Clinical results of radiation and chemoradiation therapy of locally advanced cervix cancer

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Aim. This study reported clinical results of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer who were treated with conformal radiotherapy and three-dimensional (3D) image-guided adapted brachytherapy and combinations of cytotoxic drugs.

Material and methods. This study included 190 patients with cervical cancer stages IIb, IIIb, and IVb (metastases in para-aortic lymph nodes) during 2011–2015 treated with definitive conformal radiation or chemoradiotherapy, with total dose for D95 50 Gy for 25 fractions. 3D brachytherapy high dose rate planning and dose reporting followed the GEC-ESTRO recommendations. Prescribing dose per fraction for HR-CTV D90 was 7.5 Gy weekly 4 fractions. Total dose HR-CTV D90 40 Gy (EQD2). Average total dose for HR-CTV D90 from the course of radiation therapy was 95.0 ± 0.67 Gy (EQD2).

Following four groups of patient were evaluated: group 1 – radiation therapy (n = 72), group 2 – chemoradiation therapy with cisplatin (n = 40), group 3 – chemoradiation therapy with a combination of irinotecan + cisplatin, two courses of adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 39), group 4 – chemoradiation therapy with a combination of paclitaxel + cisplatin, two courses of adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 39). Clinical outcomes including local control (LC), cancer-specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity were analyzed.

Results. Three-year OS and CSS in all these groups were as follows: group 1 – 88.4% ± 4.5% and 64.4% ± 7.3%, respectively; group 2 – 77.7% ± 7.6% and 77.5% ± 7.1%, respectively; group 3 – 69.8% ± 9.6% and 66.3% ± 8.9%, respectively; group 4 – 81.3% ± 6.4% and 62.1% ± 8.0%, respectively (p > 0.05). The use of chemoradiotherapy in the groups did not increase the 3-year OS in cervical cancer stage IIIb: in group 1 – 84.0% ± 7.5%, group 2 – 76.2% ± 9.4%; group 3 – 77.2% ± 9.1%, and group 4 – 84.9% ± 7.0% (p > 0.05). However, CSS was higher on the first year of observation in group 3 – 96.3% ± 3.6% compared with group 1 – 74.2% ± 7.5% (p = 0.049), with a 3-year observation – 75.7% ± 9.6% and 59.0% ± 11.4%, respectively (p = 0.31). Combined chemoradiation therapy in patients with cervical cancer increases the time of progression from 9.5 months (in groups 1 and 2) up to 19.4 months and 16.4 months (in groups 3 and 4), respectively (p = 0.05). A decrease in the number of local relapses during 3 years was obtained in groups 2 and 4 compared with group 1 (100% vs. 90.3%, p = 0.05). LC within 3 years among 190 patients was 94.7% ± 1.6%. Gastrointestinal early toxicity was noted higher in group 3 compared to groups 1, 2, and 4 (recites G2–3 – 25.7% vs. 5.6%, 5.0%, and 2.6%, respectively, p = 0.05). Late cystitis G2–3 is higher in groups 2, 3, 4 compared with group 1 (15.4% vs. 4.2%, p = 0.07).

Conclusion. The study showed high efficiency of treatment of patients with cervical cancer with the introduction in the clinic of modern technologies in radiation therapy with 3D visualization, as well as chemoradiotherapy programs with acceptable toxicity.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Olga A. Kravets

N.N. Blokhin’s National Medical Research Center of Oncology

Author for correspondence.
Email: Kravetz_olga@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3347-5278

MD, PhD, DSc, Senior Researcher, Department of Radiosurgery, N.N. Blokhin’s National Medical Research Center of Oncology

Russian Federation, Moscow

E. A. Romanova

N.N. Blokhin’s National Medical Research Center of Oncology

Email: Kravetz_olga@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0101-512X
Russian Federation, Moscow

V. A. Gorbunova

N.N. Blokhin’s National Medical Research Center of Oncology

Email: Kravetz_olga@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0703-2550
Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Kaprin A.D., Starinskij V. V., Petrov G. V. State of Oncology aid rendered to population of Russia in 2017. Moscow: MNIOI name P.A. Gertsena – branch Rams «NMIC Radiology» of Ministry of health of Russia. 2018. (In Russian).
  2. Castelnau-Marchand P., Chargari C., Maroun P. et al. Clinical outcomes of definitive chemoradiation followed by intracavitary pulsed-dose rate im age-guided adaptive brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 2015;139(2):288-94
  3. Chargari C., N. Magné I., Dumas T. et al. Physics contributions and clinical outcome with 3D-MRI-based pulsed-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy in cervical cancer patients. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2009;74(1):133-9.
  4. Lakosi F., de Cuypere M., Viet Nguyen P. et al. Clinical efficacy and toxicity of radio-chemotherapy and magnetic resonance imaging-guided brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer patients: A mono-institutional experience. Acta Oncol. 2015;54(9):1558-66.
  5. Potter R., Georg P., Dimopoulos J.C. et al. Clinical outcome of protocol based image (MRI) guided adaptive brachytherapy combined with 3D conformal radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Radiother. Oncol. 2011;100(1):116-23.
  6. Tharavichitkul E., Chakrabandhu S., Wanwilairat S. et al. Intermediate-term results of image-guided brachytherapy and high-technology external beam radiotherapy in cervical cancer: Chiang Mai University experience. Gynecol. Oncol. 2013;130: 81-5.
  7. Lin A.J., Kidd E., Dehdashti F. et al. Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy and Image-Guided Adapted Brachytherapy for Cervix Cancer. Int. J. Radia.t Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2019;103(5):1088-097.
  8. Gill B.S., Kim H., Houser C.J. et al. MRI-guided high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy for treatment of cervical cancer: the University of Pittsburgh experience. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2015;91(3):540-7.
  9. McNeil C. New standard of care for cervical cancer sets stage for next questions. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1999;91(6):500-1.
  10. Duenas-Gonzalez A., Cetina-Peraz L., Onate-Ocana L.E. et al. Multimodel treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer. Arch. Med. Res. 2005;36(2):129-35.
  11. Jelavic T.B., Mise B.P., Strikic A. et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer after treatment with concomitant chemoradiotherapy-room for improvement? Anticancer Res. 2015;35(7):4161-5.
  12. Umayahara K., Takekuma M., Hitashima Y. et al. Phase II study of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with weekly cisplatin and paclitaxel in patients with locally advanced uterine cervical cancer: The JACCRO GY-01 trial. J. Gynecol Oncol. 2016;140(2):253-8.
  13. Tanqiitqamol S., Katanyoo K., Laopaiboon M. et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy after concurrent for locally advanced cervical cancer. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2014;12.
  14. Mayadev J., Viswanathan A., Liu Y. et al. American Brachytherapy Task Group Report: A pooled analysis of clinical outcomes for high-dose-rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer. Brachytherapy. 2017;16(1):22-43.
  15. Kravets O.A. Radiotherapy of locally advanced cervical cancer (treatment optimization, prognostic factors): dissertation for the degree of doctor of medical sciences. Moscow. 2010. (In Russian)

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. The nature of the progression of patients with cervical cancer (%) in groups

Download (126KB)
3. Fig. 2. Gastrointestinal toxicity in groups of patients with cervical cancer

Download (126KB)
4. Fig. 3. Early toxicity from the urinary system in patients with cervical cancer

Download (95KB)
5. Fig. 4. Early toxicity of the vaginal mucosa and cervix

Download (93KB)
6. Fig. 5. Late urinary toxicity in patients with cervical cancer

Download (99KB)
7. Fig. 6. Late proctitis toxicity in group of patients with cervical cancer

Download (115KB)

Copyright (c) 2020 Eco-Vector



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: ПИ № ФС 77 - 86496 от 11.12.2023 г
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: ЭЛ № ФС 77 - 80673 от 23.03.2021 г
.



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies