Implementation of bioethic principles in the evaluation of the patient’s status and role in written medical interaction

Cover Page
Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract


The article explored the fact that various bioethical principles underlie the evaluation of the patient’s status and role in therapeutic interactions in written medical documents. We have found that characterization of biomedical, social and behavioural aspects of the patient’s existence relies on such bioethical principles as obligation, truthfulness, respect for human rights and dignity, the patient’s good. A few facts of the violation of the principle of respect for human rights and dignity consisting in verbal stigmatization have been provided. Bioethical perspective is also taken to evaluate the mode and extent of the patient’s involvement in a medical interaction, which are either negatively or positively assessed based on the patient’s compliance and good.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

V. V Zhura

Volgograd State Medical University

Email: vvzhura@gmail.com

Doctor of Philology, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Foreign Languages with a Latin Language Course

E. G Semenova

Volgograd State Medical University

Email: yaitskova@mail.ru

Senior Lecturer in the Department of Foreign Languages with a Latin Language Course

References

  1. Acute epigastric pain - case study by Dr Louise Newson on the 3 May 2017. URL: https://www.gponline.com/acute-epigastric-pain-case-study/gi-tract/article/1431336.
  2. Clinical Case Studies: Immunopaedia. URL: https://www.immunopaedia.org.za/clinical-cases.
  3. Goddu A. P., O’Conor K. J., Lanzkron S., Saheed M O., Saha S., Peek M. E., Haywood C., Beach M. C. Do Words Matter? Stigmatizing Language and the Transmission of Bias in the Medical Record // Journal of General Internal Medicine. -2018. - Vol. 33. - Issue 5. - P. 685-691.
  4. Hill T. E. How clinicians make (or avoid) moral judgments of patients: implications of the evidence for relationships and research // Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine. - 2010. - Vol. 5. - P. 5-11.
  5. Sample Written History and Physical Examination. URL: www.med.unc.edu/medclerk/files/2018/10/UMNwriteup.pdf.
  6. Van Ryn M., Burgess D., Malat J., Griffin J. Physicians’ Perceptions of Patients’ Social and Behavioral Characteristics and Race Disparities in Treatment Recommendations for Men With Coronary Artery Disease // American Journal of Public Health. - 2006. - Vol. 96 (2). -P. 351-357.
  7. Yarborough P. Case Study: A Patient With Type 2 Diabetes Working With an Advanced Practice Pharmacist to Address Interacting Comorbidities // Diabetes Spectrum. -2003. - Vol. 16 (1). - P. 41-48.

Statistics

Views

Abstract - 14

PDF (Russian) - 0

Cited-By


Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

PlumX

Dimensions


Copyright (c) 2020 Volgograd State Medical University

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies