Role of primary care pediatricians in the organization of pediatric uroandrological service (on the example of Stavropol)


Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Acesso é pago ou somente para assinantes

Resumo

The article presents the results of the survey of opinions of pediatricians (n = 80, 97.5% of the total number of specialists) in Stavropol city about the role of pediatric primary care in organization of pediatric uroandrological service. Analysis of the results indicates a lack of awareness of pediatricians in matters of pediatric urology, andrology, which is confirmed by 42.5% of respondents who said they did not receive information on the problem during the training courses. The lack of awareness of 22.5% pediatricians about the institutions that specialize in providing pediatric uroandrological care is conspicuous, and 3.8% of specialists treat these diseases themselves, that indicates non-compliance with the existing routing schemes in identifying children with uroandrological diseases. In addition, 11.3% of physicians during primary patronage only in some cases carry out inspections for pediatric uroandrological pathology, and even 6.3% of the specialists do not do it at all, that indicates the low level of suspicion among primary care pediatricians, that can result in negative impact on the reproductive health status of the child population of Stavropol city.

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

V. Muravyeva

SBEI HPE Stavropol State Medical University of RMPH

Department of organization of health care, economics and social work

V. Zenin

SBEI HPE Stavropol State Medical University of RMPH

Email: vovaz@inbox.ru
Department of organization of health care, economics and social work; Postgraduate Student

I. Panchenko

SBEI HPE Stavropol State Medical University of RMPH

Department of organization of health care, economics and social work

Bibliografia

  1. Кулакова В.И., Манухина И.Б., Савельева Г.М. Гинекология: национальное руководство. М., ГЭОТАР-Медиа. 2007. С. 1072.
  2. Мирский В.Е., Рищук С.В. Заболевания репродуктивной системы у детей и подростков (андрологические аспекты): руководство для врачей. СПб., СпецЛит. 2012. 479 с.
  3. Михайличенко В.В., Александров В.П., Назаров Т.Н. Патогенез, диагностика и лечения возрастного андрогенного дефицита у мужчин. Андрология и генитальная хирургия. 2005. № 2. С. 60-62.
  4. Неймарк А.И., Алиев Р.Т., Колядо В.Б. Андрологическая служба в Российской Федерации: организационная модель. М., ИД «Медпрактика-М». 2009. 116 с.
  5. Дала-Зуаната Ж.Т. Сексуальное поведение российской молодежи. Планирование семьи. 2000. № 3. С. 20-23.
  6. Шабров А.В., Рищук С.В., Мирский В.Е. и др. Состояние здоровья молодого поколения России и Проект Реформы по его улучшению. Здравоохранение. 2010. № 9. С. 39-50.
  7. Dohle G.R., Diemer T., Giwercman A. et al. EAU guidelines on male infertility. European Urology. 2012; 61(2): 324-332.
  8. Ильин А.Г. Об организации деятельности врача-педиатра участкового. Заместитель главного врача. М., МЦФЭР. 2008. № 10. С. 12-20.
  9. Струков С.Н. Пути профилактики мужского бесплодия у мальчиков: методические рекомендации. Воронеж. 2008. 8 с.
  10. Nieschlag E., Behre H.M., Nieschlag S. Definition of Andrology. Andrology. 2010. P. 10-12.

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML

Declaração de direitos autorais © Bionika Media, 2014

Este site utiliza cookies

Ao continuar usando nosso site, você concorda com o procedimento de cookies que mantêm o site funcionando normalmente.

Informação sobre cookies