracts, Moscow, December 01–03, 2022. Saint Petersburg: Saint Petersburg Public Organization “Man and His Health”; 2022: 954–955. (In Russ.) EDN: SLVHXW
  8. Vagapova VSh. Functional morphology of the knee joint. Bashkortostan Medical Journal 2007;2(5S):69-74. (In Russ.).
  9. Khominets VV, Gajvoronsky IV, Kudyashev AL, et al. Experimental substantiation of the optimal technique for choosing the rotation of the femoral component of the knee endoprosthesis. Bulletin of the Russian Military Medical Academy 2021;23(1):129–134. doi: 10.17816/brmma63630 EDN: DSITFH
  10. Zhizhenkova TV, Danilyak VV, Klyuchevskу VV, Klyuchevskу VasV. Diagnostic of patellar instability after total knee arthroplasty. Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia. 2015;(2):24–31. EDN: UBZEGD
  11. Weber P, Gollwitzer H. Kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2021;33(6):525–537. doi: 10.1007/s00064-021-00729-4
  12. Batailler C, Hannouche D, Benazzo F, Parratte S. Concepts and techniques of a new robotically assisted technique for total knee arthroplasty: the ROSA knee system. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021;141(12):2049–2058. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04048-y
  13. Gorbatov RO, Malyshev EE, Romanov AD, Karyakin NN. Total knee arthroplasty using virtual prototyping and additive manufacturing. Modern technologies in medicine. 2018;10(3):146–154. doi: 10.17691/stm2018.10.3.18 EDN: YLLJOX
  14. Ferris MS, Picart B, Boisrenoult P, Pujol N. Distal femoral torsion positioning in total knee arthroplasty shows equal reliability using a computer-assisted system or a robotic arm. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2023:103738. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2023.10373
  15. Nam JH, Koh YG, Kim PS, et al. Effect of the presence of the articular cartilage on the femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty in female and varus osteoarthritis knees. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020;15(1):499. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020- 02030-9
  16. Duan G, Liu C, Lin W, et al. Different Factors Conduct Anterior Knee Pain Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Arthroplasty 2018;33(6):1962–1971.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.12.024
  17. Scott CEH, Clement ND, Yapp LZ, et al. Association Between Femoral Component Sagittal Positioning and Anterior Knee Pain in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A 10-Year Case-Control Follow-up Study of a Cruciate-Retaining Single-Radius Design. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019;101(17):1575–1585. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.01096
  18. Thielemann FW, Konstantinids L, Herget GW, et al. Effect of Rotational Component Alignment on Clinical Outcome 5 to 7 Years After TKA With the Columbus Knee System. Orthopedics. 2016;39(3 Suppl):S50–55. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20160509-17
  19. Moewis P, Duda GN, Trepczynski A, et al. Retention of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Alone May Not Achieve Physiological Knee Joint Kinematics After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021;103(2):146–154. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.00024
  20. Barrack RL, Schrader T, Bertot AJ, et al. Component rotation and anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;392:46–55. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200111000-00006
  21. Berger RA, Rubash HE, Seel MJ, et al. Determining the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the epicondylar axis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;(286):40–47.
  22. Pietsch M, Hofmann S. Early revision for isolated internal malrotation of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20(6):1057–1063. doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1637-3
  23. Kulyaba TA, Kornilov NN, Tikhilov RM, editors. Guide to Primary Knee Arthroplasty. St. Petersburg: R.R. Vreden National Medical Research Center for Traumatology and Orthopedics; 2022, 636 p. (In Russ.)
  24. Kokubu Y, Kawahara S, Mizu-Uchi H, et al. Component rotational mismatch in the standing position is a potential risk factor for unfavourable functional outcomes after total knee arthroplasty. J Exp Orthop. 2024;11(3):e12069. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.12069
  25. Sereda AP, Sagradyan AS, Lychagin AV. Endoprosthetics of the articular surface of the patella in total arthroplasty of the knee joint. The department of traumatology and orthopedics. 2012;(3):18–28. (In Russ.) EDN: PDAUGP
  26. Yaffe M, Luo M, Goyal N, et al. Clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes following total knee arthroplasty with patientspecific instrumentation, computer-assisted surgery, and manual instrumentation: a short-term follow-up study. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2014;9(5):837–844. doi: 10.1007/s11548-013-0968-6
  27. Voleti PB, Hamula MJ, Baldwin KD, Lee GC. Current data do not support routine use of patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2014;29(9):1709–1712. doi: 10.1016/j. arth.2014.01.039
  28. Zubavlenko RA, Nam AV, Voskresensky OYu, et al. Relationship of the supraglenoid axis running parallel to the implanted femoral component of the knee joint endoprosthesis with a new anatomical landmark of the femur. In: III ORTOBIOLOGY 2022 Congress «From Research to Clinical Practice»: Abstracts, Moscow, April 15–16, 2022. Voronezh: Scientific Book Publishing and Printing Center; 2022: 31–33. (In Russ.) EDN: ONQUPZ
  29. Seo JG, Kim BK, Moon YW, et al. Bony landmarks for determining the mechanical axis of the femur in the sagittal plane during total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Surg. 2009;1(3):128–131. doi: 10.4055/cios.2009.1.3.128
  30. El Qaseer MH, Zykin AA, Malyshev EE. Rotational alignment of components in total knee arthroplasty (review). Modern technologies in medicine. 2024;16(6):78–89. doi: 10.17691/stm2024.16.6.07 EDN: MLTXUY
  31. Jang ES, Connors-Ehlert R, LiArno S, et al. Accuracy of Reference Axes for Femoral Component Rotation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Computed Tomography-Based Study of 2,128 Femora. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019;101(23):e125. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.00438
  32. Hirschmann MT, Konala P, Amsler F, et al. The position and orientation of total knee replacement components: a comparison of conventional radiographs, transverse 2D-CT slices and 3D-CT reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93(5):629–633. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B5.25893
  33. Rajgopal A, Sudarshan P, Kumar S, Aggarwal K. Failure modes in malrotated total knee replacement. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023;143(5):2713–2720. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04569-0
  34. Karimov MYu, Madrahimov SB. Evaluation of the medium-term results of the lateral retinaculum release during total knee arthroplasty. Politravma 2023;(2):45–52. doi: 10.24412/1819-1495-2023-2-45-52 EDN: QHYVZX
  35. Murylev VYu, Alekseev SS, Elizarov PM., et al. Evaluation of Pain Syndrome in Patients after Total Knee Replacement. Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia 2019;25(2):19–30. doi: 10.21823/2311-2905-2019-25-2-19-30 EDN: BRSZQP
  36. Lychagin AV, Rukin YaA, Gritsyuk AA, Pang Zh. The influence of extension-flexion gap imbalance on the joint function in primary total knee arthroplasty. Genij Ortopedii. 2023;29(2):159–166. doi: 10.18019/1028-4427-2023-29-2-159-166 EDN: LTXOVN
  37. Olcott CW, Scott RD. The Ranawat Award. Femoral component rotation during total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;(367):39–42.
  38. Lee JK, Lee S, Chun SH, et al. Rotational alignment of femoral component with different methods in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;18(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1574-5
  39. Hanada M, Hotta K, Matsuyama Y. Impact of implant positions in total knee arthroplasty on the postoperative knee kinematics of tibial rotation. J Orthop. 2024;(58):24–28. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.06.025
  40. Elkins JM, Jennings JM, Johnson RM, et al. Component Rotation in Well-Functioning, Gap Balanced Total Knee Arthroplasty Without Navigation. J Arthroplasty. 2023;38(6S):S204–S208. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.03.03
  41. Liu K, Liu Y, Fan Z, Fu D. Accuracy and reproducibility of two-dimensional computed tomography-based positioning of femoral component rotational alignment in preoperative planning for total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023;18(1):964. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04466-1

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download
2. Fig. 1. Methodology for the selection of scientific sources in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines.

Download (289KB)
Indexing metadata

Copyright (c) 2026 Eco-Vector

License URL: https://eco-vector.com/for_authors.php#07
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77-76249 от 19.07.2019.