Errors of sonography in the diagnosis of the prevalence rate of ovarian cancer

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract


The article is devoted to the diagnosis of ovarian cancer diseases with the use of sonographic examination. There were evaluated possibilities and disadvantages of the sonographic ultrasonic method in the evaluation of the prevalence rate of ovarian cancer. The study summarizes the results of the observation of 500 patients with the diagnosis of ovarian cancer, underwent the comprehensive treatment. For the improvement of the quality ofgynecological cancer diagnosis of diseases and the identification of causes of diagnostic errors, there was performed a comparative analysis of ultrasound conclusions, data about operation findings and results of morphological studies of drugs.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Aleksandr N. Vostrov

«National Medical Research Center of Radiology»

Email: Alexandr-V65@yandex.ru
Moscow, 125284, Russian Federation
MD, PhD, senior researcher of the Unit of Sonographic diagnostics of the P.A. Gerzen Moscow Cancer Research Institute, branch of the “National Medical Research Center of Radiology”

V. I Kazakevich

«National Medical Research Center of Radiology»

Moscow, 125284, Russian Federation
P.A. Gerzen Moscow Cancer Research Institute

L. A Mitina

«National Medical Research Center of Radiology»

Moscow, 125284, Russian Federation
P.A. Gerzen Moscow Cancer Research Institute

S. O Stepanov

«National Medical Research Center of Radiology»

Moscow, 125284, Russian Federation
P.A. Gerzen Moscow Cancer Research Institute

N. S Skreptsova

«National Medical Research Center of Radiology»

Moscow, 125284, Russian Federation
P.A. Gerzen Moscow Cancer Research Institute

E. G Novikova

«National Medical Research Center of Radiology»

Moscow, 125284, Russian Federation
P.A. Gerzen Moscow Cancer Research Institute

References

  1. Синицина М.Е. Роль ультразвуковой томографии в предоперационном стадировании и оценке эффективности лечения рака яичников: Дисс. ... канд. мед. наук. М.; 2007.
  2. Бохман Я.В. Лекции по онкогинекологии. М.: Медицинское информационное агентство; 2007.
  3. Савельева Г.М. и др. Значение дополнительных методов исследования в диагностике опухолей и опухолевидных образований яичников. Международный медицинский журнал. 2001; (1): 79-87.
  4. Каприн А.Д., Старинский В.В., Петрова Г.В. (ред.). Состояние онкологической помощи населению России в 2013 году. М.; 2014.
  5. Jayde V., White K., Blomfield P. Symptoms and diagnostic delay in ovarian cancer: a summary of the literature. Contemp. Nurse. 2009; 34: 55-65.
  6. Medeiros L.R., Freitas L.B., Rosa D.D., Silva F.R., Silva L.S., Birtencourt L.T. et al. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in ovarian tumor: a systematic quantitative review. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2011; 204 (1): 67.e1-10.
  7. Carter J. An experience with transvaginal sonography in gynecologic tumors surveillance Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2000; 40 (4): 438-41.
  8. Jelovac D., Armstrong D.K. Recent progress in the diagnosis and treatment of ovarian cancer. C.A. Cancer J. Clin. 2011; 61(3): 183-203.
  9. Levi S. The history of ultrasound in gynecology 1950-1980. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 1997; 23(4): 481-552.
  10. Pfeifer S.M., Gosman G.G. Evaluation of adnexal masses in adolescents. Pediatr. Clin. N. Am. 1999; 46(3): 573-92.
  11. Kratochwil A., Urban G., Friedrich F. Ultrasonic tomography of the ovaries. Ann. Chir. Gynaecol. Fenn. 1972; 61(4): 211-4.
  12. Sassone A.M., Timor-Trish I.E., Artner A., Westhoff C., Warren W.B. Transvaginal sonographic characterization of ovarian disease: evaluation of a new scoring system to predict ovarian malignancy. Obstet. and Gynecol. 1991; 78: 70-6.
  13. Fischerova D. Ultrasound scanning of the pelvis and abdomen for staging of gynecological tumors: a review. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2011; 38(3): 246-66.
  14. Трофимова Е.Ю., Новикова Е.Г., Востров А.Н. Ошибки ультразвуковой диагностики в онкогинекологии. Рос. онкол. журн. 1999; (1): 24-9.

Statistics

Views

Abstract - 20

PDF (Russian) - 0

Cited-By


Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies