Modular arthroplasty in patients with primary malignant pelvic bone tumors of the periacetabular localization (clinical cases)



Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Treatment of patients with pelvic bone sarcomas is accompanied by a high percentage of complications and unsatisfactory treatment results. During reconstructive surgeries in patients with malignant tumors of the periacetabular localization, modular hip endoprotheses with a cup having a conical stem are increasingly used.

CLINICAL CASES DESCRIPTION: We analyzed 15 cases of periacetabular resections with acetabular reconstruction using the LUMiC modular endoprosthesis in patients aged 19 to 71 with pelvic bone lesions caused by primary malignant tumors. Distribution by gender, age, and nosology: there were 14 men (93.3%) and 1 woman (6.7%); the average age was 47.1 years; chondrosarcoma was diagnosed in 11 cases (73.3%), osteosarcoma in 3 (20%), and epithelioid hemangioendothelioma in 1 (6.7%). A combined approach was used in 10 patients, and an iliac-inguinal-femoral approach was used in 5 patients. Resections in the PI–II zone were performed in 2 patients, in the PII zone in 5 patients, in the PII–III zone in 6 patients, and in the PI–II–III zone in 2 patients. Complications occurred in 40.0% of cases during a median follow-up period of 37.2 months (6 to 64 months). The mortality rate was 6.7% (1 patient died in the early postoperative period due to acute myocardial infarction). Deep periprosthetic infection was detected in 3 patients (20.0%) at 3, 12 weeks, and 19 months, and the endoprostheses were removed: in 2 cases, nearthrosis was created, and in one case, an inter-iliac abdominal amputation was performed. Dislocation occurred in 1 case (6.7%) in the early postoperative period due to a violation of the orthopedic regimen and was resolved closed. 1 patient (6.7%) developed persistent sciatic neuropathy in the early postoperative period. No tumor progression was observed during the follow-up period. No cases of aseptic instability of the endoprostheses were observed. The functional result on the MSTS scale was good or excellent in 10 out of 15 cases, with an average of 69.7% (16,7% to 90%).

CONCLUSION: The use of modular hip endoprostheses, including a cup with a cone-shaped stem, during surgeries in patients with primary malignant tumors of the pelvic bones of the periacetabular localization, is a promising method of surgical treatment. However, according to our results and international data, the frequency of infectious complications (up to 25%) and dislocations (up to 19%) in the postoperative period remains relatively high, which requires further research.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Anton G Nazarenko

Priorov National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Moscow, Russia

Email: nazarenkoag@cito-priorov.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1314-2887
SPIN-code: 1402-5186

д-р мед. наук, член-корреспондент РАН

Russian Federation, 127299, Россия, Москва, ул. Приорова, д. 10.

Vadim Yu Karpenko

Priorov National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Moscow, Russia

Email: Karpenko@cito-priorov.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8280-8163
SPIN-code: 1360-8298

MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.)

Russian Federation, 127299, Россия, Москва, ул. Приорова, д. 10.

Kirill A Antonov

Priorov National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Moscow, Russia

Email: osteopathology6@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0005-0176-2829

oncologist

Russian Federation, 127299, Россия, Москва, ул. Приорова, д. 10.

Aleksandr F Kolondaev

Priorov National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Moscow, Russia.

Author for correspondence.
Email: klndff@inbox.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4216-8800
SPIN-code: 5388-2606
Scopus Author ID: 57971455700

Ph.D, senior researcher

Russian Federation, 127299, Россия, Москва, ул. Приорова, д. 10.

Anatoliy L Karasev

Priorov National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Moscow, Russia

Email: karaseva81@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3356-5193

oncologist

Russian Federation, 127299, Россия, Москва, ул. Приорова, д. 10.

Nikita A Lyubeznov

Priorov National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Moscow, Russia

Email: nikitkalyubeznov@gmail.com

traumatologist

Russian Federation, 127299, Россия, Москва, ул. Приорова, д. 10.

References

  1. Kaprin AD, editor. Malignant Neoplasms in Russia in 2023 (Incidence and Mortality). Moscow: P.A. Herzen Moscow Research Institute of Oncology — branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation; 2024. 276 p. (In Russ).
  2. Wilson RJ, Freeman TH Jr, Halpern JL, Schwartz HS, Holt GE. Surgical Outcomes After Limb-Sparing Resection and Reconstruction for Pelvic Sarcoma: A Systematic Review. JBJS Rev. 2018;6(4):e10. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.17.00072
  3. Laitinen MK, Parry MC, Morris GV, Jeys LM. Pelvic bone sarcomas, prognostic factors, and treatment: A narrative review of the literature. Scand J Surg. 2023;112(3):206–215. doi: 10.1177/14574969231181504
  4. Zagorodnii NV, Karpenko VY, Karasev AL, et al. Reconstructive surgery for locally advanced malignant tumors periacetabular region. N.N. Priorov Journal of Traumatology and Orthopaedics. 2020;27(3):42–51. doi: 10.17816/vto202027342-51 EDN: TJTMKY
  5. Brown TS, Salib CG, Rose PS, et al. Reconstruction of the hip after resection of periacetabular oncological lesions: a systematic review. Bone Joint J. 2018;100-B(1 Supple A):22–30. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B1.BJJ-2017-0548.R1
  6. Fujiwara T, Ogura K, Christ A, et al. Periacetabular reconstruction following limb-salvage surgery for pelvic sarcomas. J Bone Oncol. 2021;31:100396. doi: 10.1016/j.jbo.2021.100396
  7. Jeon DG, Kim MS, Cho WH, Song WS, Lee SY. Reconstruction with pasteurized autograft-total hip prosthesis composite for periacetabular tumors. J Surg Oncol. 2007;96(6):493–502. doi: 10.1002/jso.20834
  8. Lee SY, Jeon DG, Cho WH, et al. Pasteurized Autograft-Prosthesis Composite Reconstruction May Not Be a Viable Primary Procedure for Large Skeletal Defects after Resection of Sarcoma. Sarcoma. 2017;2017:9710964. doi: 10.1155/2017/9710964
  9. Ogura K, Susa M, Morioka H, et al. Reconstruction using a constrained-type hip tumor prosthesis after resection of malignant periacetabular tumors: A study by the Japanese Musculoskeletal Oncology Group (JMOG). J Surg Oncol. 2018;117(7):1455–1463. doi: 10.1002/jso.25005
  10. Nieder E, Elson RA, Engelbrecht E, et al. The saddle prosthesis for salvage of the destroyed acetabulum. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990;72(6):1014–22. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.72B6.2246283
  11. Steinbrink K, Engelbrecht E, Fenelon GC. The total femoral prosthesis. A preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1982;64(3):305–12. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.64B3.7096396
  12. Menendez LR, Ahlmann ER, Falkinstein Y, Allison DC. Periacetabular reconstruction with a new endoprosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(11):2831–7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-1043-z
  13. Jansen JA, van de Sande MA, Dijkstra PD. Poor long-term clinical results of saddle prosthesis after resection of periacetabular tumors. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(1):324-31. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2631-x
  14. Broekhuis D, Boyle R, Karunaratne S, Chua A, Stalley P. Custom designed and 3D-printed titanium pelvic implants for acetabular reconstruction after tumour resection. Hip Int. 2023;33(5):905–915. doi: 10.1177/11207000221135068
  15. Hu X, Lu M, Zhang Y, et al. Pelvic-girdle reconstruction with three-dimensional-printed endoprostheses after limb-salvage surgery for pelvic sarcomas: current landscape. Br J Surg. 2023;110(12):1712–1722. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad310
  16. Luo Y, Sheng H, Zhou Y, et al. Modular Hemipelvic Prosthesis Preserves Normal Biomechanics and Showed Good Compatibility: A Finite Element Analysis. J Funct Biomater. 2024;15(9):276. doi: 10.3390/jfb15090276
  17. Patterson M. Ring uncemented hip replacements. The results of revision. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1987;69(3):374–80. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.69B3.3584187
  18. Schoellner C, Schoellner D. Pedestal cup operation in acetabular defects after hip cup loosening. A progress report. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2000;138(3):215–21. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-10139
  19. Karpenko VU, Derzhavin VA, Shchupak MU, et al. Reconstruction with modular endoprothesis after periacetabular resections in patients with pekvic tumors. Early results. Multicenter research. Siberian journal of oncology. 2016;15(1):11–18. doi: 10.21294/1814-4861-2016-15-1-11-18 EDN: VSLVAN
  20. Iluridze GD, Bucharov AV, Karpenko VYu, Derzhavin VA. Results of modular endoprosthetic reconstruction of periacetabular bone defects in patients with tumors of the acetabulum and hip joint. Siberian journal of oncology. 2020;19(2):90–99. doi: 10.21294/1814-4861-2020-19-2-90-99 EDN: BEKYHJ
  21. Zoccali C, Giannicola G, Zoccali G, et al. The iliac stemmed cup in reconstruction of the acetabular defects secondary to tumor resection: a systematic review of literature. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023;143(6):3659–3667. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04639-3
  22. Evenhuis RE, van de Sande MAJ, Fiocco M, et al.; and the LUMiC® Study Group. LUMiC Endoprosthetic Reconstruction of Periacetabular Tumor Defects: A Multicenter Follow-up Study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2024;106(14):1309–1316. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.23.01082
  23. Fujiwara T, Stevenson J, Parry M, et al. Pelvic reconstruction using an ice-cream cone prosthesis: correlation between the inserted length of the coned stem and surgical outcome. Int J Clin Oncol. 2021;26(6):1139–1146. doi: 10.1007/s10147-021-01882-3
  24. Rizkallah M, Ferguson PC, Basile G, et al. LUMiC® endoprosthesis for pelvic reconstruction: A Canadian experience. J Surg Oncol. 2023;127(4):727–733. doi: 10.1002/jso.27181
  25. Enneking WF, Dunham WK. Resection and reconstruction for primary neoplasms involving the innominate bone. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60(6):731–46.
  26. Wittekind C, Compton C, Quirke P, et al. A uniform residual tumor (R) classification: integration of the R classification and the circumferential margin status. Cancer. 2009;115(15):3483–8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24320
  27. Nayar SK, Kostakos TA, Savvidou O, Vlasis K, Papagelopoulos PJ. Outcomes of Hip Reconstruction for Metastatic Acetabular Lesions: A Scoping Review of the Literature. Curr Oncol. 2022;29(6):3849–3859. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29060307
  28. Wegrzyn J, Malatray M, Al-Qahtani T, et al. Total Hip Arthroplasty for Periacetabular Metastatic Disease. An Original Technique of Reconstruction According to the Harrington Classification. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33(8):2546–2555. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.096
  29. Kostakos TA, Nayar SK, Alcock H, et al. Acetabular reconstruction in oncological surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of implant survivorship and patient outcomes. Surg Oncol. 2021;38:101635. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101635
  30. Macdonald J, Baird C, Jeys L, Parry M, Stevenson J. Outcomes Following Pedestal Cup Reconstruction of (Impending) Pathological Fractures of the Acetabulum due to Metastatic Bone Disease. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2024;15(2):428–436. doi: 10.1007/s13193-024-01917-x
  31. Erol B, Sofulu O, Sirin E, Saglam F, Buyuktopcu O. Reconstruction after periacetabular tumor resection with Lumic® endoprosthesis: What are the midterm results? J Surg Oncol. 2021;123(2):532–543. doi: 10.1002/jso.26318
  32. Henderson ER, O'Connor MI, Ruggieri P, et al. Classification of failure of limb salvage after reconstructive surgery for bone tumours: a modified system Including biological and expandable reconstructions. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-B(11):1436–40. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B11.34747
  33. Fujiwara T, Sree DV, Stevenson J, et al. Acetabular reconstruction with an ice-cream cone prosthesis following resection of pelvic tumors: Does computer navigation improve surgical outcome? J Surg Oncol. 2020;121(7):1104–1114. doi: 10.1002/jso.25882
  34. Bus MP, Szafranski A, Sellevold S, et al. LUMiC® Endoprosthetic Reconstruction After Periacetabular Tumor Resection: Short-term Results. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;475(3):686–695. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4805-4
  35. Issa SP, Biau D, Babinet A, et al. Pelvic reconstructions following peri-acetabular bone tumour resections using a cementless ice-cream cone prosthesis with dual mobility cup. Int Orthop. 2018;42(8):1987–1997. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-3785-2
  36. Çolak TS, Ahmet Fevzi Kekeç AFKAFK. Adolescent pelvic chondrosarcoma, surgical treatment, and unusual reconstruction with pedestal conic cup (LUMiC®): A case report. Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2020;31(3):648–652. doi: 10.5606/ehc.2020.74884

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) Eco-Vector



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77-76249 от 19.07.2019.