Methods for improving the safety of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotripsy: current state of the problem

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Acesso é pago ou somente para assinantes

Resumo

Despite the growing popularity and expanding indications for retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in the treatment of urolithiasis, percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL) remains the method of choice for removing large kidney stones due to its high efficiency and safety. Modern approaches, such as tubeless or totally tubeless PCNL, allow faster recovery and improve patients’ postoperative quality of life. However, successful implementation of these procedures requires strict patient selection. The primary criterion is atraumatic nature, an absence of urinary tract infection and residual fragments.

To analyze modern instrumental techniques and technologies potentially capable of reducing the incidence of intra- and postoperative complications during tubeless PCNL, we carried out a literature search in PubMed, Scopus, ResearchGate, and eLibrary. The review included articles in Russian and English published between 1973 and 2024.

According to the literature, the frequency of tubeless PCNL can be increased by precise, atraumatic transpapillary puncture through the avascular zone. These conditions can be achieved not only by the surgeon’s experience, but also through the use of new atraumatic instruments for puncturing the collecting system and creating percutaneous access, such as the MG puncture needle, as well as imaging technologies that significantly improve puncture accuracy. To obtain more reliable evidence, prospective randomized studies including patients undergoing tubeless and totally tubeless PCNL are required.

Conclusion. The use of additional imaging technologies and atraumatic instruments for percutaneous access may reduce the complication rate after tubeless and totally tubeless PCNL. However, further prospective randomized studies are necessary in this field.

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

Valeriia Kim

Sechenov University

Email: lerusiya.kim@gmail.com
ORCID ID: 0009-0003-5231-5071

Student, N.V. Sklifosovskiy Institute of Clinical Medicine

Rússia, Moscow

Arianna Yakubova

Sechenov University

Email: arianna.yakubova652@mail.ru
ORCID ID: 0009-0000-8518-5013

Student, N.V. Sklifosovskiy Institute of Clinical Medicine

Rússia, Moscow

Stanislav Vovdenko

Sechenov University

Email: vovdenko_s_v@staff.sechenov.ru
ORCID ID: 0000-0001-6606-147X

Researcher at the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health

Rússia, Moscow

Yuri Olefir

Sechenov University

Email: litostar@mail.ru

Ph.D., MD, professor, Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health

Rússia, Moscow

Stanislav Ali

Sechenov University

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: ali_s_kh@staff.sechenov.ru
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-7365-4190

associate professor at the Institute for urology and reproductive health

Rússia, Moscow

Evgenii Bezrukov

Sechenov University

Email: bezrukov_e_a@staff.sechenov.ru
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-2746-5962

Ph.D., MD, professor at the Institute for urology and reproductive health

Rússia, Moscow

Magomed Gazimiev

Sechenov University

Email: gazimiev_m_a@staff.sechenov.ru
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-8398-1865

Ph.D., MD, professor at the Institute for urology and reproductive health

Rússia, Moscow

Bibliografia

  1. Fernstro ̈MI, Johansson B. Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. A new extraction technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1976;10: 257–259.
  2. Skolarikos A., Jung H., Neisius A., Petrik A., Somani B., Tailly T., Gambaro G., Davis N.F., Geraghty R., Lombardo R., Tzelves L., Bezuidenhout С. EAU Guidelines on Urolithiasis. European Association of Urology 2024.
  3. Minimal Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotripsy. Our Experience. Y.G. Alyayev et al. aterials of the XIV Congress of Russian Society of Urologists. – Saatov, Russia, 2014. pp. 241–242. Russian (Минимально-инвазивная перкутанная нефролитотрипсия. Наш опыт. Ю.Г. Аляев и др. XIV Конгресс Российского общества урологов: материалы. Саратов, 2014. С. 241–242).
  4. Rudenk V.I., Semenjakin I.V., Malhasjan V.A., Gadzhijev N.K. Kidney Stones Disease. Urologiia. 2017;2L30–63. Russian (Руденко В.И., Семенякин И.В., Малхасян В.А., Гаджиев Н.К. Мочекаменная болезнь. Урология. 2017;2:30–63).
  5. Wickham JE, Miller RA, Kellett MJ, Payne SR. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: One stage or two? Br J Urol 1984;56:582-5.
  6. Tomer N., Durbhakula V., Gupta K., Khargi R., Gallante B., Atallah W.M., Gupta M. Is Totally Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy a Safe and Efficacious Option for Complex Stone Disease? J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 3261. DOI:10.3390/ jcm13113261
  7. Moosanejad N., Firouzian A., Hashemi S.A., Bahari M., Fazli M. Comparison of totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney stones: A randomized, clinical trial. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 2016;49:e4878.
  8. Xun Y, Wang Q, Hu H, Lu Y, Zhang J, Qin B, Geng Y, Wang S. Tubeless versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an update meta-analysis. BMC Urol. 2017;17(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12894-017-0295-2. PMID: 29132344; PMCID: PMC5683212.
  9. Porpiglia F., Checcucci E., Amparore D., Peretti D., Piramide F., De Cillis S., Piana A., Niculescu G., Verri P., Manfredi M., Poggio M., Stura I., Migliaretti G., Cossu M., Fiori C. Percutaneous Kidney Puncture with Three-dimensional Mixed-reality Hologram Guidance: From Preoperative Planning to Intraoperative Navigation. European urology. 2022; 81(6):588–597. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.10.023
  10. Shen X, Li K, Wu Z, Lu C, Yu H, Lai C, Tang Z, Li K, Xu K. A Novel Computed Tomography-Ultrasound Image Fusion Technique for Guiding the Percutaneous Kidney Access. Urol J. 2023;20(4):208–214. doi: 10.22037/uj.v20i.7465. PMID: 36840447.
  11. Zhang H, Liang W, Liu Y, Wang Z. Clinical application of ultrasound-CT image fusion technology in percutaneous nephrolithotripsy. Asian J Surg. 2024;47(7):3077–3078. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2024.02.124. Epub2024 Mar 8. PMID: 3845886.
  12. Hin Lysander Chau, Hoi Chak Wilson Chan, Ting Bong Thomas Li, Man Hung Phoebe Cheung, Kin Man Justin Lam, Hing Shing So. An Innovative Free-Hand Puncture Technique to Reduce Radiation in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Using Ultrasound with Navigation System Under Magnetic Field: A Single-Center Experience in Hong Kong. 2015 Oct 20.
  13. Akins E.W., Hawkins I.F. Jr, Mladinich C., Tupler R., Siragusa R.J., Pry R. The blunt needle: a new percutaneous access device. AJR. American journal of roentgenology. 1989;152(1):181–182. doi: 10.2214/ajr.152.1.181.
  14. Hou B., Wang M., Song Z., He Q., Hao Z. Renal puncture access using a blunt needle: proposal of the blunt puncture concept. World journal of urology. 2022;40(4):1035–1041. doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03927-8.
  15. Morozov A, Kalinin N, Androsov A, Gazimiev A, Lerner Y, Gomez Rivas J, Somani B, Enikeev D, Gazimiev M. A Novel and Less Traumatic Needle for Kidney Puncture: Development and Preclinical Study Results. J Endourol. 2023;37(1):93–98. doi: 10.1089/end.2022.0371. Epub 2022 Nov 21. PMID: 36074948.
  16. Kalinin NE, Lerner JV, Mikhaylov VY, Gazimiev MA. A novel atraumatic puncture needle MG. Results of a comparative morphological study. Urologiia. 2021;(6):40–46. Russian. PMID: 34967163.
  17. Morozov A, Kalinin N, Androsov A, McFarland J, Scolarikos A, Saidian D, Gomez Rivas J, Somani B, Enikeev D, Glybochko P, Gazimiev M. A novel less-traumatic needle for kidney puncture: first clinical experience. Int Urol Nephrol. 2023;55(8):1931–1936. doi: 10.1007/s11255-023-03584-3. Epub 2023 May 19. PMID: 37204679.
  18. ElSheemy MS, Elmarakbi AA, Hytham M, Ibrahim H, Khadgi S, Al-Kandari AM. Mini vs standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones: a comparative study. Urolithiasis. 2018;16(10):18–1055
  19. Jones P., Elmussareh M., Aboumarzouk O.M., Mucksavage P.,Somani B.K. Role of Minimally Invasive (Micro and Ultra-mini) PCNL for Adult Urinary Stone Disease in the Modern Era: Evidence from a Systematic Review. Current urology reports. 2018;19(4):27. doi: 10.1007/s11934-018-0764-5
  20. Haghighi R., Zeraati H., Ghorban Zade M. Ultra-mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) versus standard PCNL: A randomised clinical trial. Arab journal of urology. 2017;15(4):294–298. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2017.10.003
  21. Akand M., Buyukaslan A., Servi S., Civcik L. A hypothetical method for calculation of the access point, direction angle and access angle for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Medical hypotheses. 2019;124:101–104. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2019.02.007
  22. Bellman GC, Davidoff R, Candela J, Gerspach J, Kurtz S, Stout L. Tubeless percutaneous renal surgery. J Urol. 1997;157:1578–82.
  23. Cormio L. et al. Exit strategies following percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): a comparison of surgical outcomes in the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES) PCNL Global Study. World J Urol. 2013;31:1239.
  24. Gauhar V, Traxer O, García Rojo E, Scarcella S, Pavia MP, Chan VW, Pretore E, Wroclawski ML, Corrales M, Tiong HY, Lim EJ, Teoh JY, Heng CT, de la Rosette J, Somani BK, Castellani D. Complications and outcomes of tubeless versus nephrostomy tube in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Urolithiasis. 2022;50(5):511–522. doi: 10.1007/s00240-022-01337-y. Epub 2022 Jun 8. PMID: 35674819; PMCID: PMC9468100.
  25. Kalinin N.E. Minimization of Intrarenal Complications during Percutaneous Nephrolithotripsy. Diss. candidate of medical sciences. M., 2023. 119 p. Russian (Калинин Н.Е. Минимизация интраренальных осложнений перкутанной нефролитотрипсии. Дисс. к.м.н. М., 2023. 119 с.)
  26. Kaprin A.D., Apolikhin O.I., Sivkov A.V., Anokhin N.V., Gadzhiev N.K., Malkhasian V.A., Akopyan G.N., Prosyannikov M.Yu. Prevalence of Kidney Stone Disease in the Russian Federation from 2005 to 2020. Experimental and Clinical Urology. 2022;15(2):10–17. Rusian (Каприн А.Д., Аполихин О.И., Сивков А.В., Анохин Н.В., Гаджиев Н.К., Малхасян В.А., Акопян Г.Н., Просянников М.Ю. Заболеваемость мочекаменной болезнью в российской федерации с 2005 по 2020 гг. Экспериментальная и клиническая урология 2022;15(2)10–17).
  27. Endovitskiy A.A., Lyutsyo V.V. Dynamics of morbidity with diseases of the genitourinary system in the Russian Federation in 2015-2021. Scientific and Practical Peer-reviewed Journal «Modern Problems of Public Health and Medical Statistics». 2022;4:256–268. Russian (Ендовицкий А.А., Люцко В.В. Динамика заболеваемости болезнями мочеполовой системы в Российской Федерации в 2015–2021 гг. Научно-практический рецензируемый журнал «Современные проблемы здравоохранения и медицинской статистики». 2022;4:256–268).
  28. Singh Bhullar J., Scott R., Patel M., Mittal V.K. Kidney access device. JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. 2014;18(4):e2014.00219. doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2014.00219

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML
2. 1 Clinical application of ultrasound and CT combination technology in percutaneous nephrolithotripsy. A is an ultrasound picture, CT and ZI reconstruction, B is the use of a fusion system by the surgeon, C is a picture of a combined image [11]

Baixar (286KB)
3. Fig. 2 Image of an electromagnetic ultrasonic navigation system. A is an ultrasound sensor; B is an electromagnetic needle sensor; C is a puncture needle; D is a magnetic field generator [12]

Baixar (97KB)
4. Fig. 3. Needles presented in the work of Noi and co-authors (2022). Experimental blunt-pointed needle (red arrow), Trocar type needle (in the middle), Chiba type needle (yellow arrow) [14]

Baixar (140KB)
5. 4. Distal ends of puncture needles: (A) Chiba needle; (B) Trocar needle; (C) MG puncture needle; (D) mechanism of operation of the MG puncture needle [25]

Baixar (153KB)

Declaração de direitos autorais © Bionika Media, 2025