<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Pharmateca</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Pharmateca</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Фарматека</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2073-4034</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2414-9128</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Bionika Media</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">312716</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18565/pharmateca.2020.7.46-52</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Статьи</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Treatment of residual breast cancer</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Лечение резидуального рака молочной железы</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Ereschenko</surname><given-names>S. S</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Ерещенко</surname><given-names>С. С</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Semiglazov</surname><given-names>V. F</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Семиглазов</surname><given-names>В. Ф</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Dr. Sci. (Med.), Corr. Member of RAS, Professor, Head of the Scientific Department, Chief Researcher at the Scientific Department of Breast Tumors</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>д.м.н., чл.-корр. РАН, профессор, зав. научным отделением, главный науч. сотр. научного отделения опухолей молочной железы</p></bio><email>vsemiglazov@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Krivorotko</surname><given-names>P. V</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Криворотько</surname><given-names>П. В</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Dashyan</surname><given-names>G. A</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Дашян</surname><given-names>Г. А</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Smirnova</surname><given-names>V. O</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Смирнова</surname><given-names>В. О</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Komyakhov</surname><given-names>A. V</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Комяхов</surname><given-names>А. В</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Gigolaeva</surname><given-names>L. P</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Гиголаева</surname><given-names>Л. П</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Zhiltsova</surname><given-names>E. K</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Жильцова</surname><given-names>Е. К</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center for Oncology</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Национальный медицинский исследовательский центр онкологии им. Н.Н. Петрова</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2020-07-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>07</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>27</volume><issue>7</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">VOL 27, NO7 (2020)</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">ТОМ 27, №7 (2020)</issue-title><fpage>46</fpage><lpage>52</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2023-03-03"><day>03</day><month>03</month><year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2020, Bionika Media</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2020, ООО «Бионика Медиа»</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2020</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Bionika Media</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">ООО «Бионика Медиа»</copyright-holder></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.eco-vector.com/2073-4034/article/view/312716">https://journals.eco-vector.com/2073-4034/article/view/312716</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Background. Patients with residual tumors after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) are at greater risk of relapse compared with those who have achieved complete pathomorphological tumor regression (pCR). Objective: to improve treatment outcomes for residual breast cancer after neoadjuvant systemic therapy. Methods. The study included information on 339 patients with breast cancer (BC) who received NST at the N.N. Petrov National Research Center of Oncology. Results. Residual tumor was detected in 212 (62.5%) patients. The presence of a residual tumor worsens the 3-year survival rate for all BC subtypes, especially with a triple negative phenotype (TNBC; 48.8 versus 91.8%; p=0.01). In TNBC, the risk of disease recurrence is 2 higher than that in patients with HER2-positive and luminal B BC subtypes (51.2 versus 23.9 and 25.6%; p=0.02). In patients with TNBC with a residual tumor after NST (anthracyclines and taxanes), the administration of adjuvant therapy with capecitabine improves the relapse-free survival rate. Conclusion. Further progress in the treatment of the most aggressive types of breast cancer (triply negative and HER2-positive phenotypes) is associated with immunotherapy. Randomized clinical trials are evaluating the contribution of anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy (atesolizumab) in combination with chemotherapy (TNBC) or targeted therapy (HER2+) in the treatment of patients with metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Обоснование. Пациенты с остаточной (резидуальной) опухолью после неоадъювантной системной терапии (НСТ) подвержены большему риску рецидива заболевания по сравнению с теми, кто достиг полного патоморфологического регресса опухоли (pCR). Цель исследования: улучшение результатов лечения резидуального рака молочной железы после неоадъювантной системной терапии. Методы. В исследование включены сведения о 339 пациентах с раком молочной железы (РМЖ), получавших НСТ в ФГБУ «НМИЦ онкологии им. Н.Н. Петрова» Минздрава России. Результаты. Резидуальная опухоль выявлена у 212 (62,5%) больных. Наличие резидуальной опухоли ухудшает показатели 3-летней выживаемости при всех подтипах РМЖ, особенно при трижды негативном фенотипе (ТНРМЖ; 48,8 против 91,8%; p=0,01). При ТНРМЖ риск рецидива заболевания в 2 раза превышает таковой у пациентов с HER2-позитивным и люминальным В-подтипами РМЖ (51,2 против 23,9 и 25,6%; p=0,02). Назначение адъювантной терапии капецитабином пациентам с ТНРМЖ с резидуальной опухолью после НСТ (антрациклины и таксаны) улучшает их показатели безрецидивной выживаемости. Заключение. Дальнейший прогресс в лечении наиболее агрессивных типов РМЖ (трижды негативного и HER2-позитивного фенотипов) связывается с иммунотерапией. В рамках рандомизированных клинических испытаний оценивается вклад анти-PD-L1 иммунотерапии (атезолизумаб) в комбинации с химио- (ТНРМЖ) или с таргетной терапией (HER2+) при лечении пациентов с метастатическим или местнораспространенным РМЖ.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>breast cancer</kwd><kwd>neoadjuvant therapy</kwd><kwd>residual tumor</kwd><kwd>adjuvant therapy</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>рак молочной железы</kwd><kwd>неоадъювантная терапия</kwd><kwd>резидуальная опухоль</kwd><kwd>адъювантная терапия</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Семиглазов В.В., Криворотько П.В., Семиглазов В.Ф. и др. Международные рекомендации по лечение раннего рака молочной железы: руководство для врачей / Под ред. В.Ф. Семиглазова. М.: МК, 2020.232 с</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Mauri D, Pavlidis N., loannidis J.P. Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant systemic treatment in breast cancer: a meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:188-194. Doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji021.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Semiglazov V.F., Topuzov E.E., Bavli J.L., et al. Primary (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy and radiotherapy compared with primary radiotherapy alone in stage IIb-IIIa breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 1994;5:591-95. Doi: 10.1093/ oxfordjournals.annonc.a058929.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Cortazar P, Zhang L., Untch M., et al. Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis. Lancet. 2014;384:164-72. Doi: 10.1016/ S0140-6736(13)62422-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Семиглазов В.Ф., Криворотько П.В., Семиглазова Т.Ю. и др. Рекомендации по лечению рака молочной железы. М.: Мегаполис, 2017. 168 с.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Curigliano G., Burstein H.J., Winer E.P, et al. De-escalating and Escalating Treatments for Early-Stage Breast Cancer: The St. Gallen International Expert Consensus Conference on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2017. Ann Oncology. 2017,28:1700-12. Doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx308.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Cardoso F, Kyriakides S., Ohno S., et al. Early breast cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow up. Ann Oncol. 2019,30:1194-220.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Robson M., Im S.A., Senkus E., et al. Olaparib for metastatic breast cancer in patients with a germline BRCA mutation. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:523-33. Doi: 10.1056/ NEJMoa1706450.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Litton J.K., Rugo H.S., Ettl J., et al. Talazoparib in patients with advanced breast cancer and a germline BRCA mutation. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:753-63. Doi: 10.1056/ NEJMoa1802905.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Miller K., Tong Y., Jones D.R., et al. Cisplatin with or without rucaparib after preoperative chemotherapy in patients with triple negative breast cancer: final efficacy results of Hoosier Oncology Group BRE09-146. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(Suppl. 15):abstract 1082. Doi: 10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.1082.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Dieras V., Miles D., Verma S., et al. Trastuzumab emtansine versus capecitabine plus lapatinib in patients with previously treated HER2-positive advanced breast cancer (EMILIA): a descriptive analysis of final overall survival results from a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18:732-42. Doi: 10.1016/ S1470-2045(17)30312-1.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Gunter von Minckwitz P.C. Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis. Lancet. 2014;384:164-72. Doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62422-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Masuda N., Lee S.J., Ohtani S., et al. Adjuvant capecitabine for breast cancer after preoperative chemotherapy. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:2147-Doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1612645.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>von Minckwitz G., Huang C.S., Mano M.S., et al. Trastuzumab emtansine for residual invasive HER2-Positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. Epub ahead of print 5 December 2018. Doi: 10.1056/ NEJMoa1814017.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Symmans W.F., Wei C., Gould R., et al. Long-term prognostic risk after neoadjuvant chemotherapy associated with residual cancer burden and breast cancer subtype. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:1049-Doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.1010.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Law M.E., Corsino P.E., Narayan S., et al. Cyclindependent kinase inhibitors as anticancer therapeutics. Mol Pharmacol. 2015;88:846-52. Doi: 10.1124/mol.115.099325.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Finn R.S., Crown J.P, Lang I., et al. The cyclindependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib in combination with letrozole versus letrozole alone as first-line treatment of oestrogen receptorpositive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer (PALOMA-1/TRIO-18): a randomised phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:25-35. Doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)71159-3.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Sledge G.W., Toi M., Neven P, et al. MONARCH 2: abemaciclib in combination with fulvestrant in women with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer who had progressed while receiving endocrine therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:2875-84. Doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.73.7585.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Slamon D.J., Neven P, Chia S., et al. Phase III randomized study of ribociclib and fulvestrant in hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor Receptor 2-Negative advanced breast cancer: MONALEESA-3. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:2465-72. Doi: 10.1200/ JCO.2018.78.9909.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Semiglazov V.F, Semiglazov K.K, Dashyan G.A., et al. Phaze II randomized trial of primary endocrine therapy versus chemotherapy in postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor positive breast cancer. Cancer. 2007;110(2):244-54. Doi: 10.1002/cncr.22789.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Sinn H.P., Schneeweiss A., Keller M., et al. Comparison of immunohistochemistry with PCR for assessment of ER, PR, and Ki-67 and prediction of pathological complete response in breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2017;17:124. Doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3111-1.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Семиглазов В.Ф., Криворотько П.В., Семиглазов В.В. и др. Иммунология рака молочной железы. М.: СИМК, 2019. [Semiglazov V.F, Krivorotko P.V., Semiglazov K.K, et al. Immunology of breast cancer. M.: SIMK, 2019. (In Russ.)].</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Hamy A., Pierga J., Sabalia A., et al. Stromal lymphocyte infiltration after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with aggressive residual disease and lower disease-free survival in HER2-positive breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(9):2233-40.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Salgado R., Denkert C., Demaria S., et al. The evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in breast cancer recommendations by an International TILs Working Group 2014. Ann Oncol. 201;26(2):259-71.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Pohlmann P.R., Diamond J.R., Hamilton E.P, et al. Atezolizumab+ nab-paclitaxel in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: 2-year update from a phase Ib trial. Poster presented at 2018 American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting; April Meeting; April 14-18, 2018; Chicago, Illinois.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>Gianni L, Eiermann W, Semiglazov V, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with trastuzumab followed be adjuvant trastuzumab versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone, in patients with HER2-positive locally advanced breast cancer (the NOAH trial); a randomized controlled superiority trial with a parallel HER2-negative cohort. Lancet. 2010;375;377-84.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>Miles D, Gligorov J, Andre F, et al. Primary results from Impasion 131, double-blind placebo-controlled randomized phase 3 trial of paclitaxel ± atezolizumab as first - line therapy for inoperable locally advanced/metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC). SABCS. 2019;Dec 12;0-5.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
