Similarity assessment of multiparameter objects whose parameters are described in different metrological scales

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to develop principles for assessing the similarity between multiparameter objects whose states are described by disparate characteristics. The parameters of many objects are described using different metrological scales (names, ranks, intervals, ratios). These parameters may be described by different units of measurement and have different levels of importance for the degree of similarity between pairs of objects. When comparing the parameters of a test object, there may be various permissible deviations, either upward or downward, relative to the reference object. Furthermore, there may be other conditions under which a test object can be considered similar to the reference object. An analysis of metrics for determining closeness between objects, as well as similarity measures, diversity measures, and inclusion measures, revealed that these theoretical principles have limitations when determining similarity between multiparameter objects. To address these limitations, we propose theoretical principles based on the formation of conditions that allow for recognizing objects as similar for each parameter, as well as additional conditions. Recognition of similarity for specific parameters between a test object and a reference object is accomplished by defining a range of permissible values. If the parameter of the compared object falls within the acceptable range, a decision is generated as one; if it does not, a decision is generated as zero. As a result, a sequence consisting of zeros and ones is formed for the compared object. The elements of the sequence are then summed, taking into account the weighting coefficient of each parameter. The values of the weighting coefficients are distributed so that their sum equals one. As a result, the closer the sum of the sequence elements is to one, the greater the similarity between the objects is considered. To assess the feasibility of the proposed provisions, a sample of values describing the condition of forest areas was used. The results demonstrate the formation of subgroups of objects whose parameters fall within acceptable value ranges and satisfy an additional condition relative to the reference object. The proposed provisions open up opportunities for the further development of information systems for analyzing the condition of complex objects.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

A. A. Sorokin

Astrakhan State Technical University; Caspian Institute of Sea and River Transport named after General Admiral F. M. Apraksin — branch of the FSBEI of HE "Volga State University of Water Transport"

Author for correspondence.
Email: alsorokin.astu@mail.ru

Cand. of Tech. Sc., Associate Professor

Russian Federation, Astrakhan; Astrakhan

References

  1. Yager R. R., Filev D. P. Approximate Clustering Viathe Mountain Method, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics,1994,vol. 24, iss. 8, pp. 1279—1284, doi: 10.1109/21.299710.
  2. Savenkov P. A., Ivutin А. N. Research of similarity metrics and methods for identifying changes in users’ mobile device use scenarios by their text data sets, Izvestiya Tula State University. Tekhnicheskie nauki, 2023, no. 11, pp. 321—323 (in Russian).
  3. Molotkov A. A., Tretiyakova O. N. Application of machine vision in laser technologies, Trudy MAI, 2022, no. 127, doi: 10.34759/trd-2022-127-25 (in Russian).
  4. Vasilyev I., Chebotarev P. Yu. Making a typology of scientists on the basis of bibliometric data, Large-scale systems control, 2018, no. 72, pp. 138—195 (in Russian)
  5. Starodubtsev V. G., Tkachenko V. V. Formation of sets of five-fold gold-type sequences for digital information transmission systems, Journal of instrument engineering, 2024, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 107—115 (in Russian).
  6. Haddad S., Halder A. А Note on the Hausdorff Distance Between Norm Balls and Their Linear Maps, Set-Valued and Variational Analysis, 2023, vol. 31,no. 30, doi: 10.1007/s11228-023-00692-1.
  7. Syafii I., Widodo C. E., Suseno J. E. Expert system diagnose broiler diseases using case based reasoning and Sorensen dice coefficient, The 8th International Conference on Energy, Environment, Epidemiology and Information System (ICENIS), 2023, vol. 448, doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202344802067.
  8. Bocianowski J., Niemann J., Jagieniak A., Szwarc J. Comparison of Six Measures of Genetic Similarity of Interspecific Brassicaceae Hybrids F2 Generation and Their Parental Forms Estimated on the Basis of ISSR Markers, Genes, 2024, vol. 15, iss. 9, DOI. 10.3390/genes15091114.
  9. Ali M. P., Biswas M., Clemente-Orta G., Kabir M. M. M., Datta J., Haque S. S., Qin X., Landis D., Kaur P., Pittendrigh B. R., Howlader M. T. H. Landscape diversity influences the arthropod species diversity the rice field. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 2022, vol. 10, doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.740287.
  10. Semkin B. I., Gorshkov M. V. Axiomatic introduction of similarities, differences, compatibility, and dependence of components of biodiversity, Vestnik Tixookeanskogo gosudarstvennogo e`konomicheskogo universitet, no. 4 (48), 2008, pp. 31—46 (in Russian).
  11. Semkin В. I. On the relation between mean values of two measures of inclusion and measures of similarity, Byulleten` Botanicheskogo sada-instituta DVO RAN, no. 3, 2009, pp. 91—101 (in Russian).
  12. Zadokhina N. V. Experiment in psychological and pedagogical research, Obrazovanie. Nauka. Nauchnyekadry, 2024, no. 4. pp. 275—278 (in Russian).
  13. Pyatkovsky O. I., Lyutova L. V. Determining the importance of factors for assessing residential real estate objects by the method of expert assessments, Polzunovskijvestnik, 2011, no. 1, pp. 171—176 (in Russian).
  14. Zorich V. A. Mathematical analysis. Part II, Moscow, MCNO, 2019, 676 p. (in Russian).
  15. Khaliphyan A. A., Koshkarov A. A., Semenov А. B. Ranking definition method of health insurance companies based on hierarchical classification, Medical doctor and information technologies, 2016, no 5, pp. 56—68 (in Russian).
  16. Nemirovskiy V. B., Stoyanov А. K. Clustering face images, Computer Optics, 2017, no. 41 (1), pp. 59—66 (in Russian).
  17. Golygin N. Kh., Ped S. E., Druzhinin P. V. Fundamentals of Interchangeability, Moscow, Publishing House MIIGAiK, 2020, 316 p. (in Russian).
  18. Yakovlev S. S., Seredin O. S. Using decision tree algorithms in multidimensional scaling, Izvestiya Tula State University. Tekhnicheskie nauki, 2018, no. 10, pp. 137—145 (in Russian).
  19. Bazhenov A. N., Telnova А. Yu. Generalization of Jaccard index for interval data analysis, Izmeritel`naya Tekhnika, 2022, no. 12, pp. 15—22 (in Russian).
  20. Zagoruiko N. G., Barakhnin V. B., Borisova I. A., Tkachev D. A. Clusterization of text documents from the database of publications using FRiS-Tax algorithm, Computational technologies, 2013, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 62—74 (in Russian).
  21. Mayorova L. P., Arkhipov E. A., Koshelkov А. M. Determination of weight coefficients of various factors during a comprehensive assessment of the ecological state urban area, Innovation & Investment, 2023, no. 7, pp. 252—257 (in Russian).
  22. Sorokin А. Asymmetric production metric for calculating the similarity of objects, International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Application (DASA), Conference Paper, IEEE, Bahrain, 2020, pp. 415—421.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Change in non-zero values ​​of the quantity in ascending order

Download (192KB)
3. Fig. 2. Change in the ranges of parameter values, as well as the number of erroneous values ​​depending on the proposed similarity measure

Download (709KB)

Copyright (c) 2026 Informacionnye Tehnologii



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № 77 - 15565 от 02 июня 2003 г.