Forest litter control and regulation modelling technology

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The complex of sanitary and health-improving measures in the forest is considered, which includes harvesting of waste wood with simultaneous quantitative and qualitative assessment of characteristics of waste wood in the whole forest area with a given accuracy in real time in the process of harvesting. The variant of waste wood harvesting with wood processing for wood chips in the forest is considered. The main machines carrying out harvesting on technological strips are specified, in particular mobile winch and chipper. With the use of natural data, mathematical model studies of estimation of the volume and quality of waste wood by simulation modelling methods based on the method of linear intersections have been carried out. It was found that at the volume of waste wood from 5 to 50 m3/ha the required total length of technological strips for the accuracy indicator P = 20 % is in the range from 500 to 6000 metres. It was determined that the errors between the true values of the waste wood volume and its estimates did not exceed 11,3 % in absolute value. It was found that the time to record and estimate the volume of waste wood decreases with increasing volume of waste wood in the plot. It was found that the main factors are the length of technological strips and the volume of waste wood on the plot. It was shown that the productivity of waste wood volume counting, and estimation increases as the volume of waste wood on the plot increases.

About the authors

Sergey P. Karpachev

BMSTU (Mytishchi Branch)

Author for correspondence.
Email: karpachevs@mail.ru

Dr. Sci. (Tech.), Professor

Russian Federation, 1, 1st Institutskaya St., 141005, Mytishchi, Moscow Region

Vyacheslav I. Zaprudnov

BMSTU (Mytishchi Branch)

Email: zaprudnov@bmstu.ru

Dr. Sci. (Tech.), Professor

Russian Federation, 1, 1st Institutskaya St., 141005, Mytishchi, Moscow Region

Sergey V. Posypanov

Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov

Email: s.posypanov@narfu.ru

Dr. Sci. (Tech.), Professor

Russian Federation, 17, Naberezhnaya Severnoy Dviny, 163002, Arkhangelsk

References

  1. Karpachev S.P., Diev R.I. Modelirovanie tekhnologicheskikh protsessov uborki drevesiny estestvennogo otpada na nuzhdy bioenergetiki [Modeling of technological processes for harvesting natural wood debris for bioenergy needs]. Tekhnika i oborudovanie dlya sela [Machinery and equipment for the village], 2017, no. 6, pp. 46–48.
  2. Moshnikov S.A., Anan’ev V.A. Zapas drevesnogo detrita osnovnykh nasazhdeniy Yuzhnoy Karelii [Stock of wood detritus in the main stands of Southern Karelia]. Trudy Sankt-Peterburgskogo nauchno-issledovatel’skogo instituta lesnogo khozyaystva [Transactions of the St. Petersburg Forestry Research Institute], 2013, no. 2, pp. 22–28.
  3. Tiryana T. Simulating harvest schedule for timber management and multipurpose management in teak plantation. Journal Manajemen Hutan Tropika, 2016, v. 22 (1), pp. 1–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.7226/jtfm. 2.1.1.
  4. Sergienko V.G., Ivanov A.M., Vlasov R.V., Antonov O.I. Drevesnyy otpad i bioraznoobrazie na uchastkakh vyborochnykh rubok v Leningradskoy oblasti [Wood debris and biodiversity in selective logging areas in the Leningrad Region]. Trudy Sankt-Peterburgskogo nauchno-issledovatel’skogo instituta lesnogo khozyaystva [Transactions of the St. Petersburg Forestry Research Institute], 2015, no. 3, pp. 4–19.
  5. Rukovodstvo po provedeniyu sanitarno-ozdorovitel’nykh meropriyatiy. Prilozhenie 2 k prikazu Rosleskhoza ot 29.12.2007 [Guide to sanitation. Appendix 2 to the Order of the Federal Forestry Agency of December 29, 2007], no. 523, 32 p.
  6. Andini S., Budiaman A., Muhdin M. Development of Line Intersect Method for Logging Residue Assessment of Teak. Journal Manajemen Hutan Tropika, 2017, v. 23(2), pp. 51–60.
  7. Daniel P. Bebber and Sean C. Thomas. Prism sweeps for coarse woody debris. Can. Journal Forest Resource, 2003, v. 33, pp. 1737–1743.
  8. Bouriaud O., Stefan G., Flocea M. Predictive models of forest logging residues in Romanian spruce and beech forests. Biomass and Bioenergy 2013, v. 54, pp. 59–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.03.022.
  9. Bate L., Torgersen T., Wisdom M., Garton E. Biased estimation of forest log characteristic using intersect diameters. Forest Ecology and Managment, 2009, v. 258(5), рр. 635–640.
  10. Bell G., Kerr A., McNickle D., Woollons R. Accuracy of the line intersect method of post-logging sampling under orientation bias. Forest Ecology and Management, 1996, v. 84(1), pp. 23–28.
  11. Pedlar J.H., Pearce J.L., Venier L.A., McKenney D.W. Coarse woody debris in relation to disturbance and forest type in boreal Canada. For. Ecol. Manage, 2002, v. 158, pp. 189–194.
  12. Michael S. Williams and Jeffrey H. Perpendicular distance sampling: an alternative method for sampling downed coarse woody debris. Can. Journal Forest Resource, 2003, v. 33, pp. 1564–1579.
  13. Ducey M.J., Williams M.S., Gove J.H., Roberge S. Distance-limited perpendicular distance sampling for coarse woody debris: theory and field results. Forestry, 2013, v. 86, pp. 119–128. doi: 10.1093/forestry/cps059
  14. Waddell K.L. Sampling Coarse Woody Debris for Multiple Attributes in Extensive Resource Inventories Extensive Resource Inventories. Ecological Indicators, 2002, v. 1, pp. 139–153.
  15. Bartels R., Dell J.D., Knight R.L., Schaefer G. Deadand down woody material. /Ed. E.R. Brown. Management of Wildlife and Fish Habitats in Forests of Western Oregon and Washington, R6-F&WL-192-1985, USDA Forest Service, Portland, OR, 1985, pp.171–186.
  16. Budiaman A, Komalasari P. Waste of felling and on-site production of teak squarewood of the community forest. Journal Manajemen Hutan Tropika, 2012, v. 18 (3), pp. 164–168.
  17. De Vries P.G. Sampling Theory for Forest Inventory. Springer-Verlag. New York, 1986, 399 p, chapter 13, pp. 242–279.
  18. Ghaffariyan M.R. Remaining slash in different harvesting operation sites in Australian plantations. Silva Balcanica, 2013, v. 14(1), pp. 83–93.
  19. Timothy G. Gregoire and Harry T. Valentine. Line intersect sampling: Ell-shaped transects and multiple intersections. Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 2003, v. 10, pp. 263–279.
  20. Hazard J.W., Pickford S.G. Simulation studies on line intersect sampling of forest residue. Part II. Forest Sci., 1986, v. 32(2), pp. 447–470.
  21. Howard S.O., Ward F.R. Measurement of logging residue alternative applications of the line intersect method. USDA Forest Serv. Res Note PNW-183, Pac. Northwest Forest and Range Exp. Stn., Portland, Oregon, 1972, 8 p.
  22. Ghaffariyan M.R., Acuna M., Brown M. Analysing the effect of five operational factors on forest residue supply chain costs: A case study in Western Australia. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2013, v. 59, pp. 486–493. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.08.029.
  23. Grushecky S.T., Wang J., McGill D.W. Influence of site characteristics and costs of extraction and trucking on logging residue utilization in southern West Virginia. Forest Product Journal, 2007, v. 57, pp. 63–67.
  24. Helmisaari H.-S., Hanssen K.H., Jacobson S., Kukkola M., Luiro J., Saarsalmi A., Tamminen P., Tveite B. Logging residue removal after thinning in Nordic boreal forests: Long-term impact on tree growth. Forest Ecology Management, 2011, v. 261, pp. 1919–1927.
  25. Karpachev S.P., Zaprudnov V.I., Bykovskiy M.A., Karpacheva I.P. Simulation Studies on Line Intersect Sampling of Residues Left After Cut-to-Length Logging // Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering, 2020, v. 41 (1), pp. 95–107.
  26. Keane R.E., Gary K. Comparing three sampling techniques for estimating fine woody down dead biomass. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 2013, v. 22, pp. 1093–1107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/WF13038
  27. Nemec A.F.L., Davis G. Efficiency of six line intersect sampling designs for estimating volume and density of coarse woody debris. Nanaimo, Forest Service British Columbia, Technical Report TR-021/2002, 2002, 12 p.
  28. Marshall P.L., Davis G., LeMay V.M. Using Line Intersect Sampling for Coarse Woody Debris. Technical Report TR-003 March, Research Section, Vancouver Forest Region, 2000, BCMOF, 34 p.
  29. Moriana R., Vilaplana F., Ek M. Forest residues as renewable resources for bio-based polymeric materials and bioenergy: chemical composition, structure and thermal properties. Cellulose, 2015, v. 22, pp. 3409–3423. doi: 10.1007/s10570-015-0738-4
  30. Sari D.R., Ariyanto A. The potential of woody waste biomass from the logging activity at the natural forest of Berau District, East Kalimantan. IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science, 2018, v. 144(1), p. 012061. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/144/1/012061
  31. Zamora-Cristales R., Sessions J. Modeling harvest forest residue collection for bioenergy production. Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering, 2016, v. 37(2), pp. 287–296.
  32. Zbiec M., Franc-Dabrowska., Drejerska N. Wood waste management in Europe through the lens of the circular bioeconomy. Energies, 2022, v. 15(12), p. 4352.
  33. Behjou F., Ramezan M., Esfahan E.Z., Eftekhari A. Wood waste during full-length and cut-to-length harvesting systems in caspian forests. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 2016, v. 3(8), pp. 52–56. doi: 10.21833/ijaas.2016.08.009
  34. Dalya N., Wahyuni W., Muin A.V.F. Utilization of community forest wood harvesting waste in Bone Pute Village, Burau District, East Luwu Regency. IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science, 2021., v. 886, p. 012021. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/886/1/012021
  35. Woldendorp G., Keenan R., Barry S., Spencer R. Analysis of sampling methods for coarse woody debris. // Forest Ecology and Management, 2004, v. 198(1), pp. 133–148.
  36. Shirnin Yu.A., Shirnin A.Yu., Denisov S.A., Petukhov I.V., Anisimov P.N. Obosnovanie tekhnologii lesosechnykh rabot v gorel’nikakh s sodeystviem estestvennomu vosstanovleniyu sosny [Justification of logging technology in burnt areas with assistance to natural restoration of pine]. Vestnik Povolzhskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnologicheskogo universiteta. Seriya: Les. Ekologiya. Prirodopol’zovanie [Bulletin of the Vоlga State Technological University. Series: Forest. Ecology. Nature Management], 2024, no. 1 (61), pp. 66–75.
  37. Rukomoynikov K., Sergeeva T., Gilyazova T., Tsarev E., Komisar V. Imitatsionnoe modelirovanie tekhnologicheskikh protsessov lesozagotovki [Simulation modeling of technological processes of logging]. Russian Fоrest Journal, 2025, no. 1, pp. 145–63.
  38. Gerasimov Yu.Yu., Perskiy S.N. Imitatsionnaya model’ sploshnykh rubok na osnove GIS-tekhnologiy [Simulation model of clear-cutting based on GIS technologies]. Modelirovanie, optimizatsiya i intensifikatsiya proizvodstvennykh protsessov i sistem: mater. Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. [Modeling, optimization and intensification of production processes and systems: Proc. Int. scientific-practical. conf.], Vologda, May 19–21, 2004. Vologda: VoGTU, 2004, pp. 286–289.
  39. Zaikin A.N. Modelirovanie rezhimov raboty lesosechnykh mashin [Modeling of operating modes of logging machines]. Russian Fоrest Journal, 2009, no. 1, pp. 71–77.
  40. Tarasov N.M., Rozhentsov A.P., Voytko P.F. Statisticheskaya otsenka skopleniya zatonuvshey drevesiny metodom latinskikh kvadratov [Statistical assessment of the accumulation of sunken wood using the Latin square method]. Melioratsiya i vodnoe khozyaystvo [Melioration and water management], 2003, no. 5, pp. 38–41.
  41. Tarasov N.M., Gaisin I.N., Rozhentsov A.P., Voytko P.F. Tekhnologiya obnaruzheniya i otsenki kachestva zatonuvshey drevesiny v vodnykh ob’yektakh Respubliki Mariy El [Technology for detecting and assessing the quality of sunken wood in water bodies of the Mari El Republic]. Melioratsiya i vodnoe khozyaystvo [Melioration and Water Management], 2003, no. 5, pp. 41–45.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2025 Karpachev S.P., Zaprudnov V.I., Posypanov S.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 68118 от  21.12.2016.