Journal of Samara State Technical University, Ser. Physical and Mathematical SciencesJournal of Samara State Technical University, Ser. Physical and Mathematical Sciences1991-86152310-7081Samara State Technical University2059510.14498/vsgtu1608Review ArticleThe limit diagram under hot sheet metal forming. A review of constitutive models of material, viscous failure criteria and standard testsKellerIlya EDr. Phys. & Math. Sci.; Associate Professor; Professor, Dept. of Dynamics and Strength of Machines; Researcher, Lab. of Nonlinear Mechanics of Deformable Solidskie@icmm.ruPetukhovDmitriy SAssistant, Dept. of Dynamics and Strength of Machines; Postgraduate Student, Lab. of Nonlinear Mechanics of Deformable Solidspetuhovds@mail.ruKazantsevAleksandr VAssistant; Dept. of Dynamics and Strength of Machinesalexkazancev@bk.ruTrofimovVictor NDr. Techn. Sci.; Associate Professor; Professor; Dept. of Dynamics and Strength of Machinestvn_perm@mail.ruPerm National Research Polytechnic UniversityInstitute of Continuous Media Mechanics UB RAS1509201822344748614022020Copyright © 2018, Samara State Technical University2018Methods of theoretical analysis and experimental verification of conditions of limit deformation are considered for a reasonable choice of the constitutive equations for mathematical modeling of processes of hot and warm treatment by pressure of sheet metal products with a deep drawing. Attention is focused on the forming limit curve of sheet metal on the plane of the principal strains (one of that corresponds to stretching, and the second can specify stretching or compression), the characteristic of the local state of the material corresponding to the critical growth of strain localization. Localization here is understood as a local thinning of the sheet and corresponds to diffuse form of localization. Other defects (shear bands, crack formation) develop from this limiting state or (formation of folds and wrinkles) are not local and require complete formulation of the problem. The forming limit curve (FLC) defines the conditions of realization of a technological process and can be theoretically predicted depending on the constitutive equations of plasticity, indicator of critical state and initial imperfections. The Marciniak-Kuczyński scheme is considered for getting FLC, where the sample has two zones of homogeneous strains and allows analytical reduction of the problem to the system of several ordinary differential equations solved numerically. The experimental methods assume testing by pressing a punch with a spherical or cylindrical tip into a specimen cut from a sheet. Depending on the depth of the lateral cutouts from the specimen, it can be provided tension or compression of the specimen in the transverse direction in these tests. Both approaches are analyzed as tools for selection and experimental verification of the constitutive model and the limit state indicator. They solve methodological problem of identification of mathematical models on a quite non-standard experiments involving strain localization. With the use of Marciniak-Kuczyński scheme the effect of a number of yield criteria for anisotropic sheet metal, hardening laws, damage accumulation models and criteria of viscous failure on qualitative and quantitative features of the FLC. To do this a proprietary algorithm has been developed. Experimental standard test methods of Hasek, Marciniak and Nakajima were implemented numerically in the software package LS-DYNA. The numerical FLD obtained were compared with theoretical and experimental ones. Possibilities of integration into Marciniak-Kuczyński scheme the dependence on temperature, strain rate and microstructure parameters for each basic rigid-plastic (scleronomous) model were discussed. It is noted this scheme is significantly limited by proportional changes of the main deformations in the sample outside and inside the strain localization zone. It is revealed this scheme is not adapted for determination of limit properties of the metals deformable in the conditions of deformation softening (aluminum, titanium alloys and some steels at temperatures of dynamic recrystallization). For a wider range of material deformation conditions, there is no alternative to the above-mentioned numerical method for predicting FLC. An open and relevant question is the description of the evolution of anisotropic plastic and fracture properties due to the anisotropic damage accumulation.sheet metal formingforming limit diagramviscous failure criteriaplastically anisotropic materialsmaterial modelscalculationstandard experimentгорячая листовая штамповкадиаграмма предельного деформированиявязкое разрушениепластическая анизотропиямодели материаларасчетстандартные испытания[Defects in thermo-mechanical processing / Thermo-Mechanical Processing of Metallic Materials / Pergamon Materials Series, 11; eds. B. Verlinden, J. Driver, I. Samajdar, R. D. Doherty. Pergamon, 2007. pp. 333-348. doi: 10.1016/S1470-1804(07)80016-2.][Marciniak Z., Duncan J. L., Hu S. J. Mechanics of Sheet Metal Forming. London: Butterworth Heinemann, 2002. xii+211 pp. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-7506-5300-8.x5000-6.][Silva M. B., Isik K., Tekkaya A. E., Martins P. A. F. Fracture Loci in Sheet Metal Forming: A Review // Acta Metall. Sin. (Engl. Lett.), 2015. vol. 28, no. 12. pp. 1415-1425. doi: 10.1007/s40195-015-0341-6.][Ильюшин A. A. Деформация вязкопластического тела // Ученые записки МГУ. Механика, 1940. № 39. С. 3-81.][Marciniak Z., Kuczyński K. Limit strains in the processes of stretch-forming sheet metal // Int. J. Mech. Sci., 1967. vol. 9, no. 9. pp. 609-620. doi: 10.1016/0020-7403(67)90066-5.][ISO 12004-2:2008. Metallic materials - Sheet and strip - Determination of forming-limit curves - Part 2 : Determination of forming-limit curves in the laboratory. International Organization for Standardization, 2008. 27 pp. doi: 10.3403/BSENISO12004.][ASTM E2218-15. Standard Test Method for Determining Forming Limit Curves. West Conshohocken, PA, USA: ASTM International, 2015. 16 pp. doi: 10.1520/E2218-15.][Богатов А. А., Мижирицкий О. И., Смирнов С. В. Ресурс пластичности металлов при обработке давлением. М.: Металлургия, 1984. 144 с.][Смирнов С. В., Швейкин В. П. Пластичность и деформируемость углеродистых сталей при обработке давлением. Екатеринбург: УрО РАН, 2009. 250 с.][Калпин Ю. Г., Перфилов В. И., Петров П. А., Рябов В. А., Филиппов Ю. К. Сопротивление деформации и пластичность при обработке металлов давлением. М.: Машиностроение, 2011. 244 с.][Kim J.B., Yang D.Y. Prediction of wrinkling initiation in sheet metal forming processes // Engineering Computations, 2003. vol. 20, no. 1. pp. 6-39. doi: 10.1108/02644400310458810.][Freudenthal A. M. The Inelastic Behavior of Engineering Materials and Structures. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1950.][Clift S. E., Hartley P., Sturgess C. E. N., Rowe G. W. Fracture prediction in plastic deformation processes // Int. J. Mech. Sci., 1990. vol. 32, no. 1. pp. 1-17. doi: 10.1016/0020-7403(90)90148-C.][Cockcroft M. G., Latham D. J. Ductility and the workability of metals // J. Inst. Metals, 1968. vol. 96. pp. 33-39.][Oh S. I., Chen C. C., Kobayashi S. Ductile fracture in axisymmetric extrusion and drawing. Part 2. Workability in extrusion and drawing // J. Eng. Ind., 1979. vol. 101, no. 1. pp. 36-44. doi: 10.1115/1.3439471.][McClintock F. A. A Criterion for Ductile Fracture by the Growth of Holes // J. Appl. Mech., 1968. vol. 35, no. 2. pp. 363-371. doi: 10.1115/1.3601204.][Rice J. R., Tracey D. M. On the ductile enlargement of voids in triaxial stress fields // J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1969. vol. 17, no. 3. pp. 201-217. doi: 10.1016/0022-5096(69)90033-7.][Johnson R., Cook W. H. Fracture characteristics of three metals subjected to various strains, strain rates, temperatures and pressures // Eng. Fract. Mech., 1985. vol. 21, no. 1. pp. 31-48. doi: 10.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-9.][Wierzbicki T., Bao Y., Lee Y.W., Bai Y. Calibration and evaluation of seven fracture models // Int. J. Mech. Sci., 2005. vol. 47, no. 4. pp. 719-743. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2005.03.003.][Bao Y., Wierzbicki T. On fracture locus in the equivalent strain and stress triaxiality space // Int. J. Mech. Sci., 2004. vol. 46, no. 1. pp. 81-98. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.02.006.][Wilkins M. L., Streit R. D., Reaugh J. E. Cumulative-strain-damage model of ductile fracture: simulation and prediction of engineering fracture tests: Technical Report UCRL-53058. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, October 3, 1980, Available at https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/6628920-KUgBmG/ (July 11, 2018).][Yang X., Lang L., Liu K., Guo C. Modified MK model combined with ductile fracture criterion and its application in warm hydroforming // Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China, 2015. vol. 25, no. 10. pp. 3389-3398. doi: 10.1016/S1003-6326(15)63974-7.][Takuda H., Mori K., Hatta N. The application of some criteria for ductile fracture to the prediction of the forming limit of sheet metals // J. Mat. Proc. Tech., 1999. vol. 95, no. 1-3. pp. 116-121. doi: 10.1016/s0924-0136(99)00275-7.][Oyane M., Sato T., Okimoto K., Shima S. Criteria for Ductile Fracture and Their Applications // Journal of Mechanical Working Technology, 1980. vol. 4, no. 1. pp. 65-81. doi: 10.1016/0378-3804(80)90006-6.][Ko Y.K., Lee J.S., Huh H. et al. Prediction of fracture in hubhole expanding process using a new ductile fracture criterion // J. Mat. Proc. Tech., 2007. vol. 187. pp. 358-362. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.11.071.][Lou Y., Huh H., Lim S., Pack K. New ductile fracture criterion for prediction of fracture forming limit diagrams of sheet metals // Int. J. Sol. Struct., 2012. vol. 49, pp. 3605-3615. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.02.016.][Ghosh A. K. A criterion for ductile fracture in sheets under biaxial loading // Metall. Trans. A, 1976. vol. 7, no. 4. pp. 523-533. doi: 10.1007/BF02643968.][Norris (Jr.) D. M., Reaugh J. E., Moran B., Quinones D. F. A Plastic-Strain, Mean-Stress Criterion for Ductile Fracture // J. Eng. Mater. Technol., 1978. vol. 100, no. 3. pp. 279-286. doi: 10.1115/1.3443491.][Atkins A. G. Possible explanation for unexpected departures in hydrostatic tension-fracture strain relations // Metal Science, 1981. vol. 15, no. 2. pp. 81-83. doi: 10.1179/msc.1981.15.2.81.][Weck A., Wilkinson D. S. Experimental investigation of void coalescence in metallic sheets containing laser drilled holes // Acta Materialia, 2008. vol. 56, no. 8. pp. 1774-1784. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.12.035.][Li H., Fu M. W., Lu J., Yang H. Ductile fracture: Experiments and computations // Int. J. Plast., 2011. vol. 27, no. 2. pp. 147-180. doi: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2010.04.001.][Власов А.В. О применении критерия Кокрофта-Лэтэма для прогнозирования разрушения при холодной объемной штамповке // Изв. Тульск. гос. ун-та. Техн. науки, 2017. № 11-1. С. 46-58.][Atkins A. G. Fracture mechanics and metal forming. Damage mechanics and the local approach of yesterday and today / Fracture research in retrospective; eds. H. P. Rossmanith. Rotterdam: Balkema, 1997. pp. 327-350.][Боткин А. В., Валиев Р., Степин П. С., Баймухаметов А. X. Оценка поврежденности металла при холодной пластической деформации c использованием модели разрушения Кокрофта-Латама // Деформация и разрушение материалов, 2011. № 7. С. 17-22.][Isik K., Silva M. B., Tekkaya A. E., Martins P. A. F. Formability limits by fracture in sheet metal forming // J. Mat. Proc. Tech., 2014. vol. 214, no. 8. pp. 1557-1565. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.02.026.][Silva M. B., Isik K., Tekkaya A. E. et al. Fracture Toughness and Failure Limits in Sheet Metal Forming // J. Mat. Proc. Tech., 2016. vol. 234, no. 8. pp. 1557-1565. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.03.029.][Atkins A. G. Fracture in forming // J. Mat. Proc. Tech., 1996. vol. 56, no. 1-4. pp. 609-618. doi: 10.1016/0924-0136(95)01875-1.][Tvergaard V., Needleman A. Analysis of the cup-cone fracture in a round tensile bar // Acta Metallurgica, 1984. vol. 32, no. 1. pp. 157-169. doi: 10.1016/0001-6160(84)90213-X.][Власов А. В., Герасимов Д. А. Реализация модели Гурсо-Твергарда-Нидельмана для расчета процессов холодной объемной штамповки несжимаемых материалов // Известия высших учебных заведений. Машиностроение, 2017. № 8 (689). С. 8-17. doi: 10.18698/0536-1044-2017-8-8-17.][Gurson A. L. Continuum theory of ductile rupture by void nucleation and growth. I. Yield criteria and flow rules for porous ductile media // J. Eng. Mater. Technol., 1977. vol. 99, no. 1. pp. 2-15. doi: 10.1115/1.3443401.][Needleman A., Triantafyllidis N. Void growth and local necking in biaxially stretched sheets // J. Eng. Mater. Technol., 1978. vol. 100, no. 2. pp. 164-169. doi: 10.1115/1.3443466.][Nahshon K., Hutchinson J. W. Modification of the Gurson Model for shear failure // Eur. J. Mech., A, Solids, 2008. vol. 27, no. 1. pp. 1-17. doi: 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2007.08.002.][Andrade F. X. C., Feucht M., Haufe A., Neukamm F. An incremental stress state dependent damage model for ductile failure prediction // Int. J. Fract., 2016. vol. 200, no. 1-2. pp. 127-150. doi: 10.1007/s10704-016-0081-2.][Andrade F. X. C., Feucht M., Haufe A. On the Prediction of Material Failure in LSDYNA ®: A Comparison Between GISSMO and DIEM: The 13th LS-DYNA International Conference (June 8-10, 2014, Dearborn, MI), 2014, Available at https://goo.gl/AQUhP9 (July 11, 2018).][Chaboche J. L. Continuum damage mechanics: present state and future trends // Nucl. Eng. Design, 1987. vol. 105, no. 1. pp. 19-33. doi: 10.1016/0029-5493(87)90225-1.][Lee H., Peng K. E., Wang J. An anisotropic damage criterion for deformation instability and its application to forming limit analysis of metal plates // Eng. Fract. Mech., 1985. vol. 21, no. 5. pp. 1031-1054. doi: 10.1016/0013-7944(85)90008-6.][Волков И. А., Игумнов Л. А. Введение в континуальную механику поврежденной среды. М.: Физматлит, 2017. 304 с.][Murakami S. Continuum Damage Mechanics. A Continuum Mechanics Approach to the Analysis of Damage and Fracture / Solid Mechanics and Its Applications. vol. 185. Netherlands: Springer, 2012. xxix+402 pp. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-2666-6.][Zhu Y. Y., Cescotto S. A fully coupled elasto-visco-plastic damage theory for anisotropic materials // Int. J. Sol. Struct., 1995. vol. 32, no. 11. pp. 1607-1641. doi: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2003.10.002.][Badreddine H., Saanouni K., Nguyen T. D. Damage anisotropy and its effect on the plastic anisotropy evolution under finite strains // Int. J. Sol. Struct., 2015. vol. pp. 11-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.02.009.][Badreddine H., Labergère C., Saanouni K. Ductile damage prediction in sheet and bulk metal forming // Comptes Rendus Mécanique, 2016. vol. 344, no. 4-5. pp. 296-318. doi: 10. 1016/j.crme.2015.11.006.][Simo J. C., Ju J. W. On continuum damage-elastoplasticity at finite strains. A computational framework // Computational Mechanics, 1989. vol. 5, no. 5. pp. 375-400. doi: 10.1007/bf01047053.][Voyiadjis G. Z., Abu Al-Rub R. K., Palazotto A. N. Thermodynamic framework for coupling of non-local viscoplasticity and non-local anisotropic viscodamage for dynamic localization problems using gradient theory // Int. J. Plast., 2004. vol. 20, no. 6. pp. 981-1038. doi: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2003.10.002.][Lemaitre J. A continuous damage mechanics model for ductile fracture // J. Eng. Mater. Technol., 1985. vol. 107, no. 1. pp. 83-89. doi: 10.1115/1.3225775.][Heibel S., Nester W., Clausmeyer T., Tekkaya A.E. Influence of Different Yield Loci on Failure Prediction with Damage Models // J. Physics: IOP Conf. Series, 2017. vol. 896, 012081. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/896/1/012081.][Hill R. A theory of the yielding and plastic flow of anisotropic metals // Proc. R. Soc. Lond., Ser. A, 1948. vol. 193, no. 1033. pp. 281-297. doi: 10.1098/rspa.1948.0045.][Hill R. Theoretical plasticity of textured aggregates // Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc., 1979. vol. 85, no. 1. pp. 179-191. doi: 10.1017/S0305004100055596.][Hill R. Constitutive dual potentials in classical plasticity // J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1987. vol. 35, no. 1. pp. 23-33. doi: 10.1016/0022-5096(87)90025-1.][Hill R. Constitutive modelling of orthotropic plasticity in sheet metals // J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1990. vol. 38, no. 3. pp. 405-417. doi: 10.1016/0022-5096(90)90006-p.][Hill R. A user-friendly theory of orthotropic plasticity in sheet metals // Int. J. Mech. Sci., 1993. vol. 35, no. 1. pp. 19-25. doi: 10.1016/0020-7403(93)90061-X.][Barlat F., Lian J. Plastic behavior and stretchability of sheet metals. Part II. A yield function for orthotropic sheets under plane stress conditions // Int. J. Plast., 1989. vol. 5, no. 2. pp. 51-66. doi: 10.1016/0749-6419(89)90026-0.][Barlat F., Lege D. J., Brem J. C. A 6-component yield function for anisotropic materials // Int. J. Plast., 1991. vol. 7, no. 7. pp. 693-712. doi: 10.1016/0749-6419(91)90052-Z.][Barlat F., Maeda Y., Chung K. et al. Yield function development for aluminum alloy sheets // J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1997. vol. 45, no. 11. pp. 1727-1763. doi: 10.1016/ S0022-5096(97)00034-3.][Barlat F., Brem J. C., Yoon J. W. et al. Plane stress yield function for aluminum alloy sheets. Part 1: Theory // Int. J. Plast., 2003. vol. 19, no. 9. pp. 1297-1319. doi: 10.1016/S0749-6419(02)00019-0.][Barlat F., Aretz H., Yoon J.W. et al. Linear transfomation-based anisotropic yield functions // Int. J. Plast., 2005. vol. 21, no. 5. pp. 1009-1039. doi: doi:10.1016/j.ijplas.2004.06.004.][Karafillis A. P., Boyce M. C. A general anisotropic yield criterton using bounds and a transformation weighting tensor // J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1993. vol. 41, no. 12. pp. 1859-1886. doi: 10.1016/0022-5096(93)90073-o.][Vial-Edwards C. Yield loci of FCC and BCC sheet metals // Int. J. Plast., 1997. vol. 13, no. 5. pp. 521-531. doi: 10.1016/S0749-6419(97)00023-5.][Banabic D. Sheet metal forming processes. Constitutive Modelling and Numerical Simulation: Springer, 2010. xv+301 pp. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-88113-1.][Multiscale Modelling in Sheet Metal Forming / eds. Banabic D.: Springer, 2016. xiii+405 pp. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-44070-5.][ASTM E8/E8M-16a. Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials. West Conshohocken, PA, USA: ASTM International, 2016.30 pp. doi: 10.1520/E0008_E0008M-16A.][ASTM E517-00. Standard Test Method for Plastic Strain Ratio]