Email this article Cognitive possibilities of the discourse analysis in the sociological research: the determination of the levelof the theoretical approaches
- Authors: Vinogradova E.Y.1
-
Affiliations:
- Issue: Vol 9, No 1-2 (2009)
- Pages: 124-129
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://aspvestnik.ru/2410-3764/article/view/25714
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/2072-2354.2009.0.1-2.124-129
- ID: 25714
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
In this article discourse-analysis is described as a specific method of contemporary sociological research, which has been formed on the basis of different theories from distinctive spheres of scientific knowledge: ethnography, social and cultural anthropology, linguistics etc. Some of the most important approaches to discourse-analysis are revealed in this work, interconnections and roles of various conceptions within the genesis of given method are elucidated.
The concept of community is held as a fundamental and crucial one for all the theories of discourse-analysis: it is belonging to community that conditions adoption of specific ways (languages) of speaking and thinking by its members, determining their participation in social practices.
The concept of community is held as a fundamental and crucial one for all the theories of discourse-analysis: it is belonging to community that conditions adoption of specific ways (languages) of speaking and thinking by its members, determining their participation in social practices.
References
- Шюц А. Избранное: Мир, светящийся смыслом. М., 2004. 1056 с.
- Rapport N., Overing J. Social and cultural anthropology: The Key Concepts. N.Y., London:, 2003. С.117.
- Девятко И.Ф.Модели объяснения и логика социологического исследования. - М., 1996. - 174 с.
- Леви-Стросс К. Мифологики: Человек голый. М., 2007. С. 621
- Фуко М. Слова и вещи. Археология гуманитарных наук. СПб, 1994. С. 10.
- Девятко И.Ф.Модели объяснения и логика социологического исследования. - М., 1996. - 174 с.
- Серио П. Как читают тексты во Франции. М., 2002. С. 12-53.
- Howard M.C. Contemporary cultural anthropology. New-York, 1993. С. 71.
- Rapport N., Overing J. Social and cultural anthropology: The Key Concepts.-N.Y., London, 2003. С. 61.
- Garfinkel H., Sacks H. On Formal Structures of Practical Actions. N. Y., 1970. P. 337-366.
- Wodak R. Mediation between discourse and society: assessing cognitive approaches in CDA.//Discourse Studies 2006; № 8; С.179-190 [Электронный ресурс] URL: http://dis.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/1/179.(Дата обращения: 10.01.2008)
- Филлипс. Л. Дж., Йоргенсен М.В. Дискурс-анализ. Теория и метод./Пер с англ., Харьков, 2004. 336 с.
- MacDonald M. Pedagogy, pathology and ideology: the production, transmission and reproduction of medical discourse//Discourse & Society 2002, № 13; С. 447-467. [Электронный ресурс] URL: http://das.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/13/4/447. (Дата обращения: 10.01.2008)
- Wodak R. Mediation between discourse and society: assessing cognitive approaches in CDA.//Discourse Studies 2006; № 8; С.179-190 [Электронный ресурс] URL: http://dis.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/1/179. (Дата обращения: 10.01.2008)
- Карпенко О. Языковые игры в «гостей с Юга» и их последствия. [Электронный ресурс] URL: http://www.cisr.ru/files/publ/Migr_Karpenko.pdf
- Филлипс. Л. Дж., Йоргенсен М.В. Дискурс-анализ. Теория и метод./Пер с англ., Харьков, 2004. 336 с.
- Edwards D. Discourse, cognition and social practices: the rich surface of language and social interaction//Discourse Studies 2006.- № 8. - P. 41-49.
- Hammersley M. Conversation Analysis and Discourse Analysis: Methods or Paradigms?// Discourse & Society 2003, №14,с. 751-781[Электронный ресурс] URL: http://das.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/14/6/751 (Дата обращения: 10.01.2008)
Supplementary files
