Bone Allograft in Knee Arthroplasty with Varus Deformity
- Authors: Yakovchuk D.1, Akhtiamov I.F.2, Ardashev S.A.2, Abukbash A.R.2, Kalinov S.N.2
-
Affiliations:
- Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education Kazan State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
- Kazan State Medical University
- Section: Clinical case reports
- Submitted: 05.11.2025
- Accepted: 06.12.2025
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/0869-8678/article/view/695828
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/vto695828
- ID: 695828
Cite item
Abstract
Relevance. With the growing demand for knee arthroplasty, orthopedic surgeons increasingly encounter advanced gonarthrosis cases accompanied by severe varus deformity and critical bone defects of the proximal tibia. While the use of structural allografts is well-established in revision surgery, their role and technical nuances in primary knee arthroplasty, particularly for AORI T2A-type defects, are insufficiently covered in the literature. This creates a lack of standardized solutions for situations where standard methods (bone cement, metal augments) may be suboptimal. Case description. This article presents a clinical case of a 60-year-old female patient with severe varus deformity and a critical marginal bone defect of the medial tibial condyle. To address the defect during primary total knee arthroplasty, alloplasty using a ready-made structural allograft was performed. This method avoided autogenous bone graft harvesting and its associated complications, while also creating an anatomically precise and biomechanically stable support platform. Intraoperatively, after staged soft-tissue release and deformity correction, the defect was prepared, the allograft was contoured and stably fixed with compression screws. Control assessment confirmed optimal construct stability and complete correction of the limb axis. Conclusion. This clinical case demonstrates that alloplasty using a structural allograft is an effective and reliable solution to the complex problem of extensive bone defects in primary knee arthroplasty. This approach not only provides a solid foundation for component fixation but also allows for radical correction even in cases of severe initial deformity, opening prospects for successful treatment of patients with severe gonarthrosis. Early postoperative results indicate full restoration of the limb's biomechanical axis and satisfactory implant positioning. Despite the success, further studies with long-term follow-up are needed to assess graft integration and long-term outcomes.
Full Text
About the authors
Daniil Yakovchuk
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education Kazan State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Email: daniilyakovchuuk@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0008-5632-0229
Ildar F. Akhtiamov
Kazan State Medical University
Email: yalta60@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4910-8835
SPIN-code: 6579-8640
postgraduate student
Russian Federation, 49, Butlerova str., Kazan, 420012Sergei Alexandrovich Ardashev
Email: ardashev-sergei@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4847-2392
SPIN-code: 4948-4406
Akhmad R.H Abukbash
Email: ahmadabukbash929@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0002-2581-664X
Sergey N. Kalinov
Author for correspondence.
Email: kalinov.03@inbox.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0000-1975-5313
References
- Cross M., Smith E., Hoy D., et al. The global burden of hip and knee osteoarthritis: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(7):1323-1330.
- Cui A., Li H., Wang D., et al. Global, regional prevalence, incidence and risk factors of knee osteoarthritis in population-based studies. EClinicalMedicine. 2020;29-30:100587.
- Hunter D.J., Bierma-Zeinstra S. Osteoarthritis. Lancet. 2019;393(10182):1745-1759.
- Berend M.E., Ritter M.A., Keating E.M., et al. Use of screws and cement in primary TKA with up to 20 years follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29(6):1207-1210. Lotke P.A., Wong R.Y., Ecker M.L. The management of bone defects in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1997;12(3):273-280.
- Huten D. The management of bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty: Bone grafts, cement, or metal augments? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021;107(1S):102765.
- Qiu Y.Y., Yan C.H., Chiu K.Y., Ng F.Y. Review: Bone defect classifications in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2017;25(1):2309499016684293.
- Engh G.A., Ammeen D.J. Use of structural allografts in revision total knee arthroplasty: how I do it. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91 Suppl 5:68-71.
- Borja V.J., Luthringer T.A., McGrath B.J., et al. Current management of bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2021;29(10):e483-e495.
- Mancino F., Cacciola G., Malahias M.A., et al. Surgical options for bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty: Where are we today? Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2020;12(Suppl 1):8660.
Supplementary files

