Adaptive calibration of fuzzy models for early warning of emergency situations

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

This paper examines the problem of improving the quality and effectiveness of emergency forecasting in rapidly changing and uncertain conditions. The relevance of the study is determined by the increasing frequency and complexity of emergency situations, as well as the heterogeneity, noisy nature, and incompleteness of monitoring data, which limit the applicability of traditional methods and fuzzy early warning models that do not take into account changes in the structure of input flows and real risk criteria. The goal of the study is to improve the accuracy and robustness of emergency forecasting by developing an adaptive method for calibrating fuzzy early warning models for emergency situations. The paper also proposes a mechanism for dynamically updating the parameters of membership functions and rule weights, ensuring stable and efficient model behavior in the face of structural shifts, noise, and missing observations. А software product was developed, and a computational experiment was conducted on various emergency scenarios, including changes in the intensity of input signals and abrupt shifts in data distribution. The obtained results confirm an increase in the quality of forecasting and a reduction in the level of fuzzy uncertainty compared to the baseline model without adaptation, while the root mean square error decreased by 26-40 %, and the level of uncertainty by 18-27 %, which indicates the practical applicability of the proposed approach in early warning and real-time monitoring systems.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

V. V. Kureichik

Southern Federal University

Author for correspondence.
Email: vkur@sfedu.ru

Dr. of Tech. Sc., Professor

Russian Federation, Taganrog

V. I. Danilchenko

Southern Federal University

Email: vdanilchenko@sfedu.ru

Cand. of Tech. Sc.,Associate Professor

Russian Federation, Taganrog

References

  1. Vafaei N., Ribeiro R. А., Camarinha-Matos L. M. Fuzzy early warning systems for condition-based maintenance, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2019, vol. 128, pp. 736—746.
  2. Natalia F. Early warning system of flood prediction with fuzzy logic, ICIC Express Letters, Part В: Applications, 2020, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 971—978.
  3. Ashraf S., Garg Н., Kousar M. An industrial disaster emergency decision-making based on China’s Tianjin port explosion under complex probabilistic hesitant fuzzy soft environment, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2023, vol. 123, art. 106400.
  4. Luo Z., Tian J., Zeng J., Pilla F. Flood risk evaluation of the coastal city by the EWM—TOPSIS and machine learning hybrid method, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2024, vol. 106.
  5. Dhamala M. C., Adhikari D., Khanal P., Pyakurel U. Generalized maximum flow over time with intermediate storage, Annals of Operations Research, 2024, vol. 335, no. 1, pp. 111—134.
  6. Mendel J. M., John R. I., Liu F. Interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems made simple. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2021, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 1073—1087.
  7. Atanassov K. T., Szmidt E. On intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their applications: А review, Cybernetics and Information Technologies, 2020, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 3—28.
  8. Xu Z. Hesitant fuzzy sets theory, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, 2014, vol. 314.
  9. Zhao M., Song Y., Huang H., Kim E.-H. Attention-based fuzzy neural networks for early warning of financial crises, Information Sciences, 2025, vol. 686, art. 121374.
  10. Korol T. Multi-factor fuzzy sets decision system forecasting consumer insolvency risk, Decision, 2024, vol. 51, pp. 279—302.
  11. Kravchenko Yu. А., Gerasimenko E. M., Kureichik V. V., Kuliev E. V., Kravchenko D. Yu., Rodzi S. I. Modified bioinspired decision support method for prevention and mitigation of emergency situations, Information Technologies (Russian journal), 2023,vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 423—436 (in Russian).
  12. Danilchenko E. V., Kureichik V. M. Definition of fuzzy conditions and analysis of existing solutions in the evacuation problem under emergency situations, Izvestiya SFU. Technical Sciences, 2022, no. 6, pp. 53—60 (in Russian).
  13. Gerasimenko E., Kureichik V. Minimum cost lexicographic evacuation flow finding in intuitionistic fuzzy networks, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 2022, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 251—263.
  14. Gerasimenko E. M., Kureichik V. V., Rodzin S. I., Kukharenko А. P. Application of fuzzy logic for evacuation decision-making under flood conditions, Izvestiya SFU. Technical Sciences, 2022, vol. 4, no. 228, pp. 15—29 (in Russian).
  15. Kacprzyk J., Bozhenyuk A., Gerasimenko E. Lexicographic maximum dynamic evacuation modeling with partial lane reversal based on hesitant fuzzy TOPSIS, Applied Soft Computing, 2023, vol. 144, art. 110435.
  16. Gerasimenko E. Dynamic flow algorithm with intermediate storage for emergency evacuation allowing lane reversal based on incomplete intuitionistic fuzzy preference relation, The Open Transportation Journal, 2024, vol. 18, no. 1.
  17. Kureichik V. V., Gerasimenko E. M. Integrated multi-criteria group decision-making algorithm for evacuation problems, Informatics and Automation, 2025, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 1284—1332 (in Russian).
  18. Kureichik V. V., Danilchenko V. I. Modified evolutionary Mole-rat algorithm with adaptive dynamic obstacle bypassing mechanism under emergency conditions, Informacionnye Tehnologii, 2024, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 342—349 (in Russian).
  19. Gamayunova V. O., Bogomolov A. S., Kushnikov V. A., Ivashchenko V. A. Multi-agent evacuation modeling considering agent collisions, Izvestiya of Saratov University. Mathematics, Mechanics, Informatics, 2025, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 106—115 (in Russian).
  20. Kotkova E. A., Matveev А. V. Intelligent forecasting of evacuation management efficiency in public buildings, Bulletin of the St. Petersburg University of State Fire Service EMERCOM of Russia, 2021, vol. 4, pp. 107—120 (in Russian).
  21. Ye J. Group decision-making strategy based on aggregation operators of linguistic confidence interval neutrosophic numbers, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2025, vol. 141.
  22. Faizi S., Shah M. H., Sałabun W., Rashid T. А novel approach employing hesitant intuitionistic fuzzy linguistic Einstein aggregation operators within EDAS for multicriteria decision making, Heliyon, 2024, vol. 10, no. 11.
  23. D’Urso P., Chachi J., Kazemifard A., De Giovanni L. OWA-based multi-criteria decision making based on fuzzy methods, Annals of Operations Research, 2024.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Architecture of the adaptive FIS calibration mechanism

Download (342KB)
3. Fig. 2. Architecture of the adaptive emergency forecasting software subsystem

Download (265KB)
4. Fig. 3. Changing the accessory function after adaptive calibration

Download (133KB)

Copyright (c) 2026 Informacionnye Tehnologii



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № 77 - 15565 от 02 июня 2003 г.