Bone Allograft in Knee Arthroplasty with Varus Deformity



Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Relevance. With the growing demand for knee arthroplasty, orthopedic surgeons increasingly encounter advanced gonarthrosis cases accompanied by severe varus deformity and critical bone defects of the proximal tibia. While the use of structural allografts is well-established in revision surgery, their role and technical nuances in primary knee arthroplasty, particularly for AORI T2A-type defects, are insufficiently covered in the literature. This creates a lack of standardized solutions for situations where standard methods (bone cement, metal augments) may be suboptimal. Case description. This article presents a clinical case of a 60-year-old female patient with severe varus deformity and a critical marginal bone defect of the medial tibial condyle. To address the defect during primary total knee arthroplasty, alloplasty using a ready-made structural allograft was performed. This method avoided autogenous bone graft harvesting and its associated complications, while also creating an anatomically precise and biomechanically stable support platform. Intraoperatively, after staged soft-tissue release and deformity correction, the defect was prepared, the allograft was contoured and stably fixed with compression screws. Control assessment confirmed optimal construct stability and complete correction of the limb axis. Conclusion. This clinical case demonstrates that alloplasty using a structural allograft is an effective and reliable solution to the complex problem of extensive bone defects in primary knee arthroplasty. This approach not only provides a solid foundation for component fixation but also allows for radical correction even in cases of severe initial deformity, opening prospects for successful treatment of patients with severe gonarthrosis. Early postoperative results indicate full restoration of the limb's biomechanical axis and satisfactory implant positioning. Despite the success, further studies with long-term follow-up are needed to assess graft integration and long-term outcomes.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Daniil Yakovchuk

Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education Kazan State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Email: daniilyakovchuuk@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0008-5632-0229

Ildar F. Akhtiamov

Kazan State Medical University

Email: yalta60@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4910-8835
SPIN-code: 6579-8640

postgraduate student

Russian Federation, 49, Butlerova str., Kazan, 420012

Sergei Alexandrovich Ardashev

Email: ardashev-sergei@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4847-2392
SPIN-code: 4948-4406

Akhmad R.H Abukbash

Email: ahmadabukbash929@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0002-2581-664X

Sergey N. Kalinov

Author for correspondence.
Email: kalinov.03@inbox.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0000-1975-5313

References

  1. Cross M., Smith E., Hoy D., et al. The global burden of hip and knee osteoarthritis: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(7):1323-1330.
  2. Cui A., Li H., Wang D., et al. Global, regional prevalence, incidence and risk factors of knee osteoarthritis in population-based studies. EClinicalMedicine. 2020;29-30:100587.
  3. Hunter D.J., Bierma-Zeinstra S. Osteoarthritis. Lancet. 2019;393(10182):1745-1759.
  4. Berend M.E., Ritter M.A., Keating E.M., et al. Use of screws and cement in primary TKA with up to 20 years follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29(6):1207-1210. Lotke P.A., Wong R.Y., Ecker M.L. The management of bone defects in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1997;12(3):273-280.
  5. Huten D. The management of bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty: Bone grafts, cement, or metal augments? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021;107(1S):102765.
  6. Qiu Y.Y., Yan C.H., Chiu K.Y., Ng F.Y. Review: Bone defect classifications in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2017;25(1):2309499016684293.
  7. Engh G.A., Ammeen D.J. Use of structural allografts in revision total knee arthroplasty: how I do it. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91 Suppl 5:68-71.
  8. Borja V.J., Luthringer T.A., McGrath B.J., et al. Current management of bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2021;29(10):e483-e495.
  9. Mancino F., Cacciola G., Malahias M.A., et al. Surgical options for bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty: Where are we today? Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2020;12(Suppl 1):8660.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) Eco-Vector



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77-76249 от 19.07.2019.