Perioperative telemonitoring in patients with degenerative spinal disorders



Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Currently, there are a number of platforms in Russia designed for remote interaction between physicians and patients, developed to promote telemedicine services. Given the high prevalence of degenerative-dystrophic spinal diseases in the general population and the frequent need for medical care — including surgical interventions — among these patients, there is a clear need to automate monitoring and data collection for this specific patient cohort.

AIM: To develop scenarios for an automated process of interaction between a healthcare facility, physician, and patient during the perioperative period using a vertebrology department as an example, and to evaluate the effectiveness of their implementation.

METHODS: Eight patient data collection scenarios were developed within the Medsenger platform. These scenarios were adapted to the specific pathologies of patients with degenerative spinal diseases, the type of planned surgical intervention, the extent of preoperative examination, and the process of clinical data collection.

RESULTS: During the first quarter of 2025, 89% of patients (317/356) activated their accounts, indicating a high level of engagement in undergoing treatment at the department. Examination results of more than 92% (224/242) of patients were successfully reviewed by a general practitioner in advance. Moreover, when test results were reviewed beforehand, the time required for a general practitioner’s examination in the admission ward was reduced from 40 to 20 minutes (by half). Preliminary review of examination results by the admitting physician reduced hospitalization cancellations sevenfold compared to the previous year. Remote completion of required clinical questionnaires significantly decreased the workload on mid-level medical staff: previously, questionnaires were filled out on paper or electronically under staff supervision.

CONCLUSION: Developing scenarios for the Medsenger platform is not simple and requires effort and time; however, with proper adaptation, its routine use significantly simplifies the daily work of department staff. Comprehensive data collection from hospitalized patients and dynamic tracking of clinical parameters form a solid foundation for scientific research and the creation of disease-specific registries.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Aleksei Kokorev

ФГБУ "НМИЦ ТО им.Н.Н.Приорова" МЗ РФ

Author for correspondence.
Email: kokorevai@cito-priorov.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5829-6372
SPIN-code: 7734-8476
Scopus Author ID: 57209688408
ResearcherId: JWP-5220-2024

Начальник отдела организации деятельности травматолого-ортопедической службы, врач травматолог-ортопед, к.м.н.

Russian Federation, Москва, Новоспасский пер.9

Olga N. Leonova

N.N. Priorov Central Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedic

Email: onleonova@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9916-3947
SPIN-code: 4907-0634

MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.)

Russian Federation, 9 Novospasskiy per., Moscow, 115172

Evgenii S. Baykov

N.N. Priorov Central Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedic

Email: Evgen-bajk@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4430-700X
SPIN-code: 5367-5438

MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.)

Russian Federation, 9 Novospasskiy per., Moscow, 115172

Vitaly R. Zakharin

Priorov National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics

Email: zakhvit@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1553-2782
SPIN-code: 2931-0703

MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, 10 Priorova str., 127299 Moscow

Nikita S. Kuzmin

N.N. Priorov Central Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedic

Email: mr.kuzmin.87@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0007-7447-024X
SPIN-code: 2978-5700
Russian Federation, 9 Novospasskiy per., Moscow, 115172

Aleksandr V. Krutko

N.N. Priorov Central Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedic

Email: ortho-ped@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2570-3066
SPIN-code: 8006-6351

MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.)

Russian Federation, 9 Novospasskiy per., Moscow, 115172

References

  1. Batsina EA, Popsuyko AN, Artamonova GV. Digitalization of healthcare in the Russian Federation: myth or reality? Vrach i informatsionnye tekhnologii. 2020;(3):73–80. doi: 10.37690/1811-0193-2020-3-73-80 EDN: BMYUHL
  2. Cruz Rivera S, Mercieca-Bebber R, Aiyegbusi OL, et al. The need for ethical guidance for the use of patient-reported outcomes in research and clinical practice. Nat Med. 2021;27(4):572–573. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01275-z EDN: LIOJMA
  3. Shaderkin IA, Shaderkina VA. Remote medical consultations in Russia: what has changed in 20 years? Rossiiskii zhurnal telemekditsiny i elektronnogo zdravookhraneniya. 2021;7(2):7–17. doi: 10.29188/2712-9217-2021-7-2-7-17 EDN: ROWCZD
  4. Osadchaya PV, Garanin AA, Davydkin IL. Opportunities for telemonitoring of patients with hematological diseases: a narrative review. Vrach i informatsionnye tekhnologii . 2025;(1):22–29. doi: 10.25881/18110193_2025_1_22 EDN: ZFYKEP
  5. Certificate of state registration of a computer program No. 2019619421. Medsenger.AI — a conversational intelligence system used as part of a specialized medical messenger. Applicant LLC "Telepat". No. 2019617967. Filed 02.07.2019. Published 17.07.2019. EDN: FOGBAV
  6. Esin IV, Perecmanas EO, Zingerma BV, et al. Modern technologies for telemedical monitoring of patients with spinal diseases during the pandemic. Vrach i informatsionnye tekhnologii. 2023;(1):4–15. doi: 10.25881/18110193_2023_1_4 EDN: LCZGJJ
  7. Savinova TL, Grudkin AA, Ermolaeva IV, et al. Remote monitoring of pregnant women: Orenburg experience. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya. 2024;(11):162–172. doi: 10.18565/aig.2024.212 EDN: HZMKKV
  8. Van der Horst AY, Kelders SM, Bohlmeijer ET, et al. Digital health interventions for spinal surgery patients: a systematic scoping review. Digit Health. 2025;11:20552076251328549. doi: 10.1177/20552076251328549
  9. Venkatraman V, Kirsch EP, Luo E, et al. Outcomes with a mobile digital health platform for patients undergoing spine surgery: retrospective analysis. JMIR Perioper Med. 2022;5(1):e38690. doi: 10.2196/38690 EDN: MWJTTC
  10. Góngora Alonso S, De la Torre Díez I, Zapirain B. Predictive, personalized, preventive and participatory (4P) medicine applied to telemedicine and eHealth in the literature. J Med Syst. 2019;43(5):1279. doi: 10.1007/s10916-019-1279-4 EDN: LPVJUY
  11. Rowland SP, Fitzgerald JE, Holme T, et al. What is the clinical value of mHealth for patients? NPJ Digit Med. 2020;3:4. doi: 10.1038/s41746-019-0206-x EDN: VSSZQN

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) Eco-Vector



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77-76249 от 19.07.2019.