Laparoscopic extraperitoneal radical cystectomy

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

Introduction: Laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) has gradually established as a reliable minimally invasive method for the treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), which can significantly reduce the number of complications. However, in the elderly and patients with serious comorbidities, LRC is still associated with a high risk of complications. There are only a few reports on the use of extraperitoneal access for LRC in the literature. At the same time, extensive experience in laparoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy and retroperitoneoscopic kidney procedures showed significant advantages of extraperitoneal access.

Materials and methods: During 2017–2021, four extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical cystectomy (ELRC) in male patients with MIBC of stage T2-T4. All patients had serious comorbidities. All but one patient had MIBC of G2-G3. Two of them had an invasion in the posterior urethra. In one patient, prostate adenocarcinoma (Gleason score 5+3=8) with invasion of the bladder wall was also diagnosed. He had chronic kidney disease of 3-4 stage due to hydronephrosis.

Results. All procedures were done laparoscopically by extraperitoneal approach. In one case, urine diversion was performed by transperitoneal route into a colon conduit. Simultaneous retroperitoneoscopic ureterocutaneostomy were performed to two cases: on one side (in a patient with a single functioning kidney) and on both sides, respectively. Simultaneous bilateral retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy was done in a patient with CKD 5, who was on chronic dialysis. In two patients, salvage cystectomy was done for recurrent bleeding. The maximum intraoperative blood loss did not exceed 500 ml. No transfusion was required in any of the patients. Bowel function in all patients was recovered within 24-36 hours after the intervention.

Conclusion. ELRC is a reproducible minimally invasive surgical procedure for patients with bladder cancer, which has advantages in terms of postoperative recovery in patients with severe comorbidities. The use of an extraperitoneal approach may be a rational alternative for salvage cystectomy. More cases are needed to determine the role of the method in the surgical treatment of MIBC.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

D. Perlin

GBUZ “Volgograd Regional Center of Urology and Nephrology”; FGBOU VO Volgograd State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: dvperlin@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4415-0903

Ph.D., MD, Chief 

俄罗斯联邦, Volzhsky; Volgograd

V. Zippunnikov

GBUZ “Volgograd Regional Center of Urology and Nephrology”; FGBOU VO Volgograd State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: vzipunnikov@yandex.ru

Ph.D., associate professor 

俄罗斯联邦, Volzhsky; Volgograd

А. Shmanev

GBUZ “Volgograd Regional Center of Urology and Nephrology”; FGBOU VO Volgograd State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: dvperlin@mail.ru

assistant at Department of Urology, oncologist and urologist  

俄罗斯联邦, Volzhsky; Volgograd

P. Kulikov

GBUZ “Volgograd Regional Center of Urology and Nephrology”

Email: dvperlin@mail.ru

urologist

俄罗斯联邦, Volzhsky

Ya. Dankov

FGBOU VO Volgograd State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: dvperlin@mail.ru

2-year resident at the Department of Urology

俄罗斯联邦, Volgograd

参考

  1. Thomas M., Mayr R., Wehrberger C., Dechet C. Comparison of Radical Cystectomy with Conservative Treatment in Geriatric (80) Patients with Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer. International Braz J Urol. 2013;39(5):622–30. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2013.05.03
  2. Zeng Shuxiong, Zhensheng Zhang, Xiaowen Yu, Ruixiang Song, Rongchao Wei, Junjie Zhao, Linhui Wang, Jianguo Hou, Yinghao Sun, and Chuanliang Xu. Laparoscopic versus Open Radical Cystectomy for Elderly Patients over 75-Year-Old: A Single Center Comparative Analysis. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(6). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098950
  3. Fontana, Pamela Portella, Sergio Alonso y Gregorio, Juan Gómez Rivas, Leslie Cuello Sánchez, Jesús Cisneros Ledo, Ángel Tabernero Gómez, Jesús Díez Sebastián, and Jesús Javier de la Peña Barthel. Perioperative and Survival Outcomes of Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer in Patients over 70 Years. Central European Journal of Urology. 2015;68(1):24–29. https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2015.01.498
  4. Kyle A. Richards, A. Karim Kader, Rick Otto, Joseph A. Pettus, John J. Smith, Ashok K. Hemal. Is Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy Justified in the Elderly? A Comparison of Robotic versus Open Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer in Elderly ≥75 Years Old. Journal of Endourology. 2012;26(10):1301–1306. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2012.0035
  5. Brodak Milos, Jan Tomasek, Lukas Holub, Petr Husek, and Jaroslav Pacovsky. Urological Surgery in Elderly Patients: Results and Complications. Clinical Interventions in Aging. 2015;379. https://doi.org/10.2147/cia.s73381
  6. Lang Feng, Jian Song, Menghua Wu, Ye Tian, Daoxin Zhang. Extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal laparoscopic radical cystectomy for selected elderly bladder cancer patients: asingle center experience. Int braz J Urol. 2016;42(4):655–662. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0608.
  7. Serel Tekin Ahmet Guven Sevin, Hakki Perk, Alim Kosar, Sedat Soyupek. Antegrade Extraperitoneal Approach to Radical Cystectomy and Ileal Neobladder. International Journal of Urology. 2003;10(1):25–28. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-2042.2003.00560.x
  8. Zhao Junjie, Shuxiong Zeng, Zhensheng Zhang, Tie Zhou, Bo Yang, Ruixiang Song, Yinghao Sun, and Chuanliang Xu. Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy versus Extraperitoneal Radical Cystectomy: Is the Extraperitoneal Technique Rewarding? Clinical Genitourinary Cancer. 2015;13(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2015.01.006
  9. Roth Beat, Frédéric D. Birkhäuser, Pascal Zehnder, Fiona C. Burkhard, George N. Thalmann, and Urs E. Studer. Readaptation of the Peritoneum Following Extended Pelvic Lymphadenectomy and Cystectomy Has a Significant Beneficial Impact on Early Postoperative Recovery and Complications: Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial. European Urology. 2011;59(2):204–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2010.10.030
  10. Kulkarni J.N., Gulla R.I., Tongaonkar H.B., Kashyapi B.D., Rajyaguru K.B. Radical cystoprostatectomy: an extraperitoneal retrograde approach. J Urol. 1999;161(2):545–548. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)61946-3.
  11. Verze Paolo, Salvatore Scuzzarella, Giorgio R. Martina, Pierluigi Giummelli, Federico Cantoni, and Vincenzo Mirone. Long-Term Oncological and Functional Results of Extraperitoneal Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: One Surgical Team’s Experience on 1,600 Consecutive Cases. World Journal of Urology. 2013;31(3):529–534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-013-1052-0
  12. Lei Y., Tong S., Zu X., et al. Extraperitoneal and transperitoneal laparoscopic partial cystectomy for benign non-urothelial bladder tumors: an initial experience. Urol Int. 2015;94(2):149-155. doi: 10.1159/000366067.
  13. Zhu Yi-Ping, Ding-Wei Ye, Xu-Dong Yao, Shi-Lin Zhang, Bo Dai, Yi-Jun Shen, Chao-fu Wang. Defining Good Candidates for Extraperitoneal Cystectomy: Results from Random Peritoneum Biopsies of 136 Cases. Urology. 2013;81(4):820–825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2012.11.057
  14. Pakish Janelle, Pamela T. Soliman, Michael Frumovitz, Shannon N. Westin, Kathleen M. Schmeler, Ricardo dos Reis, Mark F. Munsell, and Pedro T. Ramirez. A Comparison of Extraperitoneal versus Transperitoneal Laparoscopic or Robotic Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy for Staging of Endometrial Carcinoma. Gynecologic Oncology. 2014;132(2):366–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.12.019
  15. Jensen Jørgen Bjerggaard, Benedicte Parm Ulhøi, and Klaus Møller-Ernst Jensen. Extended versus Limited Lymph Node Dissection in Radical Cystectomy: Impact on Recurrence Pattern and Survival. International Journal of Urology. 2011;19(1):39–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2042.2011.02887.x
  16. Bi Liangkuan, Hai Huang, Xinxiang Fan, Kaiwen Li, Kewei Xu, Chun Jiang, Hao Liu, et al. Extended vs Non-Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection and Their Influence on Recurrence-Free Survival in Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies. BJU International. 2014;113(5b). https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.12371
  17. Larcher A., Sun M., Schiffmann J., Tian Z., Shariat S.F., McCormack M., Saad F. et al. Differential Effect on Survival of Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection at Radical Cystectomy for Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer. European Journal of Surgical Oncology (EJSO). 2015;41(3):353–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2014.10.061
  18. Vakalopoulos I., Dimitriadis G., Anastasiadis A., Gkotsos G., Radopoulos D. Does intubated uretero-ureterocutaneostomy provide better health-related quality of life than orthotopic neobladder in patients after radical cystectomy for invasive bladder cancer? Int Urol Nephrol. 2011;43(3):743–748. doi: 10.1007/s11255-011-9904-2.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Formation of the extraperitoneal working space with a balloon

下载 (841KB)
3. Fig. 2. Clipping of the left ureter

下载 (1MB)
4. Fig. 3. Mobilization of the posterior wall of the bladder

下载 (1MB)
5. Fig. 4. Ligation and division of the vascular pedicles of the bladder

下载 (1MB)
6. Figure 5. Clipping and cutting of the urethra

下载 (1MB)
7. Fig. 6. Retroperitoneoscopic ureterocutaneostomy on the right: exposure of the ureteral stump to the skin

下载 (998KB)

版权所有 © Bionika Media, 2023
##common.cookie##