The comparative analysis of surgical procedures a in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia and type 2 diabetes mellitus

Aim. To compare the efficiency of two surgical methods, holmium laser enucleation of prostate (HoLEP) and laparoscopic retropubic simple prostatectomy with clamping of internal iliac arteries and vesicourethral anastomosis [LPA+CIIA+VUA]) for treating of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Materials and methods. A total of 56 men with T2DM who underwent surgical treatment of BPH in the National Research Centre for Endocrinology of the Russian Ministry of Health (director – corresponding member of RAS Mokrysheva N.G..) in a period from 2021 until 2022 were included in the study. Patients with T2DM received two types of antidiabetic drugs: basal-bolus insulin therapy and metformin (1000 mg/day per os). Patients were divided into the group of LPA+CIIA+VUA (n=28) and HoLEP (n=28). Preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative examinations with an evaluation of intraoperative and early postoperative complications (I, II, III, IV grades according to the Clavien-Dindo scale) were performed. After 1 year of follow-up, International Prostatic Symptom Score (IPSS), “Quality of Life” score (QoL), International Index of Erectile Function-5 score (IIEF-5), maximal urine flow rate (Qmax), and postvoid residual volume (ml) were assessed. Efficiency of surgical procedures was estimated according to “trifecta”: absence of postoperative complications, urine continence, maximal urine flow (Qmax) >15 ml/sec.

Results. In the group of HoLEP, shorter postoperative bladder catheterization time but higher risk of urinary incontinence, bladder neck contracture and urethral strictures was found. LPA+CIIA+UVA leaded to a two-fold decrease in intraoperative hemoglobin loss with no necessity of repeat procedures.

Conclusions. Our preliminary results demonstrated higher efficacy of LPA+CIIA+VUA for treatment of BPH in patients with T2DM than HoLEP. Patients who underwent LPA+CIIA+VUA were more often achieved the “trifecta”. In order to implement LPA+CIIA+VUA into clinical practice, multi-center, large-scale, double-blind, placebo-controlled (“scar-surgery”) randomized studies are required.