<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">N.N. Priorov Journal of Traumatology and Orthopedics</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">N.N. Priorov Journal of Traumatology and Orthopedics</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Вестник травматологии и ортопедии им. Н.Н. Приорова</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">0869-8678</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2658-6738</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Eco-Vector</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">635230</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17816/vto635230</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Original study articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Оригинальные исследования</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">A comparative study of the data of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in the surgical correction of severe scoliosis with and without preoperative halo-traction</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Сравнительное исследование данных интраоперационного нейрофизиологического мониторинга при хирургической коррекции тяжёлого сколиоза с применением предоперационной гало-тракции и без неё</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1038-1815</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">9620-7038</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Bagirov</surname><given-names>Samir B.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Багиров</surname><given-names>Самир Беюкиши оглы</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>MD</p></bio><email>bagirov.samir22@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9657-8584</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">1989-6994</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Kolesov</surname><given-names>Sergey V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Колесов</surname><given-names>Сергей Васильевич</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine)</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>д-р мед. наук</p></bio><email>dr-kolesov@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3464-8927</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Gulayev</surname><given-names>Evgeny V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Гулаев</surname><given-names>Евгений Владимирович</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>MD</p></bio><email>evlgul@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8884-2410</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Shvec</surname><given-names>Vladimir V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Швец</surname><given-names>Владимир Викторович</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine)</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>д-р мед. наук</p></bio><email>vshvetcv@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4504-6902</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">4593-3231</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Morozova</surname><given-names>Natalia S.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Морозова</surname><given-names>Наталия Сергеевна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>канд. мед. наук</p></bio><email>morozcito@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6895-8288</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">8164-1389</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Pereverzev</surname><given-names>Vladimir S.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Переверзев</surname><given-names>Владимир Сергеевич</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>канд. мед. наук</p></bio><email>vcpereverz@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2330-0172</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">4944-4173</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Kazmin</surname><given-names>Arkady I.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Казьмин</surname><given-names>Аркадий Иванович</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>канд. мед. наук</p></bio><email>kazmin.cito@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0461-8700</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">2977-6446</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Shamik</surname><given-names>Victor B.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Шамик</surname><given-names>Виктор Борисович</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine)</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>д-р мед. наук</p></bio><email>prof.shamik@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Priorov National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Национальный медицинский исследовательский центр травматологии и ортопедии им. Н.Н. Приорова</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff2"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Rostov State Medical University</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Ростовский государственный медицинский университет</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="preprint" iso-8601-date="2024-11-19" publication-format="electronic"><day>19</day><month>11</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2024-12-25" publication-format="electronic"><day>25</day><month>12</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>31</volume><issue>4</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en"/><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>599</fpage><lpage>613</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2024-08-17"><day>17</day><month>08</month><year>2024</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2024-10-07"><day>07</day><month>10</month><year>2024</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2024, Eco-Vector</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2024, Эко-Вектор</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2024</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Eco-Vector</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Эко-Вектор</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" start_date="2025-12-25"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.eco-vector.com/0869-8678/article/view/635230">https://journals.eco-vector.com/0869-8678/article/view/635230</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p><bold>BACKGROUND:</bold> Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) in remedial spine surgery is currently a gold standard, and protecting the nervous system during surgery is a major concern for both surgeons and patients. Moreover, we use various types of preoperative halo traction in patients with severe scoliosis to reduce the risk of neurological complications. Thus, we performed a comparative study of changes in IONM findings during scoliosis surgery in patients with and without preoperative halo-gravity traction.</p> <p><bold>AIM:</bold><italic> </italic>To compare IONM findings during scoliosis surgery with and without preoperative halo-gravity traction.</p> <p><bold>MATERIALS AND METHODS:</bold> An observational, single-center, retrospective, single-arm study of IONM findings was performed in 88 patients with severe scoliosis who underwent scoliosis surgery with halo traction between 2019 and 2023. The study included two groups. Group 1 (52 patients) had preoperative halo-gravity traction while standing or sitting. Group 2 (36 patients) had intraoperative halo traction. A comparative analysis was performed, which included the following: risk criteria for neurological deficit in the lower extremities during surgery, deformation angles, mobility parameters, postoperative deformation, blood loss, and surgery duration.</p> <p><bold>RESULTS:</bold><italic> </italic>The intergroup comparison of changes in deformation angles and IONM findings revealed that Group 1 had more severe deformation based on primary and compensatory curve angles, more severe stiffness, and a lower number of patients with normal motor evoked potential (MEP) levels. The differences were significant (<italic>p</italic> &lt;0.05). Risk criteria for neurological deficit were reported in 12 patients: seven in Group 1 and five in Group 2. In two patients in Group 2, MEP values of the lower extremities were not restored, resulting in permanent neurological deficit.</p> <p><bold>CONCLUSION:</bold><italic> </italic>Preoperative halo traction prepares the nervous structures for the treatment of severe deformations and minimizes the intraoperative impact on the nervous system, reducing the risk of neurological complications in patients with severe spinal deformities compared to immediate treatment with intraoperative traction.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p><bold>Обоснование. </bold>В настоящее время применение интраоперационного нейрофизиологического мониторинга (ИОНМ) при проведении корригирующих операций на позвоночнике является золотым стандартом, а сохранение целостности нервной системы во время операции имеет первостепенное значение как для хирурга, так и для пациента. Мы используем различные виды гало-тракции в предоперационном периоде у пациентов с тяжёлыми сколиотическими деформациями позвоночника также для снижения риска развития неврологических осложнений. Поэтому проведено сравнительное исследование изменений ИОНМ при операциях по коррекции сколиоза у пациентов, которым проводилась предоперационная гало-гравитационная подготовка, и без неё.</p> <p><bold>Цель.</bold> Провести сравнительный анализ результатов ИОНМ во время операции по коррекции сколиоза при применении предоперационной гало-гравитационной тракционной подготовки и без неё.</p> <p><bold>Материалы и методы.</bold> Проведено обсервационное моноцентровое ретроспективное неконтролируемое исследование результатов ИОНМ 88 пациентов с тяжёлыми сколиотическими деформациями позвоночника, получивших хирургическое лечение по коррекции сколиоза с применением гало-тракции в период с 2019 по 2023 год. Пациенты были разделены на две группы. I группа пациентов в составе 52 человек получала в качестве предоперационной подготовки гало-гравитационную тракцию стоя или сидя. II группа (36 человек) оперирована в условиях интраоперационной гало-тракции. Выполнен сравнительный анализ сигнальных критериев с угрозой развития неврологического дефицита нижних конечностей во время операции, величины углов деформации, показателей мобильности, величины деформации после операции, а также объёма кровопотери и времени операции.</p> <p><bold>Результаты.</bold> При межгрупповом сравнении полученных параметров изменения углов деформации, а также данных ИОНМ выявлено, что в I группе отмечали более выраженную деформацию по величине угла основной дуги, противодуги, б<italic>о</italic>льшую ригидность и меньшее количество пациентов с нормальным показателем уровня моторных вызванных потенциалов (МВП), что статистически значимо подтверждается (<italic>р</italic> &lt;0,05). У 12 пациентов зарегистрированы сигнальные критерии с угрозой развития неврологического дефицита: 7 — в I группе, 5 — во II. У двоих пациентов II группы восстановления показателей МВП нижних конечностей не произошло и перманентного неврологического дефицита избежать не удалось.</p> <p><bold>Заключение.</bold> Предоперационная гало-тракция позволяет подготовить нервные структуры к коррекции тяжёлых деформаций и снизить интраоперационное воздействие на нервную систему, уменьшая риски неврологических осложнений у пациентов с тяжёлыми деформациями позвоночника, по сравнению с одномоментной коррекцией в условиях интраоперационной тракции.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>scoliosis</kwd><kwd>intraoperative neuromonitoring</kwd><kwd>halo-traction</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>сколиоз</kwd><kwd>интраоперационный нейромониторинг</kwd><kwd>гало-тракция</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fabregas N, Gomar C. Monitoring in neuroanaesthesia: update of clinical usefulness. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2001;18(7):423–439. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2346.2001.00856.x</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fabregas N., Gomar C. Monitoring in neuroanaesthesia: update of clinical usefulness // Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2001. Vol. 18, № 7. Р. 423–439. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2346.2001.00856.x</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Padberg AM, Russo MH, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Komanetsky RM. Validity and reliability of spinal cord monitoring in neuromuscular spinal deformity surgery. J Spinal Disord. 1996;9(2):150–158.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Padberg A.M., Russo M.H., Lenke L.G., Bridwell K.H., Komanetsky R.M. Validity and reliability of spinal cord monitoring in neuromuscular spinal deformity surgery // J Spinal Disord. 1996. Vol. 9, № 2. Р. 150–158.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Padberg AM, Wilson-Holden TJ, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH. Somatosensory- and motor-evoked potential monitoring without a wake-up test during idiopathic scoliosis surgery. An accepted standard of care. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998;23(12):1392–1400. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199806150-00018</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Padberg A.M., Wilson-Holden T.J., Lenke L.G., Bridwell K.H. Somatosensory- and motor-evoked potential monitoring without a wake-up test during idiopathic scoliosis surgery. An accepted standard of care // Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998. Vol. 23, № 12. Р. 1392–1400. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199806150-00018</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pereon Y, Nguyen The Tich, Delecrin J, Passuti N. Somatosensory- and motor-evoked potential monitoring without a wake-up test during idiopathic scoliosis surgery: an accepted standard of care. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999;24(11):1169–1170. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199906010-00021</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pereon Y., Nguyen The Tich, Delecrin J., Passuti N. Somatosensory- and motor-evoked potential monitoring without a wake-up test during idiopathic scoliosis surgery: an accepted standard of care // Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999. Vol. 24, № 11. Р. 1169–1170. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199906010-00021</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sala F, Krzan MJ, Deletis V. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in pediatric neurosurgery: why, when, how? Childs Nerv Syst. 2002;18(6–7):264–287. doi: 10.1007/s00381-002-0582-3</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sala F., Krzan M.J., Deletis V. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in pediatric neurosurgery: why, when, how? // Childs Nerv Syst. 2002. Vol. 18, № 6–7. Р. 264–287. doi: 10.1007/s00381-002-0582-3</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kinney GA, Slimp JC. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring technology: recent advances and evolving uses. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2007;4(1):33–41. doi: 10.1586/17434440.4.1.33</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kinney G.A., Slimp J.C. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring technology: recent advances and evolving uses // Expert Rev Med Devices. 2007. Vol. 4, № 1. Р. 33–41. doi: 10.1586/17434440.4.1.33</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gonzalez AA, Jeyanandarajan D, Hansen C, Zada G, Hsieh PC. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spine surgery: a review. Neurosurg Focus. 2009;27(4):E6. doi: 10.3171/2009.8.FOCUS09150</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gonzalez A.A., Jeyanandarajan D., Hansen C., Zada G., Hsieh P.C. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spine surgery: a review // Neurosurg Focus. 2009. Vol. 27, № 4. Р. E6. doi: 10.3171/2009.8.FOCUS09150</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Biscevic M, Sehic A, Krupic F. Intraoperative neuromonitoring in spine deformity surgery: modalities, advantages, limitations, medicolegal issues — surgeons’ views. EFORT Open Rev. 2020;5(1):9–16. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.180032</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Biscevic M., Sehic A., Krupic F. Intraoperative neuromonitoring in spine deformity surgery: modalities, advantages, limitations, medicolegal issues — surgeons’ views // EFORT Open Rev. 2020. Vol. 5, № 1. Р. 9–16. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.180032</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chen B, Chen Y, Yang J, et al. Comparison of the Wake-up Test and Combined TES-MEP and CSEP Monitoring in Spinal Surgery. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015;28(9):335–40. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182aa736d</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chen B., Chen Y., Yang J., et al. Comparison of the Wake-up Test and Combined TES-MEP and CSEP Monitoring in Spinal Surgery // J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015. Vol. 28, № 9. Р. 335–40. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182aa736d</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lall RR, Lall RR, Hauptman JS, et al. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in spine surgery: indications, efficacy, and role of the preoperative checklist. Neurosurg Focus. 2012;33(5):E10. doi: 10.3171/2012.9.FOCUS12235</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lall R.R., Lall R.R., Hauptman J.S., et al. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in spine surgery: indications, efficacy, and role of the preoperative checklist // Neurosurg Focus. 2012. Vol. 33, № 5. Р. E10. doi: 10.3171/2012.9.FOCUS12235</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Strahm C, Min K, Boos N, Ruetsch Y, Curt A. Reliability of perioperative SSEP recordings in spine surgery. Spinal Cord. 2003;41(9):483–9. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101493</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Strahm C., Min K., Boos N., Ruetsch Y., Curt A. Reliability of perioperative SSEP recordings in spine surgery // Spinal Cord. 2003. Vol. 41, № 9. Р. 483–9. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101493</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">McIntosh AL, Ramo BS, Johnston CE. Halo Gravity Traction for Severe Pediatric Spinal Deformity: A Clinical Concepts Review. Spine Deform. 2019;7(3):395–403. doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2018.09.068</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">McIntosh A.L., Ramo B.S., Johnston C.E. Halo Gravity Traction for Severe Pediatric Spinal Deformity: A Clinical Concepts Review // Spine Deform. 2019. Vol. 7, № 3. Р. 395–403. doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2018.09.068</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shi B, Liu D, Shi B, et al. A Retrospective Study to Compare the Efficacy of Preoperative Halo-Gravity Traction and Postoperative Halo-Femoral Traction After Posterior Spinal Release in Corrective Surgery for Severe Kyphoscoliosis. Med Sci Monit. 2020;26:e919281. doi: 10.12659/MSM.919281</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Shi B., Liu D., Shi B., et al. A Retrospective Study to Compare the Efficacy of Preoperative Halo-Gravity Traction and Postoperative Halo-Femoral Traction After Posterior Spinal Release in Corrective Surgery for Severe Kyphoscoliosis // Med Sci Monit. 2020. Vol. 26. Р. e919281. doi: 10.12659/MSM.919281</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yang C, Wang H, Zheng Z, et al. Halo-gravity traction in the treatment of severe spinal deformity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J. 2017;26(7):1810–1816. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4848-y</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Yang C., Wang H., Zheng Z., et al. Halo-gravity traction in the treatment of severe spinal deformity: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Eur Spine J. 2017. Vol. 26, № 7. Р. 1810–1816. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4848-y</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kuleshov AA. Severe forms of scoliosis. Surgical treatment and functional features of some organs and systems [dissertation]. Moscow; 2007. 252–255 p. Available from: https://www.dissercat.com/content/tyazhelye-formy-skolioza-operativnoe-lechenie-i-funktsionalnye-osobennosti-nekotorykh-organo?ysclid=lp5ogu1eyk942975917 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кулешов А.А. Тяжёлые формы сколиоза. Оперативное лечение и функциональные особенности некоторых органов и систем: дис. ... д-ра мед. наук. Москва, 2007. 252–255 с. Режим доступа: https://www.dissercat.com/content/tyazhelye-formy-skolioza-operativnoe-lechenie-i-funktsionalnye-osobennosti-nekotorykh-organo?ysclid=lp5ogu1eyk942975917</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Halsey MF, Myung KS, Ghag A, et al. Neurophysiological monitoring of spinal cord function during spinal deformity surgery: 2020 SRS neuromonitoring information statement. Spine Deform. 2020;8(4):591–596. doi: 10.1007/s43390-020-00140-2</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Halsey M.F., Myung K.S., Ghag A., et al. Neurophysiological monitoring of spinal cord function during spinal deformity surgery: 2020 SRS neuromonitoring information statement // Spine Deform. 2020. Vol. 8, № 4. Р. 591–596. doi: 10.1007/s43390-020-00140-2</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kuzmina VA, Syundyukov AR, Nikolaev NS, Mikhailova IV, Nikolaeva AV. Experience in the use of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spinal surgery Orthopedics, traumatology and reconstructive surgery for children. 2016;4(4):33–40. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17816/PTORS4433-40</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кузьмина В.А., Сюндюков А.Р., Николаев Н.С., Михайлова И.В., Николаева А.В. Опыт применения интраоперационного нейрофизиологического мониторирования при оперативных вмешательствах на позвоночнике // Ортопедия, травматология и восстановительная хирургия детского возраста. 2016. Т. 4, №4. C. 33–40. doi: 10.17816/PTORS4433-40</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mikhailovsky MV, Sadovoy MA. Surgical treatment of scoliotic disease. Results, outcomes. Novosibirsk: NSU Publishing House; 1993. 192 p. (In Russ.). EDN: ZQYGAD</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Михайловский М.В., Садовой М.А. Оперативное лечение сколиотической болезни. Результаты, исходы. Новосибирск: Издательство НГУ, 1993. 192 с. EDN: ZQYGAD</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Novikov VV, Novikova MV, Tsvetovsky SB, et al. Prevention of neurological complications during surgical correction of gross spinal deformities. Spinal surgery. 2011;(3):066–076. (In Russ.). doi: 10.14531/ss2011.3.66-76</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Новиков В.В., Новикова М.В., Цветовский С.Б., и др. Профилактика неврологических осложнений при хирургической коррекции грубых деформаций позвоночника // Хирургия позвоночника. 2011. № 3. С. 66–76. doi: 10.14531/ss2011.3.66-76</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bardosi L, Illes T. Neurological complication due to epidural hematoma after СD operations. Case report. In: Neurological Complications of Spinal Surgery. Proceedings of the 11th International GICD Congress. Arcachon, France; 1994. Р. 60–62.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bardosi L., Illes T. Neurological complication due to epidural hematoma after СD operations. Case report. In: Neurological Complications of Spinal Surgery. Proceedings of the 11th International GICD Congress. Arcachon, France, 1994. Р. 60–62.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Baldus C, et al. Major intraoperative neurologic deficits in pediatric and adult spinal deformity patients. Incidence and etiology at one institution. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998;23(3):324–331. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199802010-00008</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bridwell K.H., Lenke L.G., Baldus C., et al. Major intraoperative neurologic deficits in pediatric and adult spinal deformity patients. Incidence and etiology at one institution // Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998. Vol. 23, № 3. Р. 324–331. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199802010-00008</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Koller H, Zenner J, Gajic V, et al. The impact of halo-gravity traction on curve rigidity and pulmonary function in the treatment of severe and rigid scoliosis and kyphoscoliosis: a clinical study and narrative review of the literature. Eur Spine J. 2012;21(3):514–29. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-2046-5</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Koller H., Zenner J., Gajic V., et al. The impact of halo-gravity traction on curve rigidity and pulmonary function in the treatment of severe and rigid scoliosis and kyphoscoliosis: a clinical study and narrative review of the literature // Eur Spine J. 2012. Vol. 21, № 3. Р. 514–29. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-2046-5</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mechin JF. Neurological complications with CDI. In: Neurological Complications of Spinal Surgery. Proceedings of the 11th International GICD Congress. Arcachon, France; 1994. Р. 9–11.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mechin J.F. Neurological complications with CDI. In: Neurological Complications of Spinal Surgery. Proceedings of the 11th International GICD Congress. Arcachon, France, 1994. Р. 9–11.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Diab M, Smith AR, Kuklo TR. Neural complications in the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32(24):2759–2763. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815a5970</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Diab M., Smith A.R., Kuklo T.R. Neural complications in the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis // Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007. Vol. 32, № 24. Р. 2759–2763. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815a5970</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bartley CE, Yaszay B, Bastrom TP, et al. Perioperative and delayed major complications following surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2017;99(14):1206–1212. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.01331</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bartley C.E., Yaszay B., Bastrom T.P., et al. Perioperative and delayed major complications following surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis // J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2017. Vol. 99, № 14. Р. 1206–1212. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.01331</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Glover CD, Carling NP. Neuromonitoring for scoliosis surgery. Anesthesiol Clin. 2014;32(1):101–14. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2013.10.001</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Glover C.D., Carling N.P. Neuromonitoring for scoliosis surgery // Anesthesiol Clin. 2014. Vol. 32, № 1. Р. 101–14. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2013.10.001</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Qiu Y, Wang S, Wang B, et al. Incidence and risk factors of neurological deficits of surgical correction for scoliosis: analysis of 1373 cases at one Chinese institution. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33(5):519–26. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181657d93</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Qiu Y., Wang S., Wang B., et al. Incidence and risk factors of neurological deficits of surgical correction for scoliosis: analysis of 1373 cases at one Chinese institution // Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008. Vol. 33, № 5. Р. 519–26. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181657d93</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dawson EG, Sherman JE, Kanim LE, Nuwer MR. Spinal cord monitoring. Results of the Scoliosis Research Society and the European Spinal Deformity Society survey. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991;16(8 Suppl):S361–4.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dawson E.G., Sherman J.E., Kanim L.E., Nuwer M.R. Spinal cord monitoring. Results of the Scoliosis Research Society and the European Spinal Deformity Society survey // Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991. Vol. 16, № 8 (Suppl). Р. S361–4.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Burton DC, Carlson BB, Place HM, et al. Results of the scoliosis research society morbidity and mortality database 2009–2012: a report from the morbidity and mortality committee. Spine Deform. 2016;4(5):338–343. doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2016.05.003</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Burton D.C., Carlson B.B., Place H.M., et al. Results of the scoliosis research society morbidity and mortality database 2009–2012: a report from the morbidity and mortality committee // Spine Deform. 2016. Vol. 4, № 5. Р. 338–343. doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2016.05.003</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">MacEwen GD, Bunnell WP, Sriram K. Acute neurological complications in the treatment of scoliosis: a report of the Scoliosis Research Society. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 1975;57:404–408.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">MacEwen G.D., Bunnell W.P., Sriram K. Acute neurological complications in the treatment of scoliosis: a report of the Scoliosis Research Society // J Bone Jt Surg Am. 1975. Vol. 57. Р. 404–408.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schmitt EW. Neurological complications in the treatment of scoliosis. A sequential report of the Scoliosis Research Society 1971–1979. In: Reported at the 17th annual meeting of the Scoliosis Research Society. Denver; 1981.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Schmitt E.W. Neurological complications in the treatment of scoliosis. A sequential report of the Scoliosis Research Society 1971–1979. In: Reported at the 17th annual meeting of the Scoliosis Research Society. Denver, 1981.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wilber RG, Thompson GH, Shafer JW, et al. Post-operative neurological deficits in segmental spinal instrumentation. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 1984;66:1178–1187.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wilber R.G., Thompson G.H., Shafer J.W., et al. Post-operative neurological deficits in segmental spinal instrumentation // J Bone Jt Surg Am. 1984. Vol. 66. Р. 1178–1187.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B33"><label>33.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Boachie-Adjei O, Yagi M, Nemani VM, et al. Incidence and risk factors for major surgical complications in patients with complex spinal deformity: a report from an SRS GOP Site. Spine Deform. 2015;3(1):57–64. doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2014.06.008</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Boachie-Adjei O., Yagi M., Nemani V.M., et al. Incidence and risk factors for major surgical complications in patients with complex spinal deformity: a report from an SRS GOP Site // Spine Deform. 2015. Vol. 3, № 1. Р. 57–64. doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2014.06.008</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B34"><label>34.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Coe JD, Arlet V, Donaldson W, et al. Complications in spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in the new millennium. A report of the Scoliosis Research Society Morbidity and Mortality Committee. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(3):345–9. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182aa736d</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Coe J.D., Arlet V., Donaldson W., et al. Complications in spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in the new millennium. A report of the Scoliosis Research Society Morbidity and Mortality Committee // Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006. Vol. 31, № 3. Р. 345–9. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182aa736d</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B35"><label>35.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ghobrial GM, Williams KA Jr, Arnold P, Fehlings M, Harrop JS. Iatrogenic neurologic deficit after lumbar spine surgery: A review. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015;139:76–80. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.08.022</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ghobrial G.M., Williams K.A. Jr, Arnold P., Fehlings M., Harrop J.S. Iatrogenic neurologic deficit after lumbar spine surgery: A review // Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015. Vol. 139. Р. 76–80. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.08.022</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B36"><label>36.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Araus-Galdos E, Delgado P, Villalain C, et al. Prevention of brachial plexus injury due to positioning of patient in spinal surgery. Value of multimodal intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM). Clinical Neurophysiology. 2011;122:S113.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Araus-Galdos E., Delgado P., Villalain C., et al. Prevention of brachial plexus injury due to positioning of patient in spinal surgery. Value of multimodal intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) // Clinical Neurophysiology. 2011. Vol. 122. Р. S113.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B37"><label>37.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Thirumala PD, Huang J, Thiagarajan K, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Combined Multimodality Somatosensory Evoked Potential and Transcranial Motor Evoked Potential Intraoperative Monitoring in Patients With Idiopathic Scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016;41(19):E1177–E1184. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001678</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Thirumala P.D., Huang J., Thiagarajan K., et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Combined Multimodality Somatosensory Evoked Potential and Transcranial Motor Evoked Potential Intraoperative Monitoring in Patients With Idiopathic Scoliosis // Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016. Vol. 41, № 19. Р. E1177–E1184. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001678</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B38"><label>38.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Baklaushev VP, Durov OV, Kim SV, et al. Development of a motor and somatosensory evoked potentials-guided spinal cord Injury model in non-human primates. J Neurosci Methods. 2019;311:200–214. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2018.10.030</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Baklaushev V.P., Durov O.V., Kim S.V., et al. Development of a motor and somatosensory evoked potentials-guided spinal cord Injury model in non-human primates // J Neurosci Methods. 2019. Vol. 311. Р. 200–214. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2018.10.030</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B39"><label>39.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rao JS, Zhao C, Zhang A, et al. NT3-chitosan enables de novo regeneration and functional recovery in monkeys after spinal cord injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(24):E5595–E5604. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1804735115</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rao J.S., Zhao C., Zhang A., et al. NT3-chitosan enables de novo regeneration and functional recovery in monkeys after spinal cord injury // Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018. Vol. 115, № 24. Р. E5595–E5604. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1804735115</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B40"><label>40.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Da Cunha RJ, Al Sayegh S, LaMothe JM, et al. Intraoperative skull-femoral traction in posterior spinal arthrodesis for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: the impact on perioperative outcomes and health resource utilization. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40(3):E154–60. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000711</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Da Cunha R.J., Al Sayegh S., LaMothe J.M., et al. Intraoperative skull-femoral traction in posterior spinal arthrodesis for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: the impact on perioperative outcomes and health resource utilization // Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015. Vol. 40, № 3. Р. E154–60. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000711</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B41"><label>41.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Peiro-Garcia A, Brown GE, Earp MA, Parsons D, Ferri-de-Barros F. Sagittal Balance in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Managed With Intraoperative Skull Femoral Traction. Clin Spine Surg. 2019;32(10):E474–E478. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000854</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Peiro-Garcia A., Brown G.E., Earp M.A., Parsons D., Ferri-de-Barros F. Sagittal Balance in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Managed With Intraoperative Skull Femoral Traction // Clin Spine Surg. 2019. Vol. 32, № 10. Р. E474–E478. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000854</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B42"><label>42.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Erdem MN, Oltulu I, Karaca S, Sari S, Aydogan M. Intraoperative Halo-Femoral Traction in Surgical Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Curves between 70° and 90°: Is It Effective? Asian Spine J. 2018;12(4):678–685. doi: 10.31616/asj.2018.12.4.678</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Erdem M.N., Oltulu I., Karaca S., Sari S., Aydogan M. Intraoperative Halo-Femoral Traction in Surgical Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Curves between 70° and 90°: Is It Effective? // Asian Spine J. 2018. Vol. 12, № 4. Р. 678–685. doi: 10.31616/asj.2018.12.4.678</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B43"><label>43.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rushton PRP, Aldebeyan S, Ghag R, et al. What is the effect of intraoperative traction on correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS)? Spine Deform. 2021;9(6):1549–1557. doi: 10.1007/s43390-021-00369-5</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rushton P.R.P., Aldebeyan S., Ghag R., et al. What is the effect of intraoperative traction on correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS)? // Spine Deform. 2021. Vol. 9, № 6. Р. 1549–1557. doi: 10.1007/s43390-021-00369-5</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B44"><label>44.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lewis SJ, Gray R, Holmes LM, et al. Neurophysiological changes in deformity correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with intraoperative skull-femoral traction. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36(20):1627–38. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318216124e</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lewis S.J., Gray R., Holmes L.M., et al. Neurophysiological changes in deformity correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with intraoperative skull-femoral traction // Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011. Vol. 36, № 20. Р. 1627–38. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318216124e</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list></back></article>
