Method for trust management in decentralized UAV networks based on context-aware consensus

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The article proposes the method of trust management in decentralized UAV networks, which leverages the context of interactions between drones to more accurately identify reliable and suspicious nodes. This solution reduces false accusations, improves adaptability, and enhances energy efficiency compared to existing approaches, performing effectively under complex and dynamic network conditions.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

V. I. Petrenko

North-Caucasus Federal University

Author for correspondence.
Email: vipetrenko@ncfu.ru

Cand. of Tech. Sc., Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Organization and Technology of Information Security

Russian Federation, Stavropol

M. H. Najajra

Al-Istiqlal University

Email: mnajajra@pass.ps

Ph.D., Associate Professor, Department of Management Information Systems

Palestinian Territory, Occupied, Jericho

F. B. Tebueva

North-Caucasus Federal University

Email: ftebueva@ncfu.ru

Dr. of Phys. and Math. Sc., Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Computational Mathematics and Cybernetics

Russian Federation, Stavropol

N. P. Pankin

North-Caucasus Federal University

Email: pankin.nkt@gmail.com

Student

Russian Federation, Stavropol

References

  1. Dogan H. and Setzer A. SABEC: Secure and Adaptive Blockchain-Enabled Coordination Protocol for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) Network, Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Information Systems Security and Privacy (ICISSP 2025), 2025, vol. 1, pp. 377—388.
  2. Abishu H. N., Sun G., Yacob Y. H., Boateng G. O., Nguyen D. T. Multiagent DRL-Based Consensus Mechanism for Blockchain-Based Collaborative Computing in UAV-Assisted 6G Networks, IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2024, vol. 12, issue 4, pp. 4331—4348.
  3. Han Y., Wang X., Zhang Y., Yang G., Tan X. А UAV swarm communication network architecture based on consortium blockchain, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, International Conference on Control Theory and Applications (ICoCTA 2022), 2022, vol. 2352, art. № 012008, 9 p.
  4. Hafeez S. Blockchain-based secure Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) in network design and optimization, PhD thesis, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, 2024, 151 p. available at: https://theses.gla.ac.uk/84460/
  5. Kumar A., Ahuja N. J., Thapliyal M., Dutt S., Tanesh Kumar T., Diego Augusto De Jesus Pacheco D. A. D. J., Kim-Kwang Raymond Choo K.-K. R. Blockchain for unmanned underwater drones: Research issues, challenges, trends and future directions, Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 2023, vol. 215, art. № 103649.
  6. Alqarni M. A. Secure UAV adhoc network with blockchain technology, PLoS ONE, 2024, vol. 19 (5), art. № e0302513.
  7. Abbas N. H., Khoualdi J., Rammeh K. H., Kaffel H. В. A. Blockchain technologies for UAV swarms and UAV-based networks, SLR, Fusion: Practice and Applications, 2024, vol. 18 (1), pp. 1—23.
  8. Hafeez S., Cheng R., Mohjazi L., Imran M. A., Sun Y. А Blockchain-Enabled Framework of UAV Coordination for Post- Disaster Networks, IEEE 99th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2024-Spring), 2024, pp. 1—5.
  9. Peelam M. S., Chamola V., Sharma A. K., Chaurasia В. K. Decentralized Trust: NFT and Blockchain-Enabled Evidence System using Fog, Computing, Blockchain: Research and Applications, 2025, art. № 100321.
  10. Deng G., Zhou Y., Xu Y., Zhang T., Liu Y. An Investigation of Byzantine Threats in Multi-Robot Systems, RAID ‘21: Proceedings of the 24th International Symposium on Research in Attacks, Intrusions and Defenses, 2021, pp. 17—32.
  11. Liao Z., Zhang L., Dong Z. UAV Swarm Exploration with Byzantine Fault Tolerance, 2021 China Automation Congress (CAC), 2021, pp. 7150—7154.
  12. Ryabtsev S. S. Method for Detecting Malicious Robots Based on Collective Decision-Making Process Data in Swarm Robotic Systems, Control, Communication and Security Systems, 2022, no. 3, pp. 105—137 (in Russian).
  13. Petrenko V. I., Tebueva F. B., Ryabtsev S. S., Antonov V. O., Struchkov I. V. Analysis of Influence of Byzantine Robots with Random Behaviour Strategy on Collective Decision-Making in Swarms, Current Problems in Applied Mathematics and Computer Science and Systems. APAMCS 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 2023, vol. 702, pp. 205—216 (in Russian).
  14. Peng J., Xiao H., Lai G., Chen C. L. P. Consensus formation control of wheeled mobile robots with mixed disturbances under input constraints, Journal of the Franklin Institute, 2024, vol. 361 (17), art. № 107300.
  15. Mahato P., Sudipta Saha S., Sarkar Ch., Shaghil Md. Consensus-based fast and energy-efficient multi-robot task allocation, Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 2023, vol. 159, art. № 104270.
  16. Gholami А. Exploring drone classifications and applications: a review, International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 2024, vol. 9 (3). pp. 418—442.
  17. Malinovkin V. A., Mordvinkina O. S., Reznikov K. N., Barabanov А. V. Bayesian Trust Network in a Decision-Making System for UAV Control, Bulletin of Voronezh State Technical University, 2024, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 56—60 (in Russian).
  18. Struchkov I. V. Method for Assessing Trust in Agents during Their Interaction in a Decentralized Cyber-Physical Environment, Bulletin of Saint-Petersburg State University of Technology and Design. Series 1: Natural and Technical Sciences, 2023, no. 4, pp. 86—90 (in Russian).
  19. Ivanov S. V., Lozovsky V. V., Saveliev I. V. Methodology of Distributed Decentralized Control of a Heterogeneous UAV Group Based on Hierarchical Clustering Algorithms, Issues of Defense Technology. Series 16: Technical Means of Countering Terrorism. 2024, no. 3—4 (189—190), pp. 3—10 (in Russian).
  20. Zuo J., Cao R., Qi J., Gao P., Wang, Z., Li J., Zhang L., Lu Y. А Hierarchical Blockchain-Based Trust Measurement Method for Drone Cluster Nodes, Drones, 2023, vol. 7, art. № 627.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Figure 1. Dynamics of quality metrics for the proposed BARC method and its PBFT-PoW counterpart: a — packet delivery rate (PDR); b — energy efficiency (Eeff); c — number of false negatives (FN)

Download (72KB)
3. Figure 2. Dependence of quality metrics on the proportion of attackers for the proposed BARC method and its PBFT-PoW counterpart: a — packet delivery rate (PDR); b — number of false negatives (FN); c — number of true negatives (TN)

Download (65KB)

Copyright (c) 2026 Informacionnye Tehnologii



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № 77 - 15565 от 02 июня 2003 г.