Studying the nature of social orphanhood in correlation with status characteristics and personal health

Cover Page
Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract


Health is an integral characteristic of a person’s quality of life, a primary indicator of their social and familial well-being. The opposite is also true: one’s social and familial status and the main aspects of their daily activities can affect their health. When one grows up in conditions of extra-family education, a special habitus is formed among graduates of orphanages, with experiences of negative family life or none at all, adverse models of relationships and social attitudes, as well as distorted ideas about social, professional, and family self-realization.


Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Andrey V. Reshetnikov

Institute of social sciences of I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University)

Author for correspondence.
Email: niisocmed@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9413-4859
Scopus Author ID: 6602355371

Russian Federation, Moscow

the academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, the doctor of medical sciences, the doctor of sociological sciences, professor, the director of Institute

Nadezhda V. Prisyazhnaya

Institute of social sciences of I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University)

Email: nprusova@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5251-130X
Scopus Author ID: 23089112600

Russian Federation, Moscow

candidate of sociological sciences, deputy director for scientific work

References

  1. Knapp SJ, Wurm G. Theorizing family change: a review and reconceptualization. J Fam Theory Rev. 2019;11(2):4-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12329.
  2. Nelson MK. Single mothers “do” family. J Marriage Fam. 2006; 68(4):781-795. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00292.x.
  3. Лежнина Ю.П. Институт семьи в России: на пути трансформации // Социологическая наука и социальная практика. — 2016. — № 2. — С. 70–90. [Lezhnina Yu.P. Family institute in Russia: on the path of transformation. Sotsiologicheskaya nauka i sotsial’naya praktika. 2016;(2):70–90. (In Russ.)]
  4. Присяжная Н.В. Трансформация восприятия россиянами проблемы социального сиротства // Социальные и политические вызовы модернизации в XXI в.: Материалы международной научно-практической конференции (Улан-Удэ, 6–11 августа 2018 г.). — Улан-Удэ: Издательство БНЦ СО РАН; 2018. — С. 201–203. [Prisyazhnaya NV. Transformation of Russians’ perception of the problem of social orphanhood. Social and political challenges of modernization in the XXI century. Materials of the international scientific-practical conference (Ulan-Ude, August 6-11, 2018). Ulan-Ude: Izdatel’stvo BNTs SO RAN, 2018. P. 201-203. (In Russ.)]
  5. Гурко Т.А. Понятие амбивалентности в изучении семейных отношений // Социологические исследования. — 2020. — Т. 46. — № 2. — С. 63–73. [Gurko TA. The concept of ambivalence in the study of family relationships. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2020;46(2):63-73. (In Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250008526-1.
  6. Лежнина Ю.П. Семья для среднедоходных слоев населения: тыл или риск // Журнал исследований социальной политики. — 2017. — Т. 15. — № 3. — С. 435-52. [Lezhnina YuP. Family for the middle-income strata of the population: rear or risk. Zhurnal issledovaniy sotsial’noy politiki. 2017;15(3):435-52. (In Russ.)]
  7. Егорова Н.Ю., Сизова И.Л. Имеет ли российская семья шанс стать солидарной? // Социологические исследования. — 2014. — № 4. — С. 97–102. [Egorova NYu, Sizova IL. Does the Russian family have a chance to become solidary? Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2014;(4):97-102. (In Russ.)]
  8. Присяжная Н.В. Образ «идеальной» семьи в представлениях москвичей // Социология медицины. — 2019. — № 1. — С. 28–34. [Prisyazhnaya NV. The image of the «ideal» family in the views of Muscovites. Sotsiologiya meditsiny. 2019;(1):28-34. (In Russ.)]
  9. Присяжная Н.В. Конструируемый образ ребенка-сироты в представлениях москвичей // Социология медицины. — 2019. — № 2. — С. 28–34. [Prisyazhnaya NV. Constructed image of an orphan child as imagined by Muscovites. Sociology of Medicine. 2019;(2):28-34. (In Russ.)]
  10. Российский статистический ежегодник. 2019: Статистический сборник. — М.; Росстат, 2019. — 708 с. [Russian statistical yearbook. 2019: Statistical collection. Moscow; Rosstat; 2019. 708 p. (In Russ.)]
  11. Присяжная Н.В. Социология социального сиротства: современные дискурсы изучения проблемы // Общество и здоровье: современное состояние и тенденции развития: Сборник статей. — М.: Изд-во Первого МГМУ им. И.М. Сеченова; 2013. — С. 185–194. [Prisyazhnaya NV. Sociology of social orphanhood: modern discourses of the study of the problem // Society and health: current state and development trends: Digest of articles. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Pervogo MGMU im. I.M. Sechenova; 2013. P. 185–194. (In Russ.)]
  12. Landgren V, Svensson L, Gyllencreutz E, et al. Fetal alcohol spectrum disorders from childhood to adulthood: a Swedish population-based naturalistic cohort study of adoptees from Eastern Europe. BMJ Open. 2019;9(10):e032407. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032407.
  13. Дубровина И.В., Лисина М.И. Особенности психического развития детей в семье и вне семьи. Возрастные особенности психического развития детей. — М.: Педагогика, 2002. [Dubrovina IV, Lisina MI. Osobennosti psikhicheskogo razvitiya detey v sem’e i vne sem’i. Vozrastnye osobennosti psikhicheskogo razvitiya detey. Moscow: Pedagogika; 2002. (In Russ.)]
  14. Strang N, Hanson JL, Pollak SD. The importance of biological methods in linking social experience with social and emotional development. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2012;77(2):61-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5834.2011.00662.x
  15. Дементьева И.Ф. Жестокое обращение с ребенком в семье: последствия для личностного развития // Социальная педагогика. — 2010. — № 2. — С. 23–24. [Dement’eva IF. Child abuse in the family: implications for personal development. Sotsial’naya pedagogika. 2010;(2):23-24. (In Russ.)]
  16. Ferrara P, Bernasconi S. From “classic” child abuse and neglect to the new era of maltreatment. Ital J Pediatr. 2017;43:16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-017-0336-1.
  17. Finlay JE, Fink G, McCoy DC, et al. Stunting risk of orphans by caregiver and living arrangement in low-income and middle-income countries. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016;70(8):784‐790. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2015-206346.
  18. Pawliczuk W, Kaźmierczak-Mytkowska A, Srebnicki T, Wolańczyk T. The prevalence of mental disorders among children and youth staying in residential institutions, children’s homes — a review of epidemiological studies. Psychiatr Pol. 2018;52(2):345‐353. https://doi.org/10.12740/PP/75738.
  19. Murray L, Jennings S, Mortimer A, et al. The impact of early-years provision in Children’s Centres (EPICC) on child cognitive and socio-emotional development: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2018;19:450. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2700-x.
  20. Beegle K, De Weerdt J, Dercon S. The long run impact of orphanhood. Policy Research Working Paper No. 4353. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2007. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-4353.
  21. Chaibal S, Bennett S, Rattanathanthong K, Siritaratiwat W. Early developmental milestones and age of independent walking in orphans compared with typical home-raised infants. Early Hum Dev. 2016;101:23‐6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2016.06.008.
  22. Калатозишвили П.О., Давитулиани Н.Ш., Пагава Е.К., и др. Физическое развитие воспитанников детских домов // Georgian Medical News. — 2016. — № 256-257. — С. 67–71. [Kalatozishvili P, Davituliani N, Phagava E, et al. Physical development of children in orphanages. Georgian Med News. 2016;(256-257):67-71. (In Russ.)]
  23. Kamath SM, Venkatappa KG, Sparshadeep EM. Impact of nutritional status on cognition in institutionalized orphans: a pilot study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(3):CC01‐CC04. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2017/22181.9383.
  24. Cheyne WM, Jahoda G. Emotional sensitivity and intelligence in children from orphanages and normal homes. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1971;12(2):77-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1971.tb01053.x.
  25. Caserta TA, Pirttilä-Backman AM, Punamäki RL. Stigma, marginalization and psychosocial well-being of orphans in Rwanda: exploring the mediation role of social support. AIDS Care. 2016;28(6):736‐744. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2016.1147012.
  26. Hermenau K, Eggert I, Landolt MA, Hecker T. Neglect and perceived stigmatization impact psychological distress of orphans in Tanzania. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2015;6:28617. https://doi.org/10.3402/ejpt.v6.28617.
  27. Schaverien J. Boarding school: the trauma of the ‘privileged’ child. J Anal Psychol. 2004;49(5):683-705. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-8774.2004.00495.x.
  28. Nelson CA 3rd, Bos K, Gunnar MR, Sonuga-Barke EJ. The neurobiological toll of early human deprivation. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2011;76(4):127-146. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5834.2011.00630.x.
  29. Sonuga-Barke EJS, Kennedy M, Kumsta R, et al. Child-to-adult neurodevelopmental and mental health trajectories after early life deprivation: the young adult follow-up of the longitudinal English and Romanian Adoptees study. Lancet. 2017;389(10078):1539‐1548. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30045-4.
  30. McGoron L, Gleason MM, Smyke AT, et al. Recovering from early deprivation: attachment mediates effects of caregiving on psychopathology. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2012;51(7):683‐693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2012.05.004.
  31. Шпаковская Л.Л. «Подкидыши»: репрезентации приемного родительства в современной России // Журнал социологии и социальной антропологии. — 2018. — Т. 21. — № 3. — С. 71–92. [Shpakovskaya LL. «Foundlings»: representations of foster parenthood in contemporary Russia. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial’noy antropologii. 2018;21(3):71–92. (In Russ.)]
  32. Кузина И.Г., Стекольщикова А.А. Приемная семья как фактор адаптации и форма жизнеустройства детей-сирот и детей, оставшихся без попечения родителей // Историческая и социально-образовательная мысль. — 2018. — Т. 10. —№ 3-1. — С. 155–161. [Kuzina IG, Stekol’shchikova AA. Foster family as a factor of adaptation and a form of adoption of orphans and children deprived of parental care. Istoricheskaya i sotsial’no-obrazovatel’naya mysl’. 2018;10(3-1):155-161. (In Russ.)] https://doi.org/10.17748/2075-9908-2018-10-3/1-155-161.
  33. Астоянц М.С. Дети-сироты: анализ жизненных практик в условиях интернатного учреждения // Социологические исследования. — 2006. — № 3. — С. 54–63. [Astoyants MS. Orphans: an analysis of life practices in a residential institution. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2006;(3):54-63. (In Russ.)]
  34. Кондратьев М.Ю. Социальная психология закрытых образовательных учреждений. — СПб.: Питер; 2005. — С. 170–173. [Kondrat’ev MYu. Sotsial’naya psikhologiya zakrytykh obrazovatel’nykh uchrezhdeniy. St. Petersburg: Piter; 2005. P. 170-173. (In Russ.)]
  35. Мухина В.С. Психологическая помощь детям, воспитывающимся в учреждениях интернатного типа // Вопросы психологии. — 1989. — № 2. — С. 32–39. [Mukhina VS. Psychological assistance to children brought up in residential institutions. Voprosy psikhologii. 1989;(2):32-39. (In Russ.)]
  36. Прихожан А.М., Толстых Н.Н. Психология сиротства. — СПб.: Питер; 2005.
  37. Распоряжение Правительства РФ № 1618-р «Об утверждении Концепции государственной семейной политики в Российской Федерации на период до 2025 года» от 25.08.2014 г. [Order of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 1618-r. Ob utverzhdenii Kontseptsii gosudarstvennoy semeynoy politiki v Rossiyskoy Federatsii na period do 2025 goda. dated 25.08.2014. (In Russ.)] Доступно по: http://base.garant.ru/70727660/.
  38. Присяжная Н.В. Дети-сироты: постинтернатное жизнеустройство // Социологические исследования. — 2007. — № 11. — С. 54–64. [Prisyazhnaya NV. Orphan children: entering life after graduation. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2007;(11):54-64. (In Russ.)]
  39. Осипова И.И. Социальное сиротство: теоретический анализ и практика преодоления. — Нижний Новгород: НИСОЦ; 2009. [Osipova II. Sotsial’noe sirotstvo: teoreticheskiy analiz i praktika preodoleniya. Nizhniy Novgorod: NISOTs; 2009. (In Russ.)]
  40. Frank DA, Klass P, Earls F, Eisenberg L. Infants and young children in orphanages: one view from pediatrics and child psychiatry. Pediatrics. 1996;97(4):569-578.
  41. Gilbert PA, Marzell M. Characterizing a hidden group of at-risk drinkers: epidemiological profiles of alcohol-use disorder diagnostic orphans. Subst Use Misuse. 2018;53(8):1239‐1251. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2017.1402057.
  42. Послание Президента РФ Дмитрия Медведева Федеральному Собранию Российской Федерации от 30.11.2010. [Address of the President of the Russian Federation Dmitry Medvedev to the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation dated November 30, 2010. (In Russ.)] Доступно по: http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/9637.
  43. Reshetnikov AV. Sociology of medicine: Textbook. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2016.

Statistics

Views

Abstract - 33

PDF (Russian) - 0

Cited-By


Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies