Радикальная позадилонная и робот-ассистированная простатэктомия у больных локализованным раком предстательной железы: сравнительный анализ онкологических и функциональных результатов
- Авторы: Раснер П.И1, Колонтарев К.Б1, Говоров А.В1, Котенко Д.В1, Пушкарь Д.Ю1
-
Учреждения:
- ГБОУ ВПО МГМСУ им А. И. Евдокимова Минздрава России
- Выпуск: № 1S (2016)
- Страницы: 25-34
- Раздел: Статьи
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/2073-4034/article/view/289598
- ID: 289598
Цитировать
Полный текст
![Открытый доступ](https://journals.eco-vector.com/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/text_open.png)
![Доступ закрыт](https://journals.eco-vector.com/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/text_unlock.png)
![Доступ закрыт](https://journals.eco-vector.com/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/text_lock.png)
Аннотация
Полный текст
![Доступ закрыт](https://journals.eco-vector.com/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/text_lock.png)
Об авторах
П. И Раснер
ГБОУ ВПО МГМСУ им А. И. Евдокимова Минздрава РоссииКафедра урологии
К. Б Колонтарев
ГБОУ ВПО МГМСУ им А. И. Евдокимова Минздрава России
Email: kb80@yandex.ru
ассистент кафедры урологии факультета последипломного образования
А. В Говоров
ГБОУ ВПО МГМСУ им А. И. Евдокимова Минздрава РоссииКафедра урологии
Д. В Котенко
ГБОУ ВПО МГМСУ им А. И. Евдокимова Минздрава РоссииКафедра урологии
Д. Ю Пушкарь
ГБОУ ВПО МГМСУ им А. И. Евдокимова Минздрава РоссииКафедра урологии
Список литературы
- Wilson Т., Torrey Я. Open versus robotic-assist- ed radical prostatectomy: which is better? Curr. Opin. Urol. 2011;21(3):200-5.
- Boorjian S.A., Eastham J.A., Graefen M., Guilhnneau B., Karnes RJ., Moul J.W., Schaeffer E.M., Stief C, Zorn КС. A critical analysis of the long-term impact of radical prostatectomy on cancer control and function outcomes. Eur. Urol. 2012;61:664-75.
- Mottrie A., De Naeyer G., Novara G., Ғісагга V. Robotic radical prostatectomy: a critical analysis of the impact on cancer control. Curr. Opin. Urol. 2011;21:179-84.
- Pfitzenmaier J., Pahernik S., Tremmel T., Haferkamp A., Buse S., Hohenfellner M. Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: do they have an impact on biochemical or dinical progression? BJU Int. 2008;102:1413-18.
- Menon M., Bhandari M., Gupta N., Lane Z, Peabody J.O., Rogers C.G., Sammon J., Siddiqui S.A., Diaz M. Biochemical recurrence following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.analysis 1384 patients with a median 5-year follow-up. Eur. Urol. 2010;58:838-46.
- Xylinas E., Durand X., Ploussard G., Campeggi A., Allory Y., Vordos D., Hoznek A., Abbou C.C., de la Taille A., Salomon L. Evaluation of combined oncologic and functional outcomes after robot- ic-assisted laparoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: trifecta rate of achieving continence, potency and cancer control. Urol Oncol. 2013:31 (1 ):99-103.
- Suardi N., Ficarra V., Willemsen P., De Wil P., Gallina A.,De Naeyer G.,Schatteman P., Montorsi F., Carpentier P., Mottrie A. Long-term biochemical recurrence rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: anal-ysis of a single-center series of patients with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Urology. 2012;79:133-38.
- Zorn K.C., Wille M.A., Thong A.E., Katz M.H., Shikanov S.A., Razmaria A., Gofrit O.N., Zaga- ja G.P., Shalhav A.L. Continued improvement of perioperative, pathological and continence outcomes during 700 robot-assisted radical prostatectomies. Can.J. Urol. 2009;16:4742-49.
- Samadi D.B., Muntner P., Nabizada-Pace F., Brajtbord J.S., Carlucci J., Lavery H.J. Improvements in robot-assisted prostatectomy: the effect of surgeon experience and technical changes on oncologic and functional outcomes. J. Endourol. 2010;24:1105-10.
- Tewari A., Srivasatava A., Menon M. A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution. BJU Int. 2003;92:205-10.
- Smith Jr J.A., Chan R.C., Chang S.S., Herrell S.D., Clark P.E., Baumgartner R., Cookson M.S. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. J. Urol. 2007;178:2385-9. Discuss. 2389-90.
- Yossepowitch 0., Briganti A., Eastham J.A., Epstein J., Graefen M., Montironi R., Touijer K. Positive Surgical Margins After Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Contemporary Update. Eur. Urol. 2014;65:303-13.
- Ficarra V., Novara G., Secco S., D'Elia C, Boscolo- Berto ft., Gardiman M., Cavalleri S., Artibani W. Predictors of positive surgical margins after laparoscopic robot assisted radical prostatectomy. J. Urol. 2009;182:2682-88.
- Patel V.R., Coelho R.F., Rocco B., Orvieto M., Sivaraman A., Palmer K.J., Kameh D., Santoro L, Coughlin G.D., Liss M., Jeong W., Malcolm J., Stern J.M., Sharma S., Zorn КС., Shikanov S., Shalhav A.L., Zagaja G.P., Ahlering T.E., Rha K.H., Albala D.M., Fabrizio M.D., Lee D.I., Chauhan S. Positive surgical margins after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional study. J. Urol. 2011;186:511-16.
- Lo K.L., Ng C.F., Lam C.N., Hou S.S., To K.F., Yip S.K. Short-term outcome of patients with robot- assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: for local- ised carcinoma of prostate. Hong Kong Med J. 2010;16:31-5.
- Krambeck A.E., DiMarco D.S., Rangel L.J., BergstralhEJ., Myers R.P., BluteM.L., GettmanM. T. Radical prostatectomy for prostatic adenocarcinoma: a matched comparison of open retropubic and robot-assisted techniques. BJU Int. 2009;103:448-53.
- Ficarra V., Novara G., Artibani W., Cestari A., GalfanoA., Graefen M., GuazzoniG., Guillonneau B., Menon M., Montorsi F., Patel V., RassweilerJ., Van Poppel H. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur. Urol. 2009;55:1037-63.
- Hu J.C., Gu X.,Lipsitz S.R.,Barry M.J., D'Amico A.V., Weinberg A.C., Keating N.L. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive vs open radical prostatectomy. JAMA. 2009;302:1557-64.
- Rocco B., Matei D.V., Melegari S., Ospina J.C., Mazzoleni F., Errico G., Mastropasqua M., Santoro L, Detti S., de Cobelli 0. Robotic vs open prostatectomy in a laparoscopically naive centre: a matched-pair analysis. BJU Int. 2009;104:991-95.
- DiPierro G.B., Baumeister P., Stucki P., Beatrice I., Danuser H., Mattei A. A prospective trial comparing consecutive series of open retropubic and robot- assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a centre with a limited caseload. Eur. Urol. 2011;59(1):1-6.
- Thorsteinsdottir T., Stranne J., Carlsson S., Anderberg B., Bjorholt I., Damber J.E., Hugosson J., Wilderang U., Wiklund ft., Steineck G., Haglind E. LAPPRO: a prospective multicentre comparative study of robot-assisted laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Scand.J. Urol. Nephrol. 2011 ;45(2):102-12.
- Dubbelman Y.D., Dohle G.R., Schroder F.H. Sexual function before and after radical retropubic prostatectomy: a systematic review of prognostic indicators for a successful outcome. Eur. Urol. 2006;50:711-20.
Дополнительные файлы
![](/img/style/loading.gif)