Multicenter open prospective randomized study on the efficacy and safety of Canephron N in preventing recurrences of uncomplicated lower urinary tract infection in women

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат ақылы немесе тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

Introduction. In women, urinary tract infections (UTIs) rank second in morbidity after acute respiratory viral infections. Therefore, issues of non-antibacterial prevention and treatment of UTIs are of great relevance. Particular interest is focused on evaluating the efficacy of the herbal medicinal product Canephron® N in UTI prevention under conditions of rapidly increasing antibiotic resistance among uropathogenic bacterial strains, as well as the growing frequency of microbial associations and multidrug-resistant pathogens.

Aim. To assess and update data on the efficacy and safety of Canephron® N for the prevention of recurrent UTIs in outpatient practice.

Materials and methods. A total of 72 female patients with a clinical diagnosis of acute cystitis or exacerbation of chronic cystitis, for whom empirical antibiotic therapy (ABT) was indicated according to the Russian clinical guidelines, were enrolled in a multicenter, open, prospective, randomized study. Thirty-six patients were assigned to the main group, receiving ABT in combination with Canephron® N (2 tablets three times daily) followed by prophylactic monotherapy with the herbal product for 1 month. Thirty-one patients, receiving ABT only (contact was lost with 5 patients after randomization, and they were excluded from further analysis), were included in the control group. Treatment efficiency and recurrence rates were evaluated for 12 months after completion of therapy.

Results. The mean age of the patients was 37,4 years: 35,1 years in the main group and 39,7 years in the control group. Acute cystitis was diagnosed in 36 (53,7%) patients, and recurrent cystitis in 31 (46,2%). When Canephron® N was administered at the onset of the disease together with antibiotic therapy and subsequently for one month, recurrences of uncomplicated lower urinary tract infections (LUTIs) within one year were observed in 13,9% of patients, compared with 38,7% in the control group.

Among patients with acute cystitis, a recurrent episode during the year occurred in 5% of those treated with ABT and Canephron® N, compared with 31,2% in the group without phytotherapy. In patients with recurrent cystitis, the recurrence rate within one year was 25% in the Canephron® N group versus 46,7% in the control group.

Discussion. Currently, Canephron® N is one of the herbal medicinal products with the most convincing evidence base, a high safety profile, and a broad range of therapeutic effects. The components of this phytomedicine are included in the 2024 Russian Ministry of Health Clinical Guidelines «Cystitis in Women» as an agent for both the prevention and treatment of recurrent cystitis. Our study demonstrated that the combination of antibiotic therapy with Canephron® N reduced the recurrence rate by almost threefold (from 38.7% in the control group to 13.9% in the main group) and prolonged the recurrence-free period in both acute and chronic cystitis in outpatient practice.

Conclusion. Evidence has been obtained supporting the therapeutic efficiency of Canephron® N in the combination treatment and prevention of recurrent UTIs. A positive trend was observed toward improved treatment outcomes and reduced recurrence rates in real clinical practice among patients with uncomplicated cystitis receiving the herbal product in combination with antibiotic therapy.

Толық мәтін

Рұқсат жабық

Авторлар туралы

Refat Amdiy

Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia; St. Luka Clinical Hospital

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: r.e.amdiy@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1305-5791

Ph.D., MD, Professor, Department of Urology with Clinic and Postgraduate Training, Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia; Consultant Urologist, St. Luka Clinical Hospital

Ресей, St. Petersburg; St. Petersburg

Rustyam Bayguzin

City Polyclinic No. 117, St. Petersburg

Email: docurospb@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0009-7724-7718

Head of Surgical Department, Urologist

Ресей, St. Petersburg

Roman Darienko

City Polyclinic No. 4, St. Petersburg

Email: r.darienko@mail.ru

Ph.D., Urologist, Outpatient Department No. 53

Ресей, St. Petersburg

Georgiy Trufanov

City Polyclinic No. 115, St. Petersburg

Email: Urolog_Trufanov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6364-7296

Urologist

Ресей, St. Petersburg

Salman Al-Shukri

Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: shukri@spbmedu.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4857-0542

Ph.D., MD, Professor, Chief Urologist of the Northwestern Federal District of Russia, Honored Doctor of the Russian Federation, Member of the Presidium of the Russian Society of Urology, Head of the Department of Urology with Clinic and Postgraduate Training

Ресей, St. Petersburg

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Little P., Moore M.V., Turner S. et al. Effectiveness of five different approaches in management of urinary tract infection: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2010;340:199–204. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c199.
  2. Ivanov D., Abramov-Sommariva D., Moritz К. et al. An open label, non-controlled, multicentre, interventional trial to investigate the safety and efficacy of Canephron® N in the managementof uncomplicated urinary tract infections (uUTIs). Clinical Phytoscience. 2015;1(7):1–11. doi: 10.1186/s40816–015–0008-x
  3. Kazilov Y.B., Gadzhieva Z.K. Prevalence of various voiding disorders. Urologiia. 2016;(5):109-14. Russian (Казилов Ю.Б., Гаджиева З.К. Распространенность различных нарушений мочеиспускания. Урология 2016;(5):109-14).
  4. Gadzhieva Z.K., Kazilov Y.B. The features in preventing recurrent lower urinary tract infection. Urologiia 2016;3(Suppl. 3):65–76. Russian (Гаджиева З.К., Казилов Ю.Б. Особенности подхода к профилактике рецидивирующей инфекции нижних мочевыводящих путей. Урология 2016;3(Прил. 3):65–76).
  5. O’Neill J. Tackling Drug-Resistant Infections Globally: Final Report and Recommendations. Review on Antimicrobial Resistance. URL: https:// amrreview.org/sites/default/files/160518_Final%20paper_with%20cover.pdf
  6. Sinyakova L.A., Kosova I.V. Prophylaxis of recurrences of urinary tract infection. Urologiia. 2009;(2):22–25. Russian (Синякова Л.А., Косова И.В. Профилактика рецидивов инфекций мочевыводящих путей. Урология. 2009;(2):22–25).
  7. Bonkat G., Kranz J., Cai T., Geerlings S.E. et al. EAU Guidelines on Urological Infections, 2025. Available from: EAU-Guidelines-on-Urological-infections-2025.pdf (https://uroweb.org/guidelines/urological-infections).
  8. Perepanova T.S., Khazan P.L. The herbal preparation Kanefron® N in the treatment and prevention of urinary tract infections. Medical Profession. 2005;4(5):1–4. Russian (Перепанова Т.С., Хазан П.Л. Растительный препарат Канефрон® Н в лечении и профилактике инфекций мочевых путей. Врачебное сословие. 2005;4(5):1–4).
  9. Clinical Guidelines of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 14 «Cystitis in Women» 2021. Rubricator KR (minzdrav.gov.ru). Access date: 29.09.2025. Russian (Клинические рекомендации Минздрава РФ № 14 «Цистит у женщин» 2021 г. Рубрикатор КР (minzdrav.gov.ru). Дата доступа: 29.09.2025).
  10. Bleidorn J. et al. Symptomatic treatment (ibuprofen) or antibiotics (ciprofloxacin) for uncomplicated urinary tract infection? – Results of a randomized controlled pilot trial. BMC Med, 2010. 8: 30. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20504298
  11. Gágyor I., et al. Ibuprofen versus fosfomycin for uncomplicated urinary tract infection in women: randomized controlled trial. BMJ, 2015. 351:h6544.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26698878
  12. General characteristics of the medicinal product Kanefron® N tablets, coated, dated 21.03.2025; drops for oral administration, dated 26.05.2025. Russian (Общая характеристика лекарственного препарата Канефрон® Н таблетки, покрытые оболочкой от 21.03.2025; капли для приема внутрь от 26.05.2025).
  13. Clinical Guidelines of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 719 «Urinary Tract Infection in Pregnancy» 2025. Preview of the CR Access Date: 30.09.2025. Russian (Клинические рекомендации Минздрава РФ № 719 «Инфекция мочевых путей при беременности» 2025 г. Предпросмотр КР. Дата доступа: 30.09.2025).
  14. Davydov A.V., Neimark A.I. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the use of the phytopharmaceutical Kanefron N in the complex treatment of patients with chronic cystitis. Effective Pharmacotherapy. 2019;15(10):20–23. doi: 10.33978/2307-3586-2019-15-10-20-23. Russian (Давыдов А.В., Неймарк А.И. Оценка эффективности применения фитопрепарата Канефрон Н в комплексном лечении пациенток с хроническим циститом. Эффективная фармакотерапия. 2019;15(10):20–23. doi: 10.33978/2307-3586-2019-15-10-20-23).
  15. Sabadash M., Shulyak A. Canephron® N in the treatment of recurrent cystitis in women of child-bearing Age: a randomised controlled study. Clinical Phytoscience. 2017;3:9 doi: 10.1186/s40816-017-0046-7
  16. Holler M., Steindl H., Abramov-Sommariva D. et al. Treatment of urinary tract infections with Canephron® in Germany: a retrospectivedatabase analysis. Antibiotics (Basel). 2021;10(6):685.
  17. Miotla P., Wawrysiuk S., Naber K. et al. Should we always use antibiotics after urodynamic studies in high-risk patients? Biomed. Res. Int. 2018;2018: 1607425.
  18. Popov S.V. Modern principles of treatment and prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections in patients with neurogenic urinary disorders. Lechashchiy vrach. 2011;8:18–21. Russian (Попов С.В. Современные принципы лечения и профилактики катетерассоциированных инфекций мочевых путей у больных с нейрогенными расстройствами мочеиспускания. Лечащий врач. 2011;8:18–21).

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML
2. Figure. Scheme of procedures and research

Жүктеу (454KB)

© Bionika Media, 2025