Trends in the Development of the Institution of Intellectual Property in Ensuring Innovative Activities of Industrial Production


Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

The purpose of the research. Development of methodological approaches to the study of the relationship between the state of the institution of intellectual property and the innovative activity of the industrial complex in the Russian context. Achievement of the goal is seen through the solution of the following tasks: Given a characteristic of the state of the institution of intellectual property in the model of open innovation; systematized the development trends of the intellectual property market in the Russian industry; modeling of the relationship between the development of the institution of intellectual property and innovation in industry has been carried out. Results. It has been established that the main source of remuneration in the intellectual property market is the innovation rent, which is the super-profits of the investor, innovator, innovation firm and innovation-active enterprise arising in the process of innovation diffusion. In this case, the sources of income can be: products and technologies, new business, specific assets, licenses, spin-off, subsidiaries, brands, individual stages of the innovation life cycle. In the Russian industry, there is an increase in patent activity, however, no stable dynamics in the development of the institution of intellectual property has been revealed. The level of manufacturability of production of industrial enterprises directly correlates with the level of intellectual property objects used and the applications filed for the issuance of titles of protection for the results of scientific and technical activities. There is no direct positive relationship between indicators of innovative activity in industry and indicators characterizing the state of the institution of intellectual property. However, time lags were revealed between the increase in the number of intellectual property objects used by industrial enterprises and the subsequent increase in the share of shipped innovative products - 3 years, as well as between the increase in the number of intellectual property objects used by industrial enterprises and the subsequent increase in the share of costs for technological innovation in general. the volume of shipped innovative products - 5 years.

Толық мәтін

Рұқсат жабық

Авторлар туралы

Svetlana Kudryavtseva

Kazan National Research Technological University

Email: sveta516@yandex.ru
Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Assistant Professor; Professor at the Department of Logistics and Management Kazan, Russian Federation

Olga Minulina

Kazan State Power Engineering University

Email: olga.minulina@bk.ru
teacher at the Department of Economics and Production Organization Kazan, Russian Federation

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Ershova I., Sevryukova L. Global development of information support of business organizations in the region // Globalization and its Socio-Economic Consequences 16th International Scientific Conference Proceedings. ZU - University of Zilina, October 5-6, 2016. Slovak Republic: Rajecke Teplice, 2016. Pp. 449-457.
  2. Lamba K., Singh S.P. Big data in operations and supply chain management: current trends and future perspectives // Production Planning and Control. 2017. No. 28 (11-12). Pp. 877-890.
  3. Marmo R., Nicolella M., Polverino F. A Methodology for a performance information model to support facility management // Sustaina-bility. 2019. No. 11 (24). Р. 7007.
  4. Nelson R.R. Bringing institution into evolutionary growth theory // Journal of Evolutionary Economics. 2002. No. 12. Р. 45.
  5. Otten W. Industry 4.0 and digitalisation What is the potential for the chemical industry? // ATP Edition. 2019. No. 1-2. Pp. 28-32.
  6. Shinkevich A.I., Kudryavtseva S.S., Rajskaya M.V. et al. Integral technique for analyzing of national innovation systems development // Espacios. 2018. Vol. 39. No. 22. Р. 6.
  7. Telukdarie A., Buhulaiga E., Bag S. Industry 4.0 implementation for multinationals // Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 2018. Vol. 118. Pp. 316-329.
  8. Аунг М. То, Аббас С.А., Жукова Н.А., Чернокульский В.В. Модели управления процессами сбора данных в сетях интернета вещей с динамической структурой // Computational Nanotechnology. 2020. № 3. С. 62-71.
  9. Брижак О.В. Институциональные и технологические доминанты доктрины встраивания пространственных систем в мировую экономику // Вестник Челябинского государственного университета. 2019. № 9 (431). С. 65-71.
  10. Глазьев С.Ю. Теория долгосрочного технико-экономического развития. М.: ВалДар, 1993. 310 с.
  11. Костюхин Ю.Ю., Савон Д.Ю. Совершенствование оценочных показателей рынка стали в условиях усиления конкуренции // Черные металлы. 2020. № 4. С. 68-72.
  12. Кудрявцева С.С., Шинкевич А.И. Применение логистического подхода в моделировании открытых инновации // Экономика, управление и инвестиции. 2014. № 1 (3). С. 6.
  13. Медовников Д.С., Розмирович С.Д. Технологические коридоры в производстве потребительской продукции и услуг // Форсайт. 2011. Т. 5. № 1. С. 26-39.
  14. Полтерович В.М. Стратегии институциональных реформ, или искусство реформ. М.: ГУ ВШЭ, 2007. 24 с.
  15. Шинкевич М.В. Барсегян Н.В. Роль предпринимательских инициатив в совершенствовании организации производства предприятий нефтехимического комплекса // Вестник Белгородского университета кооперации, экономики и права. 2019. № 2. С. 358-369.

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML


Осы сайт cookie-файлдарды пайдаланады

Біздің сайтты пайдалануды жалғастыра отырып, сіз сайттың дұрыс жұмыс істеуін қамтамасыз ететін cookie файлдарын өңдеуге келісім бересіз.< / br>< / br>cookie файлдары туралы< / a>