Accounting for subsidies to compensate for lost income (Using the example of organizations involved in aviation activities)
- Авторлар: Aksent'ev A.A.1
-
Мекемелер:
- Kuban State University
- Шығарылым: Том 21, № 5 (2025)
- Беттер: 218-236
- Бөлім: Regional and Sectoral Economics
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/2541-8025/article/view/696867
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.33693/2541-8025-2025-21-5-218-236
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/yoeszp
- ID: 696867
Дәйексөз келтіру
Аннотация
The purpose of this paper is to examine the specifics of accounting for subsidies to compensate for lost income. The key research question is whether PBU 13/2000 is applicable to accounting for subsidies to compensate for lost income. The paper distinguishes between the concepts of ‘lost income,’ ‘lost revenue,’ ‘financial support for costs,’ and ‘compensation for losses/costs’ from the perspective of budgetary and accounting legislation. An analysis of the practice of disclosing information in the accounting (financial) reports of aviation industry organisations is carried out in terms of explanations related to the accounting of subsidies for compensation for lost income. The methodological features of accounting for subsidies to compensate for lost income are characterised using the example of two Russian airports. The scientific novelty of the research lies in the following. First, it provides justification for why the terminology of RAS (Russian accounting standard) 13/2000 differs from budgetary legislation. The relationship between the accounting and legal aspects of the concepts of ‘lost income,’ ‘unearned income,’ ‘financial support for expenses,’ and ‘reimbursement (compensation) of losses/expenses’ is defined. The problem of inconsistency between the terminology of budget legislation and accounting terminology is identified. Secondly, an analysis of the practice of accounting for subsidies to compensate for lost income is carried out using the example of Russian organisations involved in aviation activities. A number of problems were identified in terms of disclosure of information in the notes to the accounting (financial) statements; classification and valuation of subsidies for compensation of lost income. The paper presents arguments in support of the approach whereby subsidies for compensation for lost income are classified as ‘income’ rather than ‘state aid’, and therefore the requirements of RAS 9/99 apply. Prospects for further research in this area include resolving issues related to the disclosure of information on subsidies that do not fall within the scope of RAS 13/2000, as well as harmonising the terminology of RAS 13/2000 with the Russian legal system, since many of the standard's formulations are outdated.
Толық мәтін
Авторлар туралы
Andrey Aksent'ev
Kuban State University
Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: anacondaz7@rambler.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0838-4729
SPIN-код: 9601-6154
Postgraduate student of the Department of Accounting, Auditing and Automated Data Processing, advisor to the State Civil Service of the Russian Federation, 3rd class
Ресей, KrasnodarӘдебиет тізімі
- Melimerova N.M., Leontieva Zh.G. Current issues in accounting for subsidies to airlines in the context of new challenges. Bulletin of Dagestan State University. Series 3: Social Sciences. 2023. Vol. 38. No. 2. Pp. 34–39. (in Russ.) doi: 10.21779/2500-1930-2023-38-2-34-39. EDN VWOWSO.
- Stepovaya Ya.O., Pimenov V.V. Subsidies: accounting and tax accounting. Accounting in Budgetary and Non-profit Organisations. 2011. No. 12 (276). Pp. 17–20. (in Russ.) EDN: NUORPF.
- Arykov S.A., Koroleva S.N. Obtaining subsidies to compensate for costs or lost income from uncollectible accounts receivable: accounting and tax accounting. Accounting in Budgetary and Non-profit Organisations. 2016. No. 3 (387). Pp. 12–18. (in Russ.) EDN: VKXLRH.
- Fomina L. Yu. Ensuring the uniformity of terminology in normative legal acts: problems and prospects. Social and Political Sciences. 2012. No. 1. Pp. 96–100. (in Russ.) EDN: OPLFSV.
- Stryukov E.A. On the issue of conditions and directions for the unification of normative legal acts. Gaps in Russian legislation. 2014. No. 2. Pp. 79–82. (in Russ.) EDN: SFBSNT.
- Kabataeva K.T. Unity of legal terminology and a systematic approach to legal terminology. International Journal of Applied and Fundamental Research. 2013. No. 8-3. Pp. 71–74. (in Russ.) EDN: QZYEBJ.
- Toktobaev B.T., Urmatova A.D. Theoretical methods for standardising normative legal terminology. Bulletin of Science and Practice. 2024. Vol. 10. No. 10. Pp. 298–304. (in Russ.) doi: 10.33619/2414-2948/107/36. EDN: TCPMDR.
- Marenich L. Accounting for lost income. Progressive Accountant: For Government Agencies. 2017. No. 3. Pp. 4. (in Russ.) URL: https://dprof-skzd.ru/images/6.pdf.
- Usatova L.V. Classification criteria for the gradation of basic terminology in the accounting and analytical system in terms of costs, expenses, and expenditures. Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice. 2008. No. 23 (128). Pp. 60–67. (in Russ.) EDN: JUKVKT.
- Dyachenko O.G., Borodina T.A. Conceptual apparatus “costs”, “expenses”, “expenditures”. Bulletin of KrasGAU. 2010. No. 11(50). Pp. 16–23. (in Russ.) EDN: NBVMGV.
- Mizikovsky I.E., Ulyasheva L.G. Main approaches to the interpretation of cost terms. State and Municipal Administration. Scientific Notes of SKAGS. 2016. No. 3. Pp. 206–212. (in Russ.) EDN: WTPUNZ.
- Druzhylovskaya T.Y. Characteristics of ‘expenses’ and ‘costs’ for financial accounting. International Accounting. 2015. No. 2 (344). Pp. 31–45. (in Russ.) EDN: TLASBF.
- Stadler C., Nobes C.W. Accounting for government grants: Standard-setting and accounting choice. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy. 2018. Vol. 37. No. 2. Pp. 113–129. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2018.02.004.
- Forker J., Green S. Corporate governance and accounting models of the reporting entity. British Accounting Review. 2000. Vol. 32. No. 4. Pp. 375–396. doi: 10.1006/bare.2000.0144.
- Nobes C.W. Rules-Based Standards and the Lack of Principles in Accounting. Accounting Horizons. 2005. Vol. 19. No. 1. Pp. 25–34. doi: 10.2308/acch.2005.19.1.25.
- Aksent'ev A.A. Critical analysis of approaches to accounting for government assistance. Part I. International Accounting. 2024. Vol. 27. No. 9 (519). Pp. 1049–1066. (in Russ.) doi: 10.24891/ia.27.9.1049. EDN: GNSAAT.
- Aksent'ev A.A. Critical analysis of approaches to accounting for government assistance. Part II. International Accounting. 2024. Vol. 27. No. 10 (520). Pp. 1165–1187. (in Russ.) doi: 10.24891/ia.27.10.1165. EDN: KAYMHQ.
Қосымша файлдар




