Neurology BulletinNeurology Bulletin1027-48982304-3067Eco-Vector9705010.17816/nb97050Conference Report, Theses of ReportChronicle of the Society of Neurologists and Psychiatrists at the Imperial Kazan University. Volume XV, № 3 (1908)DarkshevichLiveriy O.<p>Chairman of the Society of Neuropathologists and Psychiatrov, Professor, M.D.</p>info@eco-vector.comPervushinV. P.<p>secretary of the society of neuropathologists and psychiatrists, Doctor</p>info@eco-vector.comImperial Kazan University20081908XV36006092001202220012022Copyright © 1908, Darkshevich L.O., Pervushin V.P.1908<p>Prof. N. A. Mislavsky. You cite two cases from the literature where exitus depended on the defeat of nn. vagi et phrenici, and in one of them Waller's Regeneration of the nerve was also stated. In one of your cases, you also consider the cause of death to be the defeat of nn. vagi et phrenici; there is no "breathing curve" in the presented sheets. Why do you put the disorder of breathing here in dependence on the alleged damage to the indicated nerves? What phenomena gave the right to diagnose this lesion?</p>Bekhterev neurology archiveНеврологический архив Бехтерева