<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">N.N. Priorov Journal of Traumatology and Orthopedics</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">N.N. Priorov Journal of Traumatology and Orthopedics</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Вестник травматологии и ортопедии им. Н.Н. Приорова</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">0869-8678</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2658-6738</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Eco-Vector</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">678995</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17816/vto678995</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="edn">RWZITK</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Original study articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Оригинальные исследования</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Analysis of adverse events reported in the automated information system of the federal service for surveillance in healthcare for orthopedic medical devices, 2020–2025</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Анализ неблагоприятных событий в автоматизированной информационной системе Росздравнадзора по ортопедическим медицинским изделиям за период 2020–2025 гг.</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0971-853X</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">3223-8403</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Ivanov</surname><given-names>Igor V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Иванов</surname><given-names>Игорь Владимирович</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine)</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>д-р мед. наук</p></bio><email>ivanov@vniiimt.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0061-5817</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">9730-3431</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Gorelov</surname><given-names>Maxim V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Горелов</surname><given-names>Максим Вячеславович</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><email>MGorelov@vniiimt.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4987-3127</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">2109-0188</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Borisova</surname><given-names>Elena V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Борисова</surname><given-names>Елена Васильевна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><email>eborisova@vniiimt.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Russian Scientific and Research Institute for Medical Engineering</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Всероссийский научно-исследовательский и испытательный институт медицинской техники</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="preprint" iso-8601-date="2026-02-06" publication-format="electronic"><day>06</day><month>02</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2026-05-31" publication-format="electronic"><day>31</day><month>05</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>33</volume><issue>2</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en"/><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>366</fpage><lpage>375</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2025-04-29"><day>29</day><month>04</month><year>2025</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2025-12-17"><day>17</day><month>12</month><year>2025</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2026, Eco-Vector</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2026, Эко-Вектор</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2026</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Eco-Vector</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Эко-Вектор</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" start_date="2027-05-31"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.eco-vector.com/0869-8678/article/view/678995">https://journals.eco-vector.com/0869-8678/article/view/678995</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p><bold>BACKGROUND:</bold><bold> </bold>The success of interventions in orthopedics and traumatology is largely determined by the performance of implantable medical devices. However, a substantial number of complications, including those occurring in the long term, affect patients’ quality of life. Adverse events directly attributable to implantable medical devices remain insufficiently studied, although their analysis is crucial for the development of a modern safety culture, improvement of the regulatory framework, and enhancement of the quality of medical care.</p> <p><bold>AIM: </bold>The work aimed to assess the distribution of adverse events associated with the use of orthopedic medical devices in order to improve the medical device safety monitoring system.</p> <p><bold>METHODS:</bold><bold> </bold>A quantitative analysis of adverse events reported between 2020 and 2025 was performed, including evaluation by severity, outcome, types of adverse events, and causes of failure. Statistical analysis was conducted using descriptive methods, with calculation of absolute and relative (percentage) frequencies for each category.</p> <p><bold>RESULTS: </bold>The analysis demonstrated that the largest number of adverse events recorded in the automated information system of the Federal Service for Surveillance in Healthcare during the period 2020–2025 was associated with the use of orthopedic medical devices, primarily joint endoprostheses and osteosynthesis systems. The obtained data confirm that these categories of devices account for the highest proportion of risks during clinical use, which is consistent with previously published studies.</p> <p><bold>CONCLUSION:</bold><bold> </bold>An objective analysis of data on the frequency of adverse events and their causes makes it possible to identify risk factors that were not taken into account at the stage of market authorization of medical devices, to revise accompanying documentation for medical devices, to implement measures to prevent the use of devices posing a threat to life and health, and ultimately to improve the quality of medical care.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p><bold>Обоснование. </bold>Успех вмешательств в области ортопедии и травматологии в значительной степени определяется имплантируемыми медицинскими изделиями, при этом наблюдается высокое число осложнений, в том числе на отдалённых этапах, влияющих на качество жизни пациентов. Осложнения, обусловленные непосредственно имплантируемыми изделиями, недостаточно изучены, а их изучение имеет ключевое значение для формирования современной культуры безопасности, совершенствования нормативной базы и повышения качества медицинской помощи.</p> <p><bold>Цель. </bold>Оценка структуры неблагоприятных событий при применении ортопедических медицинских изделий для совершенствования системы мониторинга безопасности.</p> <p><bold>Методы. </bold>Проведены количественный анализ неблагоприятных событий за период 2020–2025 гг., анализ по степени серьёзности, исходу, типам неблагоприятных событий и причинам отказов. Статистическая обработка данных осуществлялась с применением описательных методов: определялась абсолютная и относительная (в процентах) частота событий по каждой из категорий.</p> <p><bold>Результаты. </bold>Результаты настоящего анализа продемонстрировали, что наибольшее число неблагоприятных событий, зарегистрированных в автоматизированной информационной системе Росздравнадзора за период 2020–2025 гг. при применении ортопедических медицинских изделий, в первую очередь связаны с эндопротезами суставов и систем для остеосинтеза. Полученные данные подтверждают, что именно эти категории изделий несут наибольшую долю рисков при их использовании в клинической практике, что согласуется с результатами ранее опубликованных исследований.</p> <p><bold>Заключение. </bold>Объективный анализ данных о частоте неблагоприятных событий и их причинах позволяет выявлять факторы риска, которые не были учтены на этапе допуска медицинского изделия на рынок, проводить корректировку сопроводительной документации на медицинское изделие, принимать меры по недопущению применения медицинских изделий, представляющих угрозу жизни и здоровью граждан, и в итоге повышать качество оказания медицинской помощи.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>medical devices</kwd><kwd>medical device safety</kwd><kwd>adverse event</kwd><kwd>safety monitoring</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>медицинские изделия</kwd><kwd>безопасность медицинских изделий</kwd><kwd>неблагоприятное событие</kwd><kwd>мониторинг безопасности</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Corbett L, Losina E, Nti AA, Prokopetz JJ, Katz JN. Population-based rates of revision of primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2010;5(10):e13520. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013520</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Hozack WJ, Parvizi J, Bender B. Surgical Treatment of Hip Arthritis: Reconstruction, Replacement, and Revision. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2009: 205–406.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Wroblewski BM, Siney PD, Fleming PA. Charnley low-frictional torque arthroplasty in patients under the age of 51 years. Follow-up to 33 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84(4):540–3. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.84b4.10293</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Huo MH, Parvizi J, Bal BS, Mont MA. What’s new in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(10):2522–34. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00801</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Eskelinen A, Remes V, Helenius I, et al. Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthrosis in younger patients in the Finnish arthroplasty register. 4,661 primary replacements followed for 0–22 years. Acta Orthop. 2005;76(1):28–41. doi: 10.1080/00016470510030292</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Tikhilov RM, Shubnyakov II, Kovalenko AN, et al. The structure of early revisions after hip replacement. Traumatology and orthopedics of Russia. 2014;(2):5–13. EDN: SIWBNH</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Ankin LN, Ankin NL. Traumatology: European Standards of Diagnostics and Treatment. Moscow: MEDpress-inform; 2005. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Meeuwis MA, de Jongh MA, Roukema JA, et al. Technical errors and complications in orthopaedic trauma surgery. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016;136(2):185–93. doi: 10.1007/s00402-015-2377-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Yarullin IM. Dynamic Compression Osteosynthesis for Congenital Fractures and False Joints of the Femoral Neck [dissertation]. Kemerovo; 2000. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Kruppa C, Bunge P, Schildhauer A. Low complication rate of elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) of pediatric forearmfractures: A retrospective study of 202 cases. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(16):e6669. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006669</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Sergeev SV, Dzhodzhua AV, Zagorodniy NV, et al. Locking osteosynthesis of long bones. Experience and treatment results. N.N. Priorov Journal of Traumatology and Orthopedics. 2005;(2):40–45. EDN: HTAGZH</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Galla M, Lobenhoffer P. The minimally-invasive screw osteosynthesis of the medial femoral neck fracture in the very old. A prospective clinical study. Unfallchirurg. 2004;107(5):381–7. (In German). doi: 10.1007/s00113-004-0741-y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Yumashev GS. Errors and Complications in Osteosynthesis. Moscow: Medicine; 1966. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Pavlov DV, Vorobiyov AV, Alejnikov AV, Novikov AE, Shimbaretsky AN. Specific features of intramedullary osteosynthesis with blocking in fractures of the shin bones at different levels. Grekov’s bulletin of surgery. 2009;168(4):53–56. EDN: KZSCYP</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Klimovitsky VG, Borodin DV. Minimally invasive osteosynthesis of proximal femoral fractures in elderly patients. Trauma. 2013;14(1):6–8. EDN: QAFOOP</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Khmyzov SO, Plotkin AV, Tikhonenko AA. Modern methods of treating fractures and their consequences. Tavrichesky Medical and Biological Bulletin. 2013;13(4):193–199. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Chernyaev SN. Blocking Intramedullary Osteosynthesis in the Treatment of Metaphyseal Fractures of the Lower Leg Bones [dissertation]. Saint Petersburg; 2009. 25 р. (In Russ.) EDN: NKVPZF</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Litvina EA. Modern Surgical Treatment of Multiple and Combined Fractures of Limbs and Pelvis [dissertation]. Moscow; 2010. 339 р. (In Russ.) EDN: QEXGOL</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Dzhumabekov SA, Anarkulov BS, Asamidinov MN. Modern external osteosynthesis juxta and intraarticular fracture of long bones. Health care of Kyrgyzstan. 2009;(1):165–169. EDN: LXELGB</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Priorov NN. False Joints and Non-Fusing Fractures. In: Materials of the XXV All-Union Congress of Surgeons. Moscow; 1948: 416. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Da SC, Kafando H, Korsaga A, et al. Indications and Results of Surgical Treatment of Proximal Femoral Fractures in Adults at Ouagadougou. Open Journal of Orthopedics. 2018;(8):200–212. doi: 10.4236/ojo.2018.85023</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Salphale Y, Wasudeo M, Alankar R, et al. Proximal Femoral Nail in Reverse Trochanteric Femoral Fractures: An Analysis of 53 Cases at One Year Follow-Up. Surgical Science. 2016;7:300–308. doi: 10.4236/ss.2016.77043</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Khan T, Grindlay D, Ollivere BJ, et al. A systematic review of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures. Bone Joint J. 2017;99-B(4 Supple B):17–25. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B4.BJJ-2016-1311.R1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Perren SM. Fracture healing. The evolution of our understanding. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2008;75(4):241–6.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Treskes K, Voeten S, Maria C, et al. Trauma surgery by general surgeons: Still an option for proximal femoral fractures? Injury. 2017;48(2):339–344. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.11.020</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>Marti RK, van Heerwaarden RJ. Osteotomies for Posttraumatic Deformities. Thieme Verlag, New York, Stuttgart; 2008. 704 р.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
